search
Back to results

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes in Hip Fractures Surgically Fixed With Either a Two or Four Hole Device.

Primary Purpose

Hip Fracture

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
2 Versus 4 Hole DHS
Sponsored by
University of British Columbia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hip Fracture focused on measuring DHS, Intertrochanteric

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Consenting patients over the age of 65 with an isolated 2-, 3-, and 4-part intertrochanteric hip fractures will be included in this study. Exclusion Criteria: -

Sites / Locations

  • Vancouver General Hospital

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mechanical failure of fixation (up to 6 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Length of incision, post-operative pain, analgesic use, operative time, and mean hemoglobin drop. Length of hospital stay and medical complications will also be assessed while hospitalized

Full Information

First Posted
May 8, 2006
Last Updated
April 26, 2011
Sponsor
University of British Columbia
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00323232
Brief Title
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes in Hip Fractures Surgically Fixed With Either a Two or Four Hole Device.
Official Title
Two-Hole Versus Four-Hole Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) for the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
University of British Columbia

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Although Standard of Care for Hip Fractures is the Device (Dynamic Hip Screw) being studied in this project, and both sizes (the 2 and the 4 hole versions) are currently in use there is not widespread agreement yet whether there is an optimal number of screws (2 or 4) required for the best outcomes. If it can be shown that a 2 hole version is just as successful in outcomes it would allow for a smaller incision (surgical cut) at the site of the fracture. This could reduce soft tissue dissection, operating time, and surgical blood loss. This in turn would reduce post operative pain, blood loss, and hospital length of stay.
Detailed Description
This study has been designed to prospectively evaluate the clinical results of a two-hole versus four-hole dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. It is estimated that over 27,000 hip fractures occur in Canada each year, at an estimated cost of $10,000 per patient per hospitalization. Intertrochanteric hip fractures account for approximately half of all hip fractures. While many surgical treatment options exist, the accepted standard fixation device for the treatment of both stable and unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures is the dynamic hip screw. No consensus exists regarding the optimal number of screws required for adequate side plate fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. The most commonly used device is the 135-degree four-hole side plate, however, decreasing the length of the side plate would theoretically allow for a smaller incision site, minimal soft-tissue dissection, shortened operating time, and reduced operative blood loss. This in turn would reduce post-operative pain, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. With the majority of hip fractures occurring in the frail, elderly population, a less invasive procedure potentially decreases overall patient mortality. Biomechanical studies simulating stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures have suggested that fewer screws are adequate for good side plate fixation. Two clinical trials have reviewed series of fractures treated with a two-hole DHS and have reported favorable results. No prospective randomized study to date, however, has directly compared the clinical results of the standard four-hole plate with that of the two-hole plate. We propose a study is to evaluate the clinical results of the two-hole versus four-hole plate for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with a minimum 6-month follow-up. This study's aim is to develop clinical outcome data which can be used (a) determine range of expected clinical outcomes resulting from current standard management of these injuries, and (b) as the basis of reporting on the clinical outcomes of these injuries in the peer-reviewed literature. Patients over the age of 65 who have sustained an isolated 2-, 3-, and 4-part intertrochanteric hip fractures will be included in this study. Patients who have Pathological, subtrochanteric, reverse obliquity fractures, multiple injuries, and patients whose time to the operating room exceeds 48 hours will be excluded. The primary outcome measure to be assessed is mechanical failure of fixation. Secondary variables to be assessed during the hospital stay are: length of incision, post-operative pain, analgesic use, operative time, and mean hemoglobin drop. Length of hospital stay and medical complications will also be assessed. They will subsequently be followed at six weeks, 3 months, and six months post-operatively in clinic with a physical exam and a pelvis and hip radiograph, and an inquiry will be made as to their general medical condition and any significant medical complications since discharge. A functional inquiry and quality of life score will be administered pre-operatively and at each subsequent clinic visit.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hip Fracture
Keywords
DHS, Intertrochanteric

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
400 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
2 Versus 4 Hole DHS
Intervention Description
See Detailed Description.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mechanical failure of fixation (up to 6 months)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Length of incision, post-operative pain, analgesic use, operative time, and mean hemoglobin drop. Length of hospital stay and medical complications will also be assessed while hospitalized

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Consenting patients over the age of 65 with an isolated 2-, 3-, and 4-part intertrochanteric hip fractures will be included in this study. Exclusion Criteria: -
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
P J O'Brien, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The University of British Columbia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Vancouver General Hospital
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes in Hip Fractures Surgically Fixed With Either a Two or Four Hole Device.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs