search
Back to results

Necessity of Esophageal Dissection During Laparoscopic Fundoplication

Primary Purpose

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Hiatal Hernia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lap. Fundo. with Mobilization of the Esophageal Junction
Lap. Fundo. without Mobilization of the Esophageal Junction
Sponsored by
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease focused on measuring GERD, Hiatal Hernia, Recurrence

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - 18 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Under 18 years of age Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Exclusion Criteria: Hiatal hernia demonstrated on preoperative contrast study, computed tomography or endoscopy Prior esophageal operation (e.g. esophageal atresia repair, esophageal myotomy) Prior operation for congenital diaphragmatic hernia Patient or family circumstance that will create difficulty attaining one-year follow-up (e.g. referral from distance or anticipated relocation of family) Patients not considered laparoscopic candidates by the staff surgeon or anesthesiologist (e.g. carbon dioxide retaining lung disease, congenital heart disease, or complex previous abdominal operations)

Sites / Locations

  • Children's Hospital of Alabama
  • Children's Mercy Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Arms:Lap. Fundo. with Mobilization of the Esophageal Junction

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Hiatal hernia

Secondary Outcome Measures

control of symptoms
retching

Full Information

First Posted
February 6, 2006
Last Updated
September 21, 2009
Sponsor
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Collaborators
University of Alabama at Birmingham
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00287612
Brief Title
Necessity of Esophageal Dissection During Laparoscopic Fundoplication
Official Title
Prospective Trial Comparing Utility of Esophageal Crural Dissection During Laparoscopic Fundoplication in Children
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2009
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Collaborators
University of Alabama at Birmingham

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study compares complete dissection of the tissue around the lower esophagus to no dissection of these tissues during laparoscopic fundoplication in children.
Detailed Description
This will be a 2-center, prospective randomized clinical trial involving patients who require an operation for gastroesophageal reflux disease. This is intended to be a definitive study. All patients will receive the standard operation for reflux: laparoscopic fundoplication. The dissection will be performed by either separating the phrenoesophageal membrane, or by leaving the phrenoesophageal membrane intact. Sample size calculated on a power of 80% with an alpha level of 0.05 using the recurrence rates demonstrated by our retrospective data produce a number of 159 patients in each arm of the study. Given that we will need to follow these patients for 1 year after enrollment, there may be some attrition due to lost follow-up. Therefore 180 patients per arm would account for just over 10% attrition. One group will undergo laparoscopic fundoplication with complete mobilization of the lower esophagus by circumferentially dividing the phrenoesophageal membrane. The other group will undergo laparoscopic fundoplication without dividing this membrane. The operation, post-operative care, and follow-up plan will otherwise not differ between groups. If 4 consecutive recurrences are found in one group, an interim analysis will be conducted. If a recurrence difference between groups of statistical significance is detected, the study will be concluded at this point. Without this occurrence, an interim analysis will be conducted at 180 patients enrolled.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Hiatal Hernia
Keywords
GERD, Hiatal Hernia, Recurrence

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
177 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Arms:Lap. Fundo. with Mobilization of the Esophageal Junction
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Lap. Fundo. with Mobilization of the Esophageal Junction
Intervention Description
Complete mobilization of the esophageal junction
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Lap. Fundo. without Mobilization of the Esophageal Junction
Intervention Description
phrenoesophageal membrane left intact
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hiatal hernia
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
control of symptoms
Time Frame
1 year
Title
retching
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Under 18 years of age Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Exclusion Criteria: Hiatal hernia demonstrated on preoperative contrast study, computed tomography or endoscopy Prior esophageal operation (e.g. esophageal atresia repair, esophageal myotomy) Prior operation for congenital diaphragmatic hernia Patient or family circumstance that will create difficulty attaining one-year follow-up (e.g. referral from distance or anticipated relocation of family) Patients not considered laparoscopic candidates by the staff surgeon or anesthesiologist (e.g. carbon dioxide retaining lung disease, congenital heart disease, or complex previous abdominal operations)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shawn D St. Peter, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Alabama
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Mercy Hospital
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64108
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35171266
Citation
van der Does de Willebois EML; SPICY study group. Mesenteric SParIng versus extensive mesentereCtomY in primary ileocolic resection for ileocaecal Crohn's disease (SPICY): study protocol for randomized controlled trial. BJS Open. 2022 Jan 6;6(1):zrab136. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab136.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Necessity of Esophageal Dissection During Laparoscopic Fundoplication

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs