Back to results

Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine During Ambulance Transport.

Primary Purpose

Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Status

Unknown status

Phase

Not Applicable

Locations

Taiwan

Study Type

Interventional

Intervention

Automatic CPR machine

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cardiac Arrest focused on measuring Resuscitation, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, cardiac arrest, CPR

Eligibility Criteria

16 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient in Taipei distric Patients sent to National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) through Jhongsiao Emergency medical service (EMS) team Exclusion Criteria: Younger than 15 years old Traumatic cardia arrest Patients not sent to NTUH by Jhongsiao EMS team

Sites / Locations

National Taiwan University HospitalRecruiting

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Quality of CPR

Secondary Outcome Measures

End-tidal CO2 on arrival at ER

Recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate

Survival rate at 1hr, 24hr, and discharge from hospital

Full Information

NCT ID

NCT00308815

First Posted

March 28, 2006

Last Updated

March 28, 2006

Sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number

NCT00308815

Brief Title

Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine During Ambulance Transport.

Official Title

Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine on the CPR Performance for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Ambulance Transport.

Study Type

Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date

October 2004

Overall Recruitment Status

Unknown status

Study Start Date

January 2005 (undefined)

Primary Completion Date

undefined (undefined)

Study Completion Date

undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a randomized controlled prospective study which assigned patient to receive manual CPR or automatic CPR machine use. The quality and efficacy between manual CPR and machine CPR will be evaluated.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study

Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Keywords

Resuscitation, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, cardiac arrest, CPR

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose

Treatment

Study Phase

Not Applicable

Interventional Study Model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

Single

Allocation

Randomized

Enrollment

100 (false)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type

Device

Intervention Name(s)

Automatic CPR machine

Primary Outcome Measure Information:

Title

Quality of CPR

Secondary Outcome Measure Information:

Title

End-tidal CO2 on arrival at ER

Title

Recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate

Title

Survival rate at 1hr, 24hr, and discharge from hospital

10. Eligibility

Sex

All

Minimum Age & Unit of Time

16 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Eligibility Criteria

Overall Study Officials:

First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree

Wen-Chu Chiang, M.D.

Organizational Affiliation

National Taiwan University Hospital

Official's Role

Study Director

Facility Information:

Facility Name

National Taiwan University Hospital

City

Taipei

ZIP/Postal Code

10002

Country

Taiwan

Individual Site Status

Recruiting

Facility Contact:

First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree

Wen-Chu Chiang, M.D.

Phone

886-2-23123456

Ext

5632

drchiang@ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw

First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree

Wen-Chu Chiang, M.D.

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Versus Automatic CPR Machine During Ambulance Transport.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs