search
Back to results

Ph II Gemcitabine, Erlotinib, and Gemcitabine With Erlotinib/Elderly Patients W/ IIIB/IV NSCLC

Primary Purpose

Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
erlotinib hydrochloride
gemcitabine hydrochloride
Sponsored by
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lung Cancer focused on measuring stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

Eligibility Criteria

70 Years - 120 Years (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of stage NSCLC ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0-2 Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 Platelets ≥ 100,000 Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dl Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 upper limit of institutional normal (ULN) Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 4 x ULN Total Bilirubin below or equal to upper institutional normal limits Serum Creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN Patients may have received 1 prior treatment in the adjuvant setting, but time since prior chemotherapy must be ≥1 year. Although the protocol specifically says adjuvant therapy, we believe neoadjuvant is similar and patients who have received neo-adjuvant (pre-operative) rather than classic adjuvant (post-operative) therapy are similar and should not be distinguished. Therefore, patients may have received 1 prior treatment in the neo-adjuvant setting as well. Treated brain metastases are eligible provided the patient is asymptomatic and meets the above criteria, including PS. Measurable disease by RECIST criteria Ability to give informed consent Exclusion Criteria Patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity to gemcitabine. Incompletely healed from previous oncologic or other major surgery. Pregnancy or breast feeding (women of childbearing potential are not expected to be enrolled in this study given minimum age) Patients with severe co-morbid illness. Patients unable to participate in the QOL assessments.

Sites / Locations

  • Highlands Oncology Group - Fayetteville
  • Summit Cancer Care
  • Evanston Hospital
  • Hackensack University Medical Center Cancer Center
  • Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
  • Blumenthal Cancer Center at Carolinas Medical Center
  • Batte Cancer Center at Northeast Medical Center
  • Cape Fear Valley Medical Center Cancer Center
  • Rex Cancer Center at Rex Hospital
  • Kingsport Hematology-Oncology Associates
  • University of Tennessee Cancer Institute - Memphis

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Arm A

Arm B

Arm C

Arm Description

Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride 1200mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8. Patients with progressive disease may cross over to arm B.

Patients receive oral erlotinib hydrochloride 150mg p.o. daily on days 1-21.

Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride 1000mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 and erlotinib hydrochloride 100mg p.o. daily

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression-free Survival
We would consider the combination of gemcitabine plus erlotinib or single agent erlotinib to be worthy of further study if there was an increased progressed-free survival. We would use an increase to 45% progression-free survival at 6 months as significant. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Response Rate
The best overall response (BOR) is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression-recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurement recorded since the treatment started. The response rate was defined as the percentage of patients achieving a BOR of complete response or partial response. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Overall Survival
Survival calculated from start of treatment to death from any cause for up to three years.
Toxicity
Assessments for treatment toxicity will be done with each cycle according to CTCAE v3. Results listed here are grade >=3, treatment related hematologic events (all) and Grade>=3 treatment related non hematologic events that occurred in >=5% of patients in any arm. Adverse events (toxicities) are graded on a 5 point scale from 1 (mild) to 5 (lethal), with grades 3 and higher being severe or life threatening.
Quality of Life (QOL)- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L) Trial Outcome Index-L (TOI-L)
The FACT-L is the FACT-G and a lung cancer specific (LCS) subscale given at baseline, after each cycle and at end of treatment. The FACT-G is a 27 item measure of general QOL assessing function in 4 domains: physical well-being (PWB), social-family well-being (SFWB), emotional well-being (EWB) and functional well-being (FWB). Items are rated by patients on a Likert scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent better QOL. The TOI-L sums the PWB, FWB, and LCS subscale scores. A best response for TOI-L scores is based on change from baseline and coded as: a change >=+6 "improved", <= -6 "worsened" and otherwise "no change". A best overall score response is coded as: Improved (2 visit resp. of "improved" a min. of 28 days apart w/ no interim "worsened") No change (not "improved;" 2 visit resp. of "no change" or "improved" a min. of 28 days apart w/ no interim "worsened") Worsened (not "improved" or "no change;" 2 consecutive "worsened") Other (none of the above)

Full Information

First Posted
January 24, 2006
Last Updated
March 9, 2017
Sponsor
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00283244
Brief Title
Ph II Gemcitabine, Erlotinib, and Gemcitabine With Erlotinib/Elderly Patients W/ IIIB/IV NSCLC
Official Title
Randomized Phase II Study of First-Line Treatment With Gemcitabine vs. Erlotinib vs. Gemcitabine and Erlotinib in Elderly Patients With Stage IIIB/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Erlotinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine and erlotinib are more effective when given alone or together in treating non-small cell lung cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying gemcitabine and erlotinib to compare how well they work when given alone or together as first-line therapy in treating older patients with stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES: Primary Compare the progression-free survival rate of older patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer treated with gemcitabine hydrochloride vs erlotinib hydrochloride vs gemcitabine hydrochloride and erlotinib hydrochloride as first-line therapy. Secondary Determine the response rate in patients receiving these regimens. Determine the overall survival rate in patients receiving these regimens. Determine the toxicity profile of these regimens in these patients. Determine the quality of life of patients receiving these regimens. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel group, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by gender, smoking status (never or light vs current or former), and ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV on days 1 and 8. Patients with progressive disease may cross over to arm II. Arm II: Patients receive oral erlotinib hydrochloride daily on days 1-21. Arm III: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride as in arm I and erlotinib hydrochloride as in arm II. In all arms, treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 2 months for 3 years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lung Cancer
Keywords
stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
147 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride 1200mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8. Patients with progressive disease may cross over to arm B.
Arm Title
Arm B
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive oral erlotinib hydrochloride 150mg p.o. daily on days 1-21.
Arm Title
Arm C
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride 1000mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 and erlotinib hydrochloride 100mg p.o. daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
erlotinib hydrochloride
Other Intervention Name(s)
Tarceva
Intervention Description
given orally
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
gemcitabine hydrochloride
Other Intervention Name(s)
Gemzar
Intervention Description
given IV
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free Survival
Description
We would consider the combination of gemcitabine plus erlotinib or single agent erlotinib to be worthy of further study if there was an increased progressed-free survival. We would use an increase to 45% progression-free survival at 6 months as significant. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Time Frame
Six months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Response Rate
Description
The best overall response (BOR) is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression-recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurement recorded since the treatment started. The response rate was defined as the percentage of patients achieving a BOR of complete response or partial response. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Time Frame
Six months
Title
Overall Survival
Description
Survival calculated from start of treatment to death from any cause for up to three years.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Toxicity
Description
Assessments for treatment toxicity will be done with each cycle according to CTCAE v3. Results listed here are grade >=3, treatment related hematologic events (all) and Grade>=3 treatment related non hematologic events that occurred in >=5% of patients in any arm. Adverse events (toxicities) are graded on a 5 point scale from 1 (mild) to 5 (lethal), with grades 3 and higher being severe or life threatening.
Time Frame
After each cycle/3 weeks, up to 3 years
Title
Quality of Life (QOL)- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L) Trial Outcome Index-L (TOI-L)
Description
The FACT-L is the FACT-G and a lung cancer specific (LCS) subscale given at baseline, after each cycle and at end of treatment. The FACT-G is a 27 item measure of general QOL assessing function in 4 domains: physical well-being (PWB), social-family well-being (SFWB), emotional well-being (EWB) and functional well-being (FWB). Items are rated by patients on a Likert scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent better QOL. The TOI-L sums the PWB, FWB, and LCS subscale scores. A best response for TOI-L scores is based on change from baseline and coded as: a change >=+6 "improved", <= -6 "worsened" and otherwise "no change". A best overall score response is coded as: Improved (2 visit resp. of "improved" a min. of 28 days apart w/ no interim "worsened") No change (not "improved;" 2 visit resp. of "no change" or "improved" a min. of 28 days apart w/ no interim "worsened") Worsened (not "improved" or "no change;" 2 consecutive "worsened") Other (none of the above)
Time Frame
After each cycle/3 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
120 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of stage NSCLC ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0-2 Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 Platelets ≥ 100,000 Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dl Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 upper limit of institutional normal (ULN) Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 4 x ULN Total Bilirubin below or equal to upper institutional normal limits Serum Creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN Patients may have received 1 prior treatment in the adjuvant setting, but time since prior chemotherapy must be ≥1 year. Although the protocol specifically says adjuvant therapy, we believe neoadjuvant is similar and patients who have received neo-adjuvant (pre-operative) rather than classic adjuvant (post-operative) therapy are similar and should not be distinguished. Therefore, patients may have received 1 prior treatment in the neo-adjuvant setting as well. Treated brain metastases are eligible provided the patient is asymptomatic and meets the above criteria, including PS. Measurable disease by RECIST criteria Ability to give informed consent Exclusion Criteria Patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity to gemcitabine. Incompletely healed from previous oncologic or other major surgery. Pregnancy or breast feeding (women of childbearing potential are not expected to be enrolled in this study given minimum age) Patients with severe co-morbid illness. Patients unable to participate in the QOL assessments.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas E Stinchcombe, MD
Organizational Affiliation
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Highlands Oncology Group - Fayetteville
City
Fayetteville
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72703
Country
United States
Facility Name
Summit Cancer Care
City
Savannah
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Evanston Hospital
City
Evanston
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60201-1781
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hackensack University Medical Center Cancer Center
City
Hackensack
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599-7295
Country
United States
Facility Name
Blumenthal Cancer Center at Carolinas Medical Center
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28232-2861
Country
United States
Facility Name
Batte Cancer Center at Northeast Medical Center
City
Concord
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28025
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cape Fear Valley Medical Center Cancer Center
City
Fayetteville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28302-2000
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rex Cancer Center at Rex Hospital
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kingsport Hematology-Oncology Associates
City
Kingsport
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37660
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Tennessee Cancer Institute - Memphis
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38104
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
There is no plan to share any individual participant data.
Links:
URL
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00283244
Description
Clinical trial summary from the National Cancer Institute's PDQ® database

Learn more about this trial

Ph II Gemcitabine, Erlotinib, and Gemcitabine With Erlotinib/Elderly Patients W/ IIIB/IV NSCLC

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs