search
Back to results

Addiction Treatment in Russia: Oral vs. Naltrexone Implant

Primary Purpose

Heroin Dependence, Opioid-Related Disorders

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
naltrexone implant
oral naltrexone
oral placebo naltrexone
placebo implant
Sponsored by
University of Pennsylvania
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heroin Dependence

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 50 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Current opioid dependence Recently completed opioid detoxification Exclusion Criteria: Serious medical or psychiatric condition requiring immediate hospitalization or that would make participation in the study hazardous Planning to leave the study area within the 12 months following study entry Imminent incarceration Pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Pavlov Medical University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

ONP + DNI

ON + DNIP

ONP + DNIP

Arm Description

Oral naltrexone placebo (ONP) + Depot Naltrexone Implant (DNI) 1000 mg

Oral naltrexone (ON) 50 mg + Depot Naltrexone placebo Implant (DNIP)

Oral placebo naltrexone + placebo naltrexone implant

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Retention Without Relapse to Heroin Addiction (Measured at Month 6)
Survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier survival functions with log-rank Cox-Mantel criteria for group comparison was used to determine the primary outcome of retention, defined as not missing 2 consecutive counseling sessions and not having a relapse. Because this outcome combined patients who failed to keep appointments with those who kept appointments but relapsed, the proportion of non-survivors attributable to proven relapse.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Subjects Who Dropped Out of Treatment
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the event of subjects who dropped out of treatment
Positive Opioid Urine Test
missed urine tests were imputed to be positive for opiates
Use of Alcohol
use of alcohol grams per day
Composite Score of Psychiatric Problems
composite score is a decimal score; with 0 = no problems, 1 = the most problems based on the Addiction Severity Index composite score of 11 indexed questions.
HIV Risk (Baseline)
The Risk Assessment Behavior (RAB), is an HIV risk Scale. The Total Score is scored by adding the values that correspond to the responses selected by the subject for the items asked. This highest total score is 40 (highest risk), and the lowest score = 0 (no risk). This assessment has 2 Subsections: 1) Drug Risk = 8 questions (lowest Drug Risk score = 0 (no risk), and highest drug risk score = 22 =(greatest risk), 2) 10 Sex Risk questions: scores are 0 = no risk, and 18 = highest risk). Total RAB Score = Drug Risk Total + Sex Risk Total (0 = no risk, 40 = highest). See: Risk Assessment Battery (RAB) Scoring System, https://www.med.upenn.edu/hiv/assets/user-content/.../RABScoringv2.112.21.95.doc
Global Assessment Form (GAF)
Assessment of overall psychiatric function comprises Axis V in the DSM-IV (DSM-IV, 1994). GAF scores range from 0 to 100. A reasonably well-functioning person will score above 70; serious impairment is below 50.
Amphetamine Drug Use
Number of subjects who used Amphetamine in the past 90 days at baseline as measured by the TimeLine Follow-back Form (TLFB) . The TLFB is an instrument that assesses substance use over a specified period of time (Sobel & Sobel, 1992).
Cocaine Drug Use
Number of subjects with cocaine drug use in the past 90 days at baseline as measured by the TimeLine Follow-back Form (TLFB) . The TLFB is an instrument that assesses substance use over a specified period of time (Sobel & Sobel, 1992).
Marijuana Drug Use
Number of subjects with Marijuana use in the past 90 days at baseline as measured by the TimeLine Follow-back Form (TLFB) . The TLFB is an instrument that assesses substance use over a specified period of time (Sobel & Sobel, 1992).
Benzodiazepine Drug Use
Number of subjects with benzodiazepine drug use in the past 90 days at baseline as measured by the TimeLine Follow-back Form (TLFB) . The TLFB is an instrument that assesses substance use over a specified period of time (Sobel & Sobel, 1992).

Full Information

First Posted
September 16, 2005
Last Updated
February 28, 2019
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00218426
Brief Title
Addiction Treatment in Russia: Oral vs. Naltrexone Implant
Official Title
Addiction Treatment in Russia: Oral and Depot Naltrexone
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2006 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 4, 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Heroin addiction is a growing problem in Russia; individuals who enter heroin addiction treatment often relapse. Therefore, effective heroin addiction treatments are necessary to prevent relapse. The purpose of this study is to compare oral naltrexone with a naltrexone implant that provides opioid blockade for two months in preventing relapse to heroin addiction in St. Petersburg, Russia.
Detailed Description
The usual treatment of heroin addiction in Russia involves detoxification and 2-4 weeks of rehabilitation with referral to outpatient follow-up. Though most patients complete inpatient treatment, few keep follow-up appointments and relapse rates are high. More effective therapies are needed, especially in view of the epidemic of heroin addiction that has resulted in the spread of HIV and other infectious diseases. A recently-completed study of 52 patients randomized to oral naltrexone (ON) or oral naltrexone placebo (ONP) has shown efficacy in preventing relapse and reducing HIV risk but dropout was a problem with only 44% of ON patients proven to have not relapsed by 6 months (as compared to 16% of ONP patients). A larger study of 280 patients randomized to ON or ONP replicated these results and found some indication that adding an selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to naltrexone may improve its efficacy in women, probably because they tend to have higher levels of psychiatric symptoms than men. We think that retention and outcome can be improved by using a longer acting naltrexone preparation, and in this study we propose to compare ON with a depot naltrexone implant (DNI) that is manufactured and approved for use in Russia, and provides opioid blockade for 8-10 weeks. We will use a placebo-controlled, double-blind/double-dummy design since a placebo-controlled trial is required by the Russian equivalent of our FDA as a condition for testing a pharmacotherapy. Participants will be male and female heroin addicts who have been detoxified in addiction treatment hospitals or outpatient settings in St. Petersburg and have a family member willing and able to supervise medication adherence and facilitate follow-up. After giving informed consent and confirming the absence of physiologic dependence, 306 patients will be randomly assigned to a 6-month treatment in one of three groups of 102 each: oral naltrexone (ON) + depot naltrexone implant placebo (DNIP); oral naltrexone placebo (ONP) + depot naltrexone implant (DNI); or ONP + DNIP. All patients will receive biweekly clinical management/adherence enhancement counseling. Assessments will be done at baseline, at each biweekly appointment during the 6-months of medication treatment, and at 3 and 6 months following the end of study medication. Primary outcome will be the relapse free proportion at months 1-6; secondary outcomes will be time to dropout, opioid positive urines, HIV risk, use of alcohol and other drugs, psychiatric symptoms, and other measures of overall adjustment. We hypothesize that outcomes will be better with DNI than ON, and that each will be more effective than placebo.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heroin Dependence, Opioid-Related Disorders

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
306 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ONP + DNI
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oral naltrexone placebo (ONP) + Depot Naltrexone Implant (DNI) 1000 mg
Arm Title
ON + DNIP
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oral naltrexone (ON) 50 mg + Depot Naltrexone placebo Implant (DNIP)
Arm Title
ONP + DNIP
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Oral placebo naltrexone + placebo naltrexone implant
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
naltrexone implant
Other Intervention Name(s)
DNI
Intervention Description
naltrexone implant is 1000 mg naltrexone
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
oral naltrexone
Other Intervention Name(s)
ON
Intervention Description
oral naltrexone 50 mg/day
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
oral placebo naltrexone
Other Intervention Name(s)
ONP
Intervention Description
oral placebo naltrexone resembles active medication
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
placebo implant
Other Intervention Name(s)
DNIP
Intervention Description
placebo implant resembles active medication
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Retention Without Relapse to Heroin Addiction (Measured at Month 6)
Description
Survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier survival functions with log-rank Cox-Mantel criteria for group comparison was used to determine the primary outcome of retention, defined as not missing 2 consecutive counseling sessions and not having a relapse. Because this outcome combined patients who failed to keep appointments with those who kept appointments but relapsed, the proportion of non-survivors attributable to proven relapse.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Subjects Who Dropped Out of Treatment
Description
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the event of subjects who dropped out of treatment
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Positive Opioid Urine Test
Description
missed urine tests were imputed to be positive for opiates
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Use of Alcohol
Description
use of alcohol grams per day
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Composite Score of Psychiatric Problems
Description
composite score is a decimal score; with 0 = no problems, 1 = the most problems based on the Addiction Severity Index composite score of 11 indexed questions.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
HIV Risk (Baseline)
Description
The Risk Assessment Behavior (RAB), is an HIV risk Scale. The Total Score is scored by adding the values that correspond to the responses selected by the subject for the items asked. This highest total score is 40 (highest risk), and the lowest score = 0 (no risk). This assessment has 2 Subsections: 1) Drug Risk = 8 questions (lowest Drug Risk score = 0 (no risk), and highest drug risk score = 22 =(greatest risk), 2) 10 Sex Risk questions: scores are 0 = no risk, and 18 = highest risk). Total RAB Score = Drug Risk Total + Sex Risk Total (0 = no risk, 40 = highest). See: Risk Assessment Battery (RAB) Scoring System, https://www.med.upenn.edu/hiv/assets/user-content/.../RABScoringv2.112.21.95.doc
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Global Assessment Form (GAF)
Description
Assessment of overall psychiatric function comprises Axis V in the DSM-IV (DSM-IV, 1994). GAF scores range from 0 to 100. A reasonably well-functioning person will score above 70; serious impairment is below 50.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Amphetamine Drug Use
Description
Number of subjects who used Amphetamine in the past 90 days at baseline as measured by the TimeLine Follow-back Form (TLFB) . The TLFB is an instrument that assesses substance use over a specified period of time (Sobel & Sobel, 1992).
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Cocaine Drug Use
Description
Number of subjects with cocaine drug use in the past 90 days at baseline as measured by the TimeLine Follow-back Form (TLFB) . The TLFB is an instrument that assesses substance use over a specified period of time (Sobel & Sobel, 1992).
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Marijuana Drug Use
Description
Number of subjects with Marijuana use in the past 90 days at baseline as measured by the TimeLine Follow-back Form (TLFB) . The TLFB is an instrument that assesses substance use over a specified period of time (Sobel & Sobel, 1992).
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Benzodiazepine Drug Use
Description
Number of subjects with benzodiazepine drug use in the past 90 days at baseline as measured by the TimeLine Follow-back Form (TLFB) . The TLFB is an instrument that assesses substance use over a specified period of time (Sobel & Sobel, 1992).
Time Frame
baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Current opioid dependence Recently completed opioid detoxification Exclusion Criteria: Serious medical or psychiatric condition requiring immediate hospitalization or that would make participation in the study hazardous Planning to leave the study area within the 12 months following study entry Imminent incarceration Pregnancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
George Woody, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104 6178
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pavlov Medical University
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197022
Country
Russian Federation

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27436632
Citation
Krupitsky E, Zvartau E, Blokhina E, Verbitskaya E, Wahlgren V, Tsoy-Podosenin M, Bushara N, Burakov A, Masalov D, Romanova T, Tyurina A, Palatkin V, Yaroslavtseva T, Pecoraro A, Woody G. Anhedonia, depression, anxiety, and craving in opiate dependent patients stabilized on oral naltrexone or an extended release naltrexone implant. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2016 Sep;42(5):614-620. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2016.1197231. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Addiction Treatment in Russia: Oral vs. Naltrexone Implant

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs