search
Back to results

Prospective Evaluation of Elastic Restraint to LESSen the Effects of Heart Failure (PEERLESS-HF) Trial (PEERLESS-HF)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
HeartNet Ventricular Support System
Optimal Medical/Device Therapy
Sponsored by
Paracor Medical, Inc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure focused on measuring heart failure, cardiac support, Paracor, HeartNet, PEERLESS-HF

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 74 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Symptomatic heart failure at enrollment (American College of Cardiology [ACC]/American Heart Association [AHA] Stage C) due to ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
  2. On stable, evidence-based medical and device therapy for heart failure for 3 months prior to randomization <a> Pharmacological Therapy (as appropriate) <i> angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) for patients with ACE inhibitor intolerance or nitrate/hydralazine at the investigators discretion <ii> beta blockers <iii> diuretics, aldosterone inhibitors <b> Ejection fraction < or = to 35% while maintained on optimal medical therapy <c> Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D) <i> If implanted with a CRT or CRT-D, it must be implanted > or = to 3 months before randomization <ii> If currently eligible or anticipated eligibility with a CRT or CRT-D within 6 months, the patient should not be enrolled in the study

Specific Qualifying Characteristics

  1. Six (6) minute walk of 150 - 450m
  2. Peak VO2 for males: 10.0-20.0 ml/kg/min; Peak VO2 for females: 9.0-18.0 ml/kg/min
  3. Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) <85mm and index <40mm/m2 (LVEDD/BSA)
  4. Heart failure duration > or = to 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient History

  1. Heart failure due to a reversible condition
  2. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM)
  3. Left ventricular assist device (LVAD), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or intravenous inotropes are required or the patient has end stage heart failure despite maintenance on best medical therapy
  4. Myxoma
  5. Active infection, sepsis, endocarditis, myocarditis or pericarditis
  6. Myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, cardiac or other major surgery, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker implantation in the 3 months prior to entry
  7. Positive pregnancy test for pre-menopausal female
  8. Less than 18 years or > or = to 75 years old
  9. Hemoglobin level less than 10 gm/dL or creatinine >2.5 mg/dL
  10. Uncontrolled medical conditions that increase surgical risk
  11. Co-morbid condition that in the investigator's opinion reduces life expectancy to less than 2 years

Surgical or Anatomical Considerations

  1. Heart measurement too large or small for Implant sizes
  2. Restrictive cardiomyopathy
  3. Not a candidate for sternotomy or standard thoracotomy surgical approaches
  4. Expected to have adhesions from previous surgical procedures
  5. History of constrictive pericarditis
  6. Previously placed coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) or anticipated need for coronary artery bypass grafting
  7. Not a candidate for cardiopulmonary bypass
  8. Anatomical mitral valve regurgitation of 2+ or greater at the time of enrollment
  9. Pulmonary function testing with the following results: Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) <1L or if FEV1 is between 1 and 3L, forced expiratory volume divided by forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) <60%
  10. Cardiac or thoracic condition that might require operative correction. Cardiac transplantation is not included in this exclusion criterion.
  11. Other elective surgical procedure at the time of the index hospitalization or within 30 days, whichever is longer

Other

  1. Any other medical condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, makes the patient a poor candidate for this procedure
  2. Currently enrolled or has participated in the last 30 days in another therapeutic or interventional clinical study
  3. Unwilling/unable to comply with follow-up
  4. Unwilling/unable to give signed informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • University of Alabama Birmingham
  • USC Keck School of Medicine
  • University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center
  • University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
  • Christiana Care Health System
  • University of Florida
  • Emory University
  • Midwest Heart Foundation
  • St. Vincent Hospital and Health Services
  • Genesis Medical Center
  • University of Maryland, Division of Cardiology
  • Caritas St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
  • Wayne State University/ Oakwood Hospital
  • Minneapolis VA Medical Center
  • St. Paul Heart Clinic
  • Mid America Heart Institute
  • BryanLGH Heart Improvement Program
  • Morristown Memorial Hospital
  • Montefiore Medical Center
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
  • The Lindner Clinical Trial Center
  • The Ohio State University Medical Center
  • Oklahoma Heart Hospital
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
  • Allegheny General Hospital
  • The Stern Cardiovascular Center
  • Tennessee Cardiovascular Research Institute
  • Intermountain Medical Center
  • Inova Heart & Vascular Institute/ Fairfax Hospital
  • University of Calgary
  • St. Paul's Hospital
  • St. Boniface General Hospital
  • London Health Sciences Centre
  • Toronto General Hospital
  • McGill University Hospital Centre

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Treatment

Control

Arm Description

HeartNet and Optimal Medical/Device Therapy (e.g., medications and cardiac resynchronisation therapy)

Optimal Medical/Device Therapy alone (e.g., medications and/or cardiac resynchronisation therapy) (Note: For the purpose of the PEERLESS-HF study, optimal medical therapy is defined as the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and Beta blockers in the highest tolerable doses for three months prior to study enrollment, and Optimal device therapy is defined as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) for at least three months prior to study enrollment, when indicated.)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Responder Analysis - Peak Oxygen Uptake (Peak VO2)
A participant was considered a "responder" if cardiopulmonary exercise testing demonstrated an improvement in peak VO2 of at least 1.0 ml/kg/min at 6 months as compared to baseline.
Responder Analysis - Six (6) Minute Walk (6MW) Distance
A participant was considered a "responder" if 6MW distance at 6 months was at least 45 meters more than at baseline.
Responder Analysis - Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Quality of Life Overall Score
A participant was considered a "responder" if the MLHF overall score had improved by at least 7 points at 6 months as compared to baseline. THE MLHF questionnaire evaluates the impact of heart failure (HF) on a subject's physical, emotional, social and mental aspects of quality of life. Each of 21 questions about how much HF impacts daily activities is scored from 0-no impact to 5-very much (overall score can range from 0 to 105). Improvement is indicated by a decrease in score.
Number of Participant Deaths
Total number of participants who died within 12 months of enrollment into the trial.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class
Change in NYHA functional class between baseline and 6 months. "Maintained" means the participant's functional class remained the same as baseline. "Improved" means the participant's functional class improved (became lower in number) by at least one class. "Worsened" means the participant's functional class deteriorated (became higher in number) by at least one class.
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
The KCCQ is a 23-item questionnaire that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy/knowledge and quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect better health status. For this outcome measure, the difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month KCCQ scores was calculated. The mean change for each treatment arm is presented.
Change in Left Ventricular Mass
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular mass was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented. A decrease in mass is associated with an improvement in the participant's structural heart failure.
Responder Analysis - Peak Oxygen Uptake (Peak VO2)
A participant was considered a "responder" if cardiopulmonary exercise testing demonstrated an improvement in peak VO2 of at least 1.0 ml/kg/min at 12 months as compared to baseline.
Responder Analysis - Six (6) Minute Walk (6MW) Distance
A participant was considered a "responder" if 6MW distance at 12 months was at least 45 meters more than at baseline.
Responder Analysis - Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Quality of Life Overall Score
A participant was considered a "responder" if the MLHF overall score had improved by at least 7 points at 12 months as compared to baseline. THE MLHF questionnaire evaluates the impact of heart failure (HF) on a subject's physical, emotional, social and mental aspects of quality of life. Each of 21 questions about how much HF impacts daily activities is scored from 0-no impact to 5-very much (overall score can range from 0 to 105). Improvement is indicated by a decrease in score.
Heart Failure Hospitalization - Actuarial Analysis
Kaplan-Meier actuarial analysis of heart failure hospitalization (as classified by an independent Clinical Events Committee) within the first 12 months after enrollment
Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular end diastolic volume was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented. A decrease in volume is associated with an improvement in the participant's structural heart failure.
Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular end systolic volume was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented. A decrease in volume indicates an improvement in the participant's structural heart failure.
Change in Ejection Fraction
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented.
Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular end diastolic diameter was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented. A decrease in diameter indicates an improvement in the participant's structural heart failure.
Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Diameter
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular end systolic diameter was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented. A decrease in diameter indicates an improvement in the participant's structural heart failure.
Technical Success (Number of Treatment Arm Participants Successfully Implanted)
"Technical success" refers to the ability to successfully deliver a device onto the epicardial surface and leave the device in a satisfactory position. Participants who did not undergo an implant procedure were excluded from this analysis.
Heart Failure Death
Number of participants who died within 12 months of enrolling in the study and whose cause of death was classified, by an independent Clinical Events Committee, as heart failure
Heart Failure Death - Actuarial Analysis
Kaplan-Meier actuarial time-to-event analysis of deaths classified, by an independent Clinical Events Committee, as due to heart failure
Heart Failure Hospitalization
Number of participants who experienced a heart failure hospitaliz (as classified by an independent Clinical Events Committee) within the first 12 months after enrollment.
All-Cause Hospitalization
Number of participants who experienced a hospitalization (for any cause) within the first 12 months after enrollment. Within the Treatment Arm, hospitalization for the implant procedure was not included in this analysis.
All-Cause Hospitalization - Actuarial Analysis
Kaplan-Meier actuarial time-to-first-event analysis of all-cause hospitalizations
Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events
Number of participants who experienced a serious adverse event (as classified by an independent Clinical Events Committee) within the first 12 months after enrollment
Serious Adverse Events - Actuarial Analysis
Kaplan-Meier actuarial time-to-first-event analysis of serious adverse events
Days Alive Out of Hospital
Median number of days participants were not hospitalized within the first 12 months after enrollment. Within the Treatment Arm, hospitalization for the implant procedure was not included in this analysis.

Full Information

First Posted
September 28, 2006
Last Updated
June 7, 2012
Sponsor
Paracor Medical, Inc
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00382863
Brief Title
Prospective Evaluation of Elastic Restraint to LESSen the Effects of Heart Failure (PEERLESS-HF) Trial
Acronym
PEERLESS-HF
Official Title
Prospective Evaluation of Elastic Restraint to LESSen the Effects of Heart Failure (PEERLESS-HF) Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Resources unavailable to continue study follow-up.
Study Start Date
October 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Paracor Medical, Inc

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if patients in the HeartNet Ventricular Support System with optimal medical and device therapy arm (Treatment group) show statistically significant improvement compared to patients in the optimal medical and device therapy alone arm (Control group) after 6 months of follow-up.
Detailed Description
In the United States alone, more than five million people suffer from heart failure (CHF) and an estimated 400,000 to 700,000 new cases are diagnosed each year. Caused by a variety of cardiac conditions, systolic heart failire (HF) is the end-stage of heart disease where the heart is failing as a pump. Once diagnosed with the disease, less than 50% of the patients live for five years, and less than 25% survive for more than ten years. The number of deaths in the United States from this condition has more than doubled since 1979, averaging more than 250,000 annually. Paracor Medical, Inc. has developed an elastic prosthetic wrap that is designed to apply a gentle mechanical support to the failing heart. The Implant is a compliant elastic structure that is designed to conform to the epicardial surface of the right and left ventricles. It supports the heart throughout the cardiac cycle and was designed to offload the ventricles and reduce wall stress. The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the HeartNet Ventricular Support System with optimal medical and device therapy (Treatment group) when compared to optimal medical and device therapy (i.e., medications, cardiac resynchronisation therapy, pacemaker) alone (Control group) as treatments for patients with heart failure. Efficacy of the HeartNet Ventricular Support System in the Treatment group compared to the optimal medical and device therapy Control group will be evaluated based upon cardiopulmonary tests (Peak VO2), six (6) minute walk distance and quality of life assessment, as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire. Safety of the HeartNet Ventricular Support System in the Treatment group compared to the Control group will be evaluated based on the all-cause mortality rate. Paracor Medical intends to submit data obtained in this clinical trial to support a Pre-Market Approval Application to the United States Food and Drug Administration.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure
Keywords
heart failure, cardiac support, Paracor, HeartNet, PEERLESS-HF

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
220 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
HeartNet and Optimal Medical/Device Therapy (e.g., medications and cardiac resynchronisation therapy)
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Optimal Medical/Device Therapy alone (e.g., medications and/or cardiac resynchronisation therapy) (Note: For the purpose of the PEERLESS-HF study, optimal medical therapy is defined as the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and Beta blockers in the highest tolerable doses for three months prior to study enrollment, and Optimal device therapy is defined as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) for at least three months prior to study enrollment, when indicated.)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
HeartNet Ventricular Support System
Other Intervention Name(s)
cardiac support
Intervention Description
The HeartNet Implant is placed on the epicardial surface of the heart surrounding both the left and right ventricles.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Optimal Medical/Device Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
heart failure medications
Intervention Description
Optimal Medical/Device Therapy - For the purpose of the PEERLESS-HF study, optimal medical therapy is defined as the use of ACE inhibitors and Beta blockers in the highest tolerable doses for three months prior to study enrollment, and Optimal device therapy is defined as CRT or CRT-D for at least three months prior to study enrollment, when indicated.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Responder Analysis - Peak Oxygen Uptake (Peak VO2)
Description
A participant was considered a "responder" if cardiopulmonary exercise testing demonstrated an improvement in peak VO2 of at least 1.0 ml/kg/min at 6 months as compared to baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Responder Analysis - Six (6) Minute Walk (6MW) Distance
Description
A participant was considered a "responder" if 6MW distance at 6 months was at least 45 meters more than at baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline to 6 months
Title
Responder Analysis - Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Quality of Life Overall Score
Description
A participant was considered a "responder" if the MLHF overall score had improved by at least 7 points at 6 months as compared to baseline. THE MLHF questionnaire evaluates the impact of heart failure (HF) on a subject's physical, emotional, social and mental aspects of quality of life. Each of 21 questions about how much HF impacts daily activities is scored from 0-no impact to 5-very much (overall score can range from 0 to 105). Improvement is indicated by a decrease in score.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months
Title
Number of Participant Deaths
Description
Total number of participants who died within 12 months of enrollment into the trial.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class
Description
Change in NYHA functional class between baseline and 6 months. "Maintained" means the participant's functional class remained the same as baseline. "Improved" means the participant's functional class improved (became lower in number) by at least one class. "Worsened" means the participant's functional class deteriorated (became higher in number) by at least one class.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months
Title
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Description
The KCCQ is a 23-item questionnaire that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy/knowledge and quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect better health status. For this outcome measure, the difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month KCCQ scores was calculated. The mean change for each treatment arm is presented.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months
Title
Change in Left Ventricular Mass
Description
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular mass was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented. A decrease in mass is associated with an improvement in the participant's structural heart failure.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months
Title
Responder Analysis - Peak Oxygen Uptake (Peak VO2)
Description
A participant was considered a "responder" if cardiopulmonary exercise testing demonstrated an improvement in peak VO2 of at least 1.0 ml/kg/min at 12 months as compared to baseline.
Time Frame
baseline to 12 months
Title
Responder Analysis - Six (6) Minute Walk (6MW) Distance
Description
A participant was considered a "responder" if 6MW distance at 12 months was at least 45 meters more than at baseline.
Time Frame
baseline to 12 Months
Title
Responder Analysis - Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Quality of Life Overall Score
Description
A participant was considered a "responder" if the MLHF overall score had improved by at least 7 points at 12 months as compared to baseline. THE MLHF questionnaire evaluates the impact of heart failure (HF) on a subject's physical, emotional, social and mental aspects of quality of life. Each of 21 questions about how much HF impacts daily activities is scored from 0-no impact to 5-very much (overall score can range from 0 to 105). Improvement is indicated by a decrease in score.
Time Frame
baseline to 12 months
Title
Heart Failure Hospitalization - Actuarial Analysis
Description
Kaplan-Meier actuarial analysis of heart failure hospitalization (as classified by an independent Clinical Events Committee) within the first 12 months after enrollment
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume
Description
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular end diastolic volume was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented. A decrease in volume is associated with an improvement in the participant's structural heart failure.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months
Title
Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume
Description
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular end systolic volume was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented. A decrease in volume indicates an improvement in the participant's structural heart failure.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months
Title
Change in Ejection Fraction
Description
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months
Title
Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter
Description
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular end diastolic diameter was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented. A decrease in diameter indicates an improvement in the participant's structural heart failure.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months
Title
Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Diameter
Description
The difference between each participant's baseline and 6-month echocardiographic measure of left ventricular end systolic diameter was calculated. The median change for each treatment arm is presented. A decrease in diameter indicates an improvement in the participant's structural heart failure.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months
Title
Technical Success (Number of Treatment Arm Participants Successfully Implanted)
Description
"Technical success" refers to the ability to successfully deliver a device onto the epicardial surface and leave the device in a satisfactory position. Participants who did not undergo an implant procedure were excluded from this analysis.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Heart Failure Death
Description
Number of participants who died within 12 months of enrolling in the study and whose cause of death was classified, by an independent Clinical Events Committee, as heart failure
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Heart Failure Death - Actuarial Analysis
Description
Kaplan-Meier actuarial time-to-event analysis of deaths classified, by an independent Clinical Events Committee, as due to heart failure
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Heart Failure Hospitalization
Description
Number of participants who experienced a heart failure hospitaliz (as classified by an independent Clinical Events Committee) within the first 12 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
All-Cause Hospitalization
Description
Number of participants who experienced a hospitalization (for any cause) within the first 12 months after enrollment. Within the Treatment Arm, hospitalization for the implant procedure was not included in this analysis.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
All-Cause Hospitalization - Actuarial Analysis
Description
Kaplan-Meier actuarial time-to-first-event analysis of all-cause hospitalizations
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events
Description
Number of participants who experienced a serious adverse event (as classified by an independent Clinical Events Committee) within the first 12 months after enrollment
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Serious Adverse Events - Actuarial Analysis
Description
Kaplan-Meier actuarial time-to-first-event analysis of serious adverse events
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Days Alive Out of Hospital
Description
Median number of days participants were not hospitalized within the first 12 months after enrollment. Within the Treatment Arm, hospitalization for the implant procedure was not included in this analysis.
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
74 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Symptomatic heart failure at enrollment (American College of Cardiology [ACC]/American Heart Association [AHA] Stage C) due to ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy On stable, evidence-based medical and device therapy for heart failure for 3 months prior to randomization <a> Pharmacological Therapy (as appropriate) <i> angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) for patients with ACE inhibitor intolerance or nitrate/hydralazine at the investigators discretion <ii> beta blockers <iii> diuretics, aldosterone inhibitors <b> Ejection fraction < or = to 35% while maintained on optimal medical therapy <c> Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D) <i> If implanted with a CRT or CRT-D, it must be implanted > or = to 3 months before randomization <ii> If currently eligible or anticipated eligibility with a CRT or CRT-D within 6 months, the patient should not be enrolled in the study Specific Qualifying Characteristics Six (6) minute walk of 150 - 450m Peak VO2 for males: 10.0-20.0 ml/kg/min; Peak VO2 for females: 9.0-18.0 ml/kg/min Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) <85mm and index <40mm/m2 (LVEDD/BSA) Heart failure duration > or = to 6 months Exclusion Criteria: Patient History Heart failure due to a reversible condition Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) Left ventricular assist device (LVAD), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or intravenous inotropes are required or the patient has end stage heart failure despite maintenance on best medical therapy Myxoma Active infection, sepsis, endocarditis, myocarditis or pericarditis Myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, cardiac or other major surgery, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker implantation in the 3 months prior to entry Positive pregnancy test for pre-menopausal female Less than 18 years or > or = to 75 years old Hemoglobin level less than 10 gm/dL or creatinine >2.5 mg/dL Uncontrolled medical conditions that increase surgical risk Co-morbid condition that in the investigator's opinion reduces life expectancy to less than 2 years Surgical or Anatomical Considerations Heart measurement too large or small for Implant sizes Restrictive cardiomyopathy Not a candidate for sternotomy or standard thoracotomy surgical approaches Expected to have adhesions from previous surgical procedures History of constrictive pericarditis Previously placed coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) or anticipated need for coronary artery bypass grafting Not a candidate for cardiopulmonary bypass Anatomical mitral valve regurgitation of 2+ or greater at the time of enrollment Pulmonary function testing with the following results: Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) <1L or if FEV1 is between 1 and 3L, forced expiratory volume divided by forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) <60% Cardiac or thoracic condition that might require operative correction. Cardiac transplantation is not included in this exclusion criterion. Other elective surgical procedure at the time of the index hospitalization or within 30 days, whichever is longer Other Any other medical condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, makes the patient a poor candidate for this procedure Currently enrolled or has participated in the last 30 days in another therapeutic or interventional clinical study Unwilling/unable to comply with follow-up Unwilling/unable to give signed informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
William T. Abraham, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Chief, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama Birmingham
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294
Country
United States
Facility Name
USC Keck School of Medicine
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94143
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Christiana Care Health System
City
Newark
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19718
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Midwest Heart Foundation
City
Lombard
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60148
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Vincent Hospital and Health Services
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46260
Country
United States
Facility Name
Genesis Medical Center
City
Davenport
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52803
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Maryland, Division of Cardiology
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Caritas St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02135
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wayne State University/ Oakwood Hospital
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Minneapolis VA Medical Center
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55417
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Paul Heart Clinic
City
St. Paul
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mid America Heart Institute
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64111
Country
United States
Facility Name
BryanLGH Heart Improvement Program
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68506
Country
United States
Facility Name
Morristown Memorial Hospital
City
Morristown
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07962
Country
United States
Facility Name
Montefiore Medical Center
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10467
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Rochester Medical Center
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Lindner Clinical Trial Center
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Ohio State University Medical Center
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oklahoma Heart Hospital
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73120
Country
United States
Facility Name
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
City
Hershey
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Allegheny General Hospital
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15212
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Stern Cardiovascular Center
City
Germantown
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38138
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tennessee Cardiovascular Research Institute
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Intermountain Medical Center
City
Murray
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Inova Heart & Vascular Institute/ Fairfax Hospital
City
Falls Church
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22042
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Calgary
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N 4N1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
St. Paul's Hospital
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V6Z 1Y6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
St. Boniface General Hospital
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R2H 2A6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
London Health Sciences Centre
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 5A5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Toronto General Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2C4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
McGill University Hospital Centre
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3A 1A1
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23137493
Citation
Abraham WT, Anand I, Aranda JM Jr, Boehmer J, Costanzo MR, DeMarco T, Holcomb R, Ivanhoe R, Kolber M, Rayburn B. Randomized controlled trial of ventricular elastic support therapy in the treatment of symptomatic heart failure: rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2012 Nov;164(5):638-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
20522572
Citation
Keteyian SJ, Brawner CA, Ehrman JK, Ivanhoe R, Boehmer JP, Abraham WT; PEERLESS-HF Trial Investigators. Reproducibility of peak oxygen uptake and other cardiopulmonary exercise parameters: implications for clinical trials and clinical practice. Chest. 2010 Oct;138(4):950-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2624. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Prospective Evaluation of Elastic Restraint to LESSen the Effects of Heart Failure (PEERLESS-HF) Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs