search
Back to results

Abatacept With Methotrexate- Phase IIB

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Abatacept (BMS-188667)
Abatacept (BMS-188667)
Abatacept (BMS-188667)
Placebo
Sponsored by
Bristol-Myers Squibb
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Double blind study phase: Males or females (not nursing and not pregnant), at least 18 years of age. Women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) are eligible if they are practicing effective contraceptive measures Subjects must meet the criteria of the American Rheumatism Association (1987) for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and the American College of Rheumatology (1991) functional classes I, II, or III Subjects have been taking Methotrexate (10-30 mg weekly) for at least 6 months, and at a stable dose for 28 days prior to treatment Washout/drug stabilization requirements (except Methotrexate) [Informed consent must be signed before making any changes in RA therapy if those changes are solely for the purpose of this study]. Leflunomide or Infliximab have already been discontinued at least 60 days prior to enrollment (prior to signing of informed consent) and a total of 90 days prior to treatment. All other Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) (except Methotrexate) have been withdrawn at least 28 days prior to treatment Oral corticosteroid treatment has been reduced to the equivalent of 10 mg or less prednisone daily and stabilized for at least 28 days prior to enrollment Eligibility of subjects for the study is based on their disease activity and anti-rheumatic treatment at the initial visit: Methotrexate monotherapy: Subject is receiving only Methotrexate, steroids, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and will not require washout Combination therapy: Subject is receiving Methotrexate in combination with another DMARD(s) and will require washout At entry, Methotrexate monotherapy must have a disease activity: 10 or more swollen joints (66 joint count) 12 or more tender joints (68 joint count) C reactive protein (CRP) ≥.1 mg/dL (10 mg/L) at "Screening" visit At entry, combination therapy must have a disease activity (if subject does not satisfy the above): 6 or more swollen joints (66 joint count) 8 or more tender joints (68 joint count) No restriction on C-reactive protein (CRP) In addition All subjects who were on combination therapy at entry must undergo a 28 day washout period of DMARDs other than Methotrexate. After the washout/drug stabilization and prior to randomization such subjects must have: 10 or more swollen joints (66 joint count) 12 or more tender joints (68 joint count) C reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 1 mg/dL (10 mg/L) Subject is willing to participate in the study and willing to sign the informed consent Open label study phase: Participants that have completed the initial short term portion (double blind) of the study Exclusion Criteria: Double blind study phase: Subjects who have at any time received treatment with BMS-188667 (Abatacept) Subjects who within 30 days of the Day 1 visit have received treatment with any investigational drug Subjects with active vasculitis of a major organ system (except for subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules) Current symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, or cerebral disease. Concomitant medical conditions that in the opinion of the investigator might place the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in this study Mammogram requiring further investigation or biopsies leading to the diagnosis of a clinically significant abnormality. Complete evaluation of lesion is required before initiation of dosing Subjects with a history of cancer within the last five years (other than non-melanoma skin cell cancers cured by local resection) Subjects who have a history of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse, or admit to consumption of more than 1 alcoholic drink per day Subjects with evidence (as assessed by the investigator) of active or latent bacterial or viral infections at the time of potential enrollment, including subjects with evidence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection, or hepatitis B or C infection Subjects with any serious or chronic infections such as pneumonia, pyelo-nephritis, renal infection, chest infection with bronchiectasis, or sinusitis in the previous 3 months Subjects with active tuberculosis requiring treatment within the previous 3 years Subjects with any opportunistic infections such as herpes zoster or cytomegalovirus (CMV) within the previous 2 months Subjects with severe asthma defined as > 3 emergency room admissions in the last year or > 3 treatments with oral steroids for asthma in the last year A history of either angioedema or anaphylaxis that was associated with a reaction to a drug Subjects with the following laboratory values: Hemoglobin < 8.5 g/dL White blood cells < 3000/mm3 Platelets < 100,000/mm3 Serum creatinine > 2 times upper limit of normal Serum Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) or Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) > 2 times upper limit of normal Any other lab values that in the opinion of the investigator might place the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in this study Open label study phase: Participants must continue to meet inclusion/exclusion criteria as in the short term (double blind) phase of the protocol except subjects who have receiving other than Abatacept

Sites / Locations

  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution
  • Local Institution

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Abatacept (10 mg/Kg) - Open Label

Abatacept (2 mg/kg) - Double blind

Abatacept (10 mg/kg) - Double blind

Placebo - Double blind

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Responders to American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Criteria (ACR 20) at Day 180 of the Double-Blind (DB) Period
ACR 20 response requires a participant to have a 20% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 20% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in Health Assessment Questionnaire score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 20 response if the participant had ACR 20 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Participants Receiving Concomitant Disease Modifying Rheumatic Drugs and Biologics in Open-Label (OL) Period
The number of participants receiving concomitant rheumatoid arthritis treatment with disease modifying rheumatic drugs and/or biologics.
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in OL Period
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment.SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event. Related AE/SAE=Certain,Probable,Possible,or Missing relationship to drug.
Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest in OL Period
AEs were defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre- existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest were those which may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory agents or infusion of therapeutic proteins. Acute infusional AEs were defined as those that occurred within 1 hour after the start of the infusion. Peri-Infusional AEs were defined as those that occurred within 24 hours after the start of the infusion.
Baseline Serum Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Over Time in OL Period
Time-matched baseline (Day 0) values and post-baseline values were presented for each post-baseline visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-baseline assessment. Mean Change from Baseline data for these cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 6.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in IgA Over Time in OL Period
Blood samples for immunoglobulin assessments were obtained to determine change from baseline in serum IgA. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 5.
Baseline Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Over Time in OL Period
Time-matched baseline (Day 0) values and post-baseline vales were presented for each post-baseline visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-baseline assessment. Mean Change from Baseline data for these cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 8.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in IgG Over Time in OL Period
Blood samples for immunoglobulin assessments were obtained to determine change from baseline in serum IgG. Baseline data for these cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 7.
Baseline Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Over Time in OL Period
Time-matched baseline (Day 0) values and post-baseline values were presented for each post-baseline visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-baseline assessment. Mean Change from Baseline data for these cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 10.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in IgM in OL Period
Blood samples for immunoglobulin assessments were obtained to determine change from baseline in serum IgM. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 9.
Number of Participants With Hematology Values Meeting Marked Abnormality Criteria in OL Period
Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function Values Meeting Marked Abnormality Criteria in OL Period
Number of Participants With Electrolyte Values Meeting Marked Abnormality Criteria in OL Period
Number of Participants With Glucose, Protein, Metabolites, and Urinalysis Values Meeting Marked Abnormality Criteria in OL Period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of ACR 20 Responders in DB Period
ACR 20 response requires a participant to have a 20% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 20% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in HAQ score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 20 response if the participant had ACR 20 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Number of ACR 50 Responders in DB Period
ACR 50 response requires a participant to have a 50% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 50% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in HAQ score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 50 response if the participant had ACR 50 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Number of ACR 70 Responders in DB Period
ACR 70 response requires a participant to have a 70% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 70% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in HAQ score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 70 response if the participant had ACR 70 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
ACR Numeric Values (ACR-N)
The ACR-N is calculated for each participant by taking the lowest percentage improvement in (1) swollen joint count or (2) tender joint count or (3) the median of the remaining 5 components of the ACR response (participant's assessment of disease activity; participant's global assessment of pain; physician's assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function; an acute phase reactant value - CRP). Negative numbers indicate worsening.
ACR-N Area Under The Curve (AUC) on Day 180 and Day 360
The AUC for ACR-N is the measure of the area under the curve of the mean change from baseline in ACR-N. The trapezoidal rule was used to compute the AUC. The ACR-N AUC was compared between the two abatacept treatment groups and the placebo group using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for 6- and 12-month data (Day 180 and Day 360). This allowed for the assessment of subject response throughout the study. See Measure Description in Outcome Measure 18 for a definition of ACR-N.
Individual Components of ACR Criteria--Mean Percentage Change From Baseline at Day 180
Percentage change = 100*(Baseline value - value at specific visit) / Baseline value. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, based on a core set of variables which includes a tender joint count, a swollen joint count, patient-reported pain scale (Subject Assessment of Physical Function [SAPF]), patient and physician global assessments of disease activity (Subject Global Assessment [SGA] and Physician Global Assessment [PGA]), patient assessment of functional ability, and an acute phase reactant (C-Reactive Protein [CRP])
Individual Components of ACR Criteria--Mean Percentage Change From Baseline at Day 360
Percentage change = 100*(Baseline value - value at specific visit) / Baseline value. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, based on a core set of variables which includes a tender joint count, a swollen joint count, patient-reported pain scale (Subject Assessment of Physical Function [SAPF]), patient and physician global assessments of disease activity (Subject Global Assessment [SGA] and Physician Global Assessment [PGA]), patient assessment of functional ability, and an acute phase reactant (C-Reactive Protein [CRP])
Mean Changes From Baseline in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Health Component Summary Scores (PCS and MCS) at Day 180 and Day 360
SF-36 measures health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores: PCS=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; MCS=vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For both, 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score.
Adjusted Mean Percent Changes From Baseline in the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) at Day 180 and Day 360
A shortened version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), which uses only 8 instead of the 20 original items and is used to assess motor performance in everyday activities, such as dressing, turning a faucet on/off, and getting in and out of a car. Percent change from baseline = (baseline - post baseline value) / baseline value x 100.
Number of Participants With At Least One New Active Joint (Tender Joints and Swollen Joints) at Day 180 and Day 360
Participants Who Experienced Death, Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and Discontinuations During the Double-Blind Period
AE: any new untoward medical occurrence/worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. SAE: any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an overdose. Participants who discontinued the study due to any AEs were recorded. Related events include those that were considered by the investigator to be certain, probable, or possibly related to study drug.
Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria for Selected Blood Chemistry Values During Double-Blind Therapy
Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria for Selected Hematologic Values During Double-Blind Therapy
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy in the DB and OL Periods
Immunogenicity Data: Anti-CTLA4Ig Antibodies With Immunoglobulin (IG) Region
Immunogenicity Data: Anti-CTLA4Ig Antibodies Without IG Region
Immunogenicity Data: Categories of Post Baseline Value to Baseline Value (VA/PRE) Ratios and Number of Participants With Sero-conversion (Anti-CTLA4Ig Antibodies With IG Region)
Number of participants with ratio of VA/PRE <=3, <3 to <=9, and >9. Ratios greater than 9 are incidences of Anti-CTLA4Ig sero-conversion.
Immunogenicity Data: Categories of Post Baseline Value to Baseline Value (VA/PRE) Ratios and Number of Participants With Sero-conversion(Anti-CTLA4Ig Antibodies Without IG Region)
Number of participants with ratio of VA/PRE <=3, <3 to <=9, and >9. Ratios greater than 9 are incidences of Anti-CTLA4Ig sero-conversion.
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor at Day 180 and Day 360
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in Interleukin-6 at Day 180 and Day 360
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in Plasma Soluble Interleukin-2 Receptor (sIL-2R) at Day 180 and Day 360
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in E-Selectin at Day 180 and Day 360
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in Soluble Inter-Cellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (sICAM-1) at Day 180 and Day 360
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha at Day 180 and Day 360
Number of ACR 20 Responders in OL Period
ACR 20 response requires a participant to have a 20% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 20% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in Health Assessment Questionnaire score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 20 response if the participant had ACR 20 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Number of ACR 50 Responders in the OL Period
ACR 50 response requires a participant to have a 50% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 50% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in HAQ score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 50 response if the participant had ACR 50 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Number of ACR 70 Responders in the OL Period
ACR 70 response requires a participant to have a 70% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 70% in 3 of the following 5 parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in HAQ score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 70 response if the participant had ACR 70 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Number of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement on the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) in OL Period
The mHAQ is a self-administered questionnaire composed of 20 questions that assess physical functions in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The answers are graded on a 4-point scale: 0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The HAQ disease index is a weighted sum of the scale scores, with a higher score indicating poorer function. A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction from baseline in mHAQ score of at least 0.30 units.
Baseline Level of Serum Rheumatoid Factor Over Time in OL Period
Serum evaluations were carried out to determine participant baseline rheumatoid factor serum concentration. Time-matched baseline(Day 0) values and post-baseline vales were presented for each post-baseline visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-baseline assessment.
Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Rheumatoid Factor Level Over Time in OL Period
Serum evaluations were carried out to determine participant change from baseline in rheumatoid factor serum concentration. Mean change from baseline = value at post-baseline OL time point-value and baseline OL time point.
Mean Baseline Soluble Serum Interleukin-2 Receptor Level (sIL2-r) Over Time in OL Period
Serum evaluations were carried out to determine participant serum levels of sIL2-r at baseline. Time-matched baseline (Day 0) values and post-baseline vales were presented for each post-baseline visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-baseline assessment.
Mean Change From Baseline in sIL2-r Over Time in OL Period
Serum evaluations were carried out to determine participant serum levels of sIL2-r. Mean change from baseline=value at post-baseline OL time point-value and baseline OL time point.
Mean Baseline Serum C-Reactive Protein Level Over Time in OL Period
Serum evaluations were carried out to evaluate participant serum CRP concentrations at baseline. Time-matched BL (Day 0) values and post-BL vales were presented for each post-BL visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-BL assessment.
Mean Change From Baseline in Level of C Reactive Protein Over Time in OL Period
Serum evaluations were carried out to evaluate participant concentrations of serum C reactive protein. Mean change from baseline=value at post-baseline OL time point-value and baseline OL time point.
Mean Baseline Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Over Time in OL Period
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 50.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
The SF-36 consists of 2 summaries, the PCS and the MCS, and 8 individual indexes. The MCS addresses 4 of the 8 individual indices: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from baseline=value at post-baseline OL time point-value and baseline OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 49.
Mean Baseline Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36=PCS, MCS, & 8 individual indices. MCS addresses 4 of the 8 indices: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched baseline (Day 0) values & post-baseline (BL) values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that post-BL assessment. See Outcome Measure 51 for Change from BL.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the MCS of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
The SF-36 consists of 2 summaries, the PCS and the MCS, and 8 individual indexes. The MCS addresses 4 of the 8 individual indices: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from baseline=value at post-baseline OL time point-value and baseline OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 51.
Mean Baseline (BL) Physical Functioning Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 54.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Physical Functioning Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 53.
Mean Baseline Role-Physical Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 56.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Role-Physical Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 55.
Mean Baseline Bodily Pain Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 58.
Mean Change From BL in the Bodily Pain Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 57.
Mean BL General Health Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 60.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the General Health Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 59.
Mean Baseline Vitality Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 62.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Vitality Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 61.
Mean Baseline Social Functioning Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 64.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Social Functioning Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 63.
Mean Baseline Role-Emotional Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 66.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Role-Emotional Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 65.
Mean Baseline Mental Health Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 68.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Mental Health Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 67.

Full Information

First Posted
September 9, 2005
Last Updated
May 30, 2012
Sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00162266
Brief Title
Abatacept With Methotrexate- Phase IIB
Official Title
A Phase IIB, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Two Different Doses of BMS-188667 Administered Intravenously to Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis While Receiving Methotrexate
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2000 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study was conducted to assess the safety and tolerability of Abatacept combined with Methotrexate in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The secondary objectives were to assess efficacy, pharmacodynamic marker activity, and immunogenicity of Abatacept combined with Methotrexate.
Detailed Description
All participants who completed the 12-month double-blind study period were eligible to continue in the open-label study. Participants received placebo, Abatacept 2 mg/kg, or Abatacept 10 mg/kg in the double-blind study. Participants receiving placebo in the double-blind study were switched 1:1 to continued treatment with placebo or Abatacept 2 mg/kg. Participants receiving Abatacept 2 mg/kg or Abatacept 10 mg/kg continued at the double-blind study dosage. After results from the double-blind period became available, all participants were switched to a weight-tiered 10 mg/kg dose of Abatacept. Open label study design: Single group assignment, Single arm, Open label,

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
524 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Abatacept (10 mg/Kg) - Open Label
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Abatacept (2 mg/kg) - Double blind
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Abatacept (10 mg/kg) - Double blind
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Placebo - Double blind
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Abatacept (BMS-188667)
Intervention Description
IV, 10 mg/Kg, monthly, for the duration of the trial
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Abatacept (BMS-188667)
Intervention Description
Intravenous (IV) infusion, 2 mg/kg, infused intravenously for approximately 30 min, infusions on Days 1, 15, 30 and monthly thereafter for 12 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Abatacept (BMS-188667)
Intervention Description
Intravenous (IV) infusion, 10 mg/kg, infused intravenously for approximately 30 min, infusions on Days 1, 15, 30 and monthly thereafter for 12 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Intravenous (IV) infusion, 0 mg/kg, infused intravenously for approximately 30 min, infusions on Days 1, 15, 30 and monthly thereafter for 12 months
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Responders to American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Criteria (ACR 20) at Day 180 of the Double-Blind (DB) Period
Description
ACR 20 response requires a participant to have a 20% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 20% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in Health Assessment Questionnaire score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 20 response if the participant had ACR 20 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Time Frame
Day 180
Title
Participants Receiving Concomitant Disease Modifying Rheumatic Drugs and Biologics in Open-Label (OL) Period
Description
The number of participants receiving concomitant rheumatoid arthritis treatment with disease modifying rheumatic drugs and/or biologics.
Time Frame
Day 360 to Day 3,060
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in OL Period
Description
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment.SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event. Related AE/SAE=Certain,Probable,Possible,or Missing relationship to drug.
Time Frame
Day 360 to Day 3060
Title
Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest in OL Period
Description
AEs were defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre- existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest were those which may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory agents or infusion of therapeutic proteins. Acute infusional AEs were defined as those that occurred within 1 hour after the start of the infusion. Peri-Infusional AEs were defined as those that occurred within 24 hours after the start of the infusion.
Time Frame
Day 360 to Day 3060
Title
Baseline Serum Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Over Time in OL Period
Description
Time-matched baseline (Day 0) values and post-baseline values were presented for each post-baseline visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-baseline assessment. Mean Change from Baseline data for these cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 6.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720,1080, 1440, and 1800
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in IgA Over Time in OL Period
Description
Blood samples for immunoglobulin assessments were obtained to determine change from baseline in serum IgA. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 5.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, and 1800
Title
Baseline Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Over Time in OL Period
Description
Time-matched baseline (Day 0) values and post-baseline vales were presented for each post-baseline visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-baseline assessment. Mean Change from Baseline data for these cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 8.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440 and 1800
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in IgG Over Time in OL Period
Description
Blood samples for immunoglobulin assessments were obtained to determine change from baseline in serum IgG. Baseline data for these cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 7.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, and 1800
Title
Baseline Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Over Time in OL Period
Description
Time-matched baseline (Day 0) values and post-baseline values were presented for each post-baseline visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-baseline assessment. Mean Change from Baseline data for these cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 10.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720,1080,1440, and 1800
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in IgM in OL Period
Description
Blood samples for immunoglobulin assessments were obtained to determine change from baseline in serum IgM. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 9.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, and 1800
Title
Number of Participants With Hematology Values Meeting Marked Abnormality Criteria in OL Period
Time Frame
Day 360 to Day 3060
Title
Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function Values Meeting Marked Abnormality Criteria in OL Period
Time Frame
Day 360 to Day 3060
Title
Number of Participants With Electrolyte Values Meeting Marked Abnormality Criteria in OL Period
Time Frame
Day 360 to Day 3060
Title
Number of Participants With Glucose, Protein, Metabolites, and Urinalysis Values Meeting Marked Abnormality Criteria in OL Period
Time Frame
Day 360 to Day 3060
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of ACR 20 Responders in DB Period
Description
ACR 20 response requires a participant to have a 20% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 20% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in HAQ score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 20 response if the participant had ACR 20 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Time Frame
Days 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150,180, 240, 300, and 360
Title
Number of ACR 50 Responders in DB Period
Description
ACR 50 response requires a participant to have a 50% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 50% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in HAQ score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 50 response if the participant had ACR 50 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Time Frame
Day 15; Day 30; Day 60; Day 90; Day 120; Day 150; Day 180; Day 240; Day 300; Day 360
Title
Number of ACR 70 Responders in DB Period
Description
ACR 70 response requires a participant to have a 70% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 70% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in HAQ score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 70 response if the participant had ACR 70 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Time Frame
Day 15; Day 30; Day 60; Day 90; Day 120; Day 150; Day 180; Day 240; Day 300; Day 360
Title
ACR Numeric Values (ACR-N)
Description
The ACR-N is calculated for each participant by taking the lowest percentage improvement in (1) swollen joint count or (2) tender joint count or (3) the median of the remaining 5 components of the ACR response (participant's assessment of disease activity; participant's global assessment of pain; physician's assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function; an acute phase reactant value - CRP). Negative numbers indicate worsening.
Time Frame
Day 15; Day 30; Day 60; Day 90; Day 120; Day 150; Day 180; Day 240; Day 300; Day 360
Title
ACR-N Area Under The Curve (AUC) on Day 180 and Day 360
Description
The AUC for ACR-N is the measure of the area under the curve of the mean change from baseline in ACR-N. The trapezoidal rule was used to compute the AUC. The ACR-N AUC was compared between the two abatacept treatment groups and the placebo group using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for 6- and 12-month data (Day 180 and Day 360). This allowed for the assessment of subject response throughout the study. See Measure Description in Outcome Measure 18 for a definition of ACR-N.
Time Frame
Baseline and Day 180; Baseline and Day 360
Title
Individual Components of ACR Criteria--Mean Percentage Change From Baseline at Day 180
Description
Percentage change = 100*(Baseline value - value at specific visit) / Baseline value. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, based on a core set of variables which includes a tender joint count, a swollen joint count, patient-reported pain scale (Subject Assessment of Physical Function [SAPF]), patient and physician global assessments of disease activity (Subject Global Assessment [SGA] and Physician Global Assessment [PGA]), patient assessment of functional ability, and an acute phase reactant (C-Reactive Protein [CRP])
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180
Title
Individual Components of ACR Criteria--Mean Percentage Change From Baseline at Day 360
Description
Percentage change = 100*(Baseline value - value at specific visit) / Baseline value. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, based on a core set of variables which includes a tender joint count, a swollen joint count, patient-reported pain scale (Subject Assessment of Physical Function [SAPF]), patient and physician global assessments of disease activity (Subject Global Assessment [SGA] and Physician Global Assessment [PGA]), patient assessment of functional ability, and an acute phase reactant (C-Reactive Protein [CRP])
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 360
Title
Mean Changes From Baseline in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Health Component Summary Scores (PCS and MCS) at Day 180 and Day 360
Description
SF-36 measures health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores: PCS=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; MCS=vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For both, 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180, Day 360
Title
Adjusted Mean Percent Changes From Baseline in the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) at Day 180 and Day 360
Description
A shortened version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), which uses only 8 instead of the 20 original items and is used to assess motor performance in everyday activities, such as dressing, turning a faucet on/off, and getting in and out of a car. Percent change from baseline = (baseline - post baseline value) / baseline value x 100.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180, Day 360
Title
Number of Participants With At Least One New Active Joint (Tender Joints and Swollen Joints) at Day 180 and Day 360
Time Frame
Day 180, Day 360
Title
Participants Who Experienced Death, Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and Discontinuations During the Double-Blind Period
Description
AE: any new untoward medical occurrence/worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. SAE: any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an overdose. Participants who discontinued the study due to any AEs were recorded. Related events include those that were considered by the investigator to be certain, probable, or possibly related to study drug.
Time Frame
From the start of study through the end of the double-blind period (at 12 months)
Title
Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria for Selected Blood Chemistry Values During Double-Blind Therapy
Time Frame
From the start of study up to 60 days post the end of the 12-month double-blind period
Title
Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria for Selected Hematologic Values During Double-Blind Therapy
Time Frame
From the start of study up to 60 days post the end of the 12-month double-blind period
Title
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy in the DB and OL Periods
Time Frame
Day 1 to Day 360 (Double-Blind Period), Day 361 to Day 3060 (Open-Label Period)
Title
Immunogenicity Data: Anti-CTLA4Ig Antibodies With Immunoglobulin (IG) Region
Time Frame
Baseline, Days 30, 90, 180, 270, 360
Title
Immunogenicity Data: Anti-CTLA4Ig Antibodies Without IG Region
Time Frame
Baseline, Days 30, 90, 180, 270, 360
Title
Immunogenicity Data: Categories of Post Baseline Value to Baseline Value (VA/PRE) Ratios and Number of Participants With Sero-conversion (Anti-CTLA4Ig Antibodies With IG Region)
Description
Number of participants with ratio of VA/PRE <=3, <3 to <=9, and >9. Ratios greater than 9 are incidences of Anti-CTLA4Ig sero-conversion.
Time Frame
Baseline, Days 30, 90, 180, 270, 360
Title
Immunogenicity Data: Categories of Post Baseline Value to Baseline Value (VA/PRE) Ratios and Number of Participants With Sero-conversion(Anti-CTLA4Ig Antibodies Without IG Region)
Description
Number of participants with ratio of VA/PRE <=3, <3 to <=9, and >9. Ratios greater than 9 are incidences of Anti-CTLA4Ig sero-conversion.
Time Frame
Baseline, Days 30, 90, 180, 270, 360
Title
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor at Day 180 and Day 360
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180, Day 360
Title
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in Interleukin-6 at Day 180 and Day 360
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180, Day 360
Title
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in Plasma Soluble Interleukin-2 Receptor (sIL-2R) at Day 180 and Day 360
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180, Day 360
Title
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in E-Selectin at Day 180 and Day 360
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180, Day 360
Title
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in Soluble Inter-Cellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (sICAM-1) at Day 180 and Day 360
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180, Day 360
Title
Pharmacodynamic Measure: Mean Changes From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha at Day 180 and Day 360
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 180, Day 360
Title
Number of ACR 20 Responders in OL Period
Description
ACR 20 response requires a participant to have a 20% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 20% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in Health Assessment Questionnaire score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 20 response if the participant had ACR 20 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Time Frame
Days 360, 450, 540, 630, 720, 810, 900, 1080, 1350, 1440, 1530, 1620, 1710, 1800, 1980, 2160, 2340, 2520, 2700, 2880, and 3060
Title
Number of ACR 50 Responders in the OL Period
Description
ACR 50 response requires a participant to have a 50% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 50% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in HAQ score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 50 response if the participant had ACR 50 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Time Frame
Days 360, 450, 540, 630, 720, 810, 900, 1080, 1350, 1440, 1530, 1620, 1710, 1800, 1980, 2160, 2340, 2520, 2700, 2880, and 3060
Title
Number of ACR 70 Responders in the OL Period
Description
ACR 70 response requires a participant to have a 70% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 70% in 3 of the following 5 parameters: physician global assessment of disease, participant global assessment of disease, participant assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in HAQ score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 70 response if the participant had ACR 70 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.
Time Frame
Days 360, 450, 540, 630, 720, 810, 900, 1080, 1350, 1440, 1530, 1620, 1710, 1800, 1980, 2160, 2340, 2520, 2700, 2880, and 3060
Title
Number of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement on the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) in OL Period
Description
The mHAQ is a self-administered questionnaire composed of 20 questions that assess physical functions in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The answers are graded on a 4-point scale: 0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The HAQ disease index is a weighted sum of the scale scores, with a higher score indicating poorer function. A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction from baseline in mHAQ score of at least 0.30 units.
Time Frame
Days 360, 720,1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Baseline Level of Serum Rheumatoid Factor Over Time in OL Period
Description
Serum evaluations were carried out to determine participant baseline rheumatoid factor serum concentration. Time-matched baseline(Day 0) values and post-baseline vales were presented for each post-baseline visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-baseline assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720,1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Rheumatoid Factor Level Over Time in OL Period
Description
Serum evaluations were carried out to determine participant change from baseline in rheumatoid factor serum concentration. Mean change from baseline = value at post-baseline OL time point-value and baseline OL time point.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720,1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Baseline Soluble Serum Interleukin-2 Receptor Level (sIL2-r) Over Time in OL Period
Description
Serum evaluations were carried out to determine participant serum levels of sIL2-r at baseline. Time-matched baseline (Day 0) values and post-baseline vales were presented for each post-baseline visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-baseline assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720,1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in sIL2-r Over Time in OL Period
Description
Serum evaluations were carried out to determine participant serum levels of sIL2-r. Mean change from baseline=value at post-baseline OL time point-value and baseline OL time point.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, and 1800
Title
Mean Baseline Serum C-Reactive Protein Level Over Time in OL Period
Description
Serum evaluations were carried out to evaluate participant serum CRP concentrations at baseline. Time-matched BL (Day 0) values and post-BL vales were presented for each post-BL visit and represent only that cohort of participants with measurements available at that post-BL assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080,1440,1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Level of C Reactive Protein Over Time in OL Period
Description
Serum evaluations were carried out to evaluate participant concentrations of serum C reactive protein. Mean change from baseline=value at post-baseline OL time point-value and baseline OL time point.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, 3060
Title
Mean Baseline Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 50.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
The SF-36 consists of 2 summaries, the PCS and the MCS, and 8 individual indexes. The MCS addresses 4 of the 8 individual indices: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from baseline=value at post-baseline OL time point-value and baseline OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 49.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Baseline Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36=PCS, MCS, & 8 individual indices. MCS addresses 4 of the 8 indices: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched baseline (Day 0) values & post-baseline (BL) values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that post-BL assessment. See Outcome Measure 51 for Change from BL.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the MCS of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
The SF-36 consists of 2 summaries, the PCS and the MCS, and 8 individual indexes. The MCS addresses 4 of the 8 individual indices: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from baseline=value at post-baseline OL time point-value and baseline OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 51.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 450, 540, 630, 720, 810, 900, 1080, 1350, 1440, 1530, 1620, 1710, 1800, 1980, 2160, 2340, 2520, 2700, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Baseline (BL) Physical Functioning Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 54.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Physical Functioning Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 53.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Baseline Role-Physical Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 56.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Role-Physical Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 55.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Baseline Bodily Pain Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 58.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From BL in the Bodily Pain Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 57.
Time Frame
BL (Day 0); Day 360; Day 720; Day 1,080; Day 1,440; Day 1,800; Day 2,160; Day 2,520; Day 2,880; Day 3,060
Title
Mean BL General Health Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 60.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the General Health Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 59.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Baseline Vitality Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 62.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Vitality Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 61.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Baseline Social Functioning Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 64.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Social Functioning Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 63.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Baseline Role-Emotional Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 66.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Role-Emotional Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 65.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Baseline Mental Health Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36 = PCS & MCS & 8 individual indices (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health). Subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Time-matched BL & post-BL values are presented for each post-BL visit & represent only that cohort with measurements available at that assessment. Change from BL data are presented in Outcome Measure 68.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060
Title
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in the Mental Health Domain of the SF-36 Over Time in OL Period
Description
SF-36=2 summaries (PCS & MCS) & 8 individual indices including physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 & a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Mean change from BL = value at post-BL OL time point-value and BL OL time point. Baseline data for these time-matched cohorts are presented in Outcome Measure 67.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 0) and Days 360, 720, 1080, 1440, 1800, 2160, 2520, 2880, and 3060

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Double blind study phase: Males or females (not nursing and not pregnant), at least 18 years of age. Women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) are eligible if they are practicing effective contraceptive measures Subjects must meet the criteria of the American Rheumatism Association (1987) for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and the American College of Rheumatology (1991) functional classes I, II, or III Subjects have been taking Methotrexate (10-30 mg weekly) for at least 6 months, and at a stable dose for 28 days prior to treatment Washout/drug stabilization requirements (except Methotrexate) [Informed consent must be signed before making any changes in RA therapy if those changes are solely for the purpose of this study]. Leflunomide or Infliximab have already been discontinued at least 60 days prior to enrollment (prior to signing of informed consent) and a total of 90 days prior to treatment. All other Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) (except Methotrexate) have been withdrawn at least 28 days prior to treatment Oral corticosteroid treatment has been reduced to the equivalent of 10 mg or less prednisone daily and stabilized for at least 28 days prior to enrollment Eligibility of subjects for the study is based on their disease activity and anti-rheumatic treatment at the initial visit: Methotrexate monotherapy: Subject is receiving only Methotrexate, steroids, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and will not require washout Combination therapy: Subject is receiving Methotrexate in combination with another DMARD(s) and will require washout At entry, Methotrexate monotherapy must have a disease activity: 10 or more swollen joints (66 joint count) 12 or more tender joints (68 joint count) C reactive protein (CRP) ≥.1 mg/dL (10 mg/L) at "Screening" visit At entry, combination therapy must have a disease activity (if subject does not satisfy the above): 6 or more swollen joints (66 joint count) 8 or more tender joints (68 joint count) No restriction on C-reactive protein (CRP) In addition All subjects who were on combination therapy at entry must undergo a 28 day washout period of DMARDs other than Methotrexate. After the washout/drug stabilization and prior to randomization such subjects must have: 10 or more swollen joints (66 joint count) 12 or more tender joints (68 joint count) C reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 1 mg/dL (10 mg/L) Subject is willing to participate in the study and willing to sign the informed consent Open label study phase: Participants that have completed the initial short term portion (double blind) of the study Exclusion Criteria: Double blind study phase: Subjects who have at any time received treatment with BMS-188667 (Abatacept) Subjects who within 30 days of the Day 1 visit have received treatment with any investigational drug Subjects with active vasculitis of a major organ system (except for subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules) Current symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, or cerebral disease. Concomitant medical conditions that in the opinion of the investigator might place the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in this study Mammogram requiring further investigation or biopsies leading to the diagnosis of a clinically significant abnormality. Complete evaluation of lesion is required before initiation of dosing Subjects with a history of cancer within the last five years (other than non-melanoma skin cell cancers cured by local resection) Subjects who have a history of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse, or admit to consumption of more than 1 alcoholic drink per day Subjects with evidence (as assessed by the investigator) of active or latent bacterial or viral infections at the time of potential enrollment, including subjects with evidence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection, or hepatitis B or C infection Subjects with any serious or chronic infections such as pneumonia, pyelo-nephritis, renal infection, chest infection with bronchiectasis, or sinusitis in the previous 3 months Subjects with active tuberculosis requiring treatment within the previous 3 years Subjects with any opportunistic infections such as herpes zoster or cytomegalovirus (CMV) within the previous 2 months Subjects with severe asthma defined as > 3 emergency room admissions in the last year or > 3 treatments with oral steroids for asthma in the last year A history of either angioedema or anaphylaxis that was associated with a reaction to a drug Subjects with the following laboratory values: Hemoglobin < 8.5 g/dL White blood cells < 3000/mm3 Platelets < 100,000/mm3 Serum creatinine > 2 times upper limit of normal Serum Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) or Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) > 2 times upper limit of normal Any other lab values that in the opinion of the investigator might place the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in this study Open label study phase: Participants must continue to meet inclusion/exclusion criteria as in the short term (double blind) phase of the protocol except subjects who have receiving other than Abatacept
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Organizational Affiliation
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Highlands Ranch
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Largo
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Titusville
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Rome
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Cumberland
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Springfield
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Duluth
State/Province
Minnesota
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Los Alamos
State/Province
New Mexico
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Binghamton
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Sellersville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Amarillo
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Quilmes
State/Province
Burenos Aires
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Buenos Aries
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Adelaide
State/Province
South Australia
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Malvern
State/Province
Victoria
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Perth
State/Province
Western Australia
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Antwerpen
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Bruxelles
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Leuven
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Mons
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Ste-Foy
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
St. John
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Montpellier
State/Province
Cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Strasbourg
State/Province
Cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Freiburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Jena
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Cork
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Nijmegen
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Muckleneuk
State/Province
Gauteng
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Cape Town
State/Province
Western Cape
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Cambridge
State/Province
Cambridgeshire
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Manchester
State/Province
Greater Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Maidstone
State/Province
Kent
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Local Institution
City
Leeds
State/Province
Yorkshire
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25005467
Citation
Westhovens R, Kremer JM, Emery P, Russell AS, Alten R, Barre E, Dougados M. Long-term safety and efficacy of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a 7-year extended study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;32(4):553-62. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Abatacept With Methotrexate- Phase IIB

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs