HuMax-CD20 in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL) Patients Failing Fludarabine and Alemtuzumab
Primary Purpose
Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ofatumumab
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Tumor cell phenotype consistent with B-CLL Patients with active B-CLL and with an indication for treatment Failing at least one fludarabine-containing treatment regimen Failing at least one alemtuzumab-containing treatment regimen ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2 Life expectancy of at least 4 months Exclusion Criteria: Previous treatment with alemtuzumab within 6 weeks prior to Visit 2 Previous autologous stem cell transplantation within 6 months prior to Visit 2 Allogeneic stem cell transplantation Radioimmunotherapy
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
ofatumumab
Arm Description
Anti-CD20 antibody therapy
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders and Non-responders for Objective Response as Assessed by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IRC) in Accordance With the National Cancer Institute Working Group (NCIWG) 1996 Guidelines
Par. with complete remission (CR), nodular partial remission (nPR), and partial remission (PR) were classified as responders, while those with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were classified as non-responders. Per the NCIWG guideline (1996): CR; no lymphadenopathy/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms, normal hematology, bone marrow sample as normocellular for age, <30% lymphocytes (LC), no lymphoid nodule; PR: a >=50% decrease in LC/lymphadenopathy; nPR: persistent nodules in bone marrow; PD: new lesion or increase by >=50% from baseline; SD: no CR, PR, or PD.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Duration of Response
Duration of response is defined as the time from the initial response (first visit at which response is observed) to progression or death. If the participant had progression between scheduled visits, no progression at the end of the trial, treatment discontinuation for undocumented progression, treatment discontinuation for toxicity or other reason, new anti-cancer treatment, and experienced death or progression after two or more missed visits in a row the endpoint was censored.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the time from randomization until progression/death. Per the IRC, if the participant had progression between scheduled visits, died before the first assessment, or died between adequate visits, the endpoint was considered progressed. If there was no progression at the end of the trial, treatment discontinuation for undocumented progression, treatment discontinuation for toxicity/other reason, new anti-cancer treatment, and death/progression after 2 or more missed visits in a row, the endpoint was censored. Clinical progression is not considered as progression endpoint.
Time to Next Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treatment
Time to next chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment is defined as the time from treatment allocation/randomization (Visit 2) until the time of the first administration of the next CLL treatment other than ofatumumab (or HuMaxCD20, a fully human monoclonal antibody to CD20 that is expressed on the surface of B-cells).
Overall Survival
OS is defined as the time from allocation to death. OS will also be subgrouped for responders and non-responders.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD19+ Cell Counts
The peripheral blood for each participant was collected and analyzed for CD5+CD19+ cell counts. CD is "cluster of differentiation," is a cell surface marker for immunophenotyping, and, in this case, is a surrogate for B cell malignancy (indicates malignant B cells). Percent change from Visit 2 (Week 0, Baseline) = (value at Week 7 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD20+ Cell Counts
The peripheral blood for each participant was collected and analyzed for CD5+CD20+ cell counts. CD is "cluster of differentiation," is a cell surface marker for immunophenotyping, and, in this case, is a surrogate for B cell malignancy (indicates malignant B cells). Percent change from Visit 2 (Week 0, Baseline) = (value at Week 7 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100.
Median Percent Change of Tumor Size (Sum of Products Dimensions [SPD]) From Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 24 (Visit 14)
Tumor size and change in tumor size will be measured by the absolute value of and the percent change in the sum of products of the diameters of the largest abnormal lymph nodes from Baseline to Week 24 (Visit 14). Percent change from Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 0) = (value at Week 24 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100.
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Constitutional Symptoms at Week 24
Participants with complete resolution of constitutional symptoms were those in whom no constitutional symptoms, such as night sweats, weight loss, and fever or extreme fatigue, were observed.
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Lymphadenopathy
Participants with complete resolution of lymphadenopathy (disease involving the lymph nodes) were defined as those in whom all observed lymph nodes were of normal size (all nodes <1 centimeters) as determined by physical examination assessed by the investigator. All palpable lymph node sizes were recorded.
Number of Participants With Improvement on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale at Week 24
ECOG performance status is a measure of the participant's ability to carry out activities of daily living on 6-point scale (0=fully active, 1=restricted in physically activity, ambulatory, 2=ambulatory [>50% of waking hours], 3=capable of only limited self care, 4=completely disabled, 5=Dead). Improvement in ECOG performance status is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one score on the ECOG scale.
Number of Participants Who Were Positive, Negative, or Had Missing Data for the Indicated Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Prognostic Factors at Screening
The number of participants (par.) who were positive, negative, or had missing data for the following prognostic factors indicative of altered responsiveness to treatment and/or survival was measured: 17p-, 11q-, +12q, 6q-, 13q-. Par. were assessed by FISH for these chromosomal abnormalities known tobe prognostic for time to treatment and survival when detected at diagnosis. Par. were categorized by the chromosomal abnormality detected: 17 p deletion, 11q deletion (but not 17 p deletion), 12 q trisomy (but not 17 p or 111q deletion), 13q deletion only, and no chromosomal abnormalities found.
Number of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin
The number of participants (par.) who had improvement in hemoglobin levels >=11 grams (g)/deciliter (dl) (6.8 millimoles/liter) or 50% improvement over baseline was measured.
Number of Participants With Improvement in Thrombocytopenia (Thromb.)
Improvement in thromb. is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 by >=1 National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI CTC) grade. Thromb. is defined as low platelet counts resulting from refractory CLL, damage from prior treatment, advanced age, or reduced bone marrow function and can be considered as an adverse condition. Adverse events (AEs) such as thromb. in a cancer indication are graded on a scale determined by the NCI called the NCI CTC: lowest, grade 1; highest, grade 5 (death). Changes in this grading can assess improvements or declines in the severity of the AE.
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Hepatomegaly
Participants with complete resolution of enlarged liver (hepatomegaly) were defined as those with an enlarged palpable liver at baseline followed by the absence of hepatomegaly post- baseline (i.e., the liver was of normal size). Liver size was assessed by physical examination and documented as "centimeters" under the costal margin with relative changes in spleen size in 1 dimension calculated based on palpated numeric measurements (as per the 1996 NCIWG guidelines).
Number of Participants With Improvement in Neutropenia
Low levels of neutrophils (neutropenia) may increase the risk of developing serious infections and may be considered an adverse condition and evaluated on the NCI CTC with a grade. Improvement in neutropenia is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 (baseline) by at least one NCI CTC grade. Improvement is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 by at least one NCI CTC grade.
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Splenomegaly
Participants with complete resolution of enlarged spleen (splenomegaly) were defined as those with an enlarged palpable spleen at baseline followed by the absence of splenomegaly post-baseline (i.e., the spleen was of normal size). Spleen size was assessed by physical examination and documented as "centimeters" under the costal margin with relative changes in spleen size in 1 dimension calculated based on palpated numeric measurements (as per the 1996 NCIWG guidelines).
Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A list of AEs experienced in the study with a frequency threshold of 5% can be found in the AE section of this results record.
Cmax and Ctrough at Dose 1 (Visit 2, Week 0), Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7), and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Cmax is defined as the maximum concentration of drug in serum samples. Ctrough is defined as the trough serum concentration (measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval [taken directly before the next administration]). No drug was present before the first infusion; therefore, there are no Ctrough results for Dose 1
AUC (0-inf) and AUC(0-tau) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
AUC is defined as the area under the ofatumumab concentration-time curve as a measure of drug exposure. AUC(0-inf) is AUC from the start of infusion extrapolated to infinity. AUC(0-tau) is AUC from the start of infusion over the dosing interval.
Half-life (t1/2) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Half-life ( t1/2) is defined as the terminal half-life and is the time required for the amount of drug in the body to decrease by half.
Clearance (CL) After Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
CL is the clearance of drug from serum, which is defined as the volume of serum from which the drug is cleared per unit time.
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Vss is defined as the volume of distribution at steady state of ofatumumab.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00349349
Brief Title
HuMax-CD20 in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL) Patients Failing Fludarabine and Alemtuzumab
Official Title
A Single-arm, International, Multi-center Trial of HuMax-CD20, a Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-CD20 Antibody, in Patients With B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Who Have Failed Fludarabine and Alemtuzumab
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether HuMax-CD20 (ofatumumab) is effective in the treatment of patients failing both fludarabine and alemtuzumab.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
223 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ofatumumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Anti-CD20 antibody therapy
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
ofatumumab
Intervention Description
Intravenous infusion
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders and Non-responders for Objective Response as Assessed by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IRC) in Accordance With the National Cancer Institute Working Group (NCIWG) 1996 Guidelines
Description
Par. with complete remission (CR), nodular partial remission (nPR), and partial remission (PR) were classified as responders, while those with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were classified as non-responders. Per the NCIWG guideline (1996): CR; no lymphadenopathy/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms, normal hematology, bone marrow sample as normocellular for age, <30% lymphocytes (LC), no lymphoid nodule; PR: a >=50% decrease in LC/lymphadenopathy; nPR: persistent nodules in bone marrow; PD: new lesion or increase by >=50% from baseline; SD: no CR, PR, or PD.
Time Frame
Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of Response
Description
Duration of response is defined as the time from the initial response (first visit at which response is observed) to progression or death. If the participant had progression between scheduled visits, no progression at the end of the trial, treatment discontinuation for undocumented progression, treatment discontinuation for toxicity or other reason, new anti-cancer treatment, and experienced death or progression after two or more missed visits in a row the endpoint was censored.
Time Frame
Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Description
PFS is defined as the time from randomization until progression/death. Per the IRC, if the participant had progression between scheduled visits, died before the first assessment, or died between adequate visits, the endpoint was considered progressed. If there was no progression at the end of the trial, treatment discontinuation for undocumented progression, treatment discontinuation for toxicity/other reason, new anti-cancer treatment, and death/progression after 2 or more missed visits in a row, the endpoint was censored. Clinical progression is not considered as progression endpoint.
Time Frame
Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24
Title
Time to Next Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treatment
Description
Time to next chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment is defined as the time from treatment allocation/randomization (Visit 2) until the time of the first administration of the next CLL treatment other than ofatumumab (or HuMaxCD20, a fully human monoclonal antibody to CD20 that is expressed on the surface of B-cells).
Time Frame
Time from randomization (Week 0 of Visit 2) until the time of first administration of a CLL treatment other than ofatumumab (assessed for a median of 8.7 weeks currently [or up to 13.3 months])
Title
Overall Survival
Description
OS is defined as the time from allocation to death. OS will also be subgrouped for responders and non-responders.
Time Frame
Start of randomization (Week 0 of Visit 2) until death (up to a median of 17.1 weeks)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD19+ Cell Counts
Description
The peripheral blood for each participant was collected and analyzed for CD5+CD19+ cell counts. CD is "cluster of differentiation," is a cell surface marker for immunophenotyping, and, in this case, is a surrogate for B cell malignancy (indicates malignant B cells). Percent change from Visit 2 (Week 0, Baseline) = (value at Week 7 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 7 (Visit 9)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD20+ Cell Counts
Description
The peripheral blood for each participant was collected and analyzed for CD5+CD20+ cell counts. CD is "cluster of differentiation," is a cell surface marker for immunophenotyping, and, in this case, is a surrogate for B cell malignancy (indicates malignant B cells). Percent change from Visit 2 (Week 0, Baseline) = (value at Week 7 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 7 (Visit 9)
Title
Median Percent Change of Tumor Size (Sum of Products Dimensions [SPD]) From Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 24 (Visit 14)
Description
Tumor size and change in tumor size will be measured by the absolute value of and the percent change in the sum of products of the diameters of the largest abnormal lymph nodes from Baseline to Week 24 (Visit 14). Percent change from Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 0) = (value at Week 24 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24 (Visit 14)
Title
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Constitutional Symptoms at Week 24
Description
Participants with complete resolution of constitutional symptoms were those in whom no constitutional symptoms, such as night sweats, weight loss, and fever or extreme fatigue, were observed.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) and Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Lymphadenopathy
Description
Participants with complete resolution of lymphadenopathy (disease involving the lymph nodes) were defined as those in whom all observed lymph nodes were of normal size (all nodes <1 centimeters) as determined by physical examination assessed by the investigator. All palpable lymph node sizes were recorded.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) to end of study (up to Week 24)
Title
Number of Participants With Improvement on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale at Week 24
Description
ECOG performance status is a measure of the participant's ability to carry out activities of daily living on 6-point scale (0=fully active, 1=restricted in physically activity, ambulatory, 2=ambulatory [>50% of waking hours], 3=capable of only limited self care, 4=completely disabled, 5=Dead). Improvement in ECOG performance status is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one score on the ECOG scale.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) and Week 24
Title
Number of Participants Who Were Positive, Negative, or Had Missing Data for the Indicated Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Prognostic Factors at Screening
Description
The number of participants (par.) who were positive, negative, or had missing data for the following prognostic factors indicative of altered responsiveness to treatment and/or survival was measured: 17p-, 11q-, +12q, 6q-, 13q-. Par. were assessed by FISH for these chromosomal abnormalities known tobe prognostic for time to treatment and survival when detected at diagnosis. Par. were categorized by the chromosomal abnormality detected: 17 p deletion, 11q deletion (but not 17 p deletion), 12 q trisomy (but not 17 p or 111q deletion), 13q deletion only, and no chromosomal abnormalities found.
Time Frame
Screening (Visit 1, <=14 days prior to Visit 2)
Title
Number of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin
Description
The number of participants (par.) who had improvement in hemoglobin levels >=11 grams (g)/deciliter (dl) (6.8 millimoles/liter) or 50% improvement over baseline was measured.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28
Title
Number of Participants With Improvement in Thrombocytopenia (Thromb.)
Description
Improvement in thromb. is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 by >=1 National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI CTC) grade. Thromb. is defined as low platelet counts resulting from refractory CLL, damage from prior treatment, advanced age, or reduced bone marrow function and can be considered as an adverse condition. Adverse events (AEs) such as thromb. in a cancer indication are graded on a scale determined by the NCI called the NCI CTC: lowest, grade 1; highest, grade 5 (death). Changes in this grading can assess improvements or declines in the severity of the AE.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28
Title
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Hepatomegaly
Description
Participants with complete resolution of enlarged liver (hepatomegaly) were defined as those with an enlarged palpable liver at baseline followed by the absence of hepatomegaly post- baseline (i.e., the liver was of normal size). Liver size was assessed by physical examination and documented as "centimeters" under the costal margin with relative changes in spleen size in 1 dimension calculated based on palpated numeric measurements (as per the 1996 NCIWG guidelines).
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Improvement in Neutropenia
Description
Low levels of neutrophils (neutropenia) may increase the risk of developing serious infections and may be considered an adverse condition and evaluated on the NCI CTC with a grade. Improvement in neutropenia is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 (baseline) by at least one NCI CTC grade. Improvement is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 by at least one NCI CTC grade.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28
Title
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Splenomegaly
Description
Participants with complete resolution of enlarged spleen (splenomegaly) were defined as those with an enlarged palpable spleen at baseline followed by the absence of splenomegaly post-baseline (i.e., the spleen was of normal size). Spleen size was assessed by physical examination and documented as "centimeters" under the costal margin with relative changes in spleen size in 1 dimension calculated based on palpated numeric measurements (as per the 1996 NCIWG guidelines).
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24
Title
Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event
Description
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A list of AEs experienced in the study with a frequency threshold of 5% can be found in the AE section of this results record.
Time Frame
From first infusion (Visit 2/Week 0) to Visit 21 (Month 24 of follow-up [up to Month 48]) or time of withdrawal (treatment and follow-up)
Title
Cmax and Ctrough at Dose 1 (Visit 2, Week 0), Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7), and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Description
Cmax is defined as the maximum concentration of drug in serum samples. Ctrough is defined as the trough serum concentration (measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval [taken directly before the next administration]). No drug was present before the first infusion; therefore, there are no Ctrough results for Dose 1
Time Frame
Visit 2 (Week 0), Visit 9 (Week 7), and Visit 14 (Week 24)
Title
AUC (0-inf) and AUC(0-tau) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Description
AUC is defined as the area under the ofatumumab concentration-time curve as a measure of drug exposure. AUC(0-inf) is AUC from the start of infusion extrapolated to infinity. AUC(0-tau) is AUC from the start of infusion over the dosing interval.
Time Frame
Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24)
Title
Half-life (t1/2) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Description
Half-life ( t1/2) is defined as the terminal half-life and is the time required for the amount of drug in the body to decrease by half.
Time Frame
Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit14 (Week 24)
Title
Clearance (CL) After Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Description
CL is the clearance of drug from serum, which is defined as the volume of serum from which the drug is cleared per unit time.
Time Frame
Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24)
Title
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24)
Description
Vss is defined as the volume of distribution at steady state of ofatumumab.
Time Frame
Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Tumor cell phenotype consistent with B-CLL
Patients with active B-CLL and with an indication for treatment
Failing at least one fludarabine-containing treatment regimen
Failing at least one alemtuzumab-containing treatment regimen
ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2
Life expectancy of at least 4 months
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous treatment with alemtuzumab within 6 weeks prior to Visit 2
Previous autologous stem cell transplantation within 6 months prior to Visit 2
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Radioimmunotherapy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21856867
Citation
Wierda WG, Padmanabhan S, Chan GW, Gupta IV, Lisby S, Osterborg A; Hx-CD20-406 Study Investigators. Ofatumumab is active in patients with fludarabine-refractory CLL irrespective of prior rituximab: results from the phase 2 international study. Blood. 2011 Nov 10;118(19):5126-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-348656. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20194866
Citation
Wierda WG, Kipps TJ, Mayer J, Stilgenbauer S, Williams CD, Hellmann A, Robak T, Furman RR, Hillmen P, Trneny M, Dyer MJ, Padmanabhan S, Piotrowska M, Kozak T, Chan G, Davis R, Losic N, Wilms J, Russell CA, Osterborg A; Hx-CD20-406 Study Investigators. Ofatumumab as single-agent CD20 immunotherapy in fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1749-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3187. Epub 2010 Mar 1. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;28(22):3670.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24443277
Citation
Struemper H, Sale M, Patel BR, Ostergaard M, Osterborg A, Wierda WG, Hagenbeek A, Coiffier B, Jewell RC. Population pharmacokinetics of ofatumumab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, follicular lymphoma, and rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;54(7):818-27. doi: 10.1002/jcph.268. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
HuMax-CD20 in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL) Patients Failing Fludarabine and Alemtuzumab
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs