search
Back to results

The Development of Categorization

Primary Purpose

Cognition Disorder, Healthy

Status
Completed
Phase
Locations
United States
Study Type
Observational
Intervention
Sponsored by
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an observational trial for Cognition Disorder focused on measuring Cognition, Infancy, Perception

Eligibility Criteria

1 Year - 3 Years (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

INCLUSION CRITERIA: Infants must be healthy. Normal pregnancy/delivery status, term birth (plus or minus 14 days from due date), and no evidence of subsequent visual impairments or neurological disorders.

Sites / Locations

  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
January 18, 2000
Last Updated
September 12, 2018
Sponsor
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00001950
Brief Title
The Development of Categorization
Official Title
The Development of Categorization
Study Type
Observational

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 23, 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 14, 1999 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
May 23, 2012 (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
It is commonly believed that objects in the world can be categorized in at least three different ways or levels. The three levels are basic, superordinate, and subordinate. Previously it was believed that basic categorization presents a cognitive (mental) advantage to children's development. However, recent studies on superordinate categorization has challenged this belief. <TAB>Items in superordinate are grouped according to functional purpose, even though they may not share any similarities in how they look (perception). For instance, desks, chairs, and beds do not appear similar but they can be group together in the superordinate category of furniture. <TAB>Items in basic categorization share similarities in function and in perception. For instance, chairs can be considered as a basic category. Chairs can share functional and perceptual similarities with many kinds of chairs but are readily distinguished from other types of furniture like beds or desks. <TAB>Subordinate categories are subsets of basic categories. For instance, kitchen chairs, desk chairs, and high chairs, are all within the basic category of chairs. Each one is very similar in it's function to the others but is definitely discriminable. This study was developed to investigate the development of categorization at all three levels by using a design in which children between the ages of 1 and 3 years are tested for categorization at all three levels with sets of objects from the same domain (such as vehicle or fruit). Researchers plan to chart when infants develop categorization at the basic, subordinate, and superordinate levels over the two-year period.<TAB>...
Detailed Description
The major objective of this research is to better understand the functional significance of object categorization in early development. The proposed work is designed to examine the emergence of organization in toddlers internal representations of real-world categories such as furniture and fruit. Representation, in this capacity, refers simply to stored information that can influence later behavior. Categorization refers to the treatment of discriminable as equivalent in some way. Even young infants appear capable of categorizing diverse sets of discriminable patterns and objects, and can form internal representations of such bounded collections. Much less is known, however, about changes leading from this basic capacity to the highly structured concepts that are characteristics of children s and adults category knowledge. The present research is designed to characterize the course of these changes between infancy and childhood. The primary research strategy to be used consists of analyzing toddlers examination and manipulation of familiar objects that are similar within adult-defined categories than between such categories. The organization and temporal structure of children s actions on the objects will be coded and analyzed to infer the similarity relations that are perceived among of each stimulus set.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cognition Disorder, Healthy
Keywords
Cognition, Infancy, Perception

7. Study Design

Enrollment
219 (Actual)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Year
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
3 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Infants must be healthy. Normal pregnancy/delivery status, term birth (plus or minus 14 days from due date), and no evidence of subsequent visual impairments or neurological disorders.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc H Bornstein, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
City
Bethesda
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20892
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
9823512
Citation
Mandler JM, McDonough L. On developing a knowledge base in infancy. Dev Psychol. 1998 Nov;34(6):1274-88. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.34.6.1274.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7318519
Citation
Sugarman S. The cognitive basis of classification in very young children: an analysis of object-ordering trends. Child Dev. 1981;52(4):1172-8.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

The Development of Categorization

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs