search
Back to results

A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy

Primary Purpose

Colonoscopy, Colon Polyps

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
fospropofol disodium
Sponsored by
Eisai Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Colonoscopy focused on measuring Colonoscopy, Seadation

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patient provided a signed/dated Informed Consent and HIPAA authorization after receiving a full explanation of the extent and nature of the study. Patient was over 65 years of age at the time of screening. Patient met ASA Physical Status Classification of I to III. Exclusion Criteria: Patient had a history of allergic reaction or hypersensitivity to any anesthetic agent, narcotic, or benzodiazepine. Patient did not meet nils per os (NPO) status per ASA Guideline or institution's guideline. Patient had condition(s) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with appropriate airway management. Patient had a history of mental or visual impairment that would not permit successful measurement of cognitive evaluations. Patient was unwilling to adhere to pre- and postprocedural instructions. The use of fentanyl or midazolam was contraindicated for the patient. Patient had participated in an investigational drug study within 1 month prior to study start. Patient had prior exposure to AQUAVAN.

Sites / Locations

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    The primary efficacy endpoint was Sedation Success defined as a patient having 3 consecutive Modified OAA/S scores ≤4 and completing the procedure without requiring alternative sedative medications and without requiring manual or mechanical ventilation.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Measures of recovery and cognitive functions by the blinded evaluator
    Time to Fully Recovered from the end of the procedure
    Time to Fully Alert from the end of the procedure
    Change from baseline DSST score over time during the Recovery period
    Measures of sedation adequacy
    Modified OAA/S scores over time during the Dosing Initiation, Procedural, and Recovery periods
    Duration and percent of time when a patient's Modified OAA/S score is at each level between the first dose of study medication and Fully Alert, inclusive
    Duration of sedation
    Number of doses of study medication administered for the procedure
    Time to sedation
    Time that splenic flexure, hepatic flexure, and cecum are reached, and time to end of procedure
    Number of repositionings
    ·Number of procedure interruptions due to inadequate sedation
    Patient-reported outcome and Investigator's assessment
    Patient's rating of experience after Fully Recovered (including patient's level of sedation, memory recall, pain/discomfort, and willingness to be treated again);
    Patient's rating at 24-hour telephone survey (including time to normal food intake and time to resuming normal activities)
    Investigator's rating at the end of the procedure (including patient's level of sedation, pain/discomfort, anxiety, response to instructions, overall satisfaction with the study drug, and willingness to be use sedatives again)
    Blinded evaluator's rating after Fully Recovered
    Safety Variables
    The following were safety endpoints:
    Nature, frequency, severity, relationship to treatment, and outcome of all treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs)
    Airway management (manual repositioning, increased oxygen flow, verbal or tactile stimulation)
    Airway intervention (suction, manual ventilation, endotracheal intubation or other mechanical airway management)
    Sedation-related AEs (hypopnea, apnea, hypoxemia, bradycardia, hypotension,)
    Alternative sedation/hypnotic medications

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 13, 2005
    Last Updated
    June 16, 2023
    Sponsor
    Eisai Inc.
    Collaborators
    PPD, Covance, Quest Pharmaceutical Services
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT00209599
    Brief Title
    A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy
    Official Title
    A Phase II, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Elderly Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Procedures
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    November 2008
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Terminated
    Study Start Date
    February 2005 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    undefined (undefined)
    Study Completion Date
    March 2005 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Name of the Sponsor
    Eisai Inc.
    Collaborators
    PPD, Covance, Quest Pharmaceutical Services

    4. Oversight

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This study was designed to demonstrate that AQUAVAN® is effective in providing adequate sedation in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy as well as to assess the safety profile of AQUAVAN versus that of midazolam. Prior to the procedure, patients received fentanyl citrate for pain management followed five minutes later by AQUAVAN® Injection for sedation. Throughout the procedure, study personnel assessed the patient's vital signs and depth of sedation. After the procedure, the patient, physician, and an evaluator were asked to complete satisfaction surveys.
    Detailed Description
    This is a randomized, open-label study designed to assess the safety and efficacy of AQUAVAN ® Injection versus midazolam HCl following pretreatment with an analgesic, fentanyl citrate injection, in producing sedation in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy. Following completion of preprocedure sedation assessments, patients will be randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 i.v. treatment groups at a 4:1 (AQUAVAN®. Injection: midazolam HCl) allocation ratio. To ensure that a distribution of ages is obtained, enrollment will be stratified into 2 equal-size groups by age (>65 to <72 years of age and >72 years of age). Randomization will be stratified by site within each age group. All patients will receive fentanyl citrate injection as an analgesic pretreatment. Supplemental doses of fentanyl citrate injection may be administered if the patient reports pain or if inadequate analgesia is present as demonstrated by increased heart rate and/or blood pressure in the presence of adequate sedation. At no time should fentanyl citrate injection be administered to increase sedation levels. AQUAVAN®. Injection and midazolam HCl will be administered to induce a state of adequate sedation, defined as a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) score of 4 or less. Supplemental doses will be administered to increase depth or duration of sedation. Supplemental doses will not be administered if the Modified OAA/S score is 2 or less or if there is no purposeful response to stimulation. The depth of sedation will be measured by the Modified OAA/S scale, a validated measure. Patient and Investigator assessments will be used to confirm the depth of sedation provided met the goals of sedation, reduction of anxiety and reduced awareness.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Colonoscopy, Colon Polyps
    Keywords
    Colonoscopy, Seadation

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 2
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    100 (false)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    fospropofol disodium
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    The primary efficacy endpoint was Sedation Success defined as a patient having 3 consecutive Modified OAA/S scores ≤4 and completing the procedure without requiring alternative sedative medications and without requiring manual or mechanical ventilation.
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Measures of recovery and cognitive functions by the blinded evaluator
    Title
    Time to Fully Recovered from the end of the procedure
    Title
    Time to Fully Alert from the end of the procedure
    Title
    Change from baseline DSST score over time during the Recovery period
    Title
    Measures of sedation adequacy
    Title
    Modified OAA/S scores over time during the Dosing Initiation, Procedural, and Recovery periods
    Title
    Duration and percent of time when a patient's Modified OAA/S score is at each level between the first dose of study medication and Fully Alert, inclusive
    Title
    Duration of sedation
    Title
    Number of doses of study medication administered for the procedure
    Title
    Time to sedation
    Title
    Time that splenic flexure, hepatic flexure, and cecum are reached, and time to end of procedure
    Title
    Number of repositionings
    Title
    ·Number of procedure interruptions due to inadequate sedation
    Title
    Patient-reported outcome and Investigator's assessment
    Title
    Patient's rating of experience after Fully Recovered (including patient's level of sedation, memory recall, pain/discomfort, and willingness to be treated again);
    Title
    Patient's rating at 24-hour telephone survey (including time to normal food intake and time to resuming normal activities)
    Title
    Investigator's rating at the end of the procedure (including patient's level of sedation, pain/discomfort, anxiety, response to instructions, overall satisfaction with the study drug, and willingness to be use sedatives again)
    Title
    Blinded evaluator's rating after Fully Recovered
    Title
    Safety Variables
    Title
    The following were safety endpoints:
    Title
    Nature, frequency, severity, relationship to treatment, and outcome of all treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs)
    Title
    Airway management (manual repositioning, increased oxygen flow, verbal or tactile stimulation)
    Title
    Airway intervention (suction, manual ventilation, endotracheal intubation or other mechanical airway management)
    Title
    Sedation-related AEs (hypopnea, apnea, hypoxemia, bradycardia, hypotension,)
    Title
    Alternative sedation/hypnotic medications

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patient provided a signed/dated Informed Consent and HIPAA authorization after receiving a full explanation of the extent and nature of the study. Patient was over 65 years of age at the time of screening. Patient met ASA Physical Status Classification of I to III. Exclusion Criteria: Patient had a history of allergic reaction or hypersensitivity to any anesthetic agent, narcotic, or benzodiazepine. Patient did not meet nils per os (NPO) status per ASA Guideline or institution's guideline. Patient had condition(s) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with appropriate airway management. Patient had a history of mental or visual impairment that would not permit successful measurement of cognitive evaluations. Patient was unwilling to adhere to pre- and postprocedural instructions. The use of fentanyl or midazolam was contraindicated for the patient. Patient had participated in an investigational drug study within 1 month prior to study start. Patient had prior exposure to AQUAVAN.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    James Jones, MD,PharmD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Eisai Inc.
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs