search
Back to results

Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the OPTIMIZER System in Subjects With Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure, Congestive

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
OPTIMIZER System
Sponsored by
Impulse Dynamics
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure, Congestive focused on measuring cardiac contractility modulation, heart failure, cardiopulmonary exercise test, chronic heart disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Subjects who are 18 years of age or older Subjects who are either male or female Subjects who have a baseline ejection fraction of 35% or less by echocardiography. Subjects who have been treated for heart failure for at least 90 days (including treatment with a β-blocker for at least 90 days unless the patient is intolerant) and are in New York Heart Association functional Class III or IV at the time of enrollment. Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure, consisting of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and β-blocker. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or 50% decrease in dose. Subjects who, in the opinion of the Principle Investigator (based on the current guidelines for clinical practice), have a clinical indication for an implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and/or pacemaker, must have an existing device or agree to undergo implantation of such a device unless the patient refuses to undergo the implantation of such device for personal reasons. Subjects who are willing and able to return for all follow-up visits. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects whose baseline VO2,max is <9 ml 02/min/kg. Subjects who have a potentially correctible cause of heart failure, such as valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease. Subjects who have clinically significant angina pectoris, consisting of angina during daily life (i.e., Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina score of II or more), an episode of unstable angina within 30 days of enrollment, or angina and/or electrocardiography (ECG) changes during exercise testing performed during baseline evaluation. Subjects who have been hospitalized for heart failure which required the use of inotropic support within 30 days of enrollment. Subjects who have a clinically significant amount of ambient ectopy, defined as more than 8,900 premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) per 24 hours on baseline Holter monitoring. Subjects who have chronic atrial fibrillation or chronic atrial flutter or those cardioverted within 30 days of enrollment. Subjects whose exercise tolerance is limited by a condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or who are unable to participate in a 6-minute walk or a cardiopulmonary stress test. Subjects who are scheduled for a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedure, or who have undergone a CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment. Subjects who have a biventricular pacing system or who have an accepted indication for such a device. Subjects who have had a myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment. Subjects who have mechanical tricuspid or aortic valves. Subjects who have a prior heart transplant. Subjects who are participating in another experimental protocol. Subjects who are unable to provide informed consent.

Sites / Locations

  • Impulse Dynamics

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Optimizer System + Optimal medical treatment

Optimal medical treatment

Arm Description

Optimizer System implanted and cardiac contractility modulation therapy activated.

Treatment with optimal medical therapy only.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Efficacy Endpoint: Ventilatory Anerobic Threshold (VAT)
Number of participants with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as quantified by VO2 at ventilatory anerobic threshold (VAT) measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if VAT increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value.
Safety Endpoint: Composite All-cause Mortality and All-cause Hospitalizations
The proportion of patients experiencing a composite event of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations evaluated at 50-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Peak VO2
Number of participants with improvement in peak VO2 measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if peak VO2 increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value.
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification
Number of participants with improvement in heart failure symptoms as quantified by a blinded clinician using the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification at 24 weeks compared to baseline. The NYHA Class ranges from I - IV, with a lower class indicating a better status. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the NYHA class decreases by ≥ 1 at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline class.
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire
Number of subjects will improvement in quality of life at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire. The MLWHFQ score could range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of life. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the MLWHFQ score decreases by ≥10 points at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline score.
Six Minute Hall Walk (6MW) Test
Number of subjects with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the the six minute hall walk (6MW) test. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder with >40-meter increase in distance walked at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline distance.

Full Information

First Posted
May 27, 2005
Last Updated
July 20, 2020
Sponsor
Impulse Dynamics
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00112125
Brief Title
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the OPTIMIZER System in Subjects With Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5
Official Title
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER System With Active Fixation Leads in Subjects With Heart Failure Resulting From Systolic Dysfunction: FIX-HF-5
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2005 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 19, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 19, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Impulse Dynamics

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with the OPTIMIZER System is safe and effective in patients with moderate to severe heart failure symptoms.
Detailed Description
IMPULSE Dynamics' FIX HF 5 US Study is a prospective, multi-center, study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) signals delivered by the implantable OPTIMIZER™ System in patients with NYHA class III/IV heart failure. The study will involve the recruitment of approximately 420 subjects at a total of up to 50 sites nationwide. Those subjects who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria based upon baseline test results will be randomized to receive the OPTIMIZER™ System or to a control group. All subjects randomized will be followed for 1 year and shall receive the same study related assessments throughout the course of the study. In addition, all subjects will continue to receive optimal medical therapy for the treatment of their heart failure. The primary efficacy assessment consists of a change in exercise tolerance measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and 6 months. Safety variables, such as the rate and cause of hospitalizations or death, shall be collected in both groups and shall be compared at 12 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure, Congestive
Keywords
cardiac contractility modulation, heart failure, cardiopulmonary exercise test, chronic heart disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
428 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Optimizer System + Optimal medical treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Optimizer System implanted and cardiac contractility modulation therapy activated.
Arm Title
Optimal medical treatment
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Treatment with optimal medical therapy only.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
OPTIMIZER System
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy Endpoint: Ventilatory Anerobic Threshold (VAT)
Description
Number of participants with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as quantified by VO2 at ventilatory anerobic threshold (VAT) measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if VAT increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Safety Endpoint: Composite All-cause Mortality and All-cause Hospitalizations
Description
The proportion of patients experiencing a composite event of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations evaluated at 50-weeks
Time Frame
50-weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Peak VO2
Description
Number of participants with improvement in peak VO2 measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if peak VO2 increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification
Description
Number of participants with improvement in heart failure symptoms as quantified by a blinded clinician using the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification at 24 weeks compared to baseline. The NYHA Class ranges from I - IV, with a lower class indicating a better status. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the NYHA class decreases by ≥ 1 at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline class.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire
Description
Number of subjects will improvement in quality of life at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire. The MLWHFQ score could range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of life. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the MLWHFQ score decreases by ≥10 points at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline score.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Six Minute Hall Walk (6MW) Test
Description
Number of subjects with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the the six minute hall walk (6MW) test. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder with >40-meter increase in distance walked at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline distance.
Time Frame
24 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects who are 18 years of age or older Subjects who are either male or female Subjects who have a baseline ejection fraction of 35% or less by echocardiography. Subjects who have been treated for heart failure for at least 90 days (including treatment with a β-blocker for at least 90 days unless the patient is intolerant) and are in New York Heart Association functional Class III or IV at the time of enrollment. Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure, consisting of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and β-blocker. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or 50% decrease in dose. Subjects who, in the opinion of the Principle Investigator (based on the current guidelines for clinical practice), have a clinical indication for an implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and/or pacemaker, must have an existing device or agree to undergo implantation of such a device unless the patient refuses to undergo the implantation of such device for personal reasons. Subjects who are willing and able to return for all follow-up visits. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects whose baseline VO2,max is <9 ml 02/min/kg. Subjects who have a potentially correctible cause of heart failure, such as valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease. Subjects who have clinically significant angina pectoris, consisting of angina during daily life (i.e., Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina score of II or more), an episode of unstable angina within 30 days of enrollment, or angina and/or electrocardiography (ECG) changes during exercise testing performed during baseline evaluation. Subjects who have been hospitalized for heart failure which required the use of inotropic support within 30 days of enrollment. Subjects who have a clinically significant amount of ambient ectopy, defined as more than 8,900 premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) per 24 hours on baseline Holter monitoring. Subjects who have chronic atrial fibrillation or chronic atrial flutter or those cardioverted within 30 days of enrollment. Subjects whose exercise tolerance is limited by a condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or who are unable to participate in a 6-minute walk or a cardiopulmonary stress test. Subjects who are scheduled for a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedure, or who have undergone a CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment. Subjects who have a biventricular pacing system or who have an accepted indication for such a device. Subjects who have had a myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment. Subjects who have mechanical tricuspid or aortic valves. Subjects who have a prior heart transplant. Subjects who are participating in another experimental protocol. Subjects who are unable to provide informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dan Burkhoff, M.D, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Impulse Dynamics
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Impulse Dynamics
City
Orangeburg
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10962
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11248765
Citation
Burkhoff D, Shemer I, Felzen B, Shimizu J, Mika Y, Dickstein M, Prutchi D, Darvish N, Ben-Haim SA. Electric currents applied during the refractory period can modulate cardiac contractility in vitro and in vivo. Heart Fail Rev. 2001 Jan;6(1):27-34. doi: 10.1023/a:1009851107189. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12139295
Citation
Ellison K. Nonexcitatory stimulation: 2002: a pace odyssey. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul;13(7):696-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00696.x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12139294
Citation
Marrouche NF, Pavia SV, Zhuang S, Kim YJ, Tabata T, Wallick D, Saad E, Abdul-Karim A, Schweikert R, Saliba W, Tchou P, Natale A. Nonexcitatory stimulus delivery improves left ventricular function in hearts with left bundle branch block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul;13(7):691-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00691.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11959626
Citation
Mohri S, He KL, Dickstein M, Mika Y, Shimizu J, Shemer I, Yi GH, Wang J, Ben-Haim S, Burkhoff D. Cardiac contractility modulation by electric currents applied during the refractory period. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002 May;282(5):H1642-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00959.2001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12612875
Citation
Morita H, Suzuki G, Haddad W, Mika Y, Tanhehco EJ, Sharov VG, Goldstein S, Ben-Haim S, Sabbah HN. Cardiac contractility modulation with nonexcitatory electric signals improves left ventricular function in dogs with chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2003 Feb;9(1):69-75. doi: 10.1054/jcaf.2003.8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12446280
Citation
Mohri S, Shimizu J, Mika Y, Shemer I, Wang J, Ben-Haim S, Burkhoff D. Electric currents applied during refractory period enhance contractility and systolic calcium in the ferret heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003 Apr;284(4):H1119-23. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00378.2002. Epub 2002 Nov 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11248767
Citation
Sabbah HN, Haddad W, Mika Y, Nass O, Aviv R, Sharov VG, Maltsev V, Felzen B, Undrovinas AI, Goldstein S, Darvish N, Ben-Haim SA. Cardiac contractility modulation with the impulse dynamics signal: studies in dogs with chronic heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2001 Jan;6(1):45-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1009855208097.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12480039
Citation
Pappone C, Rosanio S, Burkhoff D, Mika Y, Vicedomini G, Augello G, Shemer I, Prutchi D, Haddad W, Aviv R, Snir Y, Kronzon I, Alfieri O, Ben-Haim SA. Cardiac contractility modulation by electric currents applied during the refractory period in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1307-13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02868-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18926146
Citation
Abraham WT, Burkhoff D, Nademanee K, Carson P, Bourge R, Ellenbogen KA, Parides M, Kadish A; FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with systolic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):641-648.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.019.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the OPTIMIZER System in Subjects With Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs