search
Back to results

Replacement of Nebulised Ipratropium With Inhaled Tiotropium in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Primary Purpose

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Inhaled Tiotropium
Sponsored by
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease focused on measuring COPD, ipratropium, tiotropium

Eligibility Criteria

35 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Stable Moderate to severe COPD (GOLD criteria) > 20 pack year smoking history current treatment with nebulised ipratropium bromide no exacerbations within preceding 3 months Exclusion Criteria: current participation in other study < 20 pack year smoking history Significant co-morbidity e.g. cardiac history of intolerance to lactose

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Spirometry

Secondary Outcome Measures

St George's Respiratory Questionnaire
Baseline/Transition Dyspnea index

Full Information

First Posted
June 8, 2006
Last Updated
July 27, 2010
Sponsor
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00335621
Brief Title
Replacement of Nebulised Ipratropium With Inhaled Tiotropium in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Official Title
Replacement of Nebulised Ipratropium With Inhaled Tiotropium in Stable COPD
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2006
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Study terminated prior to recruitment - recruitment proved impossible
Study Start Date
June 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
December 2007 (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) take nebulised treatments to ease the symptom of breathlessness, including the drug ipratropium. Nebulised bronchodilator drugs are taken up to 4 times through the day, and this can take up to 15 minutes each time. Although the treatment isbe effective, patients report that the time taken to set-up and use the nebuliser can be a disincentive to regular use. By contrast, an inhaler device is easy to use following appropriate instruction, and takes only a few seconds to administer. Inhaled tiotropium is a once daily treatment taken by inhaler which has been shown to be effective in COPD. We wish to assess whether inhaled Tiotropium as effective as nebulised ipratropium in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Detailed Description
Tiotropium and ipratropium bromide are both antimuscarinic bronchodilators, licensed for the treatment of COPD with a similar side-effect profile. Tiotropium administered by an inhaler device (Handihaler®) has been shown to be superior to placebo and inhaled ipratropium bromide in patients with COPD, in both short term and longer term studies. The superiority of inhaled tiotropium over inhaled ipratropium bromide has been demonstrated for lung function tests and also for measures of health status. It is not known however if inhaled tiotropium is superior to ipratropium bromide administered via a nebuliser. We wish to examine whether inhaled tiotropium is as effective and safe as nebulised ipratropium bromide in patients with chronic stable COPD. Design The study will be a randomised, crossover study. The patients will not be blinded to the therapy but the technician performing the pulmonary function tests will be blinded to the patients' therapy. Duration The length of the study for each patient will be 12 weeks. Patient group Patients would be recruited from the population of patients supplied with a nebuliser from the respiratory department at Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Patients will be identified from those regularly attending the out-patients department and who have stable disease. Patients who frequently admitted to the respiratory ward with exacerbations of their disease will be excluded. Patients will be recruited at the rate of 2 per week. The study will be a single site study. Following consent the patients would be asked to complete the St George's respiratory questionnaire, undergo brief spirometry and a general heath/satisfaction questionnaire, including the baseline and transitional dyspnoea index. Patient demographics will be collected including; age, sex, duration of COPD, smoking history, height, weight, concurrent therapy inhaled and oral. The patients would then be randomised to either remain on their nebulised ipratropium for a further 6 weeks or to be commenced on inhaled tiotropium via the HandiHaler. Patients commenced on tiotropium would be given instruction on how to use the new inhaler and be told not to use their nebulised ipratropium. All other medication would remain the same. The patients randomised to ipratropium would be instructed on continue to take their nebulised ipratropium as before. All patients would be issued with a diary card on which they would record their pattern of nebuliser use, symptoms, adverse events and any additional medication required eg antibiotics. Patients will also be asked to record any health resource use, eg visits to their GP or admission to hospital on the diary card. A compliance check in the form of a capsule count will be undertaken. At the end of the six weeks the patients would again undergo brief spirometry, and complete the St George's respiratory questionnaire and a general health/satisfaction questionnaire. At this point the patient's therapy will be crossed over, such that those who were taking the inhaler would now take the nebuliser and vice versa. There will be no wash out period between arms of the study, since comparisons will be made between baseline and the end of each period of treatment for lung function and questionnaires, and diary cards will be analysed only for the final 4 weeks of each treatment period. Those patients to commence on tiotropium would be given instruction on how to use their inhaler and those restarting ipratropium would be asked to take their nebulised therapy as before. All patients would be issued with a diary card on which they would record their pattern of nebuliser use, symptoms, adverse events and any additional medication required eg antibiotics. Patients will also be asked to record any health resource use, eg visits to their GP or admission to hospital on the diary card. At the end of the second 6-week period the patients would again complete the St George's respiratory questionnaire, undergo brief spirometry and a general heath/satisfaction questionnaire as before. A compliance check in the form of a capsule count will be undertaken. At the end of the study patients will be asked which therapy was preferred and a recommendation will be made to their GP depending on their preference. Details of the patient's last dose of inhaled therapy will be recorded at the time of spirometry. Patient numbers The number of patients to be included in the study is 45. The patient numbers are based on a 90% statistical power to detect a mean change of 0.2L in FEV1 between visits 2 and 3 as a result of treatment, using a 5% significance level paired test. This justification is based on previous studies which conservatively indicate the standard deviation of FEV1 values to be 0.4L. Statistical analysis will be undertaken for differences in the mean FEV1 values between visits 2 and 3 using a paired design and parametric testing. Results will be presented using the differences in means between treatments and the associated 95% confidence interval. Other response variables will be similarly analysed for evidence of any difference in treatment effect, with analysis of diary cards only for the final 4 weeks of each treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Keywords
COPD, ipratropium, tiotropium

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
45 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Inhaled Tiotropium
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Spirometry
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
St George's Respiratory Questionnaire
Title
Baseline/Transition Dyspnea index

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Stable Moderate to severe COPD (GOLD criteria) > 20 pack year smoking history current treatment with nebulised ipratropium bromide no exacerbations within preceding 3 months Exclusion Criteria: current participation in other study < 20 pack year smoking history Significant co-morbidity e.g. cardiac history of intolerance to lactose
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
George W Chalmers, MD
Organizational Affiliation
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne Boyter, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Strathclyde University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary
City
Glasgow
ZIP/Postal Code
G4 0SF
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Replacement of Nebulised Ipratropium With Inhaled Tiotropium in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs