Active clinical trials for "Respiratory Tract (Lung and Bronchial) Diseases"

A phase 2, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the effect of tezepelumab on airway inflammation in patients with COPD.

This is a randomized crossover trial of children diagnosed with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) on a baseline polysomnogram (PSG). Participants will undergo two further PSGs in random order over 4 weeks to assess the efficacy of a positional sleep therapy belt compared to a control for treating POSA.

This is a nonrandomized, open phase I dose escalation and extension clinical study designed to evaluate Aurora A inhibitor VIC-1911 tablets in combination with oxitinib in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic characteristics and preliminary antitumor efficacy were analyzed. The entire study included the screening period (28 days prior to initialadministration of the investigational drug) and the treatment period (Cycle) EoT is defined as disease progression or intolerable toxicity or premature withdrawal Out]) and the safety follow-up period (28 days after EoT). During dose increments and expansions, subjects followed Safety assessment, PK blood collection, imaging examination and efficacy assessment were performed during the visit plan. Observation subject The safety, tolerability, and occurrence of DLT until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, Death, withdrawal of informed consent, loss of follow-up or termination of the study by the sponsor shall prevail.

This is a research study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the investigational drug Mitiperstat (AZD4831) in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Background: Intermediate-high risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) remains associated with substantial mortality despite standard anticoagulation therapy. Previous efforts to decrease mortality in these patients via administration of systemic thrombolysis have failed due to an increased rate of major bleeding complications. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) has already shown some promising results in terms of efficacy and safety, including the results of our randomized pilot study. However, large randomized trials with clinical endpoints comparing catheter-directed local thrombolysis versus standard anticoagulation therapy are still lacking, thus the treatment of intermediate-high risk acute PE patients has not changed for decades. Hypothesis: Catheter-directed local thrombolysis is superior to standard anticoagulation therapy in the treatment of intermediate-high risk acute pulmonary embolism, with no additional safety concerns. Statistical considerations: Estimated incidence of the primary endpoint of 1.5% in the CDT group and 6.0% in the standard anticoagulation group, 80% power for each arm with a 2-sided alpha of 0.05. Five hundred fifty-eight should provide the requisite number of events. Statistical Analysis - Intention to Treat. Methods and Results: A Multicentre, Randomized Trial of Catheter-directed thrombolysis in intermediate-high risk acute pulmonary embolism (PRAGUE-26) is a noncommercial, multicentre, randomized, controlled parallel-group comparison trial. The trial plans to include 558 patients with intermediate-high risk acute PE. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to CDT or to standard anticoagulation therapy. The primary outcome of the study is a clinical composite of all-cause mortality, PE recurrence or cardiorespiratory decompensation, within 7 days of randomization. Secondary objectives cover all bleeding complications, functional and patient-reported outcomes over a follow-up period of 24 months and cost-effectiveness analysis.

This first-in-human study will evaluate the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) / the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D), safety, tolerability, anti-tumor activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity of AMT-151, a novel antibody-drug conjugate against folate receptor alpha, in patients with selected advanced solid tumors.

This is a randomized, Phase 2a, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ARINA-1 compared to placebo (isotonic saline, 0.9%) in participants with NCFBE. Study participants will receive either study treatment or placebo twice daily for 28 days. Efficacy endpoints will include quality of life, sputum rheological markers, and blood inflammatory markers. Quality of life will be measured using the following tools: Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) questionnaire, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT), and a daily clinical global impression questionnaire.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate The microbiological response and clinical efficacy of SPR720 compared with placebo in participants with nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). The safety and tolerability of SPR720 in a participants population with NTM- PD The pharmacokinetic (PK) of SPR719, active moiety, following orally (po) administered prodrug SPR720 in a participant population with NTM-PD.

Study Aims Pilot study: Due to the large recruitment goal and length of the project, the study team/PIs will evaluate the first cohort of 6-10 participants to refine study procedures and study-related materials. If no major modifications are made to the protocol as a result of this evaluation, data from these participants will be included for analysis. Aim 1: Evaluate the efficacy of an early, evidence-based, clinical experience-based therapeutic intervention (from the NICU to 12-months corrected age) on improving motor function and reducing severity of motor delays in infants at 12-months corrected age. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention group will demonstrate an average 8-point difference (0.5 standard deviation) compared to the standard of care group. [an 8-point difference is considered a clinically meaningful difference] Aim 2: Evaluate the early effects (i.e., before 12 months) of a therapeutic intervention, provided from NICU to 12-months corrected age, on motor function and severity of motor delay. The Investigators hypothesize that a statistically significant higher percentage of infants in the intervention group will demonstrate improved motor function and reduced severity of motor delays, compared to the standard of care group-assessed using sensors, the NSMDA and TIMP-as early as 3-months corrected age. Aim 3: Evaluate whether an early intervention that focuses on caregiver engagement improves caregiver well-being. The invetigators hypothesize that an intervention that focuses on supporting and addressing the individual needs of the caregiver will improve caregiver well-being. The investigators will evaluate these effects using the PedsQL (Family Impact Module).

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of atezolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of various cancers, in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).