search
Back to results

Radiofrequency Chip for Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions

Primary Purpose

Breast Tumor

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
RFID Localization
Wire Localization
RFID and Wire Localization
Sponsored by
University of Missouri-Columbia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Breast Tumor

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women requiring image guided pre-operative breast tumor localization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tumors deeper than 6 cm from the skin surface
  • More than one tumor requiring localization
  • Tumors requiring bracketing
  • Tumors requiring Magnetic Resonance Imaging localization
  • Inability to complete survey
  • Pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • University of Missouri

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Other

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

RFID and Wire Localization

RFID Localization

Wire Localization

Arm Description

Part A of this project is for physician training to master the technique of RFID placement and retrieval. On the day of surgery prior to going to the operating room, all participants will have the RFID placed first to allow radiologists to become familiar with placement of the RFID localizer. Participants will then immediately undergo wire localization. Either ultrasound or mammogram guidance will be used for the localization at the discretion of the performing radiologist. Surgeons will use a reader to locate the RFID chip during surgery. The wire will be present in the event the area of concern cannot be adequately located with the reader.

Participants will be stratified based on technique of localization (either US guidance or mammographic guidance). They will then be randomized to receive either the wire or RFID localization. There will be four visits: one pre-op breast surgery visit in which enrollment will occur, one radiology procedure visit for localization, one surgical visit, and one post-operative visit. This is the same number of visits as standard of care.

Participants will be stratified based on technique of localization (either US guidance or mammographic guidance). They will then be randomized to receive either the wire or RFID localization. There will be four visits: one pre-op breast surgery visit in which enrollment will occur, one radiology procedure visit for localization, one surgical visit, and one post-operative visit. This is the same number of visits as standard of care.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Successful Localization
Whether the surgeon was able to identify and remove the tumor

Secondary Outcome Measures

Surveys of Satisfaction: Participant
Survey Question: "Compared to expected, how uncomfortable was the localization?" Scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with the best being 5
Surveys of Satisfaction
Surveys of Radiology Nurse ease of scheduling the localization procedure. Scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with the best being 5
Surveys of Satisfaction
Surveys of radiologist satisfaction with the localization procedure. Scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with the best being 5
Number of Participants With Tumor Incompletely Excised
Number of participants with positive margin on pathology

Full Information

First Posted
July 27, 2018
Last Updated
August 5, 2022
Sponsor
University of Missouri-Columbia
Collaborators
Health Beacons
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03684408
Brief Title
Radiofrequency Chip for Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions
Official Title
Use of a Radiofrequency Chip for Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions: A Comparison to Wire Localization
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 18, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 19, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 19, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Missouri-Columbia
Collaborators
Health Beacons

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the project is to compare Radiofrequency identification device (RFID) localization technique with the current clinical standard wire localization technique. The Investigator's hypotheses is that the RFID localization technique is non-inferior to wire localization for breast lesions (tumors). The study will be conducted in two parts. The purpose of Part A is for physician training with the RFID device. Nine subjects will undergo RFID and wire localization prior to breast lesion excision. This will allow the breast radiologists and surgeons to become comfortable with RFID device placement and retrieval. Additionally, the investigators will pilot the data collection surveys and chart review methodology to be used in Part B. The purpose of Part B is to conduct a randomized clinical trial to assess whether RFID localization is non-inferior to wire localization for breast lesions. For this part, sixty subjects will be randomized to RFID (N=30) or wire localization (N=30) at time of enrollment. Surveys will be used to gather data from participants, radiologists, surgeons, and technologists/mammography nurses. A variety of data will be collected including, but not limited to, information on tumor size, location, depth; subject demographics; adequacy of tumor margins, re-excision rates, accuracy of wire or chip placement, and surgical complications.
Detailed Description
As part of standard of care, participants will receive: an ultrasound (US) or mammographic guided localization; excisional breast surgery; and a follow-up visit in breast surgery clinic. As part of the research protocol, participants will receive a RFID chip for the localization procedure and complete surveys. Part A of this project is for physician training to master the technique of RFID placement and retrieval. On the day of surgery prior to going to the operating room, all participants will have the RFID placed first to allow radiologists to become familiar with placement of the RFID localizer. Participants will then immediately undergo wire localization. Either ultrasound or mammogram guidance will be used for the localization at the discretion of the performing radiologist. Surgeons will use a reader to locate the RFID chip during surgery. The wire will be present in the event the area of concern cannot be adequately located with the reader. Participants, radiologists, surgeons, breast surgery and radiology staff will complete surveys. Part B of this project is a prospective trial to examine safety, efficacy, operating room utilization patterns, and satisfaction with RFID versus wire localization. Participants will be stratified based on technique of localization (either US guidance or mammographic guidance). Participants will then be randomized to receive either the wire or RFID localization. There will be four visits: one pre-op breast surgery visit in which enrollment will occur, one radiology procedure visit for localization, one surgical visit, and one post-operative visit. This is the same number of visits as standard of care. Participants, radiologists, surgeons, breast surgery and radiology staff will complete surveys.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Tumor

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
38 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
RFID and Wire Localization
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Part A of this project is for physician training to master the technique of RFID placement and retrieval. On the day of surgery prior to going to the operating room, all participants will have the RFID placed first to allow radiologists to become familiar with placement of the RFID localizer. Participants will then immediately undergo wire localization. Either ultrasound or mammogram guidance will be used for the localization at the discretion of the performing radiologist. Surgeons will use a reader to locate the RFID chip during surgery. The wire will be present in the event the area of concern cannot be adequately located with the reader.
Arm Title
RFID Localization
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will be stratified based on technique of localization (either US guidance or mammographic guidance). They will then be randomized to receive either the wire or RFID localization. There will be four visits: one pre-op breast surgery visit in which enrollment will occur, one radiology procedure visit for localization, one surgical visit, and one post-operative visit. This is the same number of visits as standard of care.
Arm Title
Wire Localization
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will be stratified based on technique of localization (either US guidance or mammographic guidance). They will then be randomized to receive either the wire or RFID localization. There will be four visits: one pre-op breast surgery visit in which enrollment will occur, one radiology procedure visit for localization, one surgical visit, and one post-operative visit. This is the same number of visits as standard of care.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
RFID Localization
Intervention Description
The RFID and wire localization devices used in this study are FDA approved for the image guided localization of breast tumors prior to surgical excision. The two techniques for localization will be compared in this trial.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Wire Localization
Intervention Description
The RFID and wire localization devices used in this study are FDA approved for the image guided localization of breast tumors prior to surgical excision. The two techniques for localization will be compared in this trial.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
RFID and Wire Localization
Intervention Description
Both RFID and the standard of care wire localization will be performed for physician training.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Successful Localization
Description
Whether the surgeon was able to identify and remove the tumor
Time Frame
From the date of localization through the date of surgery up to 4 weeks; data collected during Visit 3 at time of surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Surveys of Satisfaction: Participant
Description
Survey Question: "Compared to expected, how uncomfortable was the localization?" Scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with the best being 5
Time Frame
Data collected during date of localization at Visit 2, up to approximately one month from baseline visit
Title
Surveys of Satisfaction
Description
Surveys of Radiology Nurse ease of scheduling the localization procedure. Scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with the best being 5
Time Frame
Data collected at baseline during Visit 1
Title
Surveys of Satisfaction
Description
Surveys of radiologist satisfaction with the localization procedure. Scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with the best being 5
Time Frame
Data collected during date of localization at Visit 2, up to approximately one month from baseline visit
Title
Number of Participants With Tumor Incompletely Excised
Description
Number of participants with positive margin on pathology
Time Frame
Surgical resection specimen collected during Visit 3, at time of surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Women requiring image guided pre-operative breast tumor localization Exclusion Criteria: Tumors deeper than 6 cm from the skin surface More than one tumor requiring localization Tumors requiring bracketing Tumors requiring Magnetic Resonance Imaging localization Inability to complete survey Pregnancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Megha Garg, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Missouri-Columbia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Missouri
City
Columbia
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65212
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26001262
Citation
Dauphine C, Reicher JJ, Reicher MA, Gondusky C, Khalkhali I, Kim M. A prospective clinical study to evaluate the safety and performance of wireless localization of nonpalpable breast lesions using radiofrequency identification technology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jun;204(6):W720-3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13201.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18941069
Citation
Reicher JJ, Reicher MA, Thomas M, Petcavich R. Radiofrequency identification tags for preoperative tumor localization: proof of concept. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Nov;191(5):1359-65. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1023.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Radiofrequency Chip for Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Lesions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs