Active clinical trials for "Neoplasms"

This phase I/II trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of entinostat and ZEN003694 in treating patients with solid tumors or lymphoma that has spread to other places in the body (advanced) or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Entinostat may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is in a class of drugs called histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. ZEN003694 is an inhibitor of a family of proteins called the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET). ZEN003694 may prevent the growth of tumor cells that produce high levels of BET protein. This trial aims to test the safety of combination therapy with entinostat and ZEN003694 in treating patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors or lymphoma.

This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of pyrvinium pamoate for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that cannot be removed by surgery (resectable). Pyrvinium pamoate may slow down tumor growth and help patients live longer.

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, programmed death-1, and programmed death-ligand 1 have achieved milestones in the treatment of NSCLC, from back-line to first-line, and beyond. Is changing the standard of care for NSCLC. Currently, several phases Ⅲ clinical studies of neoadjuvant immunity combined with standard chemotherapy are underway, suggested that neoadjuvant ICI therapy is a promising way for locally advanced lung cancer. As an intermediate state in the process of tumor metastasis, Oligometastatic NSCLC patients have a better prognosis and more likely to benefit from local treatment than patients with extensive distant metastasis. However, there have been few reports of salvage surgery after ICI treatment in Oligometastatic NSCLC, and only one case has been reported to date. There is therefore a need to further gather evidence on salvage surgery after ICI.

This protocol aims to determine toxicity and efficacy of re-irradiation for patients with recurrences from anal cancers with dose-escalated pencil beam proton therapy either pre-operative for marginally resectable recurrences or as a definitive treatment strategy (un-resectable, operation declined etc.). The over-all aim is to improve local tumor control with acceptable side effects.

Nearly half of patients with high-grade, localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of extremities and trunk wall develop disease recurrence after local therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy with ifosfamide and doxorubicin may improve long-term disease-free survival, but the benefit of adjuvant treatment is limited and predictive factors for treatment response are lacking. The aim of this study is to explore sequential treatment with ifosfamide and doxorubicin in a neoadjuvant setting and to investigate biomarkers predictive of treatment response.

To study the safety and clinical effect of injection of drug-eluting microspheres into advanced solid tumors.

This is a prospective, single arm, phase Ib/IIa study. Up to 25 patients will be enrolled into the study (Part A: 2-18; Part B: 7-19). The study has been designed to allow an investigation of the optimal combination dose and schedule whilst of Osimertinib plus Anlotinib in patients with EGFRm+, treatment-naïve IIIb/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) ensuring the safety of patients with intensive safety monitoring. There are two main parts to this study; Part A, Combination dose finding and Parts B, Dose expansion.

This study is to analyze the efficacy of PD1 inhibitor and anti-CD38 antibody in relapsed or refractory NK/T-cell lymphoid malignancy. The investigational products of this study are cemiplimab (PD1 inhibitor) and isatuximab (anti-CD38 antibody). The rationale for the use of cemiplimab in patients with NK/T-cell lymphoid malignancy is the aforementioned PD-L1 expression in tumor cells of ENKTL and ANKL. In addition, the proven efficacy of pembrolizumab in relapsed or refractory ENKTL support the use of PD1 inhibitor as a salvage therapy for this disorder. The addition of isatuximab to cemiplimab might induce synergistic activity because CD38-mediated immunosuppression as a mechanism of tumor cell escape from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Furthermore, targeting CD38 by isatuximab can preferentially block immunosuppressive regulatory T-cells and thereby restore immune effector function against multiple myeloma. These functions of CD38 blocking antibody might help to improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor such as PD1 inhibitor. Given the presence of antibody-mediated cytotoxicity and direct anti-tumor effect of isatuximab against CD38-positive tumor cells, the combination of isatuximab with cemiplimab might show the synergistic activity resulting more improved treatment outcome than PD1 inhibitor alone. Thus, The investigators designed a phase II study of cemiplimab and isatuximab for patients with relapsed or refractory ENKTL and ANKL. In this study, The investigators analyze the efficacy of this novel combination and their adverse effects.

This phase II trial studies the side effects of acalabrutinib and rituximab and its effect in treating patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma. Acalabrutinib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to a protein called CD20, which is found on B-cells, and may kill cancer cells. Giving acalabrutinib and rituximab may help to control mantle cell lymphoma in elderly patients.

Currently, the optimal treatment regimen for elderly Glioblastoma (GBM) patients with poor performance status (PS) is unknown. Based on data for elderly GBM patients and the limited data for patients with poor PS, hypofractionated RT or a short course of Temozolomide (TMZ) may provide survival benefit without the added toxicity and inconvenience of a more protracted treatment regimen. In particular, treatment with RT or TMZ monotherapy on the basis of methylated O6 - methyl guanine - DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, followed by the alternative therapy at progression, may provide a safe and effective treatment regimen for patients with poor PS. The hypothesis of this trial is that in elderly GBM patients with poor performance status (age ≥ 65 years and KPS 50-70), a biomarker-guided approach to therapy results in non-inferior overall survival compared to combined TMZ/RT. Specifically, biomarker-guided therapy will consist of TMZ monotherapy for patients with a methylated MGMT promoter, and hypofractionated RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions) for patients with a non-methylated MGMT promoter. It is hypothesized that biomarker-guided therapy will result in non-inferior progression-free survival, reduced toxicity and increased cost-effectiveness compared to combined chemoradiotherapy. Primary objective: • To compare overall survival of standard vs biomarker-guided therapy in elderly and frail patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Secondary objective: To evaluate progression-free survival following treatment in both arms. To evaluate adverse events according to CTCAE criteria in both arms. To evaluate health-related quality-of-life as assessed by MoCA and EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-BN20 questionnaires in both arms. To evaluate cost-effectiveness of standard vs biomarker-guided therapy Methods: Patients will be randomized to two treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio. Standard Arm: TMZ with concurrent RT (combined modality arm) Patients will receive 15 days of TMZ daily with concurrent RT. TMZ will be delivered at a dose of 75 mg/m2, given daily with RT. TMZ will be administered 1 hour before each session of RT. After a 4-week break, patients will receive six cycles of adjuvant TMZ according to the standard 5-day schedule (days 1-5) every 28 days, up to 6 cycles as tolerated by the patient. The dose will be 150 mg/m2 for the first cycle and increased to 200 mg/m2 beginning with the second cycle, so long as there are no hematologic adverse events, intractable nausea or fatigue. Investigational Arm: Biomarker based treatment MGMT (+): TMZ monotherapy Patients will receive TMZ at a dose of 75 mg/m2 daily for 15 days on weekdays (Monday through Friday). This will be followed by six cycles of TMZ according to the standard 5-day schedule (days 1-5) every 28 days. The dose will be 150 mg/m2 for the first cycle and increased to 200 mg/m2 beginning with the second cycle, so long as there are no hematologic adverse events. Dose will be determined using the body surface area (BSA) calculation. MGMT methylation (-): No TMZ will be given. Participants will receive radiation treatment with 40Gy / 15 fractions over a period of 21 days (3 weeks). Upon treatment completion, participants will be followed by every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months for years 3-5. Response and progression will be evaluated using the new international criteria proposed by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group (RANO).