search
Back to results

Staccato: A Trial of CD4 Guided Treatment Interruption, Compared to Continuous Treatment, for HIV Infection

Primary Purpose

HIV Infection, AIDS

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Treatment interruption
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Geneva
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for HIV Infection focused on measuring Scheduled treatment interruptions, STI

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: CD4 lymphocyte count above 350/microliter and viral HIV1-RNA below 50 copies/ml on antiretroviral treatment. Exclusion Criteria: Virologic failure of treatment. Failure of treatment defined as a treatment switch motivated by high viral loads on treatment.

Sites / Locations

  • Infectious Diseases Unit - University Hospital

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Amounts of drugs used
Response of viral load to retreatment after interruption

Secondary Outcome Measures

Opportunistic infections and deaths
Adverse effects
CD4 counts
Resistance development

Full Information

First Posted
June 3, 2005
Last Updated
November 28, 2006
Sponsor
University Hospital, Geneva
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00113126
Brief Title
Staccato: A Trial of CD4 Guided Treatment Interruption, Compared to Continuous Treatment, for HIV Infection
Official Title
A Randomized Trial of CD4 Guided Treatment Interruption, Compared to Continuous Treatment, for HIV Infection
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2005
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2002 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
October 2005 (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Geneva

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Treatment of HIV repairs the immune system, but continuous treatment is expensive and causes side effects. Would it not be better to treat intermittently, e.g. stop treatment when the immune system has recovered, and start again only when damage reappears? That is the question which STACCATO proposes to answer. Approximately 500 patients were recruited for this trial from 2002 to 2004. One third were treated continuously; in two thirds, the treatment was interrupted whenever the CD4 count, a measure of immune recovery, exceeded 350. At the end of 2005, the two treatment groups will be compared in order to see which fared better regarding amount of drugs used, side effects, CD4 counts, and development of resistance to treatment.
Detailed Description
Continuous treatment has been very successful in diminishing the diseases and deaths caused by HIV. However, continuous treatment is expensive. Intermittent treatment will always cost less than continuous treatment, and therefore has the potential to facilitate access to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in developing countries. HAART also causes many undesirable effects. Intermittent treatment decreases exposure to drugs and is therefore expected to decrease side effects. STACCATO is a randomised trial of intermittent versus continuous anti-retroviral treatment. At least 600 patients on HAART, with viremia below 50 copies/ml and CD4 count above 350 cells/ml were randomised to one of two arms, in 1:2 proportions: Arm 1: Continuation (control) arm: Drugs are continued or changed according to current guidelines and good clinical practice. Arm 2: CD4-guided arm: Drugs discontinued and reintroduced according to CD4 counts, with HAART being administered only if CD4 count is < 350 cells/ml. Randomized treatment will continue during an average of approximately 2 years, and will be followed by a period of 12 to 24 weeks' continuous treatment, for patients in both arms. Endpoints: The amount of drugs used, side effects, viremia and CD4 counts, number of clinical events, at the end of the randomized treatment period, and again 12 to 24 weeks later. A subproject will study the effect of treatment interruption on resistance development, mutations in proviral DNA and proviral DNA levels.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
HIV Infection, AIDS
Keywords
Scheduled treatment interruptions, STI

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
526 (false)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Treatment interruption
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Amounts of drugs used
Title
Response of viral load to retreatment after interruption
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Opportunistic infections and deaths
Title
Adverse effects
Title
CD4 counts
Title
Resistance development

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: CD4 lymphocyte count above 350/microliter and viral HIV1-RNA below 50 copies/ml on antiretroviral treatment. Exclusion Criteria: Virologic failure of treatment. Failure of treatment defined as a treatment switch motivated by high viral loads on treatment.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bernard Hirschel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Infectious Diseases Unit - University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Infectious Diseases Unit - University Hospital
City
Geneva
ZIP/Postal Code
1205
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
14523294
Citation
Ananworanich J, Nuesch R, Le Braz M, Chetchotisakd P, Vibhagool A, Wicharuk S, Ruxrungtham K, Furrer H, Cooper D, Hirschel B, Bernasconi E, Cavassini M, Ebnother C, Fagard C, Genne D, Khanna N, Perrin L, Phanupak P, Ubolyam S, Vernazza P, Yerly S; Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Failures of 1 week on, 1 week off antiretroviral therapies in a randomized trial. AIDS. 2003 Oct 17;17(15):F33-7. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200310170-00001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16890832
Citation
Ananworanich J, Gayet-Ageron A, Le Braz M, Prasithsirikul W, Chetchotisakd P, Kiertiburanakul S, Munsakul W, Raksakulkarn P, Tansuphasawasdikul S, Sirivichayakul S, Cavassini M, Karrer U, Genne D, Nuesch R, Vernazza P, Bernasconi E, Leduc D, Satchell C, Yerly S, Perrin L, Hill A, Perneger T, Phanuphak P, Furrer H, Cooper D, Ruxrungtham K, Hirschel B; Staccato Study Group; Swiss HIV Cohort Study. CD4-guided scheduled treatment interruptions compared with continuous therapy for patients infected with HIV-1: results of the Staccato randomised trial. Lancet. 2006 Aug 5;368(9534):459-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69153-8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19425222
Citation
Calmy A, Gayet-Ageron A, Montecucco F, Nguyen A, Mach F, Burger F, Ubolyam S, Carr A, Ruxungtham K, Hirschel B, Ananworanich J; STACCATO Study Group. HIV increases markers of cardiovascular risk: results from a randomized, treatment interruption trial. AIDS. 2009 May 15;23(8):929-39. doi: 10.1097/qad.0b013e32832995fa.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
18339636
Citation
Ananworanich J, Nuesch R, Cote HC, Kerr SJ, Hill A, Jupimai T, Laopraynak N, Saenawat S, Ruxrungtham K, Hirschel B. Changes in metabolic toxicity after switching from stavudine/didanosine to tenofovir/lamivudine--a Staccato trial substudy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Jun;61(6):1340-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn097. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Staccato: A Trial of CD4 Guided Treatment Interruption, Compared to Continuous Treatment, for HIV Infection

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs