Comparative Trial of Entecavir Versus Adefovir in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection
Primary Purpose
Hepatitis B, Chronic Disease
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
entecavir
adefovir
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatitis B focused on measuring chronic hepatitis B infection
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Chronic hepatitis B treatment naive Compensated liver disease
Sites / Locations
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Insitution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
- Local Institution
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
A1
A2
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBV DNA) by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assay at Week 12
Antiviral efficacy, as measured by the mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels by PCR (log10 copies/mL) at Week 12, adjusted for baseline (Week 12 - baseline). A negative value = improvement.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in HBV DNA by PCR Assay at Week 48
Antiviral efficacy, as measured by the mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels by PCR (log10 copies/mL) at Week 48, adjusted for baseline (Week 48 - Baseline). A negative value = improvement.
Viral Load Undetectable (HBV DNA <300 Copies/mL)
Number of Subjects with HBV DNA <300 copies/mL by Roche COBAS® Amplicor (limit of quantitation 300 copies/mL)
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization
Number of participants with ALT ≤ 1 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Efficacy in Blocking Virus Production and de Novo Infections
The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. The model parameters of interest are the effectiveness of the drug in blocking virus production from infected cells (efficacy, ε) and effectiveness of the study treatment in blocking de novo infection of susceptible cells (η). The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.
HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Viral Clearance Rate and Infected Cell Death Rate
The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. The model parameters of interest are the clearance rate of the free virus (c), the death rate of productively infected cells (δ), The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.
HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Half-Life of Free Virus
The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. An important derived parameter is the half-life of free virus (ie, the average amount of time for HBV particles in plasma to be reduced to half the initial level), calculated as 24*ln(2)/c. The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.
HBV DNA Viral Kinetics - Spline Model
This analysis uses a 3-parameter piece-wise linear model and describes the biphasic decline in HBV DNA (measured by PCR assay) through Week 12. The 3 parameters are the values for the 2 slopes, describing the first and second phase declines, respectively, and the estimated HBV DNA at the knot (at day 10; the time point where the 2 phases join). The biphasic viral decay kinetics for each treatment were obtained using a spline fitting procedure to estimate the 3 parameters for each subject; these estimates were then averaged within each treatment group.
Summary of Safety - Most Frequent (> 10%) Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to AEs, and Deaths
AE=new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of pre-existing medical condition regardless of causal relationship to treatment. SAE=untoward medical occurrence that is life-threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an important medical event, or results in death, inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, or persistent/significant disability. AE grades: mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life-threatening (4), death (5). ALT flare= >2x baseline & >10x ULN up to end of therapy + 5 days. Hepatic SAE=SAEs consistent with worsening of hepatitis or hepatic decompensation.
Summary of Safety - Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Clinical AEs
Laboratory abnormalities reported as clinical AEs
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00096785
Brief Title
Comparative Trial of Entecavir Versus Adefovir in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection
Official Title
Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study to Evaluate Early Viral Load Reductions and Exploratory Viral Kinetics Following Administration of Entecavir or Adefovir in Nucleoside-Naive Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2004 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2008 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate antiviral activity and efficacy of entecavir (ETV) compared to adefovir in adults with chronic hepatitis B who have not been treated yet with an antiviral medicine.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatitis B, Chronic Disease
Keywords
chronic hepatitis B infection
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
69 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
A1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
A2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
entecavir
Other Intervention Name(s)
Baraclude
Intervention Description
Tablets, Oral, ETV 0.5 mg, once daily, up to 96 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
adefovir
Intervention Description
Tablets, Oral, ADV 10 mg, once daily, up to 96 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBV DNA) by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assay at Week 12
Description
Antiviral efficacy, as measured by the mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels by PCR (log10 copies/mL) at Week 12, adjusted for baseline (Week 12 - baseline). A negative value = improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in HBV DNA by PCR Assay at Week 48
Description
Antiviral efficacy, as measured by the mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels by PCR (log10 copies/mL) at Week 48, adjusted for baseline (Week 48 - Baseline). A negative value = improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48
Title
Viral Load Undetectable (HBV DNA <300 Copies/mL)
Description
Number of Subjects with HBV DNA <300 copies/mL by Roche COBAS® Amplicor (limit of quantitation 300 copies/mL)
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization
Description
Number of participants with ALT ≤ 1 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Efficacy in Blocking Virus Production and de Novo Infections
Description
The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. The model parameters of interest are the effectiveness of the drug in blocking virus production from infected cells (efficacy, ε) and effectiveness of the study treatment in blocking de novo infection of susceptible cells (η). The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Viral Clearance Rate and Infected Cell Death Rate
Description
The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. The model parameters of interest are the clearance rate of the free virus (c), the death rate of productively infected cells (δ), The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Half-Life of Free Virus
Description
The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. An important derived parameter is the half-life of free virus (ie, the average amount of time for HBV particles in plasma to be reduced to half the initial level), calculated as 24*ln(2)/c. The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
HBV DNA Viral Kinetics - Spline Model
Description
This analysis uses a 3-parameter piece-wise linear model and describes the biphasic decline in HBV DNA (measured by PCR assay) through Week 12. The 3 parameters are the values for the 2 slopes, describing the first and second phase declines, respectively, and the estimated HBV DNA at the knot (at day 10; the time point where the 2 phases join). The biphasic viral decay kinetics for each treatment were obtained using a spline fitting procedure to estimate the 3 parameters for each subject; these estimates were then averaged within each treatment group.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Summary of Safety - Most Frequent (> 10%) Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to AEs, and Deaths
Description
AE=new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of pre-existing medical condition regardless of causal relationship to treatment. SAE=untoward medical occurrence that is life-threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an important medical event, or results in death, inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, or persistent/significant disability. AE grades: mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life-threatening (4), death (5). ALT flare= >2x baseline & >10x ULN up to end of therapy + 5 days. Hepatic SAE=SAEs consistent with worsening of hepatitis or hepatic decompensation.
Time Frame
cumulative through the end of on-treatment observation as available at the time of the Week 48 dataset
Title
Summary of Safety - Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Clinical AEs
Description
Laboratory abnormalities reported as clinical AEs
Time Frame
Week 48
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Chronic hepatitis B treatment naive
Compensated liver disease
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Organizational Affiliation
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Torrance
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
North Miami Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Insitution
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Galveston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Chai Wan
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Pokfulham
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Tai Po
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Jakarta
Country
Indonesia
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Cebu
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Manila
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Taoyan
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Bankok
Country
Thailand
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19065670
Citation
Leung N, Peng CY, Hann HW, Sollano J, Lao-Tan J, Hsu CW, Lesmana L, Yuen MF, Jeffers L, Sherman M, Min A, Mencarini K, Diva U, Cross A, Wilber R, Lopez-Talavera J. Early hepatitis B virus DNA reduction in hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B: A randomized international study of entecavir versus adefovir. Hepatology. 2009 Jan;49(1):72-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.22658.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Comparative Trial of Entecavir Versus Adefovir in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs