search
Back to results

Compare Combined Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilation (ESBD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy (ES) in Removing Biliary Stones

Primary Purpose

Common Bile Duct Stone

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
endoscopic balloon dilatation
Standard sphincterotomy
Sponsored by
Chinese University of Hong Kong
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Common Bile Duct Stone

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients at least 18 years old, presented to Prince of Wales Hospital for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for known or suspected bile duct stones are invited to participate. Informed consent will be obtained before the beginning of ERCP. Patients are randomized to EST or ESBD after confirming the presence of bile duct stones on the initial cholangiogram Exclusion Criteria: septic shock, coagulopathy (international normalized ratio >1.3, partial thromboplastin time greater than twice that of control), platelet count <50,000x103/uL or ampullary tumors

Sites / Locations

  • Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Standard sphincterotomy (ES)

Sphincterotomy plus balloon dilation (ESBD)

Arm Description

After deep cannulation, a pull-type sphincterotomy will be performed with a 25mm sphincterotome (eg clever cut, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with division of sphincter up to the duodenal wall. A complete sphincterotomy is defined by the free passage of a fully bowed sphincterotome with a 25m wire and spontaneous bile drainage.

After complete sphincterotomy, a 3-cm long 15mm diameter CRE balloon is passed over a guidewire across the lower end of common bile duct. The contrast filled balloon is inflated to the size of the bile duct for around 30 seconds until waisting is abolished.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

stone clearance rate at the index session
The ability to achieve complete stone clearance on the first ERCP

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of ERCP's required to achieve stone clearance
The number of ERCP procedures required to achieve complete stone clearance in the bile duct
ERCP related complications
These include complications that were described in consensus published in 1991

Full Information

First Posted
September 11, 2005
Last Updated
February 16, 2012
Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00164853
Brief Title
Compare Combined Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilation (ESBD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy (ES) in Removing Biliary Stones
Official Title
Combined Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilation (ESBD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy (ES) in Removing Biliary Stones-a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To compare the technique of combined balloon sphincter dilation after an initial sphincterotomy and standard sphincterotomy in the endoscopic removal of large bile duct stones. The investigators hypothesize that combined balloon dilation and sphincterotomy allows for easier stone removal without added morbidities when compared to standard sphincterotomy.
Detailed Description
Endoscopic sphincterotomy is a standard technique to enlarge the bile duct opening before stone removal during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, complete sphincter ablation by endoscopic sphincterotomy is not always possible. Also, due to the tapering end of the distal duct, standard sphincterotomy may not be adequate for removal of particularly large stones. In a retrospective series by Ersoz et al, the addition of balloon dilation after sphincterotomy achieves a high stone clearance rate (89-95%). The investigators postulate that the combination of endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by balloon dilation may allow easier stone retrieval with acceptable complication rate.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Common Bile Duct Stone

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
180 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard sphincterotomy (ES)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
After deep cannulation, a pull-type sphincterotomy will be performed with a 25mm sphincterotome (eg clever cut, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with division of sphincter up to the duodenal wall. A complete sphincterotomy is defined by the free passage of a fully bowed sphincterotome with a 25m wire and spontaneous bile drainage.
Arm Title
Sphincterotomy plus balloon dilation (ESBD)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
After complete sphincterotomy, a 3-cm long 15mm diameter CRE balloon is passed over a guidewire across the lower end of common bile duct. The contrast filled balloon is inflated to the size of the bile duct for around 30 seconds until waisting is abolished.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
endoscopic balloon dilatation
Intervention Description
Refer to description under arms
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Standard sphincterotomy
Intervention Description
Refer to under arms
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
stone clearance rate at the index session
Description
The ability to achieve complete stone clearance on the first ERCP
Time Frame
24 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of ERCP's required to achieve stone clearance
Description
The number of ERCP procedures required to achieve complete stone clearance in the bile duct
Time Frame
3 months
Title
ERCP related complications
Description
These include complications that were described in consensus published in 1991
Time Frame
30 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients at least 18 years old, presented to Prince of Wales Hospital for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for known or suspected bile duct stones are invited to participate. Informed consent will be obtained before the beginning of ERCP. Patients are randomized to EST or ESBD after confirming the presence of bile duct stones on the initial cholangiogram Exclusion Criteria: septic shock, coagulopathy (international normalized ratio >1.3, partial thromboplastin time greater than twice that of control), platelet count <50,000x103/uL or ampullary tumors
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Frances KY Cheung, MBChB
Organizational Affiliation
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital
City
Hong Kong
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23085096
Citation
Teoh AYB, Cheung FKY, Hu B, Pan YM, Lai LH, Chiu PWY, Wong SKH, Chan FKL, Lau JYW. Randomized trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy alone for removal of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology. 2013 Feb;144(2):341-345.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.027. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Compare Combined Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilation (ESBD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy (ES) in Removing Biliary Stones

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs