search
Back to results

Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Primary Purpose

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tipifarnib;Zarnestra; R115777
Sponsored by
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Myeloid Leukemia focused on measuring Myeloid leukemia acute disease, Tipifarnib, Bone marrow aspirate

Eligibility Criteria

70 Years - 99 Years (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Newly diagnosed or re-lapsing AML Patient not medically fit for combination induction chemotherapy Pathologic confirmation of AML (= or > 20% bone marrow leukemic blasts) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2. Exclusion Criteria: Previous cytotoxic or biologic treatment for AML Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) Central nervous system leukemia Uncontrolled systemic infection Uncompensated disseminated intravascular coagulation Symptomatic neuropathy of grade 2 or worse Known allergy to imidazole drugs.

Sites / Locations

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Overall survival

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Compare patients treated with tipifarnib and patients treated with best supportive care: progression-free survival; complete remission rate; rate of morphologic leukemia-free state; one-year survival estimate and health resources utilization.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    October 7, 2004
    Last Updated
    September 13, 2016
    Sponsor
    Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT00093990
    Brief Title
    Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
    Official Title
    A Randomized Study of Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care (Including Hydroxyurea) in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Subjects 70 Years or Older (Farnesyl Transferase Inhibition Global Human Trials AML 301 [F.I.G.H.T. AML 301])
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2016
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    January 2004 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    undefined (undefined)
    Study Completion Date
    October 2007 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Name of the Sponsor
    Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

    4. Oversight

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of tipifarnib in patients aged 70 or more with acute myeloid leukemia. Tipifarnib belongs to a class of drugs called Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitors (FTI). It blocks proteins that make leukemia cells grow.
    Detailed Description
    This study tests the safety and effectiveness of the experimental drug, tipifarnib in older patients who have acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The purpose of this study is to test if tipifarnib can make patients with leukemia live longer. In this study, half the patients will receive tipifarnib and half of the patients will receive the standard treatment. The standard treatment will help to control the symptoms of AML and may include hydroxyurea to lower levels of circulating leukemia cells. Tipifarnib or the standard treatment will be given until the patient's leukemia gets better, or until they experience unacceptable side effects, or until the patient or study doctor decide to stop the study medication. Patients assigned to tipifarnib will be given tipifarnib tablets. Patients should take 6 tablets with food in the morning and 6 tablets with food in the evening, for 21 days in a row. Patients will not take tipifarnib for the next 7 days. This 28 day period is called a cycle. The rest period may be extended beyond 7 days depending on how well the patients tolerate the treatment. Patients will return to the study clinic every week and to visit their study doctor at least every two weeks. A blood draw for routine tests will be done every week. Depending on how your disease is doing, a bone marrow aspiration may be done at the end of every cycle. When patients finish treatment with the study medication, or if they leave the study early, they will be asked to see your doctor for one last visit. Routine laboratory tests will be done. After this visit the study doctor will continue to check with patients to see how they are doing and if they have started a new treatment for leukemia. This check will be made every 30 days and may be made by phone to the patient or to their health care provider. Tipifarnib; six 100 mg in a film coated, compressed tablets are given orally twice a day at for 21 consecutive days on a 28-day cycle schedule.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Acute Myeloid Leukemia
    Keywords
    Myeloid leukemia acute disease, Tipifarnib, Bone marrow aspirate

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 3
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    457 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Tipifarnib;Zarnestra; R115777
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Overall survival
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Compare patients treated with tipifarnib and patients treated with best supportive care: progression-free survival; complete remission rate; rate of morphologic leukemia-free state; one-year survival estimate and health resources utilization.

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    70 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    99 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Newly diagnosed or re-lapsing AML Patient not medically fit for combination induction chemotherapy Pathologic confirmation of AML (= or > 20% bone marrow leukemic blasts) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2. Exclusion Criteria: Previous cytotoxic or biologic treatment for AML Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) Central nervous system leukemia Uncontrolled systemic infection Uncompensated disseminated intravascular coagulation Symptomatic neuropathy of grade 2 or worse Known allergy to imidazole drugs.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial
    Organizational Affiliation
    Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    19470696
    Citation
    Harousseau JL, Martinelli G, Jedrzejczak WW, Brandwein JM, Bordessoule D, Masszi T, Ossenkoppele GJ, Alexeeva JA, Beutel G, Maertens J, Vidriales MB, Dombret H, Thomas X, Burnett AK, Robak T, Khuageva NK, Golenkov AK, Tothova E, Mollgard L, Park YC, Bessems A, De Porre P, Howes AJ; FIGHT-AML-301 Investigators. A randomized phase 3 study of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care, including hydroxyurea, in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in patients 70 years or older. Blood. 2009 Aug 6;114(6):1166-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-198093. Epub 2009 May 21.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs