
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Followed by Radical Liver Resection Versus...
Incidental Gallbladder CarcinomaBiliary Tract CancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin followed by radical liver resection versus immediate radical liver resection alone with or without adjuvant chemotherapy in incidentally detected gallbladder carcinoma after simple cholecystectomy or in front of radical resection of BTC (ICC/ECC)

Azacytidine + HAG Regimen vs. Azacytidine for Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloid Malignancy...
Acute Myeloid Leukaemia; Myelodysplastic Syndromes;Chronic Myelomonocytic LeukemiaThe primary objective is to explore the efficacy and safety of azacytidine and HAG regimen versus azacytidine for elderly patients with Newly Diagnosed MDS/AML/CMML in China. This is a post-marketing, interventional, multi-center, double-arm, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled study in elderly patients with MDS/AML/CMML in China. Patients will be recruited consecutively from the study sites during the enrollment period. The enrolled patients will be given azacytidine + HAG regimen or azacytidine under the conditions of informed consent and frequent monitoring according to the clinical guideline.

Testing the Effect of Taking Ruxolitinib and CPX-351 in Combination for the Treatment of Advanced...
Essential ThrombocythemiaMyelofibrosis3 moreThis phase I/II trial studies the best dose of ruxolitinib when given together with CPX-351 and to see how well they work in treating patients with accelerated phase or blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm. Ruxolitinib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. CPX-351 is a mixture of 2 chemotherapy drugs (daunorubicin and cytarabine) given for leukemia in small fat-based particles (liposomes) to improve the drug getting into cancer cells. Giving ruxolitinib and CPX-351 may work better in treating patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia compared to CPX-351 alone.

Survivin Long Peptide Vaccine in Treating Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Lung Atypical Carcinoid TumorLung Typical Carcinoid Tumor1 moreThis phase I trial studies the side effects of survivin long peptide vaccine and how it works with the immune system in treating patients with neuroendocrine tumors that have spread to other parts of the body (metastatic). Tumor cells make proteins that are not usually produced by normal cells. The body sees these proteins as not belonging and sends white blood cells called T cells to attack the tumor cells that contain these proteins. By vaccinating with small pieces of these proteins called peptides, the immune system can be made to kill tumor cells. Giving survivin long peptide vaccine to patients who have survivin expression in their tumors may create an immune response in the blood that is directed against neuroendocrine tumors.

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Tisagenlecleucel in HR B-ALL EOC MRD Positive Patients
B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaThis is a single arm, open-label, multi-center, phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of tisagenlecleucel in de novo HR pediatric and young adult B-ALL patients who received first-line treatment and are EOC MRD positive. The study will have the following sequential phases: screening, pre-treatment, treatment & follow-up, and survival. After tisagenlecleucel infusion, patient will have assessments performed more frequently in the first month and then at Day 29, then every 3 months for the first year, every 6 months for the second year, then yearly until the end of the study. Efficacy and safety will be assessed at study visits and as clinically indicated throughout the study. The study is expected to end in approximately 8 years after first patient first treatment (FPFT). A post-study long term follow-up safety will continue under a separate protocol per health authority guidelines.

Clinical Trial of SP-2577 (Seclidemstat) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Ewing or Ewing-related...
Ewing SarcomaMyxoid Liposarcoma9 moreSingle agent, non-randomized, open label expansion in select sarcoma patients including myxoid liposarcoma and other sarcomas that share similar chromosomal translocations to Ewing sarcoma; AND dose expansion of the combination of seclidemstat with topotecan and cyclophosphamide in patients with Ewing sarcoma

A Phase 1 Study of SHR2554 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms
Relapsed or Refractory Mature Lymphoid NeoplasmsThis is a Phase 1 multicenter, single-arm, open-label, dose escalation and dose expansion study of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2 ) inhibitor SHR2554. This study will assess the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of SHR2554 in participants with relapsed or refractory mature lymphoid neoplasms in part I, and the the efficacy in PTCL patients will be studied in Part II.

DC Vaccine in Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal AdenocarcinomaThis research study is designed to evaluate the effects of a dendritic cell (kind of white blood cell) vaccine for pancreatic cancer.

Durvalumab and Consolidation SBRT Following Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Stage III Non-Small...
Stage III Non-small-cell Lung CancerDurvalumab is a drug that stimulates the immune system to fight lung cancer. Durvalumab is FDA approved to treat lung cancer. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a newer radiation treatment that gives fewer, but higher doses of radiation than standard radiation. With SBRT, radiation is focused toward the cancer and away from normal surrounding lung tissue. It is possible that when cancer cells are damaged by SBRT Durvalumab may be more effective in activating the immune system. SBRT is a standard FDA approved treatment for early stage (stage 1) lung cancer and is investigational in patients such as yourself with stage 3 lung cancer. The combination of Durvalumab and SBRT is investigational. This study will investigate the effects, good and bad, of the combination of Durvalumab and SBRT.

TACE-HAIC vs. HAIC for Potentially Resectable HCC
Potentially ResectionHepatocellular CarcinomaHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most commonly malignant tumors around the world. Hepatic resection or liver transplantation is the radical method to cure the disease. However, due to large tumors, surgical treatment is suitable for early-stage and well-reserved liver function patients. Therefore, in clinical practice, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a preferential and standard treatment of potentially resectable HCC. EACH trial opened the door to FOLFOX-based system chemotherapy for advanced HCC patients. Recently, investigators have showed that hepatic arterial infusion of FOLFOX-based chemotherapy (HAIC) was safe and efficient for HCC patients. Several clinical studies showed that HAIC bring better tumor response rate that the conditional TACE. The combination of TACE with HAIC (TACE-HAIC), theoretically can significantly increase the local doses of chemotherapeutic agents in the liver, reduce the viability of HCC cells and increase the hepatectomy rate. However, this hasn't been verified in clinical application. To identify a more effective and safety way for treating potentially resectable HCC patients, this study is designed to compare the safety and efficacy between HAIC and TACE-HAIC for those patients.