Mouth Care Regimes During Radiotherapy
Primary Purpose
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Australia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Biotene (mouth care)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Head and Neck Neoplasms focused on measuring Radiotherapy, Mucositis, Xerostomia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Are undergoing oral or pharyngeal irradiation with a cumulative dose > 35Gy with at least 1/2 of the salivary tissue contained within the field of treatment. May or may not have undergone surgery. Are available for follow-up questionnaires. Are English speaking or have an easily accessible interpreter. Exclusion Criteria: No co-morbidities which may result in dry mouth, for example Sjögren syndrome.
Sites / Locations
- St George Hospital, Cancer Care Centre
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Mid treatment, 2 and 6 weeks post treatment relative to baseline: Oral comfort - dichotomised as difficulty yes/no based on 3 questions
Mucositis - dichotomised
Xerostomia - dichotomised
Pain medications - dichotomised
Secondary Outcome Measures
Oral flora
Oral pH
Salivary flow
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00138827
First Posted
August 29, 2005
Last Updated
December 14, 2005
Sponsor
St George Hospital, Australia
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00138827
Brief Title
Mouth Care Regimes During Radiotherapy
Official Title
A Pilot Randomised Comparison of Bicarbonate Based Mouth Care Versus Biotene Based Mouth Care During Radiotherapy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 1998
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 1999 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
March 2003 (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
St George Hospital, Australia
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess whether Biotene oral care products have a benefit in the treatment of xerostomia and mucositis when compared with conventional bicarbonate mouth care regimes.
Detailed Description
Grade III and IV mucositis occurs in 30-60% of patients undergoing head and neck irradiation. Where mucositis is severe a patient's ability to swallow may become significantly compromised and nutritional requirements may not be met.
Xerostomia is often an early side effect of treatment. As salivary tissue is very sensitive to radiation there is often a change in saliva early in the treatment.
New products on the market have claimed to alleviate the symptoms of dry mouth and to help the body's natural defenses reduce the harmful oral bacteria. These products contain the important salivary enzymes lactoperoxidase, lysozyme, lactoferrin and glucose oxidase. Biotene products therefore have the potential to reduce microbial populations which result in radiation caries and periodontal disease and in addition provide relief from the discomfort of xerostomia.
Despite the knowledge surrounding xerostomia in the head and neck irradiation population, its treatment has not been well documented and the question of patient comfort is not well addressed.
Comparisons: This study aims to compare the different mouth care regimes and determine the most effective treatment alternatives during radiotherapy. Patients will be randomised to either Biotene or Bicarbonate-based mouth care regimes. Patients will be stratified according to whether they are receiving radiotherapy alone or chemo irradiation to ensure equal distribution across the different mouth care regimes.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Keywords
Radiotherapy, Mucositis, Xerostomia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Single
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (false)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Biotene (mouth care)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mid treatment, 2 and 6 weeks post treatment relative to baseline: Oral comfort - dichotomised as difficulty yes/no based on 3 questions
Title
Mucositis - dichotomised
Title
Xerostomia - dichotomised
Title
Pain medications - dichotomised
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Oral flora
Title
Oral pH
Title
Salivary flow
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Are undergoing oral or pharyngeal irradiation with a cumulative dose > 35Gy with at least 1/2 of the salivary tissue contained within the field of treatment.
May or may not have undergone surgery.
Are available for follow-up questionnaires.
Are English speaking or have an easily accessible interpreter.
Exclusion Criteria:
No co-morbidities which may result in dry mouth, for example Sjögren syndrome.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Associate Professor Peter H Graham
Organizational Affiliation
St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
St George Hospital, Cancer Care Centre
City
Sydney
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2217
Country
Australia
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Mouth Care Regimes During Radiotherapy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs