Biphasic Defibrillation Study: Trial to Compare Fixed Versus Escalating Energy
Primary Purpose
Cardiac Arrest
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
fixed versus escalating biphasic defibrillation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Cardiac Arrest focused on measuring defibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, heart arrest
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Witnessed cardiac arrest out-of-hospital requiring defibrillation and given by first responder using an automated external defibrillator Exclusion Criteria: Terminal illness or do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status No cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) x 10 minutes Acute trauma Exsanguination Cardiac arrest experienced while in hospital
Sites / Locations
- Ottawa Hospital
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Successful conversion to an organized heart rhythm
Secondary Outcome Measures
Survival to hospital discharge
Resuscitation for survival to one hour
Neurologic function
Removal of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 5 seconds
Return of spontaneous circulation
Survival to 24 hours
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00212992
First Posted
September 13, 2005
Last Updated
January 23, 2017
Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00212992
Brief Title
Biphasic Defibrillation Study: Trial to Compare Fixed Versus Escalating Energy
Official Title
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Fixed Versus Escalating Energy Regimens for Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2001 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2005 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2006 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will compare the effect of constant low-level energy [150 joules] to an escalating energy [200-300-360 joules] regimen of biphasic waveform defibrillation on multiple patient outcomes.
Detailed Description
This pilot, which will enroll 200 subjects, will allow a reasonable estimate of effect size and this will, in turn, allow for the accurate design and planning of a definitive randomized controlled trial. The following outcomes will be evaluated:
Important Clinical Outcomes:
Successful conversion,
Resuscitation to one hour,
Survival to hospital discharge,
Neurological function, and
Quality of life.
Process Outcomes:
Number of shocks required,
Recurrences of VF, and
Responsiveness to varying periods of pulselessness.
Adverse Outcomes:
Myocardial damage.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cardiac Arrest
Keywords
defibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, heart arrest
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Double
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (false)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
fixed versus escalating biphasic defibrillation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Successful conversion to an organized heart rhythm
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Survival to hospital discharge
Title
Resuscitation for survival to one hour
Title
Neurologic function
Title
Removal of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 5 seconds
Title
Return of spontaneous circulation
Title
Survival to 24 hours
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
8 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Witnessed cardiac arrest out-of-hospital requiring defibrillation and given by first responder using an automated external defibrillator
Exclusion Criteria:
Terminal illness or do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status
No cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) x 10 minutes
Acute trauma
Exsanguination
Cardiac arrest experienced while in hospital
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ian Stiell, MD
Organizational Affiliation
OHRI
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ottawa Hospital
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1Y 4E9
Country
Canada
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17353443
Citation
Stiell IG, Walker RG, Nesbitt LP, Chapman FW, Cousineau D, Christenson J, Bradford P, Sookram S, Berringer R, Lank P, Wells GA. BIPHASIC Trial: a randomized comparison of fixed lower versus escalating higher energy levels for defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2007 Mar 27;115(12):1511-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.648204. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Biphasic Defibrillation Study: Trial to Compare Fixed Versus Escalating Energy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs