Active clinical trials for "Immune System Diseases"

This is a phase II, multicenter, single-arm and open-label study to explore Selinexor in combination with standard of care R-CHOP in New Diagnosed high-risk GCB-subtype DLBCL (IPI 3-5). Approximately 35 patients plan to be enrolled in about 6-8 study sites of the study. And the objective is to Evaluate the safety and efficacy of XR-CHOP in High-Risk (IPI 3-5) GCB-subtype DLBCL.The enrollment period for this study is expected to be approximately 18 months. The study will end when all patients have completed 6 cycles treatment/follow-up since the initiation of the study drug, or the last patient has expired, has been lost to follow-up, or has withdrawn consent, whichever occurs first.

The purpose of this study is to characterize safety and to determine the putative recommended Phase 2 dose(s) (RP2D[s]) and optimal dosing schedule(s) of JNJ-80948543 in Part A (Dose Escalation) and to further characterize the safety of JNJ-80948543 at the putative RP2D(s) in Part B (Cohort Expansion).

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the consensual 1st line conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) of RA is methotrexate (MTX). In case of contra-indication or intolerance to MTX, leflunomide is an alternative. If the treatment target is not achieved with csDMARD strategy, addition of a biological DMARD (TNF inhibitors, anti-Interleukin 6 (anti-IL6)), abatacept, or rituximab) or a targeted synthetic (ts) DMARD (JAK inhibitors) is considered. Current practice is to start a bDMARD (biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs) and especially TNF inhibitors (etanercept or monoclonal anti-TNF antibodies) with the benefit of hindsight. However, abatacept and TNF inhibitors have demonstrated similar efficacy in patients with insufficient response to csDMARD (AMPLE trial). Although abatacept has shown a very good tolerance profile that might be superior to other bDMARDs rheumatologists might be reluctant to use it as a first line bDMARD as there is a belief of a slower efficacy compared to other bDMARDs or JAK inhibitors. Indeed, in real world study, compared to TNF inhibitors it seems that discontinuation of abatacept is more related to lack of effectiveness than safety issues. Investigators have hypothesized that first rapidly controlling the inflammation phase, using TNF inhibitors followed by abatacept to induce an immunological remission would optimize response and tolerance of ACPA positive patients with RA. To demonstrate our hypothesis, the investigaors propose a randomized controlled trial with one arm receiving an induction therapy for 12 weeks with a TNF inhibitor followed by a cell-targeted bDMARD (abatacept) and the other arm, receiving TNF inhibitors.

This is a single center,randomized ,two-cohorts, open-label ,phase 1/2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors combined with CD19 positive feeder T cells treatment for CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients in remission .

This study is a phase Ib/II clinical trial conducted in Chinese adult asthmatic subjects to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of MG-K10 humanized monoclonal antibody injection in the treatment of asthma.

This phase I trial finds out the best dose and side effects of venetoclax and tocilizumab in treating patients with t(11;14) multiple myeloma that has come back (relapsed) or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Venetoclax may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Tocilizumab is used to treat side effects from immune therapy in patients with myeloma. Giving venetoclax and tocilizumab may kill more cancer cells.

As the obesity pandemic continues unabated, one can expect to see an increase in the prevalence of TID/T2D and associated CKD. As a result, death will rise, preceded by an increase in kidney failure, requiring dialysis and renal transplantation. Innovative medical treatment may help prevent chronic kidney disease (CKD) across our healthcare system. The guideline of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) suggest that patients with obesity, TID/ T2D, and CKD needed either glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor analogs (GLP1-RA) or sodium-glucose cotransport-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). If neither achieve metabolic control, then the recommendation is to combine both drugs. The evidence base for combining GLP1RA and SGLT2i are not well developed, and hence the impact of the guidelines are limited. This study will provide evidence of discrete metabolic pathways by the GLP1RA/or SGLT2i alone or in combination contributed to metabolic control. The aim of this randomised control trial (RCT) is to test the impact of the combination of GLP1RA/SGLT2i on body weight and kidney damage, in patients with T1DM and CKD. In addition, we will explore associated changes in metabolic pathways with each of the treatments used in the RCT.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of zilovertamab vedotin as monotherapy and in combination in participants with select B-cell lymphomas including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), Richter's transformation lymphoma (RTL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This study will also evaluate zilovertamab vedotin as monotherapy and in combination with respect to objective response rate. Cohort A: Participants with relapsed or refractory MCL relapsed or refractory disease after at least 2 prior systemic therapies including a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition/inhibitor (BTKi), and post therapy chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy or ineligible for CAR-T cell therapy Cohort B: Participants with relapsed or refractory RT disease after at least 1 prior systemic therapy Cohort C: Participants with relapsed or refractory MCL relapsed or refractory disease after at least 1 prior systemic therapy and no prior exposure to a non-covalent BTKi Cohort D: Participants with relapsed or refractory FL and CLL relapsed or refractory disease after at least 2 prior systemic therapies and have no other available therapy Cohort E: Participants with relapsed or refractory FL after at least 2 prior systemic therapies and have no other available therapy Cohort F: Participants with relapsed or refractory CLL after at least 2 prior systemic therapies and have no other available therapy The primary study hypothesis is that zilovertamab vedotin monotherapy has an increased Objective Response Rate (ORR) per Lugano Response Criteria as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR).

This study was divided into two stages. In the first stage (Phase Ib), 30 subjects were randomly divided into MIL62 600mg, MIL62 1000mg and cyclosporine groups at a ratio of 1:1:1, with 10 subjects in each group. Tolerance to MIL62 was evaluated within 4 weeks after the first administration. If the overall safety is determined by the investigator and sponsor to be tolerable to MIL62, phase II enrollment will be initiated. The second stage was also randomly divided into MIL62 600mg, MIL62 1000mg and cyclosporine groups according to the ratio of 1:1:1, 30 subjects in each group, to evaluate the efficacy of MIL62 and cyclosporine in the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy. Eligible subjects in both phases received treatment and follow-up for a total of 104 weeks. The 76-week overall response rate was the primary endpoint.

The primary purpose of the study is to assess safety, and to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of tolinapant in combination with oral decitabine/cedazuridine in Phase 1 and to assess preliminary efficacy as determined by overall response rate (ORR) in Phase 2.