search
Back to results

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Golimumab (CNTO 148) in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Previously Treated With Biologic Anti-TNFa Agent(s)

Primary Purpose

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo
Golimumab 50 mg
Golimumab 100 mg
Sponsored by
Centocor, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Arthritis, Rheumatoid focused on measuring Rheumatoid Arthritis, Anti-TNFa agents, subcutaneous injection

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients have a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (according to the revised 1987 criteria of the ACR) for at least 3 months prior to screening Have active RA as defined by persistent disease activity with at least 4 swollen and 4 tender joints, at the time of screening and baseline Must have been previously treated with at least one dose of etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab If currently using methotrexate, sulfasalazine and/or hydroxychloroquine must have tolerated these agents for at least 12 weeks and be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent If using NSAIDs or other analgesics must be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent If using oral corticosteroids must be on a stable dose equivalent to <= 10 mg of prednisone/day for at least 2 weeks prior to first administration of study agent Are considered eligible according to specified tuberculosis (TB) screening criteria. Exclusion Criteria: Patients cannot have other inflammatory diseases other than RA that might interfere with the evaluation of the benefit of golimumab therapy No history of treatment with natalizumab, rituximab or cytotoxic agents No history of demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis or of concurrent congestive heart failure (CHF), lymphoproliferative disease, known malignancy or history of malignancy within the previous 5 years (with the exception of a nonmelanoma skin cancer that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence) No history of, or ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease No serious infection within 2 months prior to first administration of study agent.

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Group 1: Placebo

Group 2: Golimumab 50 mg

Group 3: Golimumab 100 mg

Arm Description

Placebo Subcutaneous (SC) injections every 4 weeks (wks) thru Wk 20 (unless early escape at Wk 16); Golimumab - if early escape, 50 mg SC injections from Wk 16 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - 50 mg SC injections beginning Wk 24 up to 5 yrs (unless early escape); Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 50 to 100 mg and from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.

Golimumab 50 mg SC injections every 4 wks from Wk 0 up to 5 yrs (unless early escape at Wk 16); Golimumab - if early escape, 100 mg SC injections every 4 wks beginning Wk 16 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 50 to 100 mg and from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.

Golimumab 100 mg SC injections every 4 wks from Wk 0 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 100 to 50 mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 14.
ACR 20 response is an improvement of >= 20% from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments ( patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire and C-reactive protein)

Secondary Outcome Measures

American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 14
Number of patients who achieved an ACR 50 response at Week (Wk) 14. ACR 50 response is an improvement of >= 50% from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments ( patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient's global assessemnt of disease activity VAS scale, Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire and C-reactive protein).
Disease Activity Index Score 28 (DAS 28) (Using C-reactive Protein) Response at Week 14
DAS 28 using C-reactive protein (CRP) is an index to measure disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis which combines tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), CRP value, and participant's global assessment of disease activity (using a Visual Analog Scale of 0 to 100 mm). The DAS 28 score ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst).
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 at Week 24
Number of patients who achieved ACR 20 response at Week (Wk) 24. ACR 20 response is an improvement of >= 20% from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments ( patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient's global assessemnt of disease activity VAS scale, Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale,HAQ and CRP)
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Week 24
Improvement from baseline in HAQ score at Week 24. This 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area based on the worst score from the questions that pertain to that task. The HAQ score is determined by the average of the 8 scores; HAQ ranges from 0 to 3.

Full Information

First Posted
March 3, 2006
Last Updated
January 27, 2014
Sponsor
Centocor, Inc.
Collaborators
Schering-Plough
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00299546
Brief Title
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Golimumab (CNTO 148) in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Previously Treated With Biologic Anti-TNFa Agent(s)
Official Title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Golimumab, a Fully Human Anti-TNFa Monoclonal Antibody, Administered Subcutaneously in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Previously Treated With Biologic Anti- TNFa Agent(s)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centocor, Inc.
Collaborators
Schering-Plough

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab (CNTO 148) in subjects who have active rheumatoid arthritis and have been treated previously with at least 1 dose of a biologic anti-TNFa agent (etanercept, adalimumab or infliximab).
Detailed Description
Golimumab is a fully human protein (antibody) which binds to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFa). TNFa is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and plays a major role in causing the joint pain, swelling and damage from RA. Other marketed drugs that target TNFa (anti-TNFa drugs) have been shown to be effective in reducing the symptoms, signs and joint damage of RA, but have limitations with respect to safety and ease of use. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of a new anti-TNFa drug, golimumab, at 2 doses, injected under the skin every 4 weeks in subjects with active RA previously treated with at least 1 dose of a biologic anti-TNFa agent (etanercept, adalimumab or infliximab). Concomitant therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine and/or hydroxychloroquine is permitted if the subject has tolerated these medications for at least 12 weeks prior to the first administration of study drug and is on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent. The study hypothesis is that golimumab will be a safe and effective treatment for RA in subjects with active RA previously treated with at least one biologic anti-TNFa agent as measured by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) responses and the change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), without causing unacceptable significant adverse effects. The ACR response criteria were designed to assess the level of improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA. The DAS28 responses also measure improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA using the joint examination and laboratory testing. The HAQ is a series of questions that measure a subject's impairment in physical function caused by RA. Patients will receive golimumab 50 mg or 100 mg or placebo injections under the skin every 4 weeks until Week 24. After Week 24, all subjects receive golimumab 50 mg or 100 mg injections, and golimumab continues for all groups every 4 weeks for about 4 and a half more years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Anti-TNFa agents, subcutaneous injection

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
461 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1: Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo Subcutaneous (SC) injections every 4 weeks (wks) thru Wk 20 (unless early escape at Wk 16); Golimumab - if early escape, 50 mg SC injections from Wk 16 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - 50 mg SC injections beginning Wk 24 up to 5 yrs (unless early escape); Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 50 to 100 mg and from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.
Arm Title
Group 2: Golimumab 50 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Golimumab 50 mg SC injections every 4 wks from Wk 0 up to 5 yrs (unless early escape at Wk 16); Golimumab - if early escape, 100 mg SC injections every 4 wks beginning Wk 16 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 50 to 100 mg and from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.
Arm Title
Group 3: Golimumab 100 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Golimumab 100 mg SC injections every 4 wks from Wk 0 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 100 to 50 mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
SC injections
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Golimumab 50 mg
Intervention Description
SC injections
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Golimumab 100 mg
Intervention Description
SC injections
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 14.
Description
ACR 20 response is an improvement of >= 20% from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments ( patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire and C-reactive protein)
Time Frame
Week 14
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 14
Description
Number of patients who achieved an ACR 50 response at Week (Wk) 14. ACR 50 response is an improvement of >= 50% from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments ( patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient's global assessemnt of disease activity VAS scale, Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire and C-reactive protein).
Time Frame
Week 14
Title
Disease Activity Index Score 28 (DAS 28) (Using C-reactive Protein) Response at Week 14
Description
DAS 28 using C-reactive protein (CRP) is an index to measure disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis which combines tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), CRP value, and participant's global assessment of disease activity (using a Visual Analog Scale of 0 to 100 mm). The DAS 28 score ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst).
Time Frame
Week 14
Title
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 at Week 24
Description
Number of patients who achieved ACR 20 response at Week (Wk) 24. ACR 20 response is an improvement of >= 20% from baseline in both the tender and swollen joint count and in at least 3 of the 5 assessments ( patient's assessment of pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient's global assessemnt of disease activity VAS scale, Physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scale,HAQ and CRP)
Time Frame
From Baseline to Week 24
Title
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Week 24
Description
Improvement from baseline in HAQ score at Week 24. This 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area based on the worst score from the questions that pertain to that task. The HAQ score is determined by the average of the 8 scores; HAQ ranges from 0 to 3.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Week 24

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients have a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (according to the revised 1987 criteria of the ACR) for at least 3 months prior to screening Have active RA as defined by persistent disease activity with at least 4 swollen and 4 tender joints, at the time of screening and baseline Must have been previously treated with at least one dose of etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab If currently using methotrexate, sulfasalazine and/or hydroxychloroquine must have tolerated these agents for at least 12 weeks and be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent If using NSAIDs or other analgesics must be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent If using oral corticosteroids must be on a stable dose equivalent to <= 10 mg of prednisone/day for at least 2 weeks prior to first administration of study agent Are considered eligible according to specified tuberculosis (TB) screening criteria. Exclusion Criteria: Patients cannot have other inflammatory diseases other than RA that might interfere with the evaluation of the benefit of golimumab therapy No history of treatment with natalizumab, rituximab or cytotoxic agents No history of demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis or of concurrent congestive heart failure (CHF), lymphoproliferative disease, known malignancy or history of malignancy within the previous 5 years (with the exception of a nonmelanoma skin cancer that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence) No history of, or ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease No serious infection within 2 months prior to first administration of study agent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Centocor, Inc. Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Centocor, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
City
Paradise Valley
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Torrance
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Upland
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Trumbull
State/Province
Connecticut
Country
United States
City
Aventura
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Jupiter
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Largo
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Palm Harbor
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Tamarac
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Moline
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Springfield
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Cedar Rapids
State/Province
Iowa
Country
United States
City
Witchita
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
Country
United States
City
Wheaton
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
Country
United States
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Mayfield
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
West Reading
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Arlington
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
City
Brookfield
State/Province
Wisconsin
Country
United States
City
Racine
State/Province
Wisconsin
Country
United States
City
Adelaide
Country
Australia
City
Cotton Tree
Country
Australia
City
Melbourne
Country
Australia
City
Graz
Country
Austria
City
Lainz/Wien N/A
Country
Austria
City
Wien
Country
Austria
City
Victoria
State/Province
British Columbia
Country
Canada
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
City
St. John'S
State/Province
Newfoundland and Labrador
Country
Canada
City
Kitchener
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Newmarket
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Sainte Foy
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
City
Claire
Country
Canada
City
Helsinki
Country
Finland
City
Hyvinkaa
Country
Finland
City
Jyvalskyla
Country
Finland
City
Baden-Baden
Country
Germany
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
City
Erlangen
Country
Germany
City
Hamburg
Country
Germany
City
Herne
Country
Germany
City
Köln
Country
Germany
City
München
Country
Germany
City
Vogelsang-Gommern
Country
Germany
City
Würzburg
Country
Germany
City
Maastricht
Country
Netherlands
City
Auckland
Country
New Zealand
City
Rotorua
Country
New Zealand
City
Timaru
Country
New Zealand
City
Santander
Country
Spain
City
Sevilla
Country
Spain
City
Valencia
Country
Spain
City
Leeds
Country
United Kingdom
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
City
Oxford
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27889300
Citation
Vieira MC, Zwillich SH, Jansen JP, Smiechowski B, Spurden D, Wallenstein GV. Tofacitinib Versus Biologic Treatments in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: Results From a Network Meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2016 Dec;38(12):2628-2641.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27803138
Citation
Kay J, Fleischmann R, Keystone E, Hsia EC, Hsu B, Zhou Y, Goldstein N, Braun J. Five-year Safety Data from 5 Clinical Trials of Subcutaneous Golimumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;43(12):2120-2130. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160420. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25627338
Citation
Smolen JS, Kay J, Doyle M, Landewe R, Matteson EL, Gaylis N, Wollenhaupt J, Murphy FT, Xu S, Zhou Y, Hsia EC. Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after treatment with tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors: findings with up to five years of treatment in the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 GO-AFTER study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Jan 22;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0516-6.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
19560810
Citation
Smolen JS, Kay J, Doyle MK, Landewe R, Matteson EL, Wollenhaupt J, Gaylis N, Murphy FT, Neal JS, Zhou Y, Visvanathan S, Hsia EC, Rahman MU; GO-AFTER study investigators. Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (GO-AFTER study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Lancet. 2009 Jul 18;374(9685):210-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60506-7. Epub 2009 Jun 26. Erratum In: Lancet. 2009 Oct 24;374(9699):1422.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Golimumab (CNTO 148) in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Previously Treated With Biologic Anti-TNFa Agent(s)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs