search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety of Dexlansoprazole MR on Maintaining Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis

Primary Purpose

Esophagitis, Reflux, Esophagitis, Peptic

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dexlansoprazole MR
Dexlansoprazole MR
Placebo
Sponsored by
Takeda
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Esophagitis, Reflux focused on measuring Erosive Esophagitis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Subjects must have successfully completed the Phase 3 Study T-EE04-084 (NCT00251693) or TEE04-085 (NCT00251719); and have healed esophageal erosions proven by endoscopy. Complete healing was assessed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed (defined as anything less than the criterion for Grade A). The subject was counted as healed if endoscopy findings did not meet the Grade A criterion. Exclusion Criteria: Use of prescription or nonprescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, sucralfate, misoprostol, or prokinetics throughout the study Use of antacids (except for study supplied) throughout the study. Subjects using drugs with significant anticholinergic effects such as tricyclics who cannot stay on a stable dose throughout the study. Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy.

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD

Placebo

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.
Crude rates analyzed maintenance of healed EE from baseline of this study and considered prematurely discontinued subjects as relapsed.
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method
Percentage of subjects who maintained complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy. In the life table method, subjects without post-baseline endoscopy were included as censored; subjects who did not have a recurrence of EE and did not complete the study were also considered censored.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
The percentage was calculated as the days that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which either a daytime or nighttime result was reported.
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
The percentage was calculated as the days that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which either a daytime or nighttime result was marked
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
The percentage was calculated as the nights that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which a nighttime result was marked.
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
The percentage was calculated as the nights that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which a nighttime result was marked.

Full Information

First Posted
November 15, 2005
Last Updated
February 1, 2012
Sponsor
Takeda
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00255164
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Dexlansoprazole MR on Maintaining Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis
Official Title
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg QD and 90 mg QD) Compared to Placebo in Maintenance of Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2006 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Takeda

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of once-daily (QD) treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified-release (MR) 60 mg and 90 mg and placebo in maintaining healing of erosive esophagitis (EE).
Detailed Description
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled, 6 month maintenance study. The study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of daily Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg and 90 mg) with that of placebo, in maintaining healing of erosive esophagitis. Because the development plan for Dexlansoprazole MR formulation was revised, the results of 2 identical studies, T-EE04-086 (this study, NCT00255164) and T-EE04-087 (NCT00255151), were combined and analyzed as a single larger study referred to as study T-EE04-086. A total of 451 subjects were included in the combined analysis: 237 subjects were enrolled into Study T-EE04-086, and 214 subjects were enrolled into Study T-EE04-087.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Esophagitis, Reflux, Esophagitis, Peptic
Keywords
Erosive Esophagitis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
451 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexlansoprazole MR
Other Intervention Name(s)
TAK-390MR, Kapidex, Dexilant
Intervention Description
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexlansoprazole MR
Other Intervention Name(s)
TAK-390MR, Kapidex, Dexilant
Intervention Description
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.
Description
Crude rates analyzed maintenance of healed EE from baseline of this study and considered prematurely discontinued subjects as relapsed.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method
Description
Percentage of subjects who maintained complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy. In the life table method, subjects without post-baseline endoscopy were included as censored; subjects who did not have a recurrence of EE and did not complete the study were also considered censored.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
Description
The percentage was calculated as the days that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which either a daytime or nighttime result was reported.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
Description
The percentage was calculated as the days that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which either a daytime or nighttime result was marked
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
Description
The percentage was calculated as the nights that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which a nighttime result was marked.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
Description
The percentage was calculated as the nights that were heartburn-free out of the total number of days for which a nighttime result was marked.
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects must have successfully completed the Phase 3 Study T-EE04-084 (NCT00251693) or TEE04-085 (NCT00251719); and have healed esophageal erosions proven by endoscopy. Complete healing was assessed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed (defined as anything less than the criterion for Grade A). The subject was counted as healed if endoscopy findings did not meet the Grade A criterion. Exclusion Criteria: Use of prescription or nonprescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, sucralfate, misoprostol, or prokinetics throughout the study Use of antacids (except for study supplied) throughout the study. Subjects using drugs with significant anticholinergic effects such as tricyclics who cannot stay on a stable dose throughout the study. Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Takeda
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Alabaster
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Anaheim
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Chula Vista
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Fullerton
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Garden Grove
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Irvine
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Lancaster
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Mission Hills
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Palm Springs
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Redwood City
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
San Luis Obispo
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Boulder
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
City
Lone Tree
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
City
Wheat Ridge
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
City
Waterbury
State/Province
Connecticut
Country
United States
City
Boynton Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Jupiter
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Kissimmee
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Lakeland
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
New Port Richey
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
City
Honolulu
State/Province
Hawaii
Country
United States
City
Arlington Heights
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Hines
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Oak Park
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Rockford
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Clive
State/Province
Iowa
Country
United States
City
Dubuque
State/Province
Iowa
Country
United States
City
Newton
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
City
Shawnee Mission
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
City
Topeka
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
City
Metairie
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
City
Hollywood
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
City
Lutherville
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
City
Troy
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
City
Chaska
State/Province
Minnesota
Country
United States
City
Jackson
State/Province
Mississippi
Country
United States
City
Mexico
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
City
Washington
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
Country
United States
City
Pahrump
State/Province
Nevada
Country
United States
City
New Brunswick
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
City
Bingampton
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Great Neck
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Elkin
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Greensboro
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Hickory
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Salisbury
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Statesville
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Winston Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Mayfield Heights
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Warren
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
Country
United States
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
Country
United States
City
Beaver Falls
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Lansdale
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Bristol
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Chattanooga
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Hermitage
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Beaumont
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Bedford
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Bryan
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Corsicana
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
El Paso
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Bountiful
State/Province
Utah
Country
United States
City
Ogden
State/Province
Utah
Country
United States
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
Country
United States
City
West Jordan
State/Province
Utah
Country
United States
City
Chesapeake
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Danville
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
Country
United States
City
Monroe
State/Province
Wisconsin
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19681809
Citation
Howden CW, Larsen LM, Perez MC, Palmer R, Atkinson SN. Clinical trial: efficacy and safety of dexlansoprazole MR 60 and 90 mg in healed erosive oesophagitis - maintenance of healing and symptom relief. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 1;30(9):895-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04119.x. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19735233
Citation
Peura DA, Metz DC, Dabholkar AH, Paris MM, Yu P, Atkinson SN. Safety profile of dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with a novel dual delayed release formulation: global clinical trial experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 15;30(10):1010-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04137.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20195905
Citation
Wyrwich KW, Mody R, Larsen LM, Lee M, Harnam N, Revicki DA. Validation of the PAGI-SYM and PAGI-QOL among healing and maintenance of erosive esophagitis clinical trial participants. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):551-64. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9620-x. Epub 2010 Feb 27.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety of Dexlansoprazole MR on Maintaining Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs