search
Back to results

Results Of Patient Rated Asthma Control Test In Comparison To Diary Card Data

Primary Purpose

Asthma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/250 mcg
Salbutamol 100 mcg
DISKUS™ powder inhalers
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Asthma focused on measuring Asthma, Asthma Control Test, SERETIDE

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of asthma Reversibility >12% after inhalation of 200 µg Salbutamol willingness and ability to complete daily record card on daily basis and to measure morning PEF on daily basis 80% compliance in diary card completion asthma control status: Uncontrolled based on the GOAL criteria Exclusion criteria: Change of asthma medication during the last 4 weeks Asthma exacerbation characterized by use of oral corticoids during the last 3 months Pretreatment with inhaled corticosteroids more than 500 mcg Beclometasondipropionat or equivalent per day or other controller therapy during the last 3 months upper or lower respiratory tract infection during the RUN-IN period moderate or severe asthma exacerbation during the RUN-IN period Non compliance with use of Discus, PEF-meter and incomplete diary card data

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

SFC 50/250 mcg

Arm Description

Participants received the combination product, fluticasone 250 microgram (mcg) plus salmeterol 50 mcg (SFC 50/250 mcg) for 12 weeks. Study treatment was received using DISKUS™ powder inhalers, one dose in morning and evening. Study medication was dispensed at visits 3, 4, and 5 for 30 days each. The participants were provided with salbutamol rescue medication if they developed acute asthmatic symptoms. This medication was provided in metered dose inhalers containing at least 200 puffs of 100 mcg salbutamol. Use of rescue medications was recorded in the participant's asthma diaries. Stable dosages of other concomitant medications were allowed if they had no impact on the outcome criteria.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Well Controlled Participants as Per Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) Criteria After 12 Week Compared to Percentage of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score of 20-25 for Week 9 to Week 12
A week with well controlled asthma, when two or more of the criteria were fulfilled (diary entries): At most 2 days per week with 24-hour symptom score >1 (Range: 0= None to 5= severe), rescue salbutamol use on <= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week, and a morning peak flow >= 80% of the predicted value on each day per week. All of the criteria which includes no night-time awakenings due to asthma (diary entry), no emergency visits (diary entry), no exacerbations and no treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment change are fulfilled. The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Participants With ACT Score of 20-25 at Week 12
The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control. In order to derive the total ACT score, all 5 questions needed to be answered. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Change From Baseline in Mean ACT Score at Visit 6
The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms not under control. In order to derive the total ACT score, all 5 questions had to be answered. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Number of Participants With Well Controlled and Totally Controlled Asthma at Week 12
Well controlled or totally controlled asthma assessments were done according to the GOAL criteria. A week with well controlled asthma, when two or more of the criteria were fulfilled (diary entries): At most 2 days per week with 24-hour symptom score >1(Range: 0= None to 5= severe), rescue salbutamol use on <= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week, and morning peak flow >= 80% of the predicted value on each day per week. All of the criteria which included no night-time awakenings due to asthma (diary entry),no emergency visits (diary entry), no exacerbations and no treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment change were fulfilled. The total ACT score was based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
For the level of asthma control, baseline values were derived taking the last 8 weeks during the pre-treatment period prior to Visit 3 into consideration. Regarding derived variables based on the asthma diary, data from the last week prior to Visit 3 was taken. Visit 3, regarded as baseline. AQLQ has 32 questions regarding activities, emotions, symptoms, and environmental triggers. Each item values range from 1 (maximum impairment) to 7 (no impairment). A positive change from baseline score indicates improvement.
Correlation of Change in AQLQ Score and Change in ACT Score
Correlation between change in the AQLQ and ACT score was tabulated using the Pearson coefficient of correlation (linear correlation). The AQLQ contained 32 items in 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function and environmental stimuli. Scores for the domains as well as the overall score were scaled within a range of 1 (worst) to 7 (best).
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) to Week 12
FEV1, an amount of air exhaled by a person during a forced breath in one second. FEV1 assessed at Visit 1 and at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6. Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Morning Percent Predicted Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Week 12
PEF, a person's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter, a small, hand-held device used to monitor a person's ability to breathe out air. The mean morning PEF evaluated by means of the data documented in the asthma diaries. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Symptom Score at Week 12
The various symptoms like wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing and chest tightness were assessed by the participants every morning using a symptom score scale which ranged from 0 (no symptoms during the past 24 hours) to 5 (symptoms so severe that participant could not go to work or carry out other normal daily activities). Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Change From Baseline in Number of Additional Usage of Salbutamol at Week 12
Salbutamol was given as a rescue medicine, used on <= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Nights With no Nocturnal Awakening at Week 12
Number of nights with no night time awakening were recorded at Week 12. Baseline was the last corresponding time period immediately prior to Visit 3.
Number of Participants With Emergency Visits Due to Asthma
Frequencies of emergency visits per participant were recorded during treatment period. Only the participants at risk were considered when calculating the incidence rates.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Leading to a Change in Asthma Treatment
AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Number of participants with AE who lead to change in asthma treatment were reported.
Assessment of Tolerability by Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Serious and, Non-serious AE
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Number of participants with at least one treatment emergent serious and, non-serious AE were reported.
Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP and DBP were recorded over time (Visit 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.
Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Pulse Rate
Pulse rate was recorded over time (Visit 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.
Number of Participants With Occurrence of (Near-) Incidents Associated With Peak Flow Measurements
Frequencies of participants with at least one (near-) incident associated with peak flow measurements were recorded. analysis was done on safety population.

Full Information

First Posted
August 10, 2006
Last Updated
March 6, 2018
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00363480
Brief Title
Results Of Patient Rated Asthma Control Test In Comparison To Diary Card Data
Official Title
Asthma Control Assessment Via ACT and DRC in Asthmatics Treated With Seretide (50/250) Over 12 Weeks
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 17, 2006 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 14, 2007 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The majority of asthma patients are not well controlled, despite the availability of asthma medication that could effectively treat the disease. In this study uncontrolled patients who are steroid-naive or on low dose inhaled corticosteroids will be treated with Seretide (salmeterol/fluticasone combination, SFC) 50/250 µg twice daily. The asthma control test (ACT) will be used to detect differences in the level of asthma control during treatment. The study aims to show a correlation between improvements of ACT und the level of asthma control which will be reached by the patients. The aim of the study is to show that most of symptomatic asthma patients can reach 'well controlled asthma' with SFC. We get information about ACT in daily practice and physicians are trained to use the asthma control test as a screening tool and for follow up of asthma management. Correlations are expected between the improvements in ACT, Quality of Life and asthma control according to the Gaining Optimal Asthma controL (GOAL) criteria.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Asthma
Keywords
Asthma, Asthma Control Test, SERETIDE

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
221 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
SFC 50/250 mcg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received the combination product, fluticasone 250 microgram (mcg) plus salmeterol 50 mcg (SFC 50/250 mcg) for 12 weeks. Study treatment was received using DISKUS™ powder inhalers, one dose in morning and evening. Study medication was dispensed at visits 3, 4, and 5 for 30 days each. The participants were provided with salbutamol rescue medication if they developed acute asthmatic symptoms. This medication was provided in metered dose inhalers containing at least 200 puffs of 100 mcg salbutamol. Use of rescue medications was recorded in the participant's asthma diaries. Stable dosages of other concomitant medications were allowed if they had no impact on the outcome criteria.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Salmeterol/Fluticasone 50/250 mcg
Intervention Description
Participant received salmeterol/fluticasone combination 50/250 mcg using DISKUS™ powder inhalers.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Salbutamol 100 mcg
Intervention Description
This medication was provided in metered dose inhalers containing at least 200 puffs of 100 mcg salbutamol.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
DISKUS™ powder inhalers
Intervention Description
Participant received salmeterol and fluticasone using DISKUS™ powder inhalers.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Well Controlled Participants as Per Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) Criteria After 12 Week Compared to Percentage of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score of 20-25 for Week 9 to Week 12
Description
A week with well controlled asthma, when two or more of the criteria were fulfilled (diary entries): At most 2 days per week with 24-hour symptom score >1 (Range: 0= None to 5= severe), rescue salbutamol use on <= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week, and a morning peak flow >= 80% of the predicted value on each day per week. All of the criteria which includes no night-time awakenings due to asthma (diary entry), no emergency visits (diary entry), no exacerbations and no treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment change are fulfilled. The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control.
Time Frame
Week 9 to Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Participants With ACT Score of 20-25 at Week 12
Description
The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control. In order to derive the total ACT score, all 5 questions needed to be answered. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean ACT Score at Visit 6
Description
The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms not under control. In order to derive the total ACT score, all 5 questions had to be answered. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Time Frame
Baseline (Viait 3) and Week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Well Controlled and Totally Controlled Asthma at Week 12
Description
Well controlled or totally controlled asthma assessments were done according to the GOAL criteria. A week with well controlled asthma, when two or more of the criteria were fulfilled (diary entries): At most 2 days per week with 24-hour symptom score >1(Range: 0= None to 5= severe), rescue salbutamol use on <= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week, and morning peak flow >= 80% of the predicted value on each day per week. All of the criteria which included no night-time awakenings due to asthma (diary entry),no emergency visits (diary entry), no exacerbations and no treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment change were fulfilled. The total ACT score was based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
Description
For the level of asthma control, baseline values were derived taking the last 8 weeks during the pre-treatment period prior to Visit 3 into consideration. Regarding derived variables based on the asthma diary, data from the last week prior to Visit 3 was taken. Visit 3, regarded as baseline. AQLQ has 32 questions regarding activities, emotions, symptoms, and environmental triggers. Each item values range from 1 (maximum impairment) to 7 (no impairment). A positive change from baseline score indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12
Title
Correlation of Change in AQLQ Score and Change in ACT Score
Description
Correlation between change in the AQLQ and ACT score was tabulated using the Pearson coefficient of correlation (linear correlation). The AQLQ contained 32 items in 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function and environmental stimuli. Scores for the domains as well as the overall score were scaled within a range of 1 (worst) to 7 (best).
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) to Week 12
Description
FEV1, an amount of air exhaled by a person during a forced breath in one second. FEV1 assessed at Visit 1 and at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6. Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Morning Percent Predicted Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Week 12
Description
PEF, a person's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter, a small, hand-held device used to monitor a person's ability to breathe out air. The mean morning PEF evaluated by means of the data documented in the asthma diaries. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Symptom Score at Week 12
Description
The various symptoms like wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing and chest tightness were assessed by the participants every morning using a symptom score scale which ranged from 0 (no symptoms during the past 24 hours) to 5 (symptoms so severe that participant could not go to work or carry out other normal daily activities). Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Number of Additional Usage of Salbutamol at Week 12
Description
Salbutamol was given as a rescue medicine, used on <= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 3) and week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Nights With no Nocturnal Awakening at Week 12
Description
Number of nights with no night time awakening were recorded at Week 12. Baseline was the last corresponding time period immediately prior to Visit 3.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 3) and week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Emergency Visits Due to Asthma
Description
Frequencies of emergency visits per participant were recorded during treatment period. Only the participants at risk were considered when calculating the incidence rates.
Time Frame
Up to week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Leading to a Change in Asthma Treatment
Description
AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Number of participants with AE who lead to change in asthma treatment were reported.
Time Frame
Up to Week 12
Title
Assessment of Tolerability by Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Serious and, Non-serious AE
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Number of participants with at least one treatment emergent serious and, non-serious AE were reported.
Time Frame
Up to Week 12
Title
Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Description
SBP and DBP were recorded over time (Visit 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12
Title
Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Pulse Rate
Description
Pulse rate was recorded over time (Visit 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Occurrence of (Near-) Incidents Associated With Peak Flow Measurements
Description
Frequencies of participants with at least one (near-) incident associated with peak flow measurements were recorded. analysis was done on safety population.
Time Frame
Up to Week 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of asthma Reversibility >12% after inhalation of 200 µg Salbutamol willingness and ability to complete daily record card on daily basis and to measure morning PEF on daily basis 80% compliance in diary card completion asthma control status: Uncontrolled based on the GOAL criteria Exclusion criteria: Change of asthma medication during the last 4 weeks Asthma exacerbation characterized by use of oral corticoids during the last 3 months Pretreatment with inhaled corticosteroids more than 500 mcg Beclometasondipropionat or equivalent per day or other controller therapy during the last 3 months upper or lower respiratory tract infection during the RUN-IN period moderate or severe asthma exacerbation during the RUN-IN period Non compliance with use of Discus, PEF-meter and incomplete diary card data
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Erlangen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
91052
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kaufbeuren
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
87600
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Landsberg
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
86899
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Muenchen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
80335
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Muenchen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
81677
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rednitzhembach
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
91126
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Uttenreuth
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
91080
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wuerzburg
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
97070
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cottbus
State/Province
Brandenburg
ZIP/Postal Code
03050
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wedel
State/Province
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
22880
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bad Arolsen
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
34454
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Eschwege
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
37269
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kassel
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
34117
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kassel
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
34121
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Marburg
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
35037
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Braunschweig
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
38100
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Buchholz
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
21244
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hannover
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
30159
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hannover
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
30167
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chemnitz
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
09126
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dresden
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
01099
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Geesthacht
State/Province
Schleswig-Holstein
ZIP/Postal Code
21502
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Greiz
State/Province
Thueringen
ZIP/Postal Code
07973
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sonneberg
State/Province
Thueringen
ZIP/Postal Code
96515
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10367
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10717
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10965
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12165
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12687
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13187
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13597
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
22767
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Results Of Patient Rated Asthma Control Test In Comparison To Diary Card Data

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs