search
Back to results

Automated Constraint-Induced Therapy for Restoring Movement After Stroke

Primary Purpose

Cerebrovascular Accident

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Constrained Induced Therapy
Sponsored by
US Department of Veterans Affairs
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cerebrovascular Accident focused on measuring Constrained Induced, CI therapy, CVA, Strokes

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Stroke patients

Sites / Locations

  • VA Medical Center

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
May 24, 2002
Last Updated
January 20, 2009
Sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00037960
Brief Title
Automated Constraint-Induced Therapy for Restoring Movement After Stroke
Official Title
Automated Constraint-Induced Therapy for Restoring Movement After Stroke
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2002
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2001 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
June 2004 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
We propose to develop and evaluate a workstation that significantly enhances the application of Constraint-Induced (CI) Therapy by automating and instrumenting several of the tasks currently used in the shaping training. The motivation for development of such a device is as follows: 1) Patients could receive CI therapy at home without the need for constant supervision from a therapist. Many veterans do not have the resources to travel to their local VAMC for the two or three week period required for the treatment. A home-based device would expand the pool of veterans who could receive CI therapy. 2) For subjects who were able to receive CI therapy in the clinic, this device would facilitate an effective post-treatment home-practice program. 3) Currently, patients are treated on a one-on-one basis in the clinic. This device could allow one therapist to treat 3 or 4 patients at one time, thereby substantially reducing the cost of the therapy. 4) This workstation would provide clear and comprehensive quantification of the progress of the treatment. This could indicate on which tasks the patient was progressing most and least rapidly, and would therefore enable effective modifications of the treatment plan while treatment was in progress. The hypothesis is that the positive outcomes of CI therapy can be achieved, and possibly enhanced, if the shaping training component is performed in a workstation that guides, motivates and records exercise of the more-affected limb. In the first 18 months, the workstation will be designed and fabricated. To expedite the design, we will rely on simple modifications to "off the shelf" components. In the last 18 months, a controlled, randomized, clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of automated CI therapy programs with standard CI therapy. The standard CI therapy group would receive shaping training in a clinical setting, one-on-one with a therapist. The clinic-based automated CI therapy group would perform the shaping training in the workstation, in a clinical setting and with minimal supervision. The home-based automated CI therapy group would perform the shaping training at home in the workstation, and with no direct supervision. All other aspects of the three treatment programs will be identical. At the end of this 3-year project, a device will have been designed, built and evaluated that could significantly enhance the application of CI therapy for chronic stroke patients.
Detailed Description
Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) is the leading cause of disability in the United States. CVAs are a particular problem for the VA because of the large population of World War II and Korean War veterans who are now in the age range where CVAs are most frequent; in fiscal year 1997 the national VA system had 22,000 admissions for an acute CVA. The consequent motor deficits that veterans sustain result in very large costs to the VA and the Federal Government. The reduction of CVA-related disability thus represents a high VA and national health care priority. Constraint-Induced (CI) therapy is one of the few techniques that has been proven with controlled, randomized studies to substantially reduce the incapacitating motor deficit of the more-affected upper extremity of patients with mild to moderately severe chronic strokes. The procedures of CI therapy are relatively simple and are deemed effective because they produce transfer of increased extremity use to the activities of daily living in the real world environment. The therapy involves promoting use of the more-affected upper extremity for 90% of waking hours by constraining the less-affected extremity for two or three consecutive weeks with a resting hand splint and sling or other device which prevents movement of the hand and wrist for activities of daily living. The patients receive a type of training termed "shaping" for 7 hours/day (with rest intervals) for all weekdays during this period (massed practice). We propose to develop and evaluate a workstation that significantly enhances the application of CI therapy by automating and instrumenting several of the tasks currently used in the shaping training. The motivation for development of such a device is as follows: 1) Patients could receive CI therapy at home without the need for constant supervision from a therapist. Many veterans do not have the resources to travel to their local VAMC for the two or three week period required for the treatment. A home-based device would expand the pool of veterans who could receive CI therapy. 2) For subjects who were able to receive CI therapy in the clinic, this device would facilitate an effective post-treatment home-practice program. 3) Currently, patients are treated on a one-on-one basis in the clinic. This device could allow one therapist to treat 3 or 4 patients at one time, thereby substantially reducing the cost of the therapy. 4) This workstation would provide clear and comprehensive quantification of the progress of the treatment. This could indicate on which tasks the patient was progressing most and least rapidly, and would therefore enable effective modifications of the treatment plan while treatment was in progress. The hypothesis is that the positive outcomes of CI therapy can be achieved, and possibly enhanced, if the shaping training component is performed in a workstation that guides, motivates and records exercise of the more-affected limb. In the first 18 months, the workstation will be designed and fabricated. To expedite the design, we will rely on simple modifications to "off the shelf" components. In the last 18 months, a controlled, randomized, clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of automated CI therapy programs with standard CI therapy. The standard CI therapy group would receive shaping training in a clinical setting, one-on-one with a therapist. The clinic-based automated CI therapy group would perform the shaping training in the workstation, in a clinical setting and with minimal supervision. The home-based automated CI therapy group would perform the shaping training at home in the workstation, and with no direct supervision. All other aspects of the three treatment programs will be identical. At the end of this 3-year project, a device will have been designed, built and evaluated that could significantly enhance the application of CI therapy for chronic stroke patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cerebrovascular Accident
Keywords
Constrained Induced, CI therapy, CVA, Strokes

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Constrained Induced Therapy

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Stroke patients
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Wolff, Ph.D. Special Assistant to the Director
Organizational Affiliation
Program Analysis and Review Section (PARS), VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Danielle Kerkovitch, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Program Analysis and Review Section (PARS), VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Service
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Edward Taub, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Facility Information:
Facility Name
VA Medical Center
City
Palo Alto
State/Province
California
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Automated Constraint-Induced Therapy for Restoring Movement After Stroke

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs