search

Active clinical trials for "Neoplasms"

Results 62521-62530 of 64586

68Ga-NOTA-NFB: Radiation Dosimetry in Healthy Volunteers and Applications in Glioma Patients or...

GliomaBreast Cancer

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, biodistribution, dosimetric properties of the positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceutical agent 68Ga-NOTA-NFB. To preliminarily evaluate its application in glioma diagnosis. To assess the application of 68Ga-NOTA-NFB PET/CT in the evaluation of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer before and after the therapy.

Unknown status2 enrollment criteria

Prospective Data Collection of Elderly Patients With DLBCL Receiving at the Time of Diagnosis VGM...

LymphomaLarge B-Cell1 more

Prospective data collection of a consecutive series of elderly patients with large B-cell lymphoma newly diagnosed, receiving before the start of treatment Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment (VGM) through the use of Activity of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL) and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G).

Unknown status6 enrollment criteria

Kidney Therapy for Free Light Chain Removal in Patients With Multiple Myeloma & Cast Nephropathy...

Multiple MyelomaCast Nephropathy1 more

Hypothesis: Free light chain (FLC) removal haemodialysis will increase the rate of renal recovery in patients with cast nephropathy, severe renal failure and de novo multiple myeloma. This study will evaluate patients with multiple myeloma and severe renal failure treated with KIDNEY Therapy (previously called SUPRA HFR) to remove free light chains.

Unknown status14 enrollment criteria

Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in Renal Cell Carcinoma

CarcinomaRenal Cell4 more

The effect of preoperative glycemic control measured by HbA1c on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) outcome remains controversial. Thus, the investigators aim to examine the association of preoperative glycemic control with oncologic outcomes after radical or partial nephrectomy. The investigators will prospectively collect the relevant data including preoperative HbA1c in 238 patients of RCC patients undergoing nephrectomy. The associations between clinical variables and risk of adverse pathological features and disease recurrence will be tested using a multivariate logistic regression and multiple Cox-proportional hazards model, respectively.

Unknown status8 enrollment criteria

Phase III Trial Investigating the Potential Benefit of Adjvant Chemotherapy for Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma...

Small Bowel AdenocarcinomaAdjuvant Chemotherapy for SBA

The utility of adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma (SBA) remains unproven and awaits the results of a large, global, prospective, phase III, randomised, controlled trial. Across the 830 million population of North America and Europe, there are approximately 3,000 patients with stage I-III SBA every year who would be potentially eligible for such an adjuvant chemotherapy trial. Given the absence of good-quality and evidence-based data, it has been agreed that a trial considering adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy was appropriate for patients with stage I-III SBA in whom the oncologist and patient feel that the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is uncertain. For those patients with stage I-III SBA who, with their oncologists, feel that the potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is certain (and hence are not willing to accept randomisation to the 'no chemotherapy' arm), a randomisation between single agent fluoropyrimidine versus doublet fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy will be offered. Tumour stage will be used as a stratification factor. Those patients who do not consent to be randomised will be offered registration to allow collection of demographic, clinicopathological and survival data, thereby making optimal use of the rare patient population available. In addition, archival Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) tissue and contemporaneous venous blood samples will be collected from every registered patient to allow molecular profiling and future translational research. A questionnaire about underlying risk factors (e.g. Crohn's disease, coeliac disease, Lynch syndrome etc) will be completed along with the other collected data on all registered patients.

Unknown status25 enrollment criteria

Gastric Cancer Screening Quality Improvement System Establishment

Gastric CancerGastritis2 more

Experienced endoscopists will perform endoscopy during the study period and the detection rate of gastric premalignant lesion, correlation between endoscopic and serologic diagnosis of premalignant lesions and inter-observer agreement rate will be analyzed before and after the education.

Unknown status8 enrollment criteria

A Prospective, Observational Trial on the Diagnostic and Prognostic of LM

Lung NeoplasmsMeningeal Carcinomatosis

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the positive rate between the cell-free DNA and cytological examination of cerebrospinal fluid in Advanced lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastases.

Unknown status7 enrollment criteria

Novel Detection System for Lung Cancer Curative Effect Monitoring

Lung Neoplasms

The purpose of this study is to investigate the sensitivity,specificity and concordance rate of EGFR testing results in plasma in comparison of results in matched tumor tissues tested by amplification refractory mutation system(ARMS). Moreover, the investigators correlate our findings in plasma with survival of advanced patients.

Unknown status6 enrollment criteria

The Evaluation of Lung Cancer Patient Treated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase...

Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

To evaluate Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients clinical profile and the outcome after treatment with Gefitinib in Pulmonary Oncology Outpatient Clinic Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Unknown status7 enrollment criteria

PERCIST Criteria for Response Evaluation With Solid Tumors

Lung NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms2 more

Chemo-radiotherapy and targeted therapy are widely used as non-surgical treatments for solid tumors. Early assessment of treatment response is considered efficient and helpful to clinical management and personalized therapy.RECIST 1.1 criteria was accepted widely. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) are defined in the RECIST criteria. This type of classification divides intrinsically continuous data (tumor size) into 4 bins, losing statistical power for ease of nomenclature and convenience. The 18F-FDG PET exam is based on metabolic information and considered to overcome limitations of anatomic imaging and more suitable for assessment of therapeutic response.PERCIST 1.0 proposes a series of detailed and unambiguous regulations about standardization procedures to ensure the reproducibility. Complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), stable metabolic disease (SMD), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD) are defined in the PERCIST criteria. So far, there have several studies using metabolic-based PERCIST criteria in patients with solid tumors, including lung cancer, digestive tumor and lymphoma, etc. But all of these studies had limitations of small study sample, thus were need to be further investigated. Compared to RECIST, the advantages of PERCIST were to evaluate chemotherapy, especially targeted therapy, to distinguish PMR and SMD patients from SD group in RECIST, and to better predict the response rate. Recently, several studies applied PERCIST criteria to evaluate neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer and rectal cancer, and revealed the metabolic response results were well related to pathology. All these studies conclude PERCIST criteria could help making clinical therapeutic decisions. Moreover, several studies have shown that PERCIST has advantage in predicting early response of several malignant tumors. The aim of this multicenter study is 1) to evaluate treatment response in newly diagnosed and pre-therapeutic patients with solid tumors who are going to receive a baseline , an early follow-up (after a certain period of treatment cycle) and a final (after treatment) 18F-FDG PET/CT; 2) to compared PERCIST criteria to RECIST 1.1 criteria in prediction treatment response, especially in early stage of treatment; 3) to reveal the value of PERCIST criteria in clinical therapeutic management and tailed therapy.

Unknown status16 enrollment criteria
1...625262536254...6459

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs