search
Back to results

Testing of Different Methods for Determining Whether Breast Cancer Has Spread to the Lymph Nodes

Primary Purpose

Breast Neoplasms

Status
Completed
Phase
Early Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB)
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Sponsored by
Washington University School of Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Breast Neoplasms focused on measuring Breast Cancer, Axilla, Ultrasound, FNA, Molecular Analysis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Female patients, aged 18 and over. Patients must be newly diagnosed with clinical stage I or II breast cancer and be eligible for breast surgery and core breast biopsy of their proven breast carcinoma. Exclusion Criteria: Inability to give informed consent Contraindications for breast surgery or biopsy Patients with no evidence of malignancy scheduled to undergo procedures under general anesthesia must fulfill the following eligibility requirements: Female patients, aged 18 and over Patient must be scheduled to undergo a procedure under general anesthesia with access to lymph nodes that can be biopsied by FNA biopsy at minimal risk to the patient Patient must be willing to give informed consent Patient with no history of malignancy

Sites / Locations

  • Washington University School of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Positive Axillary Ultrasound

Negative Axillary Ultrasound

Arm Description

Positive Axillary Ultrasound -> Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy -> Cytopathology and Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) -> Positive Cyto=Axillary Lymph Node Dissection, Negative Cyto=Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy -> Pathology

Negative Axillary Ultrasound -> Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy -> Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and Pathology

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Determine the sensitivity of AUS and real-time RT-PCR/RT-LAMP to predict the pathologic status of the axilla in breast cancer patients
Determine the feasibility of AUS, FNAB, and RT-PCR/RT-LAMP as an alternative to SLNB for axillary staging of breast cancer patients
Define baseline gene expression levels in lymph nodes by RT-PCR/RT-LAMP in patients with no evidence of malignancy undergoing procedures under general anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
August 2, 2006
Last Updated
July 2, 2013
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Collaborators
Society for Surgical Oncologists, Sysmex America, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00360152
Brief Title
Testing of Different Methods for Determining Whether Breast Cancer Has Spread to the Lymph Nodes
Official Title
Minimally Invasive Staging of the Axilla in Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Axillary Ultrasound, Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Molecular Analysis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Collaborators
Society for Surgical Oncologists, Sysmex America, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has recently emerged as a less invasive alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in the treatment of breast cancer. However, SLNB has a number of limitations, and we believe that alternative strategies for staging of the axilla should be explored. The hypothesis of this proposal is that the combination of preoperative high-resolution axillary ultrasound (AUS), fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), and molecular analysis using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) represents a viable, minimally invasive alternative to SLNB. We propose a prospective cohort study to rigorously assess the diagnostic accuracy of molecular analysis of AUS-FNAB specimens. The primary endpoint of this study is to determine the feasibility of AUS-FNAB and real-time RT-PCR to predict the pathologic status of the axilla in a proof-of-principle study. In the short term, validation of this innovative strategy is likely to reduce the number of sentinel node procedures. In the long term, we believe that AUS-FNAB may ultimately replace SLNB.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Neoplasms
Keywords
Breast Cancer, Axilla, Ultrasound, FNA, Molecular Analysis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Early Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Positive Axillary Ultrasound
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Positive Axillary Ultrasound -> Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy -> Cytopathology and Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) -> Positive Cyto=Axillary Lymph Node Dissection, Negative Cyto=Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy -> Pathology
Arm Title
Negative Axillary Ultrasound
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Negative Axillary Ultrasound -> Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy -> Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and Pathology
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Determine the sensitivity of AUS and real-time RT-PCR/RT-LAMP to predict the pathologic status of the axilla in breast cancer patients
Time Frame
At the time of ultrasound guidance and during definitive surgery for cancer
Title
Determine the feasibility of AUS, FNAB, and RT-PCR/RT-LAMP as an alternative to SLNB for axillary staging of breast cancer patients
Time Frame
At the time of ultrasound guidance and during definitive surgery for cancer
Title
Define baseline gene expression levels in lymph nodes by RT-PCR/RT-LAMP in patients with no evidence of malignancy undergoing procedures under general anesthesia
Time Frame
At the time of procedure under general anesthesia

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Female patients, aged 18 and over. Patients must be newly diagnosed with clinical stage I or II breast cancer and be eligible for breast surgery and core breast biopsy of their proven breast carcinoma. Exclusion Criteria: Inability to give informed consent Contraindications for breast surgery or biopsy Patients with no evidence of malignancy scheduled to undergo procedures under general anesthesia must fulfill the following eligibility requirements: Female patients, aged 18 and over Patient must be scheduled to undergo a procedure under general anesthesia with access to lymph nodes that can be biopsied by FNA biopsy at minimal risk to the patient Patient must be willing to give informed consent Patient with no history of malignancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julie A. Margenthaler, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Washington University School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
638961
Citation
Valagussa P, Bonadonna G, Veronesi U. Patterns of relapse and survival following radical mastectomy. Analysis of 716 consecutive patients. Cancer. 1978 Mar;41(3):1170-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197803)41:33.0.co;2-i.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9753708
Citation
Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Klimberg VS, Shriver C, Feldman S, Kusminsky R, Gadd M, Kuhn J, Harlow S, Beitsch P. The sentinel node in breast cancer--a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 1;339(14):941-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810013391401.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10893287
Citation
McMasters KM, Tuttle TM, Carlson DJ, Brown CM, Noyes RD, Glaser RL, Vennekotter DJ, Turk PS, Tate PS, Sardi A, Cerrito PB, Edwards MJ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: a suitable alternative to routine axillary dissection in multi-institutional practice when optimal technique is used. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jul;18(13):2560-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.13.2560.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15564180
Citation
Ung OA. Australasian experience and trials in sentinel lymph node biopsy: the RACS SNAC trial. Asian J Surg. 2004 Oct;27(4):284-90. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60052-X.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15994144
Citation
Purushotham AD, Upponi S, Klevesath MB, Bobrow L, Millar K, Myles JP, Duffy SW. Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;23(19):4312-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.228.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15190501
Citation
Posther KE, Wilke LG, Giuliano AE. Sentinel lymph node dissection and the current status of American trials on breast lymphatic mapping. Semin Oncol. 2004 Jun;31(3):426-36. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.03.019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12192016
Citation
Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N. Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 22;347(8):567-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020128.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15525888
Citation
Brancato B, Zappa M, Bricolo D, Catarzi S, Risso G, Bonardi R, Cariaggi P, Bianchin A, Bricolo P, Rosselli Del Turco M, Cataliotti L, Bianchi S, Ciatto S. Role of ultrasound-guided fine needle cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast carcinoma staging. Radiol Med. 2004 Oct;108(4):345-55. English, Italian.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12736105
Citation
Deurloo EE, Tanis PJ, Gilhuijs KG, Muller SH, Kroger R, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, Valdes Olmos R, Schultze Kool LJ. Reduction in the number of sentinel lymph node procedures by preoperative ultrasonography of the axilla in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003 May;39(8):1068-73. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00748-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12209680
Citation
Krishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Bedi DG, Edieken BS, Fornage BD, Kuerer HM, Singletary SE, Hunt KK. Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2002 Sep 1;95(5):982-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10786.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10943279
Citation
Parker SH, Dennis MA, Kaske TI. Identification of the sentinel node in patients with breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;38(4):809-23. doi: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70202-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14990825
Citation
Bude RO. Does contrast-enhanced US have potential for sentinel lymph node detection? Radiology. 2004 Mar;230(3):603-4. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2303031683. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14990839
Citation
Goldberg BB, Merton DA, Liu JB, Thakur M, Murphy GF, Needleman L, Tornes A, Forsberg F. Sentinel lymph nodes in a swine model with melanoma: contrast-enhanced lymphatic US. Radiology. 2004 Mar;230(3):727-34. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2303021440.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12908703
Citation
Wisner ER, Ferrara KW, Short RE, Ottoboni TB, Gabe JD, Patel D. Sentinel node detection using contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound lymphography. Invest Radiol. 2003 Jun;38(6):358-65.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15166962
Citation
Gillanders WE, Mikhitarian K, Hebert R, Mauldin PD, Palesch Y, Walters C, Urist MM, Mann GB, Doherty G, Herrmann VM, Hill AD, Eremin O, El-Sheemy M, Orr RK, Valle AA, Henderson MA, Dewitty RL, Sugg SL, Frykberg E, Yeh K, Bell RM, Metcalf JS, Elliott BM, Brothers T, Robison J, Mitas M, Cole DJ. Molecular detection of micrometastatic breast cancer in histopathology-negative axillary lymph nodes correlates with traditional predictors of prognosis: an interim analysis of a prospective multi-institutional cohort study. Ann Surg. 2004 Jun;239(6):828-37; discussion 837-40. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000128687.59439.d6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15897566
Citation
Mikhitarian K, Gillanders WE, Almeida JS, Hebert Martin R, Varela JC, Metcalf JS, Cole DJ, Mitas M. An innovative microarray strategy identities informative molecular markers for the detection of micrometastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 May 15;11(10):3697-704. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2164.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11953821
Citation
Mitas M, Mikhitarian K, Hoover L, Lockett MA, Kelley L, Hill A, Gillanders WE, Cole DJ. Prostate-Specific Ets (PSE) factor: a novel marker for detection of metastatic breast cancer in axillary lymph nodes. Br J Cancer. 2002 Mar 18;86(6):899-904. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600190.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11410861
Citation
Mitas M, Mikhitarian K, Walters C, Baron PL, Elliott BM, Brothers TE, Robison JG, Metcalf JS, Palesch YY, Zhang Z, Gillanders WE, Cole DJ. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR detection of breast cancer micrometastasis using a multigene marker panel. Int J Cancer. 2001 Jul 15;93(2):162-71. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1312.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12560358
Citation
Mitas M, Cole DJ, Hoover L, Fraig MM, Mikhitarian K, Block MI, Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH, Gillanders WE, Wallace MB. Real-time reverse transcription-PCR detects KS1/4 mRNA in mediastinal lymph nodes from patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Chem. 2003 Feb;49(2):312-5. doi: 10.1373/49.2.312. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15705978
Citation
Wallace MB, Block MI, Gillanders W, Ravenel J, Hoffman BJ, Reed CE, Fraig M, Cole D, Mitas M. Accurate molecular detection of non-small cell lung cancer metastases in mediastinal lymph nodes sampled by endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration. Chest. 2005 Feb;127(2):430-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.2.430.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.siteman.wustl.edu
Description
Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine

Learn more about this trial

Testing of Different Methods for Determining Whether Breast Cancer Has Spread to the Lymph Nodes

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs