search
Back to results

EXTEND (Eltrombopag Extended Dosing Study) (EXTEND)

Primary Purpose

Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
eltrombopag olamine (SB-497115-GR)
Sponsored by
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic focused on measuring eltrombopag olamine, SB-497115-GR, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, thrombocytopenia, ITP, platelets

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Subject has signed and dated a written informed consent. Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with ITP according to the American Society for Hematology/British Committee for Standards in Haematology (ASH/BCSH) guidelines [George, 1996; BCSH, 2003]. In addition, a peripheral blood smear should support the diagnosis of ITP with no evidence of other disease causative of thrombocytopenia (e.g., pseudo thrombocytopenia, myelofibrosis). The physical examination should not suggest any disease which may cause thrombocytopenia other than ITP. Prior completion of treatment and follow up periods in an ITP study of eltrombopag (e.g., TRA100773 or TRA102537/RAISE or TRA108057/REPEAT). Subjects previously enrolled in Study TRA100773 must have completed the prescribed follow-up ophthalmic assessment at 6 months. Subjects previously enrolled in TRA102537/RAISE or other studies that may lead into EXTEND (e.g., TRA108057/REPEAT) must have completed the treatment and follow-up periods as defined in that protocol. Subject experienced no eltrombopag-related toxicity or other drug intolerance on prior eltrombopag study (e.g., TRA100773 or TRA102537/RAISE or TRA108057/REPEAT) even if resolved; subjects discontinued from previous study due to toxicity will not be eligible unless they received placebo. Subject has no intercurrent medical event, including thrombosis. Subjects must have either initially responded (platelet count > 100,000/mL) to a previous ITP therapy or have had a bone marrow examination consistent with ITP within 3 years to rule out myelodysplastic syndromes or other causes of thrombocytopenia Previous therapy for ITP with immunoglobulins (IVIg and anti-D) must have been completed at least 1 week prior to first dose of study medication and the platelet count must show a clear downward trend after the last treatment with immunoglobulins. Previous treatment for ITP with splenectomy, rituximab and cyclophosphamide must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, or clearly be ineffective. Subjects treated with concomitant ITP medication (e.g. corticosteroids or azathioprine) must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization. Subjects treated with cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil or danazol must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 3 months prior to the first dose of study medication. Prothrombin time (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) must be within 80 to 120% of the normal range with no history of hypercoagulable state. A complete blood count (CBC), within the reference range (including WBC differential not indicative of a disorder other than ITP), with the following exceptions: Hemoglobin: Subjects with hemoglobin levels between 10.0 g/dL and the lower limit of normal are eligible for inclusion, if anemia is clearly attributable to ITP (excessive blood loss). ANC≥1500/mL (1.5 x 10^9/L) is required for inclusion (elevated WBC/ANC due to steroid treatment is acceptable). The following clinical chemistries MUST NOT exceed the upper limit of normal (ULN) reference range by more than 20%: creatinine, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase. In addition, total albumin must not be below the lower limit of normal (LLN) by more than 10%. Subject is practicing an acceptable method of contraception (documented in chart). Female subjects (or female partners of male subjects) must either be of non-childbearing potential (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or post-menopausal > 1 year), or of childbearing potential and use one of the following highly effective methods of contraception (i.e., Pearl Index <1.0%) from two weeks prior to administration of study medication, throughout the study, and 28 days after completion or premature discontinuation from the study: Complete abstinence from intercourse; Intrauterine device (IUD); Two forms of barrier contraception (diaphragm plus spermicide, and for males condom plus spermicide); Male partner is sterile prior to entry into the study and is the only partner of the female; Systemic contraceptives (combined or progesterone only). Subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions. Exclusion Criteria: A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply: Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination, or any other medical condition or circumstance, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study or suggests another diagnosis. Concurrent malignant disease and/or history of cancer treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Any prior history of arterial or venous thrombosis (stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), AND≥two of the following risk factors: hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception (containing estrogen), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, medication for hypertension, cancer, hereditary thrombophilic disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, etc), or any other family history of arterial or venous thrombosis Pre-existing cardiovascular disease (including congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association [NYHA] Grade III/IV), or arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thromboembolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation), or subjects with a QTc >450 msec. Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant (positive serum or urine b-human chorionic gonadotrophin (b-hCG) pregnancy test) at screening or pre-dose on Day 1. History of alcohol/drug abuse. Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication. Subject treated with drugs that affect platelet function (including but not limited to aspirin, clopidogrel and/or NSAIDs) or anti-coagulants for > 3 consecutive days within 2 weeks of the study start and until the end of the study. History of platelet agglutination abnormality that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts. All subjects with secondary immune thrombocytopenia, including those with laboratory or clinical evidence of HIV infection, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, chronic hepatitis B infection, hepatitis C virus infection, or any evidence for active hepatitis at the time of subject screening. If a potential subject has no clinical history that would support HIV infection or hepatitis infection, no further laboratory screening is necessary; however, standard medical practice would suggest further evaluation of patients who have risk factors for these infections. A subject is planning to have cataract surgery. In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category. Other Eligibility Criteria Considerations: To assess any potential impact on subject eligibility with regard to safety, the investigator must refer to the following document(s) for detailed information regarding warnings, precautions, contraindications, adverse events, and other significant data pertaining to the investigational product(s) being used in this study: CIB, SPM.

Sites / Locations

  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis investigative Site
  • Novartis investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Eltrombopag

Arm Description

Open-label eltrombopag

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall Summary of On-Therapy Adverse Events (Safety Population)
All safety evaluation findings considered to be adverse events are reported in the Adverse Event section.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Subjects Achieving Maximum Platelet Counts Greater Than or Equal to 30 Gi/L or 50 Gi/L in the Absence of Rescue Medication
Subjects who achieved maximum platelet count at least once during treatment. All platelet counts after an on-study splenectomy are not classed as responses. Platelet counts within 7 days after a platelet transfusion are not classed as responses. Platelet counts while taking an increased ITP medication or within 6 weeks after the end of an increased ITP medication are not classed as responses.
Summary of Subjects Achieving Platelet Count Levels by Week, in the Absence of Rescue Medication
If a subject has more than 1 platelet count result within a week, the lowest value observed is used to determine response. All platelet counts after an on-study splenectomy are not classed as responses. Platelet counts within 7 days after a platelet transfusion are not classed as responses. Platelet counts while taking an increased ITP medication or within 6 weeks after the end of an increased ITP medication are not classed as responses.
Number of Subjects Who Responded to Eltrombopag in a Previous Study and Who Respond to Retreatment With a Rise in Platelet Count to Either ≥ 50,000/µL or ≥30,000/µL
Responder in TRA100773: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline (BL) at last on-treatment assessment. Responders in EXTEND: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline (BL), 50 Gi/L, and 30 Gi/L at any time. Responder in RAISE: Platelet count 50GI/L and 2 x baseline at Week 6 assessment. Responders in EXTEND: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline, 50 Gi/L, and 30 Gi/L at any time. Responder in REPEAT: Platelet count 50 GI/L and 2 x baseline (BL) at Week 6 assessment in Cycle 1. Responders in EXTEND: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline (BL) 50 Gi/L, and 30 Gi/L at any time.
Number of Participants With Reduction and/or Sparing of Concomitant ITP Therapies, While Maintaining a Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/mL.
Sustain reduct: Sustained reduction 1 Denominator is number of subjects taking an ITP medication at baseline. 2 Denominator is number of subjects with a sustained reduction. Note: Sustained reduction defined as reduction from baseline in dose and/or frequency which is maintained for at least 4 weeks. Excludes sustained reductions started more than 1 day after last dose.
Number of Subjects Who Required Rescue Therapy During Treatment With Eltrombopag.
Rescue treatment is defined as a composite of: new ITP medication, increased dose of a concomitant ITP medication, platelet transfusion, and splenectomy. Subjects may have received more than 1 type of rescue therapy
Maximum ITP Bleeding Score at Any Time During the Study During All Stages.
The ITP bleeding score is a tool which has been designed specifically to assess the bruising and bleeding in patients with ITP across body sites, ranging from mild to severe. The WHO Grades were dichotomized into the following categories: - Grade 0, No bleeding -Grade 1 to 4, Any bleeding -Grade 0 to 1: No clinically significant bleeding -Grade 2 to 4 Clinically significant bleeding
Best Post-Baseline Change in SF-36v2 Questionnaire Score From Any Time Point Compared With Baseline
The SF-36v2 assessment tool was used to obtain information about subjects' general health status and health-related quality of life. Until a formal assessment of minimal clinically important differences (MCID) is performed, changes from baseline of more than 0.5 standard deviations are suggested as clinically meaningful. Scores were transformed to a 0-100 point scale, with higher scores representing more positive answers. Scores were normalized to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 to allow for comparison with outcomes from other chronic diseases. Recall period is the past week prior to administration. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group
Best Post-Baseline Change in the Short Form of the Motivation and Energy Scale (MEI-SF) From Any Time Point Compared With Baseline
The MEI-SF (18 questions) was used to measure the reductions in mental energy, physical energy, and social motivation, either as symptoms of chronic ITP or as a side effect of pharmacotherapy. Minimal clinically important differences are estimated as 0.5 standard deviations or 7.5 points. All items use either a 7-level (0 to 6) or 5-level (0 to 4) response scale; items with a 5-level response scale were rescaled to 7-levels, and items were reverse-scored as necessary such that higher scores represent higher HRQoL Total score ranges from 0 to 108 points. Recall period is past week prior to administration. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group
Best Post-Baseline Change in the FACIT-Fatigue 13 Item Subscale Score From Any Time Point Compared to Baseline
The FACIT-Fatigue consists of 13 questions in which patients rate the frequency (0-4) of symptoms of fatigue, in terms of tiredness, weakness, and fatigue Items were reverse-scored as necessary such that higher scores represent higher HRQoL Total score ranges from 0 to 52.Using anchor-based estimates, the minimally important difference in this subscale is 3.0 points. Recall period is past week prior to administration. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group
Best Post-Baseline Change in the FACT-TH6 at Any Time Point Compared to Baseline
The FACT-TH6 consists of 6 questions in which patients rate (0-4) their general degree of worry related to bleeding and bruising, and resulting activity impairment and frustration. Although the six items do not constitute a formal domain or subscale of the FACT-Th assessment tool, these items had been identified by focus groups of patients with chronic ITP as important indicators of their HRQoL. Items were reverse-scored as necessary such that higher scores represent higher HRQoL. Total scores ranged from 0 to 24. Recall period is not specified. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group

Full Information

First Posted
July 10, 2006
Last Updated
March 5, 2017
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00351468
Brief Title
EXTEND (Eltrombopag Extended Dosing Study)
Acronym
EXTEND
Official Title
EXTEND (Eltrombopag Extended Dosing Study): An Extension Study of Eltrombopag Olamine (SB-497115-GR) in Adults, With Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), Previously Enrolled in an Eltrombopag Study.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
An open-label, dose-adjustment, extension study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for the treatment of subjects with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who have previously been enrolled in an eltrombopag trial. This study will allow adjustment of the eltrombopag dose to achieve an individualized dose and schedule for each subject. In addition, the ability to reduce the dose of concomitant ITP medications in the presence of eltrombopag, while maintaining platelet counts = 50,000/μL will be investigated.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic
Keywords
eltrombopag olamine, SB-497115-GR, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, thrombocytopenia, ITP, platelets

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
302 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Eltrombopag
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Open-label eltrombopag
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
eltrombopag olamine (SB-497115-GR)
Intervention Description
Eltrombopag with starting dose of 50mg daily, max dose of 75mg daily and min dose of 25mg daily or less frequently. Modifications were given to maintain platelet count in range of 50 to 200 Gi/L.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Summary of On-Therapy Adverse Events (Safety Population)
Description
All safety evaluation findings considered to be adverse events are reported in the Adverse Event section.
Time Frame
Start date was the first dose of investigational product and up to the day after the last dose . Post-therapy: start date was more than 1 day after the last dose and up to 30 days after last dose of investigational product up to week 364
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Subjects Achieving Maximum Platelet Counts Greater Than or Equal to 30 Gi/L or 50 Gi/L in the Absence of Rescue Medication
Description
Subjects who achieved maximum platelet count at least once during treatment. All platelet counts after an on-study splenectomy are not classed as responses. Platelet counts within 7 days after a platelet transfusion are not classed as responses. Platelet counts while taking an increased ITP medication or within 6 weeks after the end of an increased ITP medication are not classed as responses.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2 years
Title
Summary of Subjects Achieving Platelet Count Levels by Week, in the Absence of Rescue Medication
Description
If a subject has more than 1 platelet count result within a week, the lowest value observed is used to determine response. All platelet counts after an on-study splenectomy are not classed as responses. Platelet counts within 7 days after a platelet transfusion are not classed as responses. Platelet counts while taking an increased ITP medication or within 6 weeks after the end of an increased ITP medication are not classed as responses.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Year 7/Week 364
Title
Number of Subjects Who Responded to Eltrombopag in a Previous Study and Who Respond to Retreatment With a Rise in Platelet Count to Either ≥ 50,000/µL or ≥30,000/µL
Description
Responder in TRA100773: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline (BL) at last on-treatment assessment. Responders in EXTEND: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline (BL), 50 Gi/L, and 30 Gi/L at any time. Responder in RAISE: Platelet count 50GI/L and 2 x baseline at Week 6 assessment. Responders in EXTEND: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline, 50 Gi/L, and 30 Gi/L at any time. Responder in REPEAT: Platelet count 50 GI/L and 2 x baseline (BL) at Week 6 assessment in Cycle 1. Responders in EXTEND: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline (BL) 50 Gi/L, and 30 Gi/L at any time.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2 years
Title
Number of Participants With Reduction and/or Sparing of Concomitant ITP Therapies, While Maintaining a Platelet Count ≥ 50,000/mL.
Description
Sustain reduct: Sustained reduction 1 Denominator is number of subjects taking an ITP medication at baseline. 2 Denominator is number of subjects with a sustained reduction. Note: Sustained reduction defined as reduction from baseline in dose and/or frequency which is maintained for at least 4 weeks. Excludes sustained reductions started more than 1 day after last dose.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2 years
Title
Number of Subjects Who Required Rescue Therapy During Treatment With Eltrombopag.
Description
Rescue treatment is defined as a composite of: new ITP medication, increased dose of a concomitant ITP medication, platelet transfusion, and splenectomy. Subjects may have received more than 1 type of rescue therapy
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2 years
Title
Maximum ITP Bleeding Score at Any Time During the Study During All Stages.
Description
The ITP bleeding score is a tool which has been designed specifically to assess the bruising and bleeding in patients with ITP across body sites, ranging from mild to severe. The WHO Grades were dichotomized into the following categories: - Grade 0, No bleeding -Grade 1 to 4, Any bleeding -Grade 0 to 1: No clinically significant bleeding -Grade 2 to 4 Clinically significant bleeding
Time Frame
Baseline up to 2 years
Title
Best Post-Baseline Change in SF-36v2 Questionnaire Score From Any Time Point Compared With Baseline
Description
The SF-36v2 assessment tool was used to obtain information about subjects' general health status and health-related quality of life. Until a formal assessment of minimal clinically important differences (MCID) is performed, changes from baseline of more than 0.5 standard deviations are suggested as clinically meaningful. Scores were transformed to a 0-100 point scale, with higher scores representing more positive answers. Scores were normalized to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 to allow for comparison with outcomes from other chronic diseases. Recall period is the past week prior to administration. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group
Time Frame
Baseline, beginning of each stage, change in therapy and minimum frequency of every 3 months during stages, prior to early discontinuation, up to 2 years
Title
Best Post-Baseline Change in the Short Form of the Motivation and Energy Scale (MEI-SF) From Any Time Point Compared With Baseline
Description
The MEI-SF (18 questions) was used to measure the reductions in mental energy, physical energy, and social motivation, either as symptoms of chronic ITP or as a side effect of pharmacotherapy. Minimal clinically important differences are estimated as 0.5 standard deviations or 7.5 points. All items use either a 7-level (0 to 6) or 5-level (0 to 4) response scale; items with a 5-level response scale were rescaled to 7-levels, and items were reverse-scored as necessary such that higher scores represent higher HRQoL Total score ranges from 0 to 108 points. Recall period is past week prior to administration. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group
Time Frame
Baseline, beginning of each stage, change in therapy and minimum frequency of every 3 months during stages, prior to early discontinuation, up to 2 years
Title
Best Post-Baseline Change in the FACIT-Fatigue 13 Item Subscale Score From Any Time Point Compared to Baseline
Description
The FACIT-Fatigue consists of 13 questions in which patients rate the frequency (0-4) of symptoms of fatigue, in terms of tiredness, weakness, and fatigue Items were reverse-scored as necessary such that higher scores represent higher HRQoL Total score ranges from 0 to 52.Using anchor-based estimates, the minimally important difference in this subscale is 3.0 points. Recall period is past week prior to administration. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group
Time Frame
Baseline, beginning of each stage, change in therapy and minimum frequency of every 3 months during stages, prior to early discontinuation, up to 2 years
Title
Best Post-Baseline Change in the FACT-TH6 at Any Time Point Compared to Baseline
Description
The FACT-TH6 consists of 6 questions in which patients rate (0-4) their general degree of worry related to bleeding and bruising, and resulting activity impairment and frustration. Although the six items do not constitute a formal domain or subscale of the FACT-Th assessment tool, these items had been identified by focus groups of patients with chronic ITP as important indicators of their HRQoL. Items were reverse-scored as necessary such that higher scores represent higher HRQoL. Total scores ranged from 0 to 24. Recall period is not specified. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group
Time Frame
Baseline, beginning of each stage, change in therapy and minimum frequency of every 3 months during stages, prior to early discontinuation, up to 2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject has signed and dated a written informed consent. Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with ITP according to the American Society for Hematology/British Committee for Standards in Haematology (ASH/BCSH) guidelines [George, 1996; BCSH, 2003]. In addition, a peripheral blood smear should support the diagnosis of ITP with no evidence of other disease causative of thrombocytopenia (e.g., pseudo thrombocytopenia, myelofibrosis). The physical examination should not suggest any disease which may cause thrombocytopenia other than ITP. Prior completion of treatment and follow up periods in an ITP study of eltrombopag (e.g., TRA100773 or TRA102537/RAISE or TRA108057/REPEAT). Subjects previously enrolled in Study TRA100773 must have completed the prescribed follow-up ophthalmic assessment at 6 months. Subjects previously enrolled in TRA102537/RAISE or other studies that may lead into EXTEND (e.g., TRA108057/REPEAT) must have completed the treatment and follow-up periods as defined in that protocol. Subject experienced no eltrombopag-related toxicity or other drug intolerance on prior eltrombopag study (e.g., TRA100773 or TRA102537/RAISE or TRA108057/REPEAT) even if resolved; subjects discontinued from previous study due to toxicity will not be eligible unless they received placebo. Subject has no intercurrent medical event, including thrombosis. Subjects must have either initially responded (platelet count > 100,000/mL) to a previous ITP therapy or have had a bone marrow examination consistent with ITP within 3 years to rule out myelodysplastic syndromes or other causes of thrombocytopenia Previous therapy for ITP with immunoglobulins (IVIg and anti-D) must have been completed at least 1 week prior to first dose of study medication and the platelet count must show a clear downward trend after the last treatment with immunoglobulins. Previous treatment for ITP with splenectomy, rituximab and cyclophosphamide must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, or clearly be ineffective. Subjects treated with concomitant ITP medication (e.g. corticosteroids or azathioprine) must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization. Subjects treated with cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil or danazol must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 3 months prior to the first dose of study medication. Prothrombin time (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) must be within 80 to 120% of the normal range with no history of hypercoagulable state. A complete blood count (CBC), within the reference range (including WBC differential not indicative of a disorder other than ITP), with the following exceptions: Hemoglobin: Subjects with hemoglobin levels between 10.0 g/dL and the lower limit of normal are eligible for inclusion, if anemia is clearly attributable to ITP (excessive blood loss). ANC≥1500/mL (1.5 x 10^9/L) is required for inclusion (elevated WBC/ANC due to steroid treatment is acceptable). The following clinical chemistries MUST NOT exceed the upper limit of normal (ULN) reference range by more than 20%: creatinine, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase. In addition, total albumin must not be below the lower limit of normal (LLN) by more than 10%. Subject is practicing an acceptable method of contraception (documented in chart). Female subjects (or female partners of male subjects) must either be of non-childbearing potential (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or post-menopausal > 1 year), or of childbearing potential and use one of the following highly effective methods of contraception (i.e., Pearl Index <1.0%) from two weeks prior to administration of study medication, throughout the study, and 28 days after completion or premature discontinuation from the study: Complete abstinence from intercourse; Intrauterine device (IUD); Two forms of barrier contraception (diaphragm plus spermicide, and for males condom plus spermicide); Male partner is sterile prior to entry into the study and is the only partner of the female; Systemic contraceptives (combined or progesterone only). Subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions. Exclusion Criteria: A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply: Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination, or any other medical condition or circumstance, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study or suggests another diagnosis. Concurrent malignant disease and/or history of cancer treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Any prior history of arterial or venous thrombosis (stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), AND≥two of the following risk factors: hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception (containing estrogen), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, medication for hypertension, cancer, hereditary thrombophilic disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, etc), or any other family history of arterial or venous thrombosis Pre-existing cardiovascular disease (including congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association [NYHA] Grade III/IV), or arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thromboembolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation), or subjects with a QTc >450 msec. Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant (positive serum or urine b-human chorionic gonadotrophin (b-hCG) pregnancy test) at screening or pre-dose on Day 1. History of alcohol/drug abuse. Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication. Subject treated with drugs that affect platelet function (including but not limited to aspirin, clopidogrel and/or NSAIDs) or anti-coagulants for > 3 consecutive days within 2 weeks of the study start and until the end of the study. History of platelet agglutination abnormality that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts. All subjects with secondary immune thrombocytopenia, including those with laboratory or clinical evidence of HIV infection, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, chronic hepatitis B infection, hepatitis C virus infection, or any evidence for active hepatitis at the time of subject screening. If a potential subject has no clinical history that would support HIV infection or hepatitis infection, no further laboratory screening is necessary; however, standard medical practice would suggest further evaluation of patients who have risk factors for these infections. A subject is planning to have cataract surgery. In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category. Other Eligibility Criteria Considerations: To assess any potential impact on subject eligibility with regard to safety, the investigator must refer to the following document(s) for detailed information regarding warnings, precautions, contraindications, adverse events, and other significant data pertaining to the investigational product(s) being used in this study: CIB, SPM.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Organizational Affiliation
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35805
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36608
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Jonesboro
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Duarte
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94143
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30341
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Savannah
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Peoria
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Brunsville
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55337
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10021
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97227
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79410
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Arlington
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vancouver
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98684
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis investigative Site
City
Garran
State/Province
Australian Capital Territory
ZIP/Postal Code
2606
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kogarah
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2217
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
A-1090
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8S 4K1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2L 4M1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1E2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Jiang Su Province
ZIP/Postal Code
215006
Country
China
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200025
Country
China
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tianjin
ZIP/Postal Code
300020
Country
China
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
625 00
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Olomouc
ZIP/Postal Code
775 20
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 20
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Odense
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kuopio
ZIP/Postal Code
70210
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Caen cedex 9
ZIP/Postal Code
14033
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Créteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94010
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pessac
ZIP/Postal Code
33604
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Muenchen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
80639
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Giessen
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
35392
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hannover
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
30159
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hannover
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
30625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saarbruecken
State/Province
Saarland
ZIP/Postal Code
66113
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13353
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
10676
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
11525
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
57010
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Shatin, New Territories
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bologna
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
40138
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Albano Laziale (Roma)
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00041
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis investigative Site
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Padova
State/Province
Veneto
ZIP/Postal Code
35128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
136-705
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Amersfoort
ZIP/Postal Code
3816 CP
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1105 AZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Den Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
2545 CH
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nijmegen
ZIP/Postal Code
6525 GA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 GE
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Auckland
ZIP/Postal Code
2024
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Christchurch
ZIP/Postal Code
8011
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Grafton
ZIP/Postal Code
1001
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Takapuna, Auckland
ZIP/Postal Code
0622
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Karachi
ZIP/Postal Code
75300
Country
Pakistan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lahore
ZIP/Postal Code
54600
Country
Pakistan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
Lima 27
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
Lima 41
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-276
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
93-510
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-081
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Slupsk
ZIP/Postal Code
76-200
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Torun
ZIP/Postal Code
87-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-367
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
022328
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
050098
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
105 229
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125167
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630087
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis investigative Site
City
St Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
193024
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kosice
ZIP/Postal Code
041 90
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Presov
ZIP/Postal Code
080 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ljubljana
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Slovenia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Badalona/Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08916
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08025
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28007
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Palma de Mallorca
ZIP/Postal Code
07014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pamplona
ZIP/Postal Code
31008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Santiago de Compostela
ZIP/Postal Code
15706
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Göteborg
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-413 45
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
SE 171 76
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
100
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bangkok
ZIP/Postal Code
10330
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Khon Kaen
ZIP/Postal Code
40002
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Novartis investigative Site
City
Montfleury
ZIP/Postal Code
1008
Country
Tunisia
Facility Name
Novartis investigative Site
City
Sfax
ZIP/Postal Code
3029
Country
Tunisia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sousse
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Tunisia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tunis
ZIP/Postal Code
1008
Country
Tunisia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dnipropetrovsk
ZIP/Postal Code
49102
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lviv
ZIP/Postal Code
79044
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Plymouth
State/Province
Devon
ZIP/Postal Code
PL6 8DH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Taunton
State/Province
Somerset
ZIP/Postal Code
TA1 5DA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Liverpool
ZIP/Postal Code
L7 8XP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
E1 1BB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
NW1 2PG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9WL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Reading
ZIP/Postal Code
RG1 5AN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Swansea
ZIP/Postal Code
SA6 6NL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ho Chi Minh
Country
Vietnam

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29042367
Citation
Wong RSM, Saleh MN, Khelif A, Salama A, Portella MSO, Burgess P, Bussel JB. Safety and efficacy of long-term treatment of chronic/persistent ITP with eltrombopag: final results of the EXTEND study. Blood. 2017 Dec 7;130(23):2527-2536. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-04-748707. Epub 2017 Oct 17. Erratum In: Blood. 2018 Feb 8;131(6):709.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23492914
Citation
Tarantino MD, Fogarty P, Mayer B, Vasey SY, Brainsky A. Efficacy of eltrombopag in management of bleeding symptoms associated with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013 Apr;24(3):284-96. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32835fac99.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23169778
Citation
Saleh MN, Bussel JB, Cheng G, Meyer O, Bailey CK, Arning M, Brainsky A; EXTEND Study Group. Safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia: results of the long-term, open-label EXTEND study. Blood. 2013 Jan 17;121(3):537-45. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-425512. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22117897
Citation
Fogarty PF, Tarantino MD, Brainsky A, Signorovitch J, Grotzinger KM. Selective validation of the WHO Bleeding Scale in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):79-87. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.644849. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
21533818
Citation
Signorovitch J, Brainsky A, Grotzinger KM. Validation of the FACIT-fatigue subscale, selected items from FACT-thrombocytopenia, and the SF-36v2 in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1737-44. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9912-9. Epub 2011 May 1.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

EXTEND (Eltrombopag Extended Dosing Study)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs