search
Back to results

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema (IVT)

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Macular Edema

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Standard of Care Group
1mg triamcinolone acetonide
4mg triamcinolone acetonide
Sponsored by
Jaeb Center for Health Research
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Macular Edema focused on measuring diabetic, macular, edema, intravitreal, triamcinolone, laser, photocoagulation, DME

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met: Age ≥18 years Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) Able and willing to provide informed consent. Patient understands that (1) if both eyes are eligible at the time of randomization, one eye will receive intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and one eye will receive laser, and (2) if only one eye is eligible at the time of randomization and the fellow eye develops DME later, then the fellow eye will not receive intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide if the study eye received intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (however, if the study eye was assigned to the laser group, then the fellow eye may be treated with the 4mg dose of the study intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide formulation, provided the eye assigned to laser has not received an intravitreal injection; such an eye will not be a "study eye" but since it is receiving study drug, it will be followed for adverse effects). Exclusion Criteria A patient is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present: 7. History of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant. 8. A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure and glycemic control). Note: Patients in poor glycemic control who, within the last 4 months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next 4 months should not be enrolled. 9. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of study entry that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry. 10. Known allergy to any corticosteroid or any component of the delivery vehicle. 11. History of systemic (e.g., oral, IV, IM, epidural, bursal) corticosteroids within 4 months prior to randomization or topical, rectal, or inhaled corticosteroids in current use more than 2 times per week. 12. Patient is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the 3 years of the study. 13. Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110). Note: If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, patient can become eligible. Study Eye Eligibility Inclusion Best corrected Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (e-ETDRS) visual acuity score of ≥ 24 letters (i.e., 20/320 or better) and ≤73 letters (i.e., 20/40 or worse). Definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema based on clinical exam involving the center of the macula. Mean retinal thickness on two Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) measurements ≥250 microns in the central subfield. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and patient cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs. Exclusion Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition). An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.) Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal). History of prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids. History of peribulbar steroid injection within 6 months prior to randomization. History of focal/grid macular photocoagulation within 15 weeks (3.5 months) prior to randomization.Note: Patients are not required to have had prior macular photocoagulation to be enrolled. If prior macular photocoagulation has been performed, the investigator should believe that the patient may possibly benefit from additional photocoagulation. History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to randomization. Anticipated need for PRP in the 4 months following randomization. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy. History of major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 6 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization. Intraocular pressure ≥25 mmHg. History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma.) Note: Angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion. A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure (IOP) is <25 mm Hg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous. If the intraocular pressure is 22 to <25 mm Hg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met. History of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment. History of prior herpetic ocular infection. Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis. Aphakia. Exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis. In patients with only one eye meeting criteria to be a study eye at the time of randomization, the fellow eye must meet the following criteria: Best corrected e-ETDRS visual acuity score ≥19 letters (i.e., 20/400 or better). No prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids. Intraocular pressure < 25 mmHg. No history of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma.)Note: Angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion. A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure is <25 mmHg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous. If the intraocular pressure is 22 to <25 mmHg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met. No history of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment. No exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.

Sites / Locations

  • Jones Eye Institute/University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • SCPMG Regional Offices - Kaiser Permanente
  • Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
  • University of California, Irvine
  • Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
  • Doheny Eye Institute
  • Jules Stein Eye Institute
  • Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
  • West Coast Retina Medical Group, Inc.
  • Orange County Retina Medical Group
  • California Retina Consultants
  • Bay Area Retina Associates
  • Denver Health Medical Center
  • Eldorado Retina Associates, P.C.
  • Connecticut Retina Consultants
  • Connecticut Retina Consultants
  • National Ophthalmic Research Institute
  • Retina Group of Florida
  • Central Florida Retina Institute
  • Florida Retina Consultants
  • Sarasota Retina Institute
  • International Eye Center
  • Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
  • Retina Consultants of Hawaii, Inc.
  • Retina Associates of Hawaii, Inc.
  • Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Illinois Retina Associates
  • Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
  • John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
  • Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
  • Paducah Retinal Center
  • Maine Vitreoretinal Consultants
  • Elman Retina Group, P.A.
  • Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute at Johns Hopkins
  • The Retina Group of Washington
  • Retina Consultants of Delmarva, P.A.
  • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
  • Joslin Diabetes Center
  • Kresge Eye Institute
  • Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
  • Associated Retinal Consultants
  • Vision Research Foundation
  • Retina Center, PA
  • University of Minnesota
  • St. Louis University Eye Institute
  • Barnes Retina Institute
  • Delaware Valley Retina Associates
  • The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
  • University of Rochester
  • Retina Consultants, PLLC
  • Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
  • University of North Carolina, Dept. of Ophthalmology
  • Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Assoc, PA
  • Horizon Eye Care, PA
  • Wake Forest University Eye Center
  • Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • OSU Eye Physicians and Surgeons, LLC.
  • Dean A. McGee Eye Institute
  • Retina Northwest, PC
  • Casey Eye Institute
  • Penn State College of Medicine
  • University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
  • Retina Consultants
  • Palmetto Retina Center
  • Carolina Retina Center
  • Black Hills Regional Eye Institute
  • Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • West Texas Retina Consultants P.A.
  • Texas Retina Associates
  • Retina Research Center
  • Texas Retina Associates
  • University of Texas Medical Branch, Dept of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
  • Charles A. Garcia, PA & Associates
  • Retina and Vitreous of Texas
  • Retina Consultants of Houston, PA
  • Texas Retina Associates
  • Valley Retina Institute
  • Rocky Mountain Retina Consultants
  • University of Washington Medical Center
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Ophthalmology
  • Medical College of Wiconsin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

1

2

3

Arm Description

Standard of care group: conventional treatment consisting of focal/grid photocoagulation.

Intravitreal injection of 1mg of triamcinolone acetonide

Intravitreal injection of 4mg of triamcinolone acetonide

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years.
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years
Median central subfield thickness at two-years. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes and improvement.
Median Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Overall Central Subfield Thickening Decreased by >=50% Baseline to 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
Central Subfield Thickness < 250 Microns at 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best Value on the scale=97, Worst Value=0
Distribution of Visual Acuity Change Baseline to 3 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale=97, worst=0
Central Subfield Thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at Three Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT Baseline to 3 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Percentage of Eyes With a Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT <250 Microns From Baseline to 3 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.

Full Information

First Posted
August 3, 2006
Last Updated
August 25, 2016
Sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Collaborators
National Eye Institute (NEI), Allergan
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00367133
Brief Title
Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema
Acronym
IVT
Official Title
A Randomized Trial Comparing Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide and Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2004 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2008 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Collaborators
National Eye Institute (NEI), Allergan

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study involves the enrollment of patients over 18 years of age with diabetic macular edema(DME). Patients with one study eye will be randomly assigned (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser) with equal probability to one of the three treatment groups: Laser photocoagulation 1mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection For patients with two study eyes (both eyes eligible at the time of randomization), the right eye (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser) will be randomly assigned with equal probabilities to one of the three treatment groups listed above. The left eye will be assigned to the alternative treatment (laser or triamcinolone). If the left eye is assigned to triamcinolone, then the dose (1mg or 4 mg) will be randomly assigned to the left eye with equal probability (stratified by visual acuity and prior laser). The study drug, triamcinolone acetonide, has been manufactured as a sterile intravitreal injectable by Allergan. Study eyes assigned to an intravitreal triamcinolone injection will receive a dose of either 1mg or 4mg. There is no indication of which treatment regimen will be better. Patients enrolled into the study will be followed for three years and will have study visits every 4 months after receiving their assigned study treatment. In addition, standard of care post-treatment visits will be performed at 4 weeks after each intravitreal injection.
Detailed Description
Diabetic retinopathy is a major cause of visual impairment in the United States. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a manifestation of diabetic retinopathy that produces loss of central vision. Data from the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) estimate that after 15 years of known diabetes, the prevalence of diabetic macular edema is approximately 20% in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), 25% in patients with type 2 DM who are taking insulin, and 14% in patients with type 2 DM who do not take insulin. In a review of three early studies concerning the natural history of diabetic macular edema, Ferris and Patz found that 53% of 135 eyes with diabetic macular edema, presumably all involving the center of the macula, lost two or more lines of visual acuity over a two year period. In the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), 33% of 221 untreated eyes available for follow-up at the 3-year visit, all with edema involving the center of the macula at baseline, had experienced a 15 or more letter decrease in visual acuity score (equivalent to a doubling of the visual angle, e.g., 20/25 to 20/50, and termed "moderate visual acuity loss"). In the ETDRS, focal/grid photocoagulation of eyes with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) reduced the risk of moderate visual loss by approximately 50% (from 24% to 12%, three years after initiation of treatment). Therefore, 12% of treated eyes developed moderate visual loss in spite of treatment. Furthermore, approximately 40% of treated eyes that had retinal thickening involving the center of the macula at baseline still had thickening involving the center at 12 months, as did 25% of treated eyes at 36 months. Although several treatment modalities are currently under investigation, the only demonstrated means to reduce the risk of vision loss from diabetic macular edema are laser photocoagulation, as demonstrated by the ETDRS, and intensive glycemic control, as demonstrated by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). In the DCCT, intensive glucose control reduced the risk of onset of diabetic macular edema by 23% compared with conventional treatment. Long-term follow-up of patients in the DCCT show a sustained effect of intensive glucose control, with a 58% risk reduction in the development of diabetic macular edema for the DCCT patients followed in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study. The frequency of an unsatisfactory outcome following laser photocoagulation in some eyes with diabetic macular edema has prompted interest in other treatment modalities. One such treatment is pars plana vitrectomy. These studies suggest that vitreomacular traction, or the vitreous itself, may play a role in increased retinal vascular permeability. Removal of the vitreous or relief of mechanical traction with vitrectomy and membrane stripping may be followed by substantial resolution of macular edema and corresponding improvement in visual acuity. However, this treatment may be applicable only to a specific subset of eyes with diabetic macular edema. It also requires a complex surgical intervention with its inherent risks, recovery time, and expense. Other treatment modalities such as pharmacologic therapy with oral protein kinase C inhibitors and antibodies targeted at vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are under investigation. The use of intravitreal corticosteroids is another treatment modality that has generated recent interest. The optimal dose of corticosteroid to maximize efficacy with minimum side effects is not known. A 4mg dose of Kenalog is principally being used in clinical practice. However, this dose has been used based on feasibility rather than scientific principles. There is also experience using Kenalog doses of 1mg and 2mg. These doses anecdotally have been reported to reduce the macular edema. There is a rationale for using a dose lower than 4mg. Glucocorticoids bind to glucocorticoid receptors in the cell cytoplasm, and the steroid-receptor complex moves to the nucleus where it regulates gene expression. The steroid-receptor binding occurs with high affinity (low dissociation constant (Kd) which is on the order of 5 to 9 nanomolar). Complete saturation of all the receptors occurs about 20-fold higher levels, i.e., about 100-200 nanomolar. A 4mg dose of triamcinolone yields a final concentration of 7.5 millimolar, or nearly 10,000-fold more than the saturation dose. Thus, the effect of a 1mg dose may be equivalent to that of a 4mg dose, because compared to the 10,000-fold saturation, a 4-fold difference in dose is inconsequential. It is also possible that higher doses of corticosteroid could be less effective than lower doses due to down-regulation of the receptor. The steroid implant studies provide additional justification for evaluating a lower dose, a 0.5mg device which delivers only 0.5 micrograms per day has been observed to have a rapid effect in reducing macular edema. There has been limited experience using doses greater than 4mg. Jonas' case series reported results using a 25mg dose. However, others have not been able to replicate this dose using the preparation procedure described by Jonas. In the trial, 4mg and 1mg doses will be evaluated. The former will be used because it is the dose that is currently most commonly used in clinical practice and the latter because there is reasonable evidence for efficacy and the potential for lower risk. Although there is good reason to believe that a 1mg dose will reduce the macular edema, it is possible that the retreatment rate will be higher with this dose compared with 4mg since the latter will remain active in the eye for a longer duration than the former. Insufficient data are available to warrant evaluating a dose higher than 4mg at this time.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Macular Edema
Keywords
diabetic, macular, edema, intravitreal, triamcinolone, laser, photocoagulation, DME

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
840 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard of care group: conventional treatment consisting of focal/grid photocoagulation.
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intravitreal injection of 1mg of triamcinolone acetonide
Arm Title
3
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intravitreal injection of 4mg of triamcinolone acetonide
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Standard of Care Group
Other Intervention Name(s)
soc with laser, modified ETDRS photocoagulation
Intervention Description
Standard of care group: conventional treatment consisting of focal/grid photocoagulation.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
1mg triamcinolone acetonide
Other Intervention Name(s)
corticosteroid
Intervention Description
Intravitreal injection of 1mg of triamcinolone acetonide at baseline. At each 4-month interval visit, the investigator will assess whether persistent or recurrent DME is present that warrants retreatment with the randomization assigned treatment. Retreatment, when indicated, will be performed within four weeks after the follow-up visit. Retreatment should not be performed sooner than 3.5 months from the time of the last treatment.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
4mg triamcinolone acetonide
Other Intervention Name(s)
corticosteroid
Intervention Description
4mg intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection at baseline. At each 4-month interval visit, the investigator will assess whether persistent or recurrent DME is present that warrants retreatment with the randomization assigned treatment. Retreatment, when indicated, will be performed within four weeks after the follow-up visit. Retreatment should not be performed sooner than 3.5 months from the time of the last treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years.
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Time Frame
Baseline to 2 Years
Title
Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline to 2 Years
Title
Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method.
Time Frame
baseline to 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years
Description
Median central subfield thickness at two-years. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
Time Frame
2 Years
Title
Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years
Description
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes and improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline to 2 years
Title
Median Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years
Description
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline to 2 Years
Title
Overall Central Subfield Thickening Decreased by >=50% Baseline to 2 Years
Description
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
Time Frame
Baseline to 2 Years
Title
Central Subfield Thickness < 250 Microns at 2 Years
Description
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
Time Frame
2 Years
Title
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3 year
Title
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best Value on the scale=97, Worst Value=0
Time Frame
Baseline to 3 year
Title
Distribution of Visual Acuity Change Baseline to 3 Years
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale=97, worst=0
Time Frame
Baseline to 3 years
Title
Central Subfield Thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at Three Years
Description
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT Baseline to 3 Years
Description
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3 years
Title
Percentage of Eyes With a Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT <250 Microns From Baseline to 3 Years
Description
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met: Age ≥18 years Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) Able and willing to provide informed consent. Patient understands that (1) if both eyes are eligible at the time of randomization, one eye will receive intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and one eye will receive laser, and (2) if only one eye is eligible at the time of randomization and the fellow eye develops DME later, then the fellow eye will not receive intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide if the study eye received intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (however, if the study eye was assigned to the laser group, then the fellow eye may be treated with the 4mg dose of the study intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide formulation, provided the eye assigned to laser has not received an intravitreal injection; such an eye will not be a "study eye" but since it is receiving study drug, it will be followed for adverse effects). Exclusion Criteria A patient is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present: 7. History of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant. 8. A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure and glycemic control). Note: Patients in poor glycemic control who, within the last 4 months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next 4 months should not be enrolled. 9. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of study entry that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry. 10. Known allergy to any corticosteroid or any component of the delivery vehicle. 11. History of systemic (e.g., oral, IV, IM, epidural, bursal) corticosteroids within 4 months prior to randomization or topical, rectal, or inhaled corticosteroids in current use more than 2 times per week. 12. Patient is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the 3 years of the study. 13. Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110). Note: If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, patient can become eligible. Study Eye Eligibility Inclusion Best corrected Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (e-ETDRS) visual acuity score of ≥ 24 letters (i.e., 20/320 or better) and ≤73 letters (i.e., 20/40 or worse). Definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema based on clinical exam involving the center of the macula. Mean retinal thickness on two Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) measurements ≥250 microns in the central subfield. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and patient cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs. Exclusion Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition). An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.) Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal). History of prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids. History of peribulbar steroid injection within 6 months prior to randomization. History of focal/grid macular photocoagulation within 15 weeks (3.5 months) prior to randomization.Note: Patients are not required to have had prior macular photocoagulation to be enrolled. If prior macular photocoagulation has been performed, the investigator should believe that the patient may possibly benefit from additional photocoagulation. History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to randomization. Anticipated need for PRP in the 4 months following randomization. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy. History of major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 6 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization. Intraocular pressure ≥25 mmHg. History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma.) Note: Angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion. A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure (IOP) is <25 mm Hg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous. If the intraocular pressure is 22 to <25 mm Hg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met. History of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment. History of prior herpetic ocular infection. Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis. Aphakia. Exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis. In patients with only one eye meeting criteria to be a study eye at the time of randomization, the fellow eye must meet the following criteria: Best corrected e-ETDRS visual acuity score ≥19 letters (i.e., 20/400 or better). No prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids. Intraocular pressure < 25 mmHg. No history of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma.)Note: Angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion. A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure is <25 mmHg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous. If the intraocular pressure is 22 to <25 mmHg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met. No history of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment. No exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Ip, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Wisconsin Medical School
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Jones Eye Institute/University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205-7199
Country
United States
Facility Name
SCPMG Regional Offices - Kaiser Permanente
City
Baldwin Park
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91706
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
City
Beverly Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90211
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California, Irvine
City
Irvine
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92697
Country
United States
Facility Name
Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
City
Loma Linda
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92354
Country
United States
Facility Name
Doheny Eye Institute
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jules Stein Eye Institute
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
City
Palm Springs
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92262
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Coast Retina Medical Group, Inc.
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orange County Retina Medical Group
City
Santa Ana
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92705
Country
United States
Facility Name
California Retina Consultants
City
Santa Barbara
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bay Area Retina Associates
City
Walnut Creek
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94598
Country
United States
Facility Name
Denver Health Medical Center
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Eldorado Retina Associates, P.C.
City
Louisville
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80027
Country
United States
Facility Name
Connecticut Retina Consultants
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06519-1600
Country
United States
Facility Name
Connecticut Retina Consultants
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06519
Country
United States
Facility Name
National Ophthalmic Research Institute
City
Fort Myers
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33912
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Group of Florida
City
Ft. Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33334
Country
United States
Facility Name
Central Florida Retina Institute
City
Lakeland
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33805
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Retina Consultants
City
Lakeland
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33805
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sarasota Retina Institute
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34239
Country
United States
Facility Name
International Eye Center
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33603
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
City
Augusta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30909
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Consultants of Hawaii, Inc.
City
Aiea
State/Province
Hawaii
ZIP/Postal Code
96701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Associates of Hawaii, Inc.
City
Honolulu
State/Province
Hawaii
ZIP/Postal Code
96813
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush University Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Illinois Retina Associates
City
Joliet
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60435
Country
United States
Facility Name
Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46290
Country
United States
Facility Name
John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
City
New Albany
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47150
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40509-1802
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paducah Retinal Center
City
Paducah
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42001
Country
United States
Facility Name
Maine Vitreoretinal Consultants
City
Bangor
State/Province
Maine
ZIP/Postal Code
04401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Elman Retina Group, P.A.
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21237
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute at Johns Hopkins
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287-9277
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Retina Group of Washington
City
Greenbelt
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20770-3502
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Consultants of Delmarva, P.A.
City
Salisbury
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Joslin Diabetes Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kresge Eye Institute
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201-1423
Country
United States
Facility Name
Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Associated Retinal Consultants
City
Grand Rapids
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49546
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vision Research Foundation
City
Royal Oak
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48073
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Center, PA
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55404
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Minnesota
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Louis University Eye Institute
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Barnes Retina Institute
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Delaware Valley Retina Associates
City
Lawrenceville
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08648
Country
United States
Facility Name
The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10003
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Consultants, PLLC
City
Slingerlands
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12159
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13224
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina, Dept. of Ophthalmology
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599
Country
United States
Facility Name
Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Assoc, PA
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Horizon Eye Care, PA
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Forest University Eye Center
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
City
Beachwood
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Case Western Reserve University
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
OSU Eye Physicians and Surgeons, LLC.
City
Dublin
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dean A. McGee Eye Institute
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Northwest, PC
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Casey Eye Institute
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Penn State College of Medicine
City
Hershey
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17033
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Consultants
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02903
Country
United States
Facility Name
Palmetto Retina Center
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29169
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolina Retina Center
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29223
Country
United States
Facility Name
Black Hills Regional Eye Institute
City
Rapid City
State/Province
South Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
57701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37909
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Texas Retina Consultants P.A.
City
Abilene
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Retina Associates
City
Arlington
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76012
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Research Center
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Retina Associates
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas Medical Branch, Dept of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
City
Galveston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77555-1106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Charles A. Garcia, PA & Associates
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77002
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina and Vitreous of Texas
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77025
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Consultants of Houston, PA
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Retina Associates
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79424
Country
United States
Facility Name
Valley Retina Institute
City
McAllen
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78503
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rocky Mountain Retina Consultants
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84107
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Washington Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98195
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept. of Ophthalmology
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical College of Wiconsin
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53226
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17765429
Citation
Bhavsar AR, Ip MS, Glassman AR; DRCRnet and the SCORE Study Groups. The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep;144(3):454-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.04.011.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18698292
Citation
Ip MS, Bressler SB, Antoszyk AN, Flaxel CJ, Kim JE, Friedman SM, Qin H; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. A randomized trial comparing intravitreal triamcinolone and focal/grid photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema: baseline features. Retina. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(7):919-30. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31818144a7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18662829
Citation
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. A randomized trial comparing intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and focal/grid photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1447-9, 1449.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.06.015. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19273785
Citation
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net); Beck RW, Edwards AR, Aiello LP, Bressler NM, Ferris F, Glassman AR, Hartnett E, Ip MS, Kim JE, Kollman C. Three-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing focal/grid photocoagulation and intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;127(3):245-51. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.610.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20122739
Citation
Aiello LP, Edwards AR, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Davis MD, Ferris F, Glassman AR, Ip MS, Miller KM; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Factors associated with improvement and worsening of visual acuity 2 years after focal/grid photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2010 May;117(5):946-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.002. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20008708
Citation
Bressler NM, Edwards AR, Beck RW, Flaxel CJ, Glassman AR, Ip MS, Kollman C, Kuppermann BD, Stone TW; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Exploratory analysis of diabetic retinopathy progression through 3 years in a randomized clinical trial that compares intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide with focal/grid photocoagulation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;127(12):1566-71. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.308.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33206392
Citation
Rittiphairoj T, Mir TA, Li T, Virgili G. Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 17;11(11):CD005656. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005656.pub3.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
21571677
Citation
Gangaputra S, Almukhtar T, Glassman AR, Aiello LP, Bressler N, Bressler SB, Danis RP, Davis MD; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Comparison of film and digital fundus photographs in eyes of individuals with diabetes mellitus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Aug 3;52(9):6168-73. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7321.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs