search
Back to results

ACVBP Versus ACVBP Plus Rituximab in Low Risk Localized Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Primary Purpose

Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
rituximab
Sponsored by
Lymphoma Study Association
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma focused on measuring lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell, rituximab, chemotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patient with histologically proven CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (WHO classification). Age from 18 to 65 years. Patient not previously treated. Ann Arbor stage I or II. ECOG performance status < 2. Normal LDH. Negative HIV, HBV and HCV serologies 4 weeks (except after vaccination). Having previously signed a written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Any other histological type of lymphoma. vAny history of treated or non-treated indolent lymphoma. However, patients not previously diagnosed and having a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with some small cell infiltration in lymph node may be included. Central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma. Contra-indication to any drug contained in the chemotherapy regimens. Poor renal function (creatinin level >150 mmol/l), poor hepatic function (total bilirubin level >30 mmol/l, transaminases >2.5 maximum normal level). Poor bone marrow reserve as defined by neutrophils < 1.5 G/l or platelets < 100 G/l. Any history of cancer during the last 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin tumors or stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma. Any serious active disease (according to the investigator's decision). Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days before planned first cycle of chemotherapy and during the study. Pregnant or lactating women Adult patient under tutelage.

Sites / Locations

  • Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'adulte
  • Hôpital Henri Mondor
  • Hématologie CHU de Lille
  • Hôpital Saint Louis
  • Hématologie Adultes - Hôpital Necker
  • Service d'Hématologie - Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
  • Centre Hospitalier Robert Debré
  • Centre Henri Becquerel
  • Hématologie CHU Purpan
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • Centre Pluridisciplinaire d'Oncologie, CHUV

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

R-ACVBP

ACVBP

Arm Description

addition of rituximab to standard ACVBP chemotherapy

standard ACVBP chemotherapy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Event-free survival (EFS)
events defined as death from any cause, relapse for complete responders (CR) and unconfirmed complete responders (CRu), progression during and after treatment and change of therapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Response rate at the end of the treatment
Disease-free survival for complete responders
Overall survival
additionnal toxicities with R-ACVBP
number of SAE

Full Information

First Posted
August 31, 2005
Last Updated
March 9, 2017
Sponsor
Lymphoma Study Association
Collaborators
Amgen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00140660
Brief Title
ACVBP Versus ACVBP Plus Rituximab in Low Risk Localized Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Official Title
Randomized Study of ACVBP Versus ACVBP Plus Rituximab in Previously Untreated Patients Aged From 18 to 65 Years With Low-risk Localized Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (Age-adjusted IPI = 0)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Low acrual
Study Start Date
December 2003 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Lymphoma Study Association
Collaborators
Amgen

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is a multicentric randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of the combination R-ACVBP in patients 18 to 65 years with low risk localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Detailed Description
Approximately 30 to 40% of diffuse large B cell lymphomas are localized at diagnosis (stage I-II). Until the seventies, radiotherapy was used as the single modality to treat these localized stages but no more than half of the patients were cured. From the eighties, anthracycline-based regimens combined or not with radiotherapy gave superior results in term of relapse free survival compared with radiotherapy alone. Later on Miller et al. published a randomized study showing that 3 cycles of CHOP combined with radiotherapy gave superior results in term of overall survival as compared with 8 cycles of CHOP. This study was recently updated with a follow up of more than 8 years and shows no more difference between the two arms, due to an excess of late mortality after the combined treatment. Recently, two trials were conducted by the GELA to compare chemotherapy alone to a combined chemo-radiotherapy approach in patients with low risk localized diffuse large cell lymphoma (age-adjusted IPI = 0). The objective of the LNH 93-1 study was to compare, in patients aged from 18 to 60 years 3 cycles of CHOP followed by radiotherapy with chemotherapy alone consisting in 3 cycles of ACVBP. The ACVBP regimen includes a more intensive induction followed by a sequential consolidation. With a median follow up of 55 months, the results have shown a superiority of the ACVBP arm for both the 5 year event free (83% vs. 74%, p = 0.004) and overall survival (89% vs. 80%, p = 0.02). The LNH 93-4 study compared in patients >60 years the association of 4 cycles of CHOP + radiotherapy to the same regimen without irradiation. This study fails to demonstrate any benefit of the combined chemo-radiotherapy in term of survival, but indicates that chemotherapy alone is probably less toxic in patients older than 69 years. Considering these two trials, we concluded that radiotherapy given after chemotherapy did not give any benefit to elderly patients treated for a low risk localized diffuse large cell lymphoma, and that ACVBP regimen was superior to 3 CHOP + radiotherapy in patients <60 years, and has to be considered as the treatment of reference in these patients. Two other GELA trials contributed recently to improve the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma and have to be considered for the elaboration of future studies: The objective of the LNH 98-5 study was to compare the association of CHOP + rituximab (R-CHOP) to the CHOP regimen alone in elderly patients with previously untreated large B-cell lymphoma. The analysis showed a significant superiority of the association CHOP + rituximab. The LNH 93-5 study compared the ACVBP regimen to the CHOP in patients aged from 61 to 69 years with aggressive lymphoma and at least one adverse prognostic factor according to the International Prognostic Index. Out of 703 patients included in this study, the results have shown the same complete response rate in the two arms, but a significantly better 3-year event free survival and overall survival in the ACVBP arm than in the CHOP arm. However, the benefit seems to be greater in patients <66 years, due to higher toxicity with the ACVBP regimen in elderly patients. All the above-mentioned results led us to propose a randomized trial comparing ACVBP to ACVBP + rituximab (R-ACVBP) in previously untreated patients with low risk localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (age-adjusted IPI = 0), and to extend the upper age limit from 60 to 65 years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma
Keywords
lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell, rituximab, chemotherapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
223 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
R-ACVBP
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
addition of rituximab to standard ACVBP chemotherapy
Arm Title
ACVBP
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
standard ACVBP chemotherapy
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
rituximab
Intervention Description
375 mg/m2 on D1
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Event-free survival (EFS)
Description
events defined as death from any cause, relapse for complete responders (CR) and unconfirmed complete responders (CRu), progression during and after treatment and change of therapy.
Time Frame
4 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Response rate at the end of the treatment
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Disease-free survival for complete responders
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Overall survival
Time Frame
4 years
Title
additionnal toxicities with R-ACVBP
Description
number of SAE
Time Frame
4 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient with histologically proven CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (WHO classification). Age from 18 to 65 years. Patient not previously treated. Ann Arbor stage I or II. ECOG performance status < 2. Normal LDH. Negative HIV, HBV and HCV serologies 4 weeks (except after vaccination). Having previously signed a written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Any other histological type of lymphoma. vAny history of treated or non-treated indolent lymphoma. However, patients not previously diagnosed and having a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with some small cell infiltration in lymph node may be included. Central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma. Contra-indication to any drug contained in the chemotherapy regimens. Poor renal function (creatinin level >150 mmol/l), poor hepatic function (total bilirubin level >30 mmol/l, transaminases >2.5 maximum normal level). Poor bone marrow reserve as defined by neutrophils < 1.5 G/l or platelets < 100 G/l. Any history of cancer during the last 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin tumors or stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma. Any serious active disease (according to the investigator's decision). Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days before planned first cycle of chemotherapy and during the study. Pregnant or lactating women Adult patient under tutelage.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicolas Ketterer, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Lymphoma Study Association
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Felix Reyes, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Lymphoma Study Association
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hervé Tilly, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Lymphoma Study Association
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Corinne Haioun, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Lymphoma Study Association
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'adulte
City
Mont-Godinne
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Hôpital Henri Mondor
City
Créteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94010
Country
France
Facility Name
Hématologie CHU de Lille
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59000
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Saint Louis
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75010
Country
France
Facility Name
Hématologie Adultes - Hôpital Necker
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75743
Country
France
Facility Name
Service d'Hématologie - Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
City
Pierre-Bénite cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
69495
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Robert Debré
City
Reims
ZIP/Postal Code
51092
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Henri Becquerel
City
Rouen
ZIP/Postal Code
76038
Country
France
Facility Name
Hématologie CHU Purpan
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Gustave Roussy
City
Villejuif
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Pluridisciplinaire d'Oncologie, CHUV
City
Lausanne
ZIP/Postal Code
1011
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15788496
Citation
Reyes F, Lepage E, Ganem G, Molina TJ, Brice P, Coiffier B, Morel P, Ferme C, Bosly A, Lederlin P, Laurent G, Tilly H; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA). ACVBP versus CHOP plus radiotherapy for localized aggressive lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 24;352(12):1197-205. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042040.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9647875
Citation
Miller TP, Dahlberg S, Cassady JR, Adelstein DJ, Spier CM, Grogan TM, LeBlanc M, Carlin S, Chase E, Fisher RI. Chemotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 2;339(1):21-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807023390104.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15867204
Citation
Feugier P, Van Hoof A, Sebban C, Solal-Celigny P, Bouabdallah R, Ferme C, Christian B, Lepage E, Tilly H, Morschhauser F, Gaulard P, Salles G, Bosly A, Gisselbrecht C, Reyes F, Coiffier B. Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 20;23(18):4117-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.131. Epub 2005 May 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12920037
Citation
Tilly H, Lepage E, Coiffier B, Blanc M, Herbrecht R, Bosly A, Attal M, Fillet G, Guettier C, Molina TJ, Gisselbrecht C, Reyes F; Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. Intensive conventional chemotherapy (ACVBP regimen) compared with standard CHOP for poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2003 Dec 15;102(13):4284-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0542. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26373676
Citation
Copie-Bergman C, Cuilliere-Dartigues P, Baia M, Briere J, Delarue R, Canioni D, Salles G, Parrens M, Belhadj K, Fabiani B, Recher C, Petrella T, Ketterer N, Peyrade F, Haioun C, Nagel I, Siebert R, Jardin F, Leroy K, Jais JP, Tilly H, Molina TJ, Gaulard P. MYC-IG rearrangements are negative predictors of survival in DLBCL patients treated with immunochemotherapy: a GELA/LYSA study. Blood. 2015 Nov 26;126(22):2466-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-647602. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.gela.org
Description
Official site of the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (In french)

Learn more about this trial

ACVBP Versus ACVBP Plus Rituximab in Low Risk Localized Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs