search
Back to results

Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) As Adjunctive Therapy In Subjects With Mild To Moderate Alzheimer's Disease (REFLECT-3)

Primary Purpose

Alzheimer's Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg
Placebo
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Alzheimer's Disease focused on measuring adjunctive therapy, moderate, Alzheimer's disease, apolipoprotein E, mild, rosiglitazone, cognition

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply: Male or female subject with a clinical diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease in accordance with NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (Appendix 2). (Note: National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (ADRDA).) Subject has mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease as defined by a MMSE score 10 to 26 inclusive at Screening. Hachinski Ischemia Score ≤ 4 at Screening (See Appendix 3). Age ≥50 and ≤90 years. At least 6 months of ongoing acetylcholinesterase inhibitor therapy for Alzheimer's disease, with stable dosing for at least the last 2 months (and with no intent to change for the duration of the study). Current use of medication is in accordance with the criteria listed in Table 2 (Permitted Medications, Section 8.1). Female subjects must be post-menopausal (i.e. >1 year without menstrual period), surgically sterile, or agree to use adequate method of contraception (Appendix 4) for the duration of the study. Female subjects who are pre-menopausal or who have been post-menopausal for <1 year must undertake pregnancy testing (urine test) at Visit 1, which must be negative. Brain CT or MRI scan performed within the past 12 months or at Screening, showing no evidence of any other potential cause of dementia other than Alzheimer's disease. (Note: Questionable CT or MRI scans should be discussed with the medical monitor, using central imaging guidelines.) Neurological exam without focal changes (excluding changes attributable to AD or peripheral trauma). Subject has the ability to comply with procedures for cognitive and other testing. Subject lives with (or has substantial periods of contact with) a regular caregiver who is willing to attend all visits, oversee the subject's compliance with protocol-specified procedures and study medication, and report on subject's status. (Note: A non-cohabiting caregiver must spend sufficient time with the subject so that, in the opinion of the Investigator, the caregiver can reliably assess cognitive function, activities and behavior, and report on the subject's compliance and health. As caregiver time spent with a potential subject is anticipated to be highly variable across countries and cultures, GSK will consider a variety of different measures by which this stipulation may be met, and GSK should be consulted if adequacy of a caregiver situation is in doubt. However, as guidance, the ability for a caregiver to meet his/her expected responsibilities for this study would normally be possible when the caregiver spends no less than 10 hours per week with the subject, divided over multiple days.) Subject has provided full written informed consent prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure; or if unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive status, full written informed consent on behalf of the subject has been provided by a legally acceptable representative. (Note: Consent by legally acceptable representative is allowed where this is in accordance with local laws, regulations and ethics committee policy.) Caregiver has provided full written informed consent on his/her own behalf prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure. Subjects considered for enrolment must have a QTc (either QTc B (Bazett's correction) or QTc F (Fridericia's correction)) <450msec at Visit 1, with the exception of subjects with bundle branch block (for whom either QTc B or QTc F must be <480msec). (Note: For the purposes of these criteria, QTc B is defined as (QT interval [msec]) / (square root of RR interval [seconds]); and QTc F is defined as (QT interval [msec]) / (cube root of RR interval [seconds]).) Exclusion Criteria: A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply: Diagnosis of possible, probable, or definite vascular dementia in accordance with NINDS-AIREN criteria (Appendix 5). (Note: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (AIREN).) History or evidence of any other CNS disorder that could be interpreted as a cause of dementia: e.g. cerebrovascular disease (stroke, hemorrhage), structural abnormality, epilepsy, infectious or inflammatory/demyelinating CNS conditions, Parkinson's disease. Evidence of the following disorders: current vitamin B12 deficiency, positive syphilis serology, or active thyroid dysfunction (particularly that suggestive of hypothyroidism), including abnormally high or low serum levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), that are clinically significant in the opinion of the investigator. (Note: Testing is required for each parameter only when no result is available from previous 12 months.) History of Type 1 diabetes mellitus or secondary diabetes mellitus. Type 2 diabetes mellitus where the subject is being treated with insulin, a PPARγ agonist, or an insulin secretagogue (e.g. a sulfonylurea or glitinide). Any patient with an HbA1c ≥8.5%. (See Section 6.3.8.4 for Safety Measures for Enrolled Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.) History or clinical/investigational evidence of congestive heart failure defined by the New York Heart Association criteria (Class I to IV cardiac status; Appendix 6). History of cardiovascular event within the last 6 months (i.e. intervention, percutaneous coronary intervention, vascular surgery, acute coronary syndrome [non Q-wave myocardial infarction, Q-wave myocardial infarction, unstable angina] or significant arrhythmia; or major intervention (e.g. cardiac surgery or angiography plus stenting) scheduled). History of significant psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder that in the opinion of the Investigator would interfere with participation in the study, major depressive disorder (according to DSM-IV) in the past year, or current active depression requiring initiation of treatment. (Note: If not currently treated, but active depression is suspected, the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD, Appendix 7) can be used by the Investigator as a guide for deciding whether a prospective subject requires treatment. If the subject has a CSDD score >7, the Investigator should decide if the subject has depression in need of prescribed medication, and a CSDD >12 is considered a strong indicator that treatment is needed. Subjects will be allowed to re-screen after their depression has been adequately managed for >3 months.) History or presence of gastro-intestinal, hepatic, or renal disease or other condition known to interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs, or any other clinically relevant abnormality, medical or psychiatric condition, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study. Clinically significant peripheral edema at the time of screening. Current or recent drug or alcohol abuse or dependence (defined by DSM-IV criteria for substance-related disorders), or recent or remote history of the same if that could be a contributing factor to the dementia. Systolic blood pressure >165 or <90 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >95 or <60 mmHg at the time of screening. Clinically significant anemia (i.e. hemoglobin <11 g/dL for males or <10 g/dL for females) or presence of hemoglobinopathies which would prevent accurate assessment of HbA1c. Abnormal kidney function tests (>1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)). ALT, AST, or alkaline phosphatase values >2.5 times the ULN, total bilirubin values >1.5 times the ULN, or history of severe hepatobiliary disease (e.g. hepatitis B or C, or cirrhosis, Child-Pugh Class B/C). (Note: For subjects with a diagnosis of Gilberts Syndrome and an isolated increase in total bilirubin >1.5 ULN, fractionation should be performed. If all of the following conditions are met, the patient may enter or remain in the study, even if total bilirubin >1.5 ULN: an elevated unconjugated (indirect) bilirubin; the percentage of direct bilirubin <35%; ALT, AST, and alkaline phosphatase <2.5 ULN if subject is in screening (<2.0 ULN for Canadian subjects only), or ≤3 ULN if subject is already randomized into the study) History of a bone marrow transplant. Subject is unable (with assistance, if appropriate) to take study medication as prescribed throughout the study or is at risk of non-compliance with study medication or procedures. Subject is an immediate family member or employee of the participating Investigator, of any of the participating site staff, or of GSK. In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category. The French subject has participated in any study using an investigational drug during the previous 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer). Cognitive tasks prescribed for cognitive rehabilitation and performed under medical supervision are prohibited for 6 months prior to Screening, as well as for the duration of the study.

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Description

Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg OD

Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg OD

Placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in APOE4 Negatives Cohort
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in All Except E4/E4s Cohort
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in Full Population Cohort
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in APOE4 Negatives Cohort
The CDR-SB was a validated clinical assessment of global function in patients with AD. Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", can be added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Primary inference will be based on the week 48 treatment differences obtained from the MMRM model. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in All Except E4/E4s Cohort
The CDR-SB was a validated clinical assessment of global function in patients with AD. Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", can be added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Primary inference will be based on the week 48 treatment differences obtained from the MMRM model. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in Full Population Cohort
The CDR-SB was a validated clinical assessment of global function in patients with AD. Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", can be added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Primary inference will be based on the week 48 treatment differences obtained from the MMRM model. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 36
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. It was calculated at Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 36. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Weeks 12, 24 and 36
The CDR-SB was a validated clinical assessment of global function in patients with AD. Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", can be added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. It was calculated at Weeks 12, 24 and 36. Full population data was presented.
Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score
The MMSE consists of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. Scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment. The scale is completed by the investigator, based on the performance of the participant. Change from screening was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus screening value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score
The DAD assessed the ability of a participant to execute basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) and leisure activities. The scale consists of 40 questions assessing basic and instrumental ADLs. This scale assessed a participants' ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item was scored as yes: 1, no: 0 and N/A: not applicable. Higher scores indicate less disability with a score of 100 indicating no disability and 0 indicating no functional ability. The percentage score was calculated as (DAD Total score /Total number of applicable items) multiplied by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score
NPI is an assessment of frequency and severity of behavioral disturbances in dementia that comprised of 10 dimensions: delusions, hallucinations, dysphoria, apathy, euphoria, disinhibition, aggressiveness and agitation, irritability, anxiety, aberrant motor activity. Participant's caregiver asked about behavior in participant. If "Yes", informant then rated both severity on a 3-point scale, 1-mild to 3-severe (total range: 0-36) and frequency using a 4-point scale, 1-occasionally to 4-very frequently. Total score was frequency × severity. Distress was scored on 5-point scale, 0-no distress to 5-very severe or extreme. Total NPI score was calculated by adding all domain scores; NPI total score: 0-144 and NPI distress score: 0-60, higher scores indicated more severe behavioral disturbance. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in Domains of the Resource Utilization in Dementia Scale (RUD)- Q1 and Q2 Caregiver Hours
The RUD instrument was developed as a comprehensive tool to assess the amount of resource use among demented patients. RUD assessd both formal and informal resource use of the patient and the primary caregiver, making it possible to calculate costs from a societal perspective. Q1 corresponds to the number of hours during the last month the caregiver spent assisting the patient with toilet visits, eating, dressing, grooming, walking and bathing and Q2 corresponds to the number of hours during the last month the caregiver spent assisting the patient with shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, taking medication and managing financial matters. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Scale Total Score- Thermometer Score
The EQ-5D Proxy is an assessment of quality of life and utility benefit. The EQ-5D Proxy is composed of two parts: part two is the visual analogue scale 'Thermometer'. Caregivers are asked to respond as they feel the participant would on dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The 'Thermometer' has endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) and 0 (worst imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Scale Total Score- Utility Score
The EQ-5D Proxy is an assessment of quality of life and utility benefit. The EQ-5D Proxy is composed of two parts: part one is the five dimensional Health State Classification. The Utility score is a caregiver rating of health status on dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Answers to each question were responded to on a 3-point scale which indicates the level of impairment (level 1= no problem; level 2=some or moderate problem(s) and level 3=unable, or extreme problem with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Carer's Quality of Life Instrument (ACQLI) Score
The ACQLI is an assessment of caregiver quality of life. This instrument consisted of 30 questions exploring various aspects of carer's quality of life. Each of the questions had two point response, and the 30 questions were summed to provide a total score. Items were assumed to be unidimensional (i.e., represent a single variable) and were scored 0/1 (false/true) before summation into a total score with a 0-30 range. To ease comparisons between scales, ACQLI scores were transformed to range between 0-100 (100: worse). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Change in ADAS-Cog Total Score for Observed Cases at Week 54 Compared to Week 48
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. It was of interest to compare the single blind phase data between the treatment groups defined based on the double blind treatment group. This analysis only included participants who received at least one dose of single-blind medication. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Change in CDR-SB Total Score for Observed Cases at Week 54 Compared to Week 48
The CDR-SB was a validated clinical assessment of global function in participants with AD. Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", can be added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). It was of interest to compare the single blind phase data between the treatment groups defined based on the double blind treatment group. This analysis only included participants who received at least one dose of single-blind medication. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 48
Blood samples were collected for assessments of HbA1c levels at Baseline and up to Week 48. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value . Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. Full population data was presented.
Number of Participants With On-treatment Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Severity of AEs
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, was life threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was considered as medically significant.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Clinical Concern at Any Time on Treatment- Weight
Body weight was measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. The assessment was performed a t Baseline and up to Week 54. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Clinical Concern at Any Time on Treatment- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP and DBP of participants were recorded in sitting posture as vital sign at each visit. The blood pressure (BP) values were identified as of potential clinical concern if the values were out of the reference range (for SBP, 90 to 140 mmHg and DBP, 50 to 90 mmHg) or meet a change from baseline criterion. The change from baseline criterion for SBP, was increase from Baseline (high) if increased by more than or equal to (>=) 40 mm Hg from Baseline; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >= 30 mmHg from Baseline. For DBP, increase from baseline (high) if increased by >=30 mmHg from baseline; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >= 20 mmHg from Baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Clinical Concern at Any Time on Treatment- Heart Rate (HR)
HR of participants were recorded in sitting posture as vital sign at each visit. The HR values were identified as of potential clinical concern if the values were out of the reference range (50 to 100 beats per minute) or meet a change from baseline criterion. The change from baseline criterion for HR, was increase from Baseline (high) if increased by more than or equal to (>=) 30 from Baseline; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >= 30 from Baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in Weight
Body weight was measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. The assessment was performed at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 54. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Hematology parameters were assessed at Baseline, Weeks 4, 16, 36, 48. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
Hematology parameters were assessed at Baseline and up to Week 48. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Any Time on Treatment Differences in Frequencies of Hematology Data Outside the Reference Range
Haematology parameters were identified as of PCC (high [H], low [L]), if the values were out of the reference range (RR). The range for parameters was: platelet (100AV-500AV), red blood cell (RBC , 0.8-1.2), hemoglobin (L: female [F]:10, male [M]:11; H: F:16.5-AV, M:18), hematocrit (0.8-1.2), white blood cell (WBC, 3-15), Total neutrophils (ANC- absolute Neutrophil count) (0.75-1.5), lymphocytes (0.75-1.5), monocyte s (0.75-2), eosinophils (none -2), basophils (none -2), mean corpuscle volume (MCV, 0.8-1.2), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH, 0.8-1.2), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC , 0.8-1.2), red cell distribution width (RDW, 0.8-1.2), Neutrophil bands (none-1) and segmented neutrophils (0.75-1.3). Full population data was presented.
Any Time on Treatment Differences in Frequencies of Clinical Chemistry Data Outside the Reference Range
Clinical chemistry parameters were identified as of PCC (High, Low), if values were out of RR: Alanine amino transferase (ALT,none-120 [250percent upper limit of RR, ULRR ]),Album in (0.75-2),Aldolase(1.1-1.1),Aspartate amino transferase (AST,none-105 (3-64y),137.5(65+y),>250 percent ULRR), Alkaline phosphatase(ALP,none-312.5 (20+y),>250percent ULRR),blood urea nitrogen(BUN)/Creatinine ratio(none-1.25),BUN(none-11),Chloride(80-115),Calcium (0.75-1.25),Carbon dioxide(CO2,15-40) content,Creatinine (22,<50percent lower limit of RR [LLRR ]-155, >125percent ULRR),Creatine phosphokinase(CPK,none-1.25),Gamma glutamyl transferase(GGT,none-2.5),Glucose (3.6-7.8),HbA1C, High density lipoprotein (HDL,0.65-none),Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH,none -2), Low density lipoprotein(LDL,none-1.25),Magnesium (0.5-2),Potassium (3-5.5),Phosphorus inorganic(0.5-1.5), Sodium (130-150), Total protein (0.8-1.5),Total cholesterol(none -1.5),Direct Billirubin.
Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- HR
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measures was obtained digitally, approximately one minute apart after the participant had rested in the supine position in a quiet room (no TV, minimal talking) for atleast 10 minutes. The ECG parameters includes HR. The assessments were performed at Baseline and up to Week 54. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value . Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Changes From Baseline in ECG Parameters- RR Interval, QT Interval, QTcB, QTcF, PR Interval and QRS Duration
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measures was obtained digitally, approximately one minute apart after the participant had rested in the supine position in a quiet room (no TV, minimal talking) for atleast 10 minutes. The ECG parameters includes PR interval, QRS duration, QT - uncorrected interval, QTc Bazett (QTcB), QTc Fridericia (QTcF) and RR interval. The assessments were performed at Baseline and up to Week 54. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Change From Baseline in HbA1c up to Week 54
Blood samples were collected for assessments of HbA1c levels at Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 54. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Change From Baseline in Short Term Memory Assessment
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Questions 1 (word recall) and 7 (word recognition) of ADAS-Cog questionnaire was summed to get a short term memory assessment. The score for Question 1 was calculated as the mean number of words not recalled over the trials for which data was available. If data for all three trials was missing, or if the score for Question 7 was missing then the short term memory score will also be set to missing. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented.

Full Information

First Posted
June 30, 2006
Last Updated
August 3, 2017
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00348140
Brief Title
Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) As Adjunctive Therapy In Subjects With Mild To Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Acronym
REFLECT-3
Official Title
A 54 Week, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Effects of Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) as Adjunctive Therapy to Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors on Cognition and Overall Clinical Response in APOE4-stratified Subjects With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 12, 2006 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 20, 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 20, 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Rosiglitazone (RSG) has been tested in clinical studies and is approved by the FDA as a treatment for type II diabetes mellitus, a disease that occurs when the body is unable to effectively use glucose. RSG XR, the investigational drug used in this study, is an extended-release form of RSG. This study tests whether RSG XR safely provides clinical benefit to people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) when combined with one of the currently approved AD medications, Aricept®, Razadyne® or Exelon®. RSG XR is a new approach to AD therapy and this study tests a new way to treat AD by testing whether one's genetic makeup affects the response to the study drug. Clinical data suggesting that RSG may benefit AD patients was first seen in a small study performed at the University of Washington and then from a larger GSK study conducted in Europe and New Zealand. In the first study, subjects receiving RSG once daily for 6 months scored significantly better on 3 tests of memory and thought than those who did not receive RSG. In the GSK study, those that appeared to benefit most from treatment with RSG XR had a specific genetic pattern. They did not have the gene that caused them to produce the protein apolipoprotein E e4 (APOE e4). Subjects who have the APOE e4 gene may have two copies, one from each parent, or they may have only one APOE e4 gene meaning that they inherited either the APOE e2 or APOE e3 version of the gene, instead of APOE e4, from one of their parents. Subjects with one copy of the APOE e4 gene remained at their same level of thinking ability while those with two copies of the APOE e4 gene, continued to worsen during the 6-month treatment. The current study will more directly test the effectiveness or RSG XR on people who either have or lack the APOE e4 gene.
Detailed Description
A 54-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to investigate the effects of rosiglitazone (extended release tablets) as adjunctive therapy to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors on cognition and overall clinical response in APOE e4-stratified subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (REFLECT-3)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Alzheimer's Disease
Keywords
adjunctive therapy, moderate, Alzheimer's disease, apolipoprotein E, mild, rosiglitazone, cognition

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1468 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg OD
Arm Title
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg OD
Arm Title
Arm 3
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg
Intervention Description
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg OD
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg
Intervention Description
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg OD
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in APOE4 Negatives Cohort
Description
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in All Except E4/E4s Cohort
Description
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in Full Population Cohort
Description
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in APOE4 Negatives Cohort
Description
The CDR-SB was a validated clinical assessment of global function in patients with AD. Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", can be added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Primary inference will be based on the week 48 treatment differences obtained from the MMRM model. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in All Except E4/E4s Cohort
Description
The CDR-SB was a validated clinical assessment of global function in patients with AD. Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", can be added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Primary inference will be based on the week 48 treatment differences obtained from the MMRM model. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 48, as a Function of APOE ε4 Status in Full Population Cohort
Description
The CDR-SB was a validated clinical assessment of global function in patients with AD. Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", can be added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Primary inference will be based on the week 48 treatment differences obtained from the MMRM model. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for statistical tests in the two RSG dose groups and the genetic subgroups.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score at Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 36
Description
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. It was calculated at Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 36. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8, 16, 24, 36
Title
Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Weeks 12, 24 and 36
Description
The CDR-SB was a validated clinical assessment of global function in patients with AD. Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", can be added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. It was calculated at Weeks 12, 24 and 36. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12, 24, 36
Title
Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score
Description
The MMSE consists of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. Scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment. The scale is completed by the investigator, based on the performance of the participant. Change from screening was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus screening value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Screening (Week -4) and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score
Description
The DAD assessed the ability of a participant to execute basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) and leisure activities. The scale consists of 40 questions assessing basic and instrumental ADLs. This scale assessed a participants' ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item was scored as yes: 1, no: 0 and N/A: not applicable. Higher scores indicate less disability with a score of 100 indicating no disability and 0 indicating no functional ability. The percentage score was calculated as (DAD Total score /Total number of applicable items) multiplied by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8, 16, 24, 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score
Description
NPI is an assessment of frequency and severity of behavioral disturbances in dementia that comprised of 10 dimensions: delusions, hallucinations, dysphoria, apathy, euphoria, disinhibition, aggressiveness and agitation, irritability, anxiety, aberrant motor activity. Participant's caregiver asked about behavior in participant. If "Yes", informant then rated both severity on a 3-point scale, 1-mild to 3-severe (total range: 0-36) and frequency using a 4-point scale, 1-occasionally to 4-very frequently. Total score was frequency × severity. Distress was scored on 5-point scale, 0-no distress to 5-very severe or extreme. Total NPI score was calculated by adding all domain scores; NPI total score: 0-144 and NPI distress score: 0-60, higher scores indicated more severe behavioral disturbance. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8, 16, 24, 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Domains of the Resource Utilization in Dementia Scale (RUD)- Q1 and Q2 Caregiver Hours
Description
The RUD instrument was developed as a comprehensive tool to assess the amount of resource use among demented patients. RUD assessd both formal and informal resource use of the patient and the primary caregiver, making it possible to calculate costs from a societal perspective. Q1 corresponds to the number of hours during the last month the caregiver spent assisting the patient with toilet visits, eating, dressing, grooming, walking and bathing and Q2 corresponds to the number of hours during the last month the caregiver spent assisting the patient with shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, taking medication and managing financial matters. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12, 24, 36, 48
Title
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Scale Total Score- Thermometer Score
Description
The EQ-5D Proxy is an assessment of quality of life and utility benefit. The EQ-5D Proxy is composed of two parts: part two is the visual analogue scale 'Thermometer'. Caregivers are asked to respond as they feel the participant would on dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The 'Thermometer' has endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) and 0 (worst imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12, 36, 48
Title
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Scale Total Score- Utility Score
Description
The EQ-5D Proxy is an assessment of quality of life and utility benefit. The EQ-5D Proxy is composed of two parts: part one is the five dimensional Health State Classification. The Utility score is a caregiver rating of health status on dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Answers to each question were responded to on a 3-point scale which indicates the level of impairment (level 1= no problem; level 2=some or moderate problem(s) and level 3=unable, or extreme problem with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12, 36, 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Carer's Quality of Life Instrument (ACQLI) Score
Description
The ACQLI is an assessment of caregiver quality of life. This instrument consisted of 30 questions exploring various aspects of carer's quality of life. Each of the questions had two point response, and the 30 questions were summed to provide a total score. Items were assumed to be unidimensional (i.e., represent a single variable) and were scored 0/1 (false/true) before summation into a total score with a 0-30 range. To ease comparisons between scales, ACQLI scores were transformed to range between 0-100 (100: worse). Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12, 36, 48
Title
Change in ADAS-Cog Total Score for Observed Cases at Week 54 Compared to Week 48
Description
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. It was of interest to compare the single blind phase data between the treatment groups defined based on the double blind treatment group. This analysis only included participants who received at least one dose of single-blind medication. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Week 48 and Week 54
Title
Change in CDR-SB Total Score for Observed Cases at Week 54 Compared to Week 48
Description
The CDR-SB was a validated clinical assessment of global function in participants with AD. Impairment was scored in each of 6 cognitive categories on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", can be added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0 to 18 (severe impairment). It was of interest to compare the single blind phase data between the treatment groups defined based on the double blind treatment group. This analysis only included participants who received at least one dose of single-blind medication. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Week 48 and Week 54
Title
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 48
Description
Blood samples were collected for assessments of HbA1c levels at Baseline and up to Week 48. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value . Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With On-treatment Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Severity of AEs
Description
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, was life threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was considered as medically significant.
Time Frame
Upto Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Clinical Concern at Any Time on Treatment- Weight
Description
Body weight was measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. The assessment was performed a t Baseline and up to Week 54. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Upto Week 54
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Clinical Concern at Any Time on Treatment- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Description
SBP and DBP of participants were recorded in sitting posture as vital sign at each visit. The blood pressure (BP) values were identified as of potential clinical concern if the values were out of the reference range (for SBP, 90 to 140 mmHg and DBP, 50 to 90 mmHg) or meet a change from baseline criterion. The change from baseline criterion for SBP, was increase from Baseline (high) if increased by more than or equal to (>=) 40 mm Hg from Baseline; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >= 30 mmHg from Baseline. For DBP, increase from baseline (high) if increased by >=30 mmHg from baseline; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >= 20 mmHg from Baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Time Frame
Upto Week 54
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Vital Signs of Clinical Concern at Any Time on Treatment- Heart Rate (HR)
Description
HR of participants were recorded in sitting posture as vital sign at each visit. The HR values were identified as of potential clinical concern if the values were out of the reference range (50 to 100 beats per minute) or meet a change from baseline criterion. The change from baseline criterion for HR, was increase from Baseline (high) if increased by more than or equal to (>=) 30 from Baseline; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by >= 30 from Baseline. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Upto Week 54
Title
Change From Baseline in Weight
Description
Body weight was measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. The assessment was performed at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 54. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 54
Title
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Description
Hematology parameters were assessed at Baseline, Weeks 4, 16, 36, 48. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 4, 16, 36, 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
Description
Hematology parameters were assessed at Baseline and up to Week 48. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 4, 16, 36, 48
Title
Any Time on Treatment Differences in Frequencies of Hematology Data Outside the Reference Range
Description
Haematology parameters were identified as of PCC (high [H], low [L]), if the values were out of the reference range (RR). The range for parameters was: platelet (100AV-500AV), red blood cell (RBC , 0.8-1.2), hemoglobin (L: female [F]:10, male [M]:11; H: F:16.5-AV, M:18), hematocrit (0.8-1.2), white blood cell (WBC, 3-15), Total neutrophils (ANC- absolute Neutrophil count) (0.75-1.5), lymphocytes (0.75-1.5), monocyte s (0.75-2), eosinophils (none -2), basophils (none -2), mean corpuscle volume (MCV, 0.8-1.2), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH, 0.8-1.2), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC , 0.8-1.2), red cell distribution width (RDW, 0.8-1.2), Neutrophil bands (none-1) and segmented neutrophils (0.75-1.3). Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Up to Week 48
Title
Any Time on Treatment Differences in Frequencies of Clinical Chemistry Data Outside the Reference Range
Description
Clinical chemistry parameters were identified as of PCC (High, Low), if values were out of RR: Alanine amino transferase (ALT,none-120 [250percent upper limit of RR, ULRR ]),Album in (0.75-2),Aldolase(1.1-1.1),Aspartate amino transferase (AST,none-105 (3-64y),137.5(65+y),>250 percent ULRR), Alkaline phosphatase(ALP,none-312.5 (20+y),>250percent ULRR),blood urea nitrogen(BUN)/Creatinine ratio(none-1.25),BUN(none-11),Chloride(80-115),Calcium (0.75-1.25),Carbon dioxide(CO2,15-40) content,Creatinine (22,<50percent lower limit of RR [LLRR ]-155, >125percent ULRR),Creatine phosphokinase(CPK,none-1.25),Gamma glutamyl transferase(GGT,none-2.5),Glucose (3.6-7.8),HbA1C, High density lipoprotein (HDL,0.65-none),Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH,none -2), Low density lipoprotein(LDL,none-1.25),Magnesium (0.5-2),Potassium (3-5.5),Phosphorus inorganic(0.5-1.5), Sodium (130-150), Total protein (0.8-1.5),Total cholesterol(none -1.5),Direct Billirubin.
Time Frame
Upto Week 48
Title
Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- HR
Description
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measures was obtained digitally, approximately one minute apart after the participant had rested in the supine position in a quiet room (no TV, minimal talking) for atleast 10 minutes. The ECG parameters includes HR. The assessments were performed at Baseline and up to Week 54. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value . Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48, 54
Title
Changes From Baseline in ECG Parameters- RR Interval, QT Interval, QTcB, QTcF, PR Interval and QRS Duration
Description
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measures was obtained digitally, approximately one minute apart after the participant had rested in the supine position in a quiet room (no TV, minimal talking) for atleast 10 minutes. The ECG parameters includes PR interval, QRS duration, QT - uncorrected interval, QTc Bazett (QTcB), QTc Fridericia (QTcF) and RR interval. The assessments were performed at Baseline and up to Week 54. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Full population data was presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48, 54
Title
Change From Baseline in HbA1c up to Week 54
Description
Blood samples were collected for assessments of HbA1c levels at Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 54. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 54
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Term Memory Assessment
Description
The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a five point scale. Scores range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Questions 1 (word recall) and 7 (word recognition) of ADAS-Cog questionnaire was summed to get a short term memory assessment. The score for Question 1 was calculated as the mean number of words not recalled over the trials for which data was available. If data for all three trials was missing, or if the score for Question 7 was missing then the short term memory score will also be set to missing. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value a t Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 0) and upto Week 48

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply: Male or female subject with a clinical diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease in accordance with NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (Appendix 2). (Note: National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (ADRDA).) Subject has mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease as defined by a MMSE score 10 to 26 inclusive at Screening. Hachinski Ischemia Score ≤ 4 at Screening (See Appendix 3). Age ≥50 and ≤90 years. At least 6 months of ongoing acetylcholinesterase inhibitor therapy for Alzheimer's disease, with stable dosing for at least the last 2 months (and with no intent to change for the duration of the study). Current use of medication is in accordance with the criteria listed in Table 2 (Permitted Medications, Section 8.1). Female subjects must be post-menopausal (i.e. >1 year without menstrual period), surgically sterile, or agree to use adequate method of contraception (Appendix 4) for the duration of the study. Female subjects who are pre-menopausal or who have been post-menopausal for <1 year must undertake pregnancy testing (urine test) at Visit 1, which must be negative. Brain CT or MRI scan performed within the past 12 months or at Screening, showing no evidence of any other potential cause of dementia other than Alzheimer's disease. (Note: Questionable CT or MRI scans should be discussed with the medical monitor, using central imaging guidelines.) Neurological exam without focal changes (excluding changes attributable to AD or peripheral trauma). Subject has the ability to comply with procedures for cognitive and other testing. Subject lives with (or has substantial periods of contact with) a regular caregiver who is willing to attend all visits, oversee the subject's compliance with protocol-specified procedures and study medication, and report on subject's status. (Note: A non-cohabiting caregiver must spend sufficient time with the subject so that, in the opinion of the Investigator, the caregiver can reliably assess cognitive function, activities and behavior, and report on the subject's compliance and health. As caregiver time spent with a potential subject is anticipated to be highly variable across countries and cultures, GSK will consider a variety of different measures by which this stipulation may be met, and GSK should be consulted if adequacy of a caregiver situation is in doubt. However, as guidance, the ability for a caregiver to meet his/her expected responsibilities for this study would normally be possible when the caregiver spends no less than 10 hours per week with the subject, divided over multiple days.) Subject has provided full written informed consent prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure; or if unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive status, full written informed consent on behalf of the subject has been provided by a legally acceptable representative. (Note: Consent by legally acceptable representative is allowed where this is in accordance with local laws, regulations and ethics committee policy.) Caregiver has provided full written informed consent on his/her own behalf prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure. Subjects considered for enrolment must have a QTc (either QTc B (Bazett's correction) or QTc F (Fridericia's correction)) <450msec at Visit 1, with the exception of subjects with bundle branch block (for whom either QTc B or QTc F must be <480msec). (Note: For the purposes of these criteria, QTc B is defined as (QT interval [msec]) / (square root of RR interval [seconds]); and QTc F is defined as (QT interval [msec]) / (cube root of RR interval [seconds]).) Exclusion Criteria: A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply: Diagnosis of possible, probable, or definite vascular dementia in accordance with NINDS-AIREN criteria (Appendix 5). (Note: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (AIREN).) History or evidence of any other CNS disorder that could be interpreted as a cause of dementia: e.g. cerebrovascular disease (stroke, hemorrhage), structural abnormality, epilepsy, infectious or inflammatory/demyelinating CNS conditions, Parkinson's disease. Evidence of the following disorders: current vitamin B12 deficiency, positive syphilis serology, or active thyroid dysfunction (particularly that suggestive of hypothyroidism), including abnormally high or low serum levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), that are clinically significant in the opinion of the investigator. (Note: Testing is required for each parameter only when no result is available from previous 12 months.) History of Type 1 diabetes mellitus or secondary diabetes mellitus. Type 2 diabetes mellitus where the subject is being treated with insulin, a PPARγ agonist, or an insulin secretagogue (e.g. a sulfonylurea or glitinide). Any patient with an HbA1c ≥8.5%. (See Section 6.3.8.4 for Safety Measures for Enrolled Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.) History or clinical/investigational evidence of congestive heart failure defined by the New York Heart Association criteria (Class I to IV cardiac status; Appendix 6). History of cardiovascular event within the last 6 months (i.e. intervention, percutaneous coronary intervention, vascular surgery, acute coronary syndrome [non Q-wave myocardial infarction, Q-wave myocardial infarction, unstable angina] or significant arrhythmia; or major intervention (e.g. cardiac surgery or angiography plus stenting) scheduled). History of significant psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder that in the opinion of the Investigator would interfere with participation in the study, major depressive disorder (according to DSM-IV) in the past year, or current active depression requiring initiation of treatment. (Note: If not currently treated, but active depression is suspected, the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD, Appendix 7) can be used by the Investigator as a guide for deciding whether a prospective subject requires treatment. If the subject has a CSDD score >7, the Investigator should decide if the subject has depression in need of prescribed medication, and a CSDD >12 is considered a strong indicator that treatment is needed. Subjects will be allowed to re-screen after their depression has been adequately managed for >3 months.) History or presence of gastro-intestinal, hepatic, or renal disease or other condition known to interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs, or any other clinically relevant abnormality, medical or psychiatric condition, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study. Clinically significant peripheral edema at the time of screening. Current or recent drug or alcohol abuse or dependence (defined by DSM-IV criteria for substance-related disorders), or recent or remote history of the same if that could be a contributing factor to the dementia. Systolic blood pressure >165 or <90 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >95 or <60 mmHg at the time of screening. Clinically significant anemia (i.e. hemoglobin <11 g/dL for males or <10 g/dL for females) or presence of hemoglobinopathies which would prevent accurate assessment of HbA1c. Abnormal kidney function tests (>1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)). ALT, AST, or alkaline phosphatase values >2.5 times the ULN, total bilirubin values >1.5 times the ULN, or history of severe hepatobiliary disease (e.g. hepatitis B or C, or cirrhosis, Child-Pugh Class B/C). (Note: For subjects with a diagnosis of Gilberts Syndrome and an isolated increase in total bilirubin >1.5 ULN, fractionation should be performed. If all of the following conditions are met, the patient may enter or remain in the study, even if total bilirubin >1.5 ULN: an elevated unconjugated (indirect) bilirubin; the percentage of direct bilirubin <35%; ALT, AST, and alkaline phosphatase <2.5 ULN if subject is in screening (<2.0 ULN for Canadian subjects only), or ≤3 ULN if subject is already randomized into the study) History of a bone marrow transplant. Subject is unable (with assistance, if appropriate) to take study medication as prescribed throughout the study or is at risk of non-compliance with study medication or procedures. Subject is an immediate family member or employee of the participating Investigator, of any of the participating site staff, or of GSK. In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category. The French subject has participated in any study using an investigational drug during the previous 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer). Cognitive tasks prescribed for cognitive rehabilitation and performed under medical supervision are prohibited for 6 months prior to Screening, as well as for the duration of the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sun City
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85351
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85741
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Laguna Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92653
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Redlands
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92374
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92103
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94109
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Norwalk
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06851
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Deerfield Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33064
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Delray Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33445
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33308
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33016
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ocala
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34471
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33702
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33617
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Decatur
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30033
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60610
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Springfield
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01104
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
West Yarmouth
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02673
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Eatontown
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07724
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Manchester Township
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08759
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toms River
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08755
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Amherst
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14226
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14620
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13210
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27607
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Centerville
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45459
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toledo
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43623
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73112
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
74104
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Jenkintown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19046
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Norristown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19401
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19102
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19115
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
East Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02914
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02906
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Greer
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29651
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wichita Falls
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76309
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84107
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22903
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98108
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Middleton
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53562-2215
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53226
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hornsby
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2077
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Randwick
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2031
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Auchenflower
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4066
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chermside
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4032
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kippa Ring
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4021
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Adelaide
State/Province
South Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Woodville
State/Province
South Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
5011
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cheltenham
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3192
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Heidelberg West
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3084
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kew
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3101
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nedlands
State/Province
Western Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
6009
Country
Australia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1070
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kortrijk
ZIP/Postal Code
8500
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Woluwe-Saint-Lambert
ZIP/Postal Code
1200
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1113
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1527
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Varna
ZIP/Postal Code
9010
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kelowna
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V1W 4V5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint John
State/Province
New Brunswick
ZIP/Postal Code
E2L 3L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kentville
State/Province
Nova Scotia
ZIP/Postal Code
B4N 4K9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kingston
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K7L 5G2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1G 4G3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1N 5C8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Peterborough
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K9H 2P4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M3B 2S7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M6M 3Z5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Greenfield Park
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J4V 2J2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mirabel
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J7J 2K8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H4H 1R3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1J 3H5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Québec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1R 3X5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Olomouc
ZIP/Postal Code
775 20
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 10
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 8
ZIP/Postal Code
180 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Trutnov
ZIP/Postal Code
541 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Helsinki
ZIP/Postal Code
00120
Country
Finland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Joensuu
ZIP/Postal Code
80100
Country
Finland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kuopio
ZIP/Postal Code
70211
Country
Finland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33076
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
La Chapelle sur Erdre
ZIP/Postal Code
44240
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
La Seyne sur Mer
ZIP/Postal Code
83500
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59000
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Limoges
ZIP/Postal Code
87042
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Metz
ZIP/Postal Code
57000
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44000
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44300
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75013
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sautron
ZIP/Postal Code
44880
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toulon
ZIP/Postal Code
83000
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31300
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Valence
ZIP/Postal Code
26000
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aalen
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
73430
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Calw
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
75365
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ellwangen
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
73479
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ludwigsburg
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
71634
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Stuttgart
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
70176
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tuebingen
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
72076
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ulm
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
89073
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ulm
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
89075
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wiesloch
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69168
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Alzenau
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
63755
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Muenchen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
81675
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Unterhaching
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
82008
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bad Saarow
State/Province
Brandenburg
ZIP/Postal Code
15526
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bad Homburg
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
61348
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Erbach
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
64711
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chemnitz
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
09111
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dresden
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
01097
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dresden
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leipzig
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
04103
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leipzig
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
04107
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leipzig
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
04157
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gera
State/Province
Thueringen
ZIP/Postal Code
07551
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Jena
State/Province
Thueringen
ZIP/Postal Code
07743
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12163
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12167
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12555
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13053
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13125
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13156
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13187
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13357
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13439
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13507
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
14163
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Shatin
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seongnam-si,
ZIP/Postal Code
463-707
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
138-736
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
150-713
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras
ZIP/Postal Code
50586
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras
ZIP/Postal Code
59100
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ipoh
ZIP/Postal Code
30990
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kelantan
ZIP/Postal Code
16150
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Alkmaar
ZIP/Postal Code
1815 JD
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Blaricum
ZIP/Postal Code
1261 AN
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Den Bosch
ZIP/Postal Code
5232 JL
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Den Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
2545 CH
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hengelo
ZIP/Postal Code
7555 DL
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hilversum
ZIP/Postal Code
1213 XZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Manila
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pasig City
ZIP/Postal Code
1600
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-796
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
31-530
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Torun
ZIP/Postal Code
87-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
02-097
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
169608
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
308433
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
539747
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
811 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
811 07
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
825 56
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kosice
ZIP/Postal Code
041 66
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ljubljana
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Slovenia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Šempeter
ZIP/Postal Code
5290
Country
Slovenia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Loeventstein
ZIP/Postal Code
7530
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oakdale
ZIP/Postal Code
7530
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Richards Bay
ZIP/Postal Code
3900
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rosebank
ZIP/Postal Code
2196
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Somerset West
ZIP/Postal Code
7130
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Waverley, Bloemfontein
ZIP/Postal Code
9301
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Willows, X14, Pretoria
ZIP/Postal Code
0040
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Baracaldo/Vizcaya
ZIP/Postal Code
48903
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08003
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08025
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08036
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08907
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Palma de Mallorca
ZIP/Postal Code
07014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tarrasa, Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08221
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Falköping
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-521 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Jönköping
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-551 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kalix
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-952 82
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mölndal
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-431 41
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sundsvall
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-851 86
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Umeå
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-901 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Blackpool
State/Province
Lancashire
ZIP/Postal Code
FY2 0JH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bradford
ZIP/Postal Code
BD3 0DQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Liverpool
ZIP/Postal Code
L9 7LJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Stirling
ZIP/Postal Code
FK8 1RW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
West End, Southampton
ZIP/Postal Code
SO30 3JB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
West of Scotland Science Park, Glasgow
ZIP/Postal Code
G20 0XA
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21592048
Citation
Harrington C, Sawchak S, Chiang C, Davies J, Donovan C, Saunders AM, Irizarry M, Jeter B, Zvartau-Hind M, van Dyck CH, Gold M. Rosiglitazone does not improve cognition or global function when used as adjunctive therapy to AChE inhibitors in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: two phase 3 studies. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011 Aug;8(5):592-606. doi: 10.2174/156720511796391935.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Description
Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.
Available IPD and Supporting Information:
Available IPD/Information Type
Dataset Specification
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
AVA102670
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Statistical Analysis Plan
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
AVA102670
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Individual Participant Data Set
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
AVA102670
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Informed Consent Form
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
AVA102670
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Study Protocol
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
AVA102670
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Clinical Study Report
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
AVA102670
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
Available IPD/Information Type
Annotated Case Report Form
Available IPD/Information URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Available IPD/Information Identifier
AVA102670
Available IPD/Information Comments
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

Learn more about this trial

Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) As Adjunctive Therapy In Subjects With Mild To Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs