search
Back to results

CAFE Study - Cancer Patient Fracture Evaluation (CAFE)

Primary Purpose

Cancer, Spinal Fractures

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Balloon Kyphoplasty
Non Surgical Management
Sponsored by
Medtronic Spine LLC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cancer focused on measuring Balloon Kyphoplasty, Cancer, Vertebral Compression Fracture, Back Pain, Spine

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: One to 3 painful (pain on palpation/percussion over fractured vertebral body) VCF(s), T5-L5, with either bone marrow edema imaged by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or a fracture imaged by plain radiographs using the method of Genant Pain NRS score ≥4 on a scale of 0 to 10 When the patient is newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma, the pain assessment must not be done until after completion of at least one pulse of steroid therapy or one week after the initiation of active multiple myeloma therapy. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ≥ 10 on a scale of 0 to 24 Patients must be at least 21 years old. No change in chemotherapy regimen (change in dose(s) permitted) for 1 month prior to enrollment No change in chemotherapy regimen (change in dose(s) permitted) planned for at least 1 month following enrollment No major surgery to the spine planned for at least 1 month following enrollment Life expectancy of ≥ 3 months Patient has sufficient mental capacity to comply with the protocol requirements Patient has stated availability for all study visits Patient is able to understand the risks and benefits of participating in the study and is willing to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with primary tumors of the bone (e.g., osteosarcoma) or solitary plasmacytoma at site of the index VCF. Patients with these tumors in anatomic sites other than the index VCF are eligible. Concurrent Phase I investigational anti-cancer treatment Significant clinical morbidities (aside from the index fracture(s) and cancer) that may potentially interfere with the collection of data concerning pain and function VCF morphology deemed unsuitable for balloon kyphoplasty Additional non-kyphoplasty surgical treatment is required for the index fracture Patients requiring the use of high-dose steroid (≥ 100 mg prednisone or 20 mg dexamethasone per day), intravenous (IV) pain medication, or nerve block to control chronic back pain unrelated to index VCF(s). Patients who receive high-dose steroids for treatment of their cancer (for at least 30 days) are eligible. Patients with a platelet count of < 20,000 measured at the time of hospital admission for the procedure Spinal cord compression or canal compromise requiring decompression Patients with osteoblastic tumors at the site of index VCF. Patients with osteoblastic tumors outside of vertebral levels intended for kyphoplasty may be enrolled. Medical/surgical conditions contrary to the balloon kyphoplasty procedure (e.g., in the presence of active or incompletely treated local infection) Known allergy to bone cement or contrast medium used in the treatment of study subjects MRI contraindication (e.g., cerebral aneurysm clips, pacemaker, implanted biostimulators, cochlear implants, penile prosthesis) Positive baseline pregnancy test (for women of child-bearing potential) Patients who may require allogeneic bone marrow transplantation during the course of the study. Other Reasons for Lack of Enrollment: A. Patient is afraid to have surgery B. Patient is afraid to have anesthesia C. Patient/family is not willing to participate in research D. Patient is not willing to be randomized

Sites / Locations

  • Valley Radiology Inc., UCSD
  • Boulder Neurosurgical Associates
  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
  • Sibley Memorial Hospital
  • Greater Oncology Associates
  • Karmanos Cancer Center
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • University of Utah
  • St. Vincent's Hospital
  • The Alfred Hospital
  • Institut Jules Bordet
  • Foothills Hospital
  • Toronto Western Hospital
  • Montreal General Hospital
  • Charité Virchow-Klinikum
  • Medizinische Hochschule
  • National Center for Spinal Disorders
  • Akademiska Sjukhuset
  • Royal London

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Balloon Kyphoplasty (BKP)

Non Surgical Management

Arm Description

The subjects assigned to this group will undergo the treatment with Balloon kyphoplasty for their painful VCFs.

The subjects in this group will undergo the non-operative treatments aimed at alleviation of back pain and restoration of decreased function associated with VCFs.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The Functional Status, as Measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) at 1 Month
The full scale name is the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; it is a validated measure of physical disability due to back pain. The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 24 (maximum disability)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Score
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was used to assess the physical disability due to back pain. The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 24 (maximum disability).
Change in Functional Status Assessed With the Karnofsky Performance Scale
The Karnofsky Performance Scale rates a patient on an 11-step scale from 0 (dead) to 100 (normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease).
Change in Functional Status Assessed With the Karnofsky Performance Scale
The Karnofsky Performance Scale rates a patient on an 11-step scale from 0 (dead) to 100 (normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease).
Change in Back Pain
Back pain was assessed on a 10-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Change in Back Pain
Back pain was assessed on a NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Change in Quality of Life.
The SF-36 was used to assess quality of life. The SF-36 results were summarized into two components, a physical component summary score (PCS) (0-100) and a mental component summary score (MCS) (0-100). The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Change in Quality of Life
The SF-36 were used to assess quality of life. The SF-36 results were summarized into two components, a physical component summary score (PCS) (0-100) and a mental component summary score (MCS) (0-100). The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Activities Reduced Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Activities Reduced Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Number of Days With Reduced Activities Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Number of Days With Reduced Activities Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Number of Days in Bed Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Number of Days in Bed Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Ambulatory Status Change From Baseline to One Month
Ambulatory status was assessed using a three-category system, fully ambulatory, ambulatory with assistance, or not ambulatory.
Ambulatory Status Change
Ambulatory status was assessed using a three-category system, fully ambulatory, ambulatory with assistance, or not ambulatory.
Index Spinal Deformity Change Measured by Index Vertebral Body Angles From Baseline to 1 Month
Index spinal deformity was measured by Kyphotic angle, local Cobb angle, thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle, and anterior, middle and posterior vertebral body heights for each index VCF.
Index Spinal Deformity Change Measured by Index Vertebral Body Angles
Index spinal deformity was measured by Kyphotic angle, local Cobb angle, thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle, and anterior, middle and posterior vertebral body heights for each index VCF.
Index Spinal Deformity Change Measured by Index Vertebral Body Height Ratio
Index spinal deformity was measured by Kyphotic angle, local Cobb angle, thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle, and anterior, middle and posterior vertebral body heights for each index VCF. Index Vertebral Body Height Ratio (VBHR) was defined as index vertebra height divided by the average of normal superior and inferior adjacent vertebrae.
Index Spinal Deformity Change Measured by Index Vertebral Body Height Ratio
Index spinal deformity was measured by Kyphotic angle, local Cobb angle, thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle, and anterior, middle and posterior vertebral body heights for each index VCF. Index Vertebral Body Height Ratio (VBHR) was defined as index vertebra height divided by the average of normal superior and inferior adjacent vertebrae.
Back Pain Analgesics Used
Back Pain Analgesics Used
Change in Neurology Status From Baseline (Motor Strength)
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Evaluation criteria of motor strength (scored 0-5) for rectus abdominis, hip extensors and flexors, knee extensors and flexors, and foot plantar and dorsiflexors as following: absent voluntary contraction = 0, contractions unable to move joint = 1, movement with gravity eliminated = 2, movement against gravity = 3, movement against resistance = 4, full strength = 5
Change in Neurology Status From Baseline (Motor Strength)-Per Protocol
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Evaluation criteria of motor strength (scored 0-5) for rectus abdominis, hip extensors and flexors, knee extensors and flexors, and foot plantar and dorsiflexors as following: absent voluntary contraction = 0, contractions unable to move joint = 1, movement with gravity eliminated = 2, movement against gravity = 3, movement against resistance = 4, full strength = 5
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Sensory Examination)
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. For sensory examination, the Investigator assessed sensory status at baseline and a change from baseline beginning with the most cephalad index level treated through L5.
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Sensory Examination)
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. For sensory examination, the Investigator assessed sensory status at baseline and a change from baseline beginning with the most cephalad index level treated through L5.
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Reflex Strength)
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Evaluation criteria of reflexes (scored 0-3) for patellar and Achilles reflexes as following: absent = 0, hypoactive = 1, normal = 2, brisk or clonus = 3
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Reflex Strength)
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Evaluation criteria of reflexes (scored 0-3) for patellar and Achilles reflexes as following: absent = 0, hypoactive = 1, normal = 2, brisk or clonus = 3
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Limb Strength)
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Radicular lower limb pain was assessed the presence of paresthesia, weakness, and/or painful straight leg raising (SLR).
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Limb Strength)
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Radicular lower limb pain was assessed the presence of paresthesia, weakness, and/or painful straight leg raising (SLR).
Rate of Study Treatment-related Adverse Events Within 30 Days of Baseline
The study treatment-related AEs were defined as follows: Related defined as the AE had a direct relationship to a Sponsor medical device used in the study patient. Possibly related defined as the AE may have had a relationship to a Sponsor medical device but an alternative cause may be equally or less likely associated. Unrelated defined as the AE was due to the underlying indication or disease state or to concomitant medication or therapy not related to any Sponsor device. Unknown defined as the relationship of the AE to a Sponsor device could not be determined.
Rate of Study Treatment-related Adverse Events Till Study Completion
The study treatment-related AEs were defined as follows: Related defined as the AE had a direct relationship to a Sponsor medical device used in the study patient. Possibly related defined as the AE may have had a relationship to a Sponsor medical device but an alternative cause may be equally or less likely associated. Unrelated defined as the AE was due to the underlying indication or disease state or to concomitant medication or therapy not related to any Sponsor device. Unknown defined as the relationship of the AE to a Sponsor device could not be determined.
Rate of Subsequent Vertebral Body Fractures
Rate of Subsequent Vertebral Body Fractures
Based on patients with at least 7 analyzable vertebrae.

Full Information

First Posted
September 13, 2005
Last Updated
December 10, 2020
Sponsor
Medtronic Spine LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00211237
Brief Title
CAFE Study - Cancer Patient Fracture Evaluation
Acronym
CAFE
Official Title
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Compare Balloon Kyphoplasty to Non-surgical Fracture Management in the Treatment of Painful, Acute Vertebral Body Compression Fractures in Cancer Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Medtronic Spine LLC

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty treatment for painful, acute, vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) as compared to standard non-surgical therapy in patients with cancer.
Detailed Description
1. STUDY OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS 1.1. Objectives The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty treatment for painful, acute, VCFs as compared to standard non-surgical therapy in patients with cancer. 1.2. Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint of the study is the improvement in functional status, as measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) at 1 month. The primary hypothesis of the study is that the mean improvement will be larger in subjects initially assigned to management with balloon kyphoplasty. Note that all subjects will undergo 12 months of follow-up after initial treatment assignment. 1.3. Secondary Endpoints The following secondary endpoints will also be examined. Comparisons will be made at each follow-up visit. Safety: Rate of study treatment-related adverse events Change in neurological status Clinical: Change in functional status as assessed with Karnofsky Performance Scale Change in quality of life as assessed by the SF-36v2™ Health Survey Change in back pain, as measured by a 10-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Change in back-pain analgesics used Change in ambulation status Changes in activities of daily living Time to treatment failure Radiographic: Change in spinal deformity, defined as the degree of spine angulation as assessed by an independent radiologist at the core laboratory Rate of subsequent vertebral body fractures, as assessed by independent radiologists at the core lab In each case, the study hypothesis is that treatment with balloon kyphoplasty will result in an improvement in clinical or radiographic outcomes compared to baseline and compared to non-surgical treatment, with a preservation of outcomes in long-term follow-up.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cancer, Spinal Fractures
Keywords
Balloon Kyphoplasty, Cancer, Vertebral Compression Fracture, Back Pain, Spine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
134 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Balloon Kyphoplasty (BKP)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The subjects assigned to this group will undergo the treatment with Balloon kyphoplasty for their painful VCFs.
Arm Title
Non Surgical Management
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The subjects in this group will undergo the non-operative treatments aimed at alleviation of back pain and restoration of decreased function associated with VCFs.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Balloon Kyphoplasty
Other Intervention Name(s)
KyphX Inflatable Bone Tamps
Intervention Description
Ballon Kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive technique aimed at reduction of VCFs using KyphX® Inflatable Bone Tamps followed by fracture fixation with KyphX® HV-R™ Bone Cement.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Non Surgical Management
Intervention Description
Non-surgical treatment includes, but is not limited to, the following: back brace, pain medication, physical therapy, walking aids, bed rest, and radiation treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Functional Status, as Measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) at 1 Month
Description
The full scale name is the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; it is a validated measure of physical disability due to back pain. The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 24 (maximum disability)
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 Month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Score
Description
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was used to assess the physical disability due to back pain. The best score is 0 (no disability) and worst is 24 (maximum disability).
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Change in Functional Status Assessed With the Karnofsky Performance Scale
Description
The Karnofsky Performance Scale rates a patient on an 11-step scale from 0 (dead) to 100 (normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease).
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 month
Title
Change in Functional Status Assessed With the Karnofsky Performance Scale
Description
The Karnofsky Performance Scale rates a patient on an 11-step scale from 0 (dead) to 100 (normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease).
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Change in Back Pain
Description
Back pain was assessed on a 10-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 month
Title
Change in Back Pain
Description
Back pain was assessed on a NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Change in Quality of Life.
Description
The SF-36 was used to assess quality of life. The SF-36 results were summarized into two components, a physical component summary score (PCS) (0-100) and a mental component summary score (MCS) (0-100). The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 month
Title
Change in Quality of Life
Description
The SF-36 were used to assess quality of life. The SF-36 results were summarized into two components, a physical component summary score (PCS) (0-100) and a mental component summary score (MCS) (0-100). The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Activities Reduced Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
Description
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 month
Title
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Activities Reduced Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
Description
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Number of Days With Reduced Activities Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
Description
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 month
Title
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Number of Days With Reduced Activities Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
Description
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Number of Days in Bed Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
Description
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 month
Title
Change in Activities of Daily Living - Number of Days in Bed Due to Back Pain in Previous 2 Weeks
Description
The Activities of Daily Living assessment comprised three questions about the effects of back pain or back problems over the previous 2-week period. The patient was asked if they had cut down on usual activities, the number of days in which the patient had cut down on usual activities and the number of days that the patient had spent at least half a day in bed because of back pain or back problems.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Ambulatory Status Change From Baseline to One Month
Description
Ambulatory status was assessed using a three-category system, fully ambulatory, ambulatory with assistance, or not ambulatory.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Ambulatory Status Change
Description
Ambulatory status was assessed using a three-category system, fully ambulatory, ambulatory with assistance, or not ambulatory.
Time Frame
Baseline, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Index Spinal Deformity Change Measured by Index Vertebral Body Angles From Baseline to 1 Month
Description
Index spinal deformity was measured by Kyphotic angle, local Cobb angle, thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle, and anterior, middle and posterior vertebral body heights for each index VCF.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 month
Title
Index Spinal Deformity Change Measured by Index Vertebral Body Angles
Description
Index spinal deformity was measured by Kyphotic angle, local Cobb angle, thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle, and anterior, middle and posterior vertebral body heights for each index VCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, post-operation, 1 month, and 12 months
Title
Index Spinal Deformity Change Measured by Index Vertebral Body Height Ratio
Description
Index spinal deformity was measured by Kyphotic angle, local Cobb angle, thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle, and anterior, middle and posterior vertebral body heights for each index VCF. Index Vertebral Body Height Ratio (VBHR) was defined as index vertebra height divided by the average of normal superior and inferior adjacent vertebrae.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 month
Title
Index Spinal Deformity Change Measured by Index Vertebral Body Height Ratio
Description
Index spinal deformity was measured by Kyphotic angle, local Cobb angle, thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle, and anterior, middle and posterior vertebral body heights for each index VCF. Index Vertebral Body Height Ratio (VBHR) was defined as index vertebra height divided by the average of normal superior and inferior adjacent vertebrae.
Time Frame
Baseline, post-operation, 1 month, and 12 months
Title
Back Pain Analgesics Used
Time Frame
Baseline, 7 days, and 1 month
Title
Back Pain Analgesics Used
Time Frame
Baseline, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Change in Neurology Status From Baseline (Motor Strength)
Description
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Evaluation criteria of motor strength (scored 0-5) for rectus abdominis, hip extensors and flexors, knee extensors and flexors, and foot plantar and dorsiflexors as following: absent voluntary contraction = 0, contractions unable to move joint = 1, movement with gravity eliminated = 2, movement against gravity = 3, movement against resistance = 4, full strength = 5
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Change in Neurology Status From Baseline (Motor Strength)-Per Protocol
Description
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Evaluation criteria of motor strength (scored 0-5) for rectus abdominis, hip extensors and flexors, knee extensors and flexors, and foot plantar and dorsiflexors as following: absent voluntary contraction = 0, contractions unable to move joint = 1, movement with gravity eliminated = 2, movement against gravity = 3, movement against resistance = 4, full strength = 5
Time Frame
1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Sensory Examination)
Description
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. For sensory examination, the Investigator assessed sensory status at baseline and a change from baseline beginning with the most cephalad index level treated through L5.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Sensory Examination)
Description
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. For sensory examination, the Investigator assessed sensory status at baseline and a change from baseline beginning with the most cephalad index level treated through L5.
Time Frame
1 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Reflex Strength)
Description
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Evaluation criteria of reflexes (scored 0-3) for patellar and Achilles reflexes as following: absent = 0, hypoactive = 1, normal = 2, brisk or clonus = 3
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Reflex Strength)
Description
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Evaluation criteria of reflexes (scored 0-3) for patellar and Achilles reflexes as following: absent = 0, hypoactive = 1, normal = 2, brisk or clonus = 3
Time Frame
1 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Limb Strength)
Description
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Radicular lower limb pain was assessed the presence of paresthesia, weakness, and/or painful straight leg raising (SLR).
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Change in Neurological Status From Baseline (Limb Strength)
Description
The neurological examination included motor strength, sensory examination, reflexes below the level of the most cephalad index vertebral body fracture, and the presence of radicular pain. Radicular lower limb pain was assessed the presence of paresthesia, weakness, and/or painful straight leg raising (SLR).
Time Frame
1 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Rate of Study Treatment-related Adverse Events Within 30 Days of Baseline
Description
The study treatment-related AEs were defined as follows: Related defined as the AE had a direct relationship to a Sponsor medical device used in the study patient. Possibly related defined as the AE may have had a relationship to a Sponsor medical device but an alternative cause may be equally or less likely associated. Unrelated defined as the AE was due to the underlying indication or disease state or to concomitant medication or therapy not related to any Sponsor device. Unknown defined as the relationship of the AE to a Sponsor device could not be determined.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Rate of Study Treatment-related Adverse Events Till Study Completion
Description
The study treatment-related AEs were defined as follows: Related defined as the AE had a direct relationship to a Sponsor medical device used in the study patient. Possibly related defined as the AE may have had a relationship to a Sponsor medical device but an alternative cause may be equally or less likely associated. Unrelated defined as the AE was due to the underlying indication or disease state or to concomitant medication or therapy not related to any Sponsor device. Unknown defined as the relationship of the AE to a Sponsor device could not be determined.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Rate of Subsequent Vertebral Body Fractures
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Rate of Subsequent Vertebral Body Fractures
Description
Based on patients with at least 7 analyzable vertebrae.
Time Frame
1 month and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: One to 3 painful (pain on palpation/percussion over fractured vertebral body) VCF(s), T5-L5, with either bone marrow edema imaged by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or a fracture imaged by plain radiographs using the method of Genant Pain NRS score ≥4 on a scale of 0 to 10 When the patient is newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma, the pain assessment must not be done until after completion of at least one pulse of steroid therapy or one week after the initiation of active multiple myeloma therapy. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score ≥ 10 on a scale of 0 to 24 Patients must be at least 21 years old. No change in chemotherapy regimen (change in dose(s) permitted) for 1 month prior to enrollment No change in chemotherapy regimen (change in dose(s) permitted) planned for at least 1 month following enrollment No major surgery to the spine planned for at least 1 month following enrollment Life expectancy of ≥ 3 months Patient has sufficient mental capacity to comply with the protocol requirements Patient has stated availability for all study visits Patient is able to understand the risks and benefits of participating in the study and is willing to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with primary tumors of the bone (e.g., osteosarcoma) or solitary plasmacytoma at site of the index VCF. Patients with these tumors in anatomic sites other than the index VCF are eligible. Concurrent Phase I investigational anti-cancer treatment Significant clinical morbidities (aside from the index fracture(s) and cancer) that may potentially interfere with the collection of data concerning pain and function VCF morphology deemed unsuitable for balloon kyphoplasty Additional non-kyphoplasty surgical treatment is required for the index fracture Patients requiring the use of high-dose steroid (≥ 100 mg prednisone or 20 mg dexamethasone per day), intravenous (IV) pain medication, or nerve block to control chronic back pain unrelated to index VCF(s). Patients who receive high-dose steroids for treatment of their cancer (for at least 30 days) are eligible. Patients with a platelet count of < 20,000 measured at the time of hospital admission for the procedure Spinal cord compression or canal compromise requiring decompression Patients with osteoblastic tumors at the site of index VCF. Patients with osteoblastic tumors outside of vertebral levels intended for kyphoplasty may be enrolled. Medical/surgical conditions contrary to the balloon kyphoplasty procedure (e.g., in the presence of active or incompletely treated local infection) Known allergy to bone cement or contrast medium used in the treatment of study subjects MRI contraindication (e.g., cerebral aneurysm clips, pacemaker, implanted biostimulators, cochlear implants, penile prosthesis) Positive baseline pregnancy test (for women of child-bearing potential) Patients who may require allogeneic bone marrow transplantation during the course of the study. Other Reasons for Lack of Enrollment: A. Patient is afraid to have surgery B. Patient is afraid to have anesthesia C. Patient/family is not willing to participate in research D. Patient is not willing to be randomized
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James Berenson, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Institute for Myeloma & Bone Cancer Research
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Frank Vrionis, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Valley Radiology Inc., UCSD
City
Escondido
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92025
Country
United States
Facility Name
Boulder Neurosurgical Associates
City
Boulder
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80304
Country
United States
Facility Name
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sibley Memorial Hospital
City
Chevy Chase
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20815
Country
United States
Facility Name
Greater Oncology Associates
City
Silver Spring
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20910
Country
United States
Facility Name
Karmanos Cancer Center
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Vincent's Hospital
City
Fitzroy
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3065
Country
Australia
Facility Name
The Alfred Hospital
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3004
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Institut Jules Bordet
City
Brussels
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Foothills Hospital
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N2T9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Toronto Western Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5T 2S8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Montreal General Hospital
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3G 1A4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Charité Virchow-Klinikum
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Medizinische Hochschule
City
Hannover
Country
Germany
Facility Name
National Center for Spinal Disorders
City
Budapest
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Akademiska Sjukhuset
City
Uppsala
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Royal London
City
London
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21333599
Citation
Berenson J, Pflugmacher R, Jarzem P, Zonder J, Schechtman K, Tillman JB, Bastian L, Ashraf T, Vrionis F; Cancer Patient Fracture Evaluation (CAFE) Investigators. Balloon kyphoplasty versus non-surgical fracture management for treatment of painful vertebral body compression fractures in patients with cancer: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Mar;12(3):225-35. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70008-0. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

CAFE Study - Cancer Patient Fracture Evaluation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs