Back to resultsClinical Comparison of RPDs Retained by Conical and Galvanoformed Double Crowns.
Primary Purpose
Denture, Partial, Removable, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Oral Health
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
survival failure of more than 20 %
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Denture, Partial, Removable
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Indication for RPDs retained by double crowns; 2 to 6 Abutment teeth; Exclusion Criteria: limited contractual capability and absence of consent of the patient
Sites / Locations
- University of Heidelberg
- University of Heidelberg
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00176215
First Posted
September 13, 2005
Last Updated
September 13, 2005
Sponsor
Heidelberg University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00176215
Brief Title
Clinical Comparison of RPDs Retained by Conical and Galvanoformed Double Crowns.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2005
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
May 2003 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Heidelberg University
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to investigate the clinical performance and complication rate of RPDs (Removable partial dentures) retained on conventional conical double crowns in comparison to galvanoformed telscopic double crowns. Additionally the OHIP (Oral Health related Qualitiy of Life)and the abrasion of the teeth were investigated.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Denture, Partial, Removable, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Oral Health, Tooth Abrasion
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
survival failure of more than 20 %
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Indication for RPDs retained by double crowns; 2 to 6 Abutment teeth;
Exclusion Criteria:
limited contractual capability and absence of consent of the patient
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christiane Grossmann, DDS
Organizational Affiliation
Heidelberg University
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Franziska Lehmann, DDS
Organizational Affiliation
Heidelberg University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Heidelberg
City
Heidelberg
State/Province
Baden-Württemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University of Heidelberg
City
Heidelberg
State/Province
Baden_Württemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69120
Country
Germany
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Comparison of RPDs Retained by Conical and Galvanoformed Double Crowns.
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs