search
Back to results

R-ICE Versus R-DHAP in Patients Aged 18-65 With Relapse Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Primary Purpose

Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Diffuse

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rituximab
Etoposide
Carboplatine
Ifosfamide + Mesna
Cisplatine
Cytosine Arabinoside
Dexamethasone
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
BCNU
Etoposide
Cytarabine
Melphalan
Sponsored by
Lymphoma Study Association
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Diffuse focused on measuring Lymphoma, Chemotherapy, rituximab

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients with CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Disease must be histologically proven in case of relapse or partial response. Aged 18 to 65 years First relapse after complete remission (CR), less than partial remission (PR) or partial response to first line treatment not achieving documented or confirmed complete remission. Eligible for transplant Previously treated with chemotherapy regimen containing anthracyclines with or without rituximab. ECOG performance status 0 to 2. Minimum life expectancy of 3 months. Signed written informed consent prior to randomization. Exclusion Criteria: Burkitt, mantle-cell and T-cell lymphoma. CD20-negative diffuse large cell lymphoma Documented infection with HIV and hepatitis B virus [HBV] (in the absence of vaccination) Central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma. Not previously treated with anthracycline-containing regimens Prior transplantation Contra-indication to any drug contained in the chemotherapy regimens. Any serious active disease or co-morbid condition (according to the investigator's decision and information provided in the Investigational Drug Brochure [IDB]). Poor renal function (creatinine level > 150µmol/l or 1.5-2.0 x upper limit of normal [ULN]); poor hepatic function (total bilirubin level > 30mmol/l [> 1.5 x ULN], transaminases > 2.5 maximum normal level) unless these abnormalities are related to the lymphoma; poor bone marrow reserve as defined by neutrophils < 1.5G/l or platelets < 100G/l, unless related to bone marrow infiltration. Any history of cancer during the last 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin tumors or stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma. Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days before planned first cycle of chemotherapy and during the study. Pregnant women Adult patients unable to provide informed consent because of intellectual impairment.

Sites / Locations

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • Australian leukemia and lymphoma group
  • Groupe d'atude des lymphome de l'adulte
  • Czech Lymphoma study group
  • Hospital district of south west Finland
  • German high grade non hodgkin's lymphoma group
  • Israel Society of Hematology
  • Nordic center
  • Schweirische Arbeitsgruppe fur klinische Krebsforschung
  • National cancer research institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

R-ICE

R-DHAP

Arm Description

R-ICE + R-BEAM /ASCT Rituximab, Etoposide, Carboplatine, Ifosfamide + Mesna BCNU, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

R-DHAP + R-BEAM /ASCT Rituximab, Cisplatine, Cytosine Arabinoside, Dexamethasone BCNU, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

MARR (mobilization adjusted response rate)
EFS (event free survival)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression rate
Overall survival
Duration of response

Full Information

First Posted
August 25, 2005
Last Updated
August 22, 2019
Sponsor
Lymphoma Study Association
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00137995
Brief Title
R-ICE Versus R-DHAP in Patients Aged 18-65 With Relapse Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Official Title
Randomized Study of ICE Plus RITUXIMAB Versus DHAP Plus Rituximab in Previously Treated Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, Followed by Randomized Maintenance With Rituximab
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2003 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2008 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Lymphoma Study Association

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction therapy R-ICE in comparison to R-DHAP after 3 cycles adjusted to successful mobilization of stem cells in patients with previously treated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma CD20. The goal is to detect a difference in mobilization adjusted response rate of 15% between R-ICE and R-DHAP. The other objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MabThera maintenance therapy after transplantation as measured by the event free survival. The goal is to obtain a 15% increase of event free survival at 2 years.
Detailed Description
In vitro, the addition of rituximab to standard anticancer drugs increases cell lyses even in chemoresistant cell lines. This chemosensitization effect was also demonstrated in vivo by the results of the GELA trial in elderly patients with DLCL. Reported phase II study results on the RICE regimen for treatment of patients with relapsed DLCL and comparison with historical controls being treated with ICE suggests that this effect (15% improvement in response rate) is likely in relapsing DLCL and had led the SWOG to stop a randomized trial comparing ICE vs RICE in patients with relapsed aggressive lymphoma. In the setting of relapsed DLCL, high dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard to improve survival in highly selected chemosensitive patients. In the Parma study, only 58% of the patients with relapsed aggressive NHL were good responders after DHAP and 24% were in complete remission. Moreover, the quality of response depended on prognostic factors such as IPI and relapse > 12 months after treatment, and only patients responding to salvage therapy benefited from HDT + ASCT. As shown in the PARMA study. The goal in relapsed DLCL is to improve complete response rates before transplantation as it is the main parameter for eligibility for HDT + ASCT and the main prognostic factor. Unlike first line treatment with CHOP, no standard chemotherapy exists for relapsing patients. DHAP has been the most frequently used regimen for decades but incorporates only two drugs, and has dose-limiting renal toxicity. The ICE regimen was developed at several dosages and studies consistently produced CR rates that were 10-15% superior to DHAP. It is expected that this difference will remain the same with the addition of rituximab to both regimens. Recent phase II data in patients with relapsed DLCL not previously treated with rituximab showed that RICE produced a response rate of 78% with a complete remission rate of 58% and was active in primary refractory disease as well as in intermediate-high risk patients (IPI 2-3). Association of DHAP to Rituximab, R-DHAP has been done on small series of patients by investigators, including patients relapsing after autotransplant. Despite numerous phase II studies, no randomized study has been performed comparing the two regimens (DHAP/ICE) or others in relapsing DLCL. Treatment of first line DLCL has been changed in the past 10 years with more intensive regimens, often followed by ASCT, and very recently with the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy and therefore the population of relapsing patients might be different from the one in the initial PARMA study. A large lymphoma intergroup study working on a large prospective data base might help to find the best salvage regimen and to assess the role of retreatment with monoclonal antibodies in these patients. Finally, the role of rituximab maintenance therapy after HDT + ASCT in prolonging second complete response should be evaluated.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Diffuse
Keywords
Lymphoma, Chemotherapy, rituximab

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
481 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
R-ICE
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
R-ICE + R-BEAM /ASCT Rituximab, Etoposide, Carboplatine, Ifosfamide + Mesna BCNU, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
Arm Title
R-DHAP
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
R-DHAP + R-BEAM /ASCT Rituximab, Cisplatine, Cytosine Arabinoside, Dexamethasone BCNU, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rituximab
Other Intervention Name(s)
R
Intervention Description
375 mg/m² D-2/D1
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Etoposide
Intervention Description
100 mg/m² D1-D2-D3
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Carboplatine
Intervention Description
max 800mg D2
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ifosfamide + Mesna
Intervention Description
5 g/m² from D2 to D13
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cisplatine
Intervention Description
100 mg/m² from D1 to D13
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cytosine Arabinoside
Intervention Description
2000 mg/m²/12 h D2 D3
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexamethasone
Intervention Description
40 mg From D1 to D4
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
Other Intervention Name(s)
ASCT
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
BCNU
Other Intervention Name(s)
BICNU
Intervention Description
300mg/m² on D-6
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Etoposide
Intervention Description
200 mg/m² from D-6 to D-3
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cytarabine
Intervention Description
100 mg/m² from D-6 to D-3
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Melphalan
Intervention Description
140 mg/m² on D-2
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
MARR (mobilization adjusted response rate)
Time Frame
3 months
Title
EFS (event free survival)
Time Frame
2 years post transplantation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression rate
Time Frame
2 years post transplantation
Title
Overall survival
Time Frame
2 years post transplantation
Title
Duration of response
Time Frame
2 years post transplantation

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Disease must be histologically proven in case of relapse or partial response. Aged 18 to 65 years First relapse after complete remission (CR), less than partial remission (PR) or partial response to first line treatment not achieving documented or confirmed complete remission. Eligible for transplant Previously treated with chemotherapy regimen containing anthracyclines with or without rituximab. ECOG performance status 0 to 2. Minimum life expectancy of 3 months. Signed written informed consent prior to randomization. Exclusion Criteria: Burkitt, mantle-cell and T-cell lymphoma. CD20-negative diffuse large cell lymphoma Documented infection with HIV and hepatitis B virus [HBV] (in the absence of vaccination) Central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma. Not previously treated with anthracycline-containing regimens Prior transplantation Contra-indication to any drug contained in the chemotherapy regimens. Any serious active disease or co-morbid condition (according to the investigator's decision and information provided in the Investigational Drug Brochure [IDB]). Poor renal function (creatinine level > 150µmol/l or 1.5-2.0 x upper limit of normal [ULN]); poor hepatic function (total bilirubin level > 30mmol/l [> 1.5 x ULN], transaminases > 2.5 maximum normal level) unless these abnormalities are related to the lymphoma; poor bone marrow reserve as defined by neutrophils < 1.5G/l or platelets < 100G/l, unless related to bone marrow infiltration. Any history of cancer during the last 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin tumors or stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma. Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days before planned first cycle of chemotherapy and during the study. Pregnant women Adult patients unable to provide informed consent because of intellectual impairment.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christian Gisselbrecht
Organizational Affiliation
Lymphoma Study Association
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10021
Country
United States
Facility Name
Australian leukemia and lymphoma group
City
Sydney
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Groupe d'atude des lymphome de l'adulte
City
Yvoir
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Czech Lymphoma study group
City
Praha
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Hospital district of south west Finland
City
Turku
Country
Finland
Facility Name
German high grade non hodgkin's lymphoma group
City
Hamburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Israel Society of Hematology
City
Tel-Hashomer
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Nordic center
City
Uppsala
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Schweirische Arbeitsgruppe fur klinische Krebsforschung
City
Lausanne
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
National cancer research institute
City
London
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
9808548
Citation
Blay J, Gomez F, Sebban C, Bachelot T, Biron P, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, Somers R, Chauvin F, Philip T. The International Prognostic Index correlates to survival in patients with aggressive lymphoma in relapse: analysis of the PARMA trial. Parma Group. Blood. 1998 Nov 15;92(10):3562-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14739217
Citation
Kewalramani T, Zelenetz AD, Nimer SD, Portlock C, Straus D, Noy A, O'Connor O, Filippa DA, Teruya-Feldstein J, Gencarelli A, Qin J, Waxman A, Yahalom J, Moskowitz CH. Rituximab and ICE as second-line therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2004 May 15;103(10):3684-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-11-3911. Epub 2004 Jan 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11807147
Citation
Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, Morel P, Van Den Neste E, Salles G, Gaulard P, Reyes F, Lederlin P, Gisselbrecht C. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):235-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011795.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9779700
Citation
Guglielmi C, Gomez F, Philip T, Hagenbeek A, Martelli M, Sebban C, Milpied N, Bron D, Cahn JY, Somers R, Sonneveld P, Gisselbrecht C, Van Der Lelie H, Chauvin F. Time to relapse has prognostic value in patients with aggressive lymphoma enrolled onto the Parma trial. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Oct;16(10):3264-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3264.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23091101
Citation
Gisselbrecht C, Schmitz N, Mounier N, Singh Gill D, Linch DC, Trneny M, Bosly A, Milpied NJ, Radford J, Ketterer N, Shpilberg O, Duhrsen U, Hagberg H, Ma DD, Viardot A, Lowenthal R, Briere J, Salles G, Moskowitz CH, Glass B. Rituximab maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed CD20(+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final analysis of the collaborative trial in relapsed aggressive lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 20;30(36):4462-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.9416. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
20660832
Citation
Gisselbrecht C, Glass B, Mounier N, Singh Gill D, Linch DC, Trneny M, Bosly A, Ketterer N, Shpilberg O, Hagberg H, Ma D, Briere J, Moskowitz CH, Schmitz N. Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 20;28(27):4184-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.1618. Epub 2010 Jul 26. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1896.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

R-ICE Versus R-DHAP in Patients Aged 18-65 With Relapse Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs