search
Back to results

A Comparison of Two Anti-HIV Drug Regimens for Youth Who Have Failed Prior Therapy

Primary Purpose

HIV Infections

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Abacavir sulfate
Emtricitabine
Lamivudine
Lopinavir/ritonavir
Saquinavir
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
Zidovudine
Sponsored by
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for HIV Infections focused on measuring Treatment Experienced, Child

Eligibility Criteria

4 Years - 21 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria for Step I: HIV infected No currently available therapeutic options that would likely result in long-term suppression of virus to less than 400 copies/ml Two measurements within 4 months prior to screening and at screening of either CD4% of less than 15% and HIV viral load of greater than 10,000 copies/ml OR HIV viral load greater than 30,000 copies/ml Previous exposure to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), NRTIs, and PIs AND have experienced virologic failure. More information on previous treatment regimen requirements is available in the protocol. Prior or current virologic failure with genotypic or phenotypic resistance OR historical virologic failure with a PI- or NNRTI-containing regimen Resistance to 2 or more drugs in most recent treatment regimen within 26 weeks prior to study screening Able and willing to swallow study medications Parent or guardian willing to provide informed consent, if applicable Willing to use acceptable methods of contraception Exclusion Criteria for Step I: Previous cumulative exposure to TDF for more than 24 weeks OR more than 14 days of TDF exposure during the 24 weeks prior to study entry Grade 1 lipase or higher within 28 days prior to study entry Grade 3 or higher laboratory abnormality (except for lipase) within 28 days prior to study entry History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs Active CDC Stage C opportunistic infection or serious bacterial infection requiring therapy at the time of screening Chemotherapy for active cancer Require certain medications Abnormal kidney function Any clinically significant diseases other than HIV infection or findings during medical history screening that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Sites / Locations

  • Chicago Children's CRS
  • Columbia IMPAACT CRS
  • SUNY Stony Brook NICHD CRS
  • DUMC Ped. CRS

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Tolerability of dual PI-based HAART versus multi-NRTI HAART salvage regimens (time to first intolerant event)
95% confidence interval (CI) for change in CD4% computed for PI-containing groups versus PI-sparing group
95% CI for change in BMD (both percent change in BMD and change in z-score from baseline) for each treatment group

Secondary Outcome Measures

HIV-1 RNA
growth and development markers
toxicity
adherence
pharmacokinetics
special virologic and immunologic parameters

Full Information

First Posted
January 25, 2005
Last Updated
October 28, 2021
Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00102206
Brief Title
A Comparison of Two Anti-HIV Drug Regimens for Youth Who Have Failed Prior Therapy
Official Title
A Phase II, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Two Antiretroviral Therapeutic Strategies: A Dual PI-Based HAART Regimen Versus a Multi-NRTI ART Regimen, in ART-Experienced Children and Youth Who Have Experienced Virologic Failure
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
undefined (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
May 2007 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
HIV infected children and adolescents who have taken many anti-HIV drugs may have limited treatment options and are at high risk for progressing to AIDS. The purpose of this study is to determine whether an anti-HIV treatment regimen of 2 protease inhibitors (PIs) and 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is more effective than a regimen of 4 NRTIs in treatment-experienced children and adolescents who have failed previous anti-HIV treatment.
Detailed Description
HIV infected children and adolescents on anti-HIV treatment regimens have traditionally had more difficulty with non-adherence and drug resistance than adults, often resulting in virologic failure. Additionally, HIV infected children with extensive exposure to antiretrovirals (ARVs) are likely to have fewer therapeutic options for salvage therapy, and their physicians find it difficult to choose regimens that will keep the HIV infection under control. This study will compare the efficacy of three 4-drug ARV salvage regimens in treatment-experienced, HIV infected children and adolescents who have experienced virologic failure. This study will last at least 96 weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups. Group 1A will receive a dual-PI based regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), saquinavir (SQV), and the NRTIs emtricitabine (FTC) and abacavir sulfate (ABC). Group 1B will receive a dual-PI based regimen of LPV/r, SQV, FTC, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Group 2 will receive an NRTI-only regimen of ABC, lamivudine, zidovudine, and TDF. There will be 11 study visits during Step I of this study. Medical history, a physical exam, and blood collection will occur at all visits. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans will occur at study entry and at Weeks 24, 48, 72, and 96. Urine collection will occur at most visits; participants will also take part in adherence modules at most visits. Participants will be asked to complete a pill count form at Weeks 4 and 24. Additionally, some study participants will be asked to participate in an intensive pharmacokinetics study at Week 4.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
HIV Infections
Keywords
Treatment Experienced, Child

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
6 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Abacavir sulfate
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Emtricitabine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lamivudine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lopinavir/ritonavir
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Saquinavir
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Zidovudine
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tolerability of dual PI-based HAART versus multi-NRTI HAART salvage regimens (time to first intolerant event)
Title
95% confidence interval (CI) for change in CD4% computed for PI-containing groups versus PI-sparing group
Title
95% CI for change in BMD (both percent change in BMD and change in z-score from baseline) for each treatment group
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
HIV-1 RNA
Title
growth and development markers
Title
toxicity
Title
adherence
Title
pharmacokinetics
Title
special virologic and immunologic parameters

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
4 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria for Step I: HIV infected No currently available therapeutic options that would likely result in long-term suppression of virus to less than 400 copies/ml Two measurements within 4 months prior to screening and at screening of either CD4% of less than 15% and HIV viral load of greater than 10,000 copies/ml OR HIV viral load greater than 30,000 copies/ml Previous exposure to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), NRTIs, and PIs AND have experienced virologic failure. More information on previous treatment regimen requirements is available in the protocol. Prior or current virologic failure with genotypic or phenotypic resistance OR historical virologic failure with a PI- or NNRTI-containing regimen Resistance to 2 or more drugs in most recent treatment regimen within 26 weeks prior to study screening Able and willing to swallow study medications Parent or guardian willing to provide informed consent, if applicable Willing to use acceptable methods of contraception Exclusion Criteria for Step I: Previous cumulative exposure to TDF for more than 24 weeks OR more than 14 days of TDF exposure during the 24 weeks prior to study entry Grade 1 lipase or higher within 28 days prior to study entry Grade 3 or higher laboratory abnormality (except for lipase) within 28 days prior to study entry History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs Active CDC Stage C opportunistic infection or serious bacterial infection requiring therapy at the time of screening Chemotherapy for active cancer Require certain medications Abnormal kidney function Any clinically significant diseases other than HIV infection or findings during medical history screening that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrew Wiznia, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Jacobi Medical Center
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ann J. Melvin, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Seattle Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Chicago Children's CRS
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia IMPAACT CRS
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
SUNY Stony Brook NICHD CRS
City
Stony Brook
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11794-8111
Country
United States
Facility Name
DUMC Ped. CRS
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15886376
Citation
Brogly S, Williams P, Seage GR 3rd, Oleske JM, Van Dyke R, McIntosh K; PACTG 219C Team. Antiretroviral treatment in pediatric HIV infection in the United States: from clinical trials to clinical practice. JAMA. 2005 May 11;293(18):2213-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.18.2213.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12175273
Citation
Gavin PJ, Yogev R. The role of protease inhibitor therapy in children with HIV infection. Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4(9):581-607. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200204090-00004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15170362
Citation
Handforth J, Sharland M. Triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy in children. Paediatr Drugs. 2004;6(3):147-59. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200406030-00002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14642195
Citation
Neely M, Kovacs A. Management of Antiretroviral Therapy in Neonates, Children, and Adolescents. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2003 Dec;5(6):521-530. doi: 10.1007/s11908-003-0097-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10449277
Citation
Piketty C, Race E, Castiel P, Belec L, Peytavin G, Si-Mohamed A, Gonzalez-Canali G, Weiss L, Clavel F, Kazatchkine MD. Efficacy of a five-drug combination including ritonavir, saquinavir and efavirenz in patients who failed on a conventional triple-drug regimen: phenotypic resistance to protease inhibitors predicts outcome of therapy. AIDS. 1999 Jul 30;13(11):F71-7. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199907300-00001.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

A Comparison of Two Anti-HIV Drug Regimens for Youth Who Have Failed Prior Therapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs