search
Back to results

Irinotecan With or Without Panitumumab or Cyclosporine in Treating Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Did Not Respond to Fluorouracil

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
panitumumab
cyclosporine
irinotecan hydrochloride
Sponsored by
University of Leeds
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Colorectal Cancer focused on measuring recurrent colon cancer, stage IV colon cancer, recurrent rectal cancer, stage IV rectal cancer, adenocarcinoma of the colon, adenocarcinoma of the rectum

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 120 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma meeting 1 of the following criteria:

    • Previous or current histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum and clinical/radiological evidence of advanced or metastatic disease
    • Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma with clinical or radiological evidence of colorectal primary tumor
  • Unidimensionally measurable disease
  • Disease progression during or after prior fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin therapy and/or with or without bevacizumab

    • Adjuvant therapy and/or prior therapy for advanced disease allowed
  • No clinical or radiological evidence of pleural effusion or ascites causing ≥ grade 2 dyspnea
  • No clinical or radiological evidence of biliary obstruction
  • No known CNS metastases or carcinomatous meningitis

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • WHO performance status 0-2
  • Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
  • Hemoglobin > 10.0 g/dL
  • WBC > 3,000/mm³
  • Platelet count > 100,000/mm³
  • Glomerular filtration rate > 50 mL/min OR EDTA clearance > 60 mL/min
  • Bilirubin < 1.46 mg/dL
  • Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN
  • No history of Gilbert's syndrome
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 6 months after completion of study treatment
  • Capable of completing quality of life questionnaires
  • No prior anaphylactic allergic reaction to cetuximab
  • No other prior or concurrent cancer (excluding nonmelanomatous skin cancer)
  • No unresolved bowel obstruction, uncontrolled gastrointestinal infection, chronic enteropathy (e.g., Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis), or chronic diarrhea (≥ 4 stools per day) of any cause
  • No recent history of seizures
  • No clinical or radiological evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis,
  • Capable of reliable oral self-medication
  • No other condition that would make the patient unsuitable for participation in this study

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No major thoracic or abdominal surgery within the past 4 weeks
  • No systemic anticancer therapy within the past 3 weeks
  • No prior irinotecan hydrochloride
  • No grapefruit juice within 3 days before and after each chemotherapy treatment
  • No experimental drug therapy or antibody therapy, other than cetuximab, within the past 6 weeks
  • No systemic chemotherapy and/or cetuximab within the past 3 weeks
  • No antifungals or antibiotics within the past 5 days
  • No ongoing requirement for cyclosporine or any other medication including, but not limited to, the following:

    • Ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole
    • Erythromycin, clarithromycin, norfloxacin
    • Diltiazem hydrochloride, verapamil, amiodarone hydrochloride
    • Fluvoxamine

Sites / Locations

  • Royal Bournemouth Hospital
  • Sussex Cancer Centre at Royal Sussex County Hospital
  • Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital
  • Gloucestershire Oncology Centre at Cheltenham General Hospital
  • Eastbourne District General Hospital
  • St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital
  • Huddersfield Royal Infirmary
  • Hinchingbrooke Hospital
  • Airedale General Hospital
  • Cookridge Hospital
  • Royal Liverpool University Hospital
  • UCL Cancer Institute
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woolwich
  • St. Mary's Hospital
  • Mid Kent Oncology Centre at Maidstone Hospital
  • Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
  • James Cook University Hospital
  • Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital
  • Peterborough Hospitals Trust
  • Dorset Cancer Centre
  • Portsmouth Oncology Centre at Saint Mary's Hospital
  • Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital
  • South Tyneside District Hospital
  • Royal Marsden - Surrey
  • Great Western Hospital
  • Worthing Hospital
  • Yeovil District Hospital
  • Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital
  • Ysbyty Gwynedd
  • Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital
  • Glan Clwyd Hospital
  • South West Wales Cancer Institute

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of patients treated with irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) alone vs Ir and cyclosporine (IrC) who are progression-free at 12 weeks
Overall survival of patients treated with Ir vs Ir and panitumumab (IrP) and no prior cetuximab

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of patients free from treatment failure at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Overall survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Nurse-assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality, diarrhea ≥ grade 3 at 12 weeks) in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Progression-free at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab
Nurse assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality) in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab
Progression-free survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab
Best response at 1 year in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab
Patient-assessed symptom/quality of life/acceptability scores at 12 and 24 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab

Full Information

First Posted
October 18, 2006
Last Updated
May 26, 2022
Sponsor
University of Leeds
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00389870
Brief Title
Irinotecan With or Without Panitumumab or Cyclosporine in Treating Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Did Not Respond to Fluorouracil
Official Title
A Randomised Clinical Trial of Treatment for Fluorouracil-Resistant Advanced Colorectal Cancer Comparing Standard Single-Agent Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Plus Panitumumab and Versus Irinotecan Plus Ciclosporin [Panitumumab, Irinotecan & Ciclosporin in COLOrectal Cancer Therapy (PICCOLO)]
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
University of Leeds

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Cyclosporine may help irinotecan work better by making tumor cells more sensitive to the drug. Monoclonal antibodies, such as panitumumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Panitumumab may also stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether irinotecan is more effective when given with or without panitumumab or cyclosporine in treating colorectal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying irinotecan to compare how well it works when given with or without panitumumab or cyclosporine in treating patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer that did not respond to fluorouracil.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES: Primary Compare the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) vs Ir with cyclosporine (IrC) in patients with fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer. Compare the efficacy of single-agent Ir vs Ir with panitumumab (IrP) in these patients. Secondary Correlate the toxicity of Ir and/or IrC with genetic variability in the enzymes involved in irinotecan hydrochloride's disposition pathway. Compare IrC to Ir and its metabolites (SN38; SN38G), in terms of pharmacokinetic profile. Correlate the benefit of IrP with tumor expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or its known down-stream molecules as a predictive measure. Correlate IrP efficacy or toxicity (specifically the severity of skin rash) with somatic alterations in the EGFR gene and/or with germline variability in related genes. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to prior cetuximab (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Arm II: Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 15-40 minutes on day 1 and oral cyclosporine three times a day on days 1-3. Arm III: Patients receive panitumumab IV over 30-90 minutes followed by irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Single-agent panitumumab may be continued during breaks in chemotherapy treatment. In all arms, treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with responding or stable disease may continue treatment in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 12 weeks for 1 year. Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,269 patients will be accrued for this study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer
Keywords
recurrent colon cancer, stage IV colon cancer, recurrent rectal cancer, stage IV rectal cancer, adenocarcinoma of the colon, adenocarcinoma of the rectum

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1198 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
panitumumab
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
cyclosporine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
irinotecan hydrochloride
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of patients treated with irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) alone vs Ir and cyclosporine (IrC) who are progression-free at 12 weeks
Title
Overall survival of patients treated with Ir vs Ir and panitumumab (IrP) and no prior cetuximab
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of patients free from treatment failure at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Title
Overall survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Title
Nurse-assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality, diarrhea ≥ grade 3 at 12 weeks) in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
Title
Progression-free at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab
Title
Nurse assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality) in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab
Title
Progression-free survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab
Title
Best response at 1 year in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab
Title
Patient-assessed symptom/quality of life/acceptability scores at 12 and 24 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
120 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma meeting 1 of the following criteria: Previous or current histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum and clinical/radiological evidence of advanced or metastatic disease Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma with clinical or radiological evidence of colorectal primary tumor Unidimensionally measurable disease Disease progression during or after prior fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin therapy and/or with or without bevacizumab Adjuvant therapy and/or prior therapy for advanced disease allowed No clinical or radiological evidence of pleural effusion or ascites causing ≥ grade 2 dyspnea No clinical or radiological evidence of biliary obstruction No known CNS metastases or carcinomatous meningitis PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: WHO performance status 0-2 Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks Hemoglobin > 10.0 g/dL WBC > 3,000/mm³ Platelet count > 100,000/mm³ Glomerular filtration rate > 50 mL/min OR EDTA clearance > 60 mL/min Bilirubin < 1.46 mg/dL Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN No history of Gilbert's syndrome Not pregnant or nursing Negative pregnancy test Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 6 months after completion of study treatment Capable of completing quality of life questionnaires No prior anaphylactic allergic reaction to cetuximab No other prior or concurrent cancer (excluding nonmelanomatous skin cancer) No unresolved bowel obstruction, uncontrolled gastrointestinal infection, chronic enteropathy (e.g., Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis), or chronic diarrhea (≥ 4 stools per day) of any cause No recent history of seizures No clinical or radiological evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis, Capable of reliable oral self-medication No other condition that would make the patient unsuitable for participation in this study PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: See Disease Characteristics No major thoracic or abdominal surgery within the past 4 weeks No systemic anticancer therapy within the past 3 weeks No prior irinotecan hydrochloride No grapefruit juice within 3 days before and after each chemotherapy treatment No experimental drug therapy or antibody therapy, other than cetuximab, within the past 6 weeks No systemic chemotherapy and/or cetuximab within the past 3 weeks No antifungals or antibiotics within the past 5 days No ongoing requirement for cyclosporine or any other medication including, but not limited to, the following: Ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole Erythromycin, clarithromycin, norfloxacin Diltiazem hydrochloride, verapamil, amiodarone hydrochloride Fluvoxamine
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthew T. Seymour, MA, MD, FRCP
Organizational Affiliation
Cookridge Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Royal Bournemouth Hospital
City
Bournemouth
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
BH7 7DW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Sussex Cancer Centre at Royal Sussex County Hospital
City
Brighton
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
BN2 5BE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
City
Bristol
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
BS2 8ED
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Addenbrooke's Hospital
City
Cambridge
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
CB2 2QQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Gloucestershire Oncology Centre at Cheltenham General Hospital
City
Cheltenham
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
GL53 7AN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Eastbourne District General Hospital
City
Eastbourne
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
BN21 2UD
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital
City
Guildford
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
GU2 7XX
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Huddersfield Royal Infirmary
City
Huddersfield, West Yorks
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
HD3 3EA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Hinchingbrooke Hospital
City
Huntingdon
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
PE18 6NT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Airedale General Hospital
City
Keighley
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
BD20 6TD
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Cookridge Hospital
City
Leeds
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
LS16 6QB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
City
Liverpool
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
L7 8XP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
UCL Cancer Institute
City
London
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
NW3 2PF
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woolwich
City
London
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
SE18 4QH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
St. Mary's Hospital
City
London
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
W2 1NY
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Mid Kent Oncology Centre at Maidstone Hospital
City
Maidstone
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
ME16 9QQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
City
Merseyside
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
CH63 4JY
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
James Cook University Hospital
City
Middlesbrough
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
TS4 3BW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital
City
Northwood
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
HA6 2RN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Peterborough Hospitals Trust
City
Peterborough
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
PE3 6DA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Dorset Cancer Centre
City
Poole Dorset
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
BH15 2JB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Portsmouth Oncology Centre at Saint Mary's Hospital
City
Portsmouth Hants
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
PO3 6AD
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital
City
Sheffield
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
S10 2SJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
South Tyneside District Hospital
City
South Shields
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
NE34 0PL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal Marsden - Surrey
City
Sutton
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
SM2 5PT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Great Western Hospital
City
Swindon
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
SN3 6BB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Worthing Hospital
City
Worthing
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
BN11 2DH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Yeovil District Hospital
City
Yeovil
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
BA21 4AT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital
City
Edinburgh
State/Province
Scotland
ZIP/Postal Code
EH4 2XU
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Ysbyty Gwynedd
City
Bangor
State/Province
Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
LL57 2PW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital
City
Cardiff
State/Province
Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
CF14 2TL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Glan Clwyd Hospital
City
Rhyl, Denbighshire
State/Province
Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
LL 18 5UJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
South West Wales Cancer Institute
City
Swansea
State/Province
Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
SA2 8QA
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23725851
Citation
Seymour MT, Brown SR, Middleton G, Maughan T, Richman S, Gwyther S, Lowe C, Seligmann JF, Wadsley J, Maisey N, Chau I, Hill M, Dawson L, Falk S, O'Callaghan A, Benstead K, Chambers P, Oliver A, Marshall H, Napp V, Quirke P. Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jul;14(8):749-59. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70163-3. Epub 2013 May 29.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23953030
Citation
Middleton G, Brown S, Lowe C, Maughan T, Gwyther S, Oliver A, Richman S, Blake D, Napp V, Marshall H, Wadsley J, Maisey N, Chau I, Hill M, Gollins S, Myint S, Slater S, Wagstaff J, Bridgewater J, Seymour M. A randomised phase III trial of the pharmacokinetic biomodulation of irinotecan using oral ciclosporin in advanced colorectal cancer: results of the Panitumumab, Irinotecan & Ciclosporin in COLOrectal cancer therapy trial (PICCOLO). Eur J Cancer. 2013 Nov;49(16):3507-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.017. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26867820
Citation
Seligmann JF, Elliott F, Richman SD, Jacobs B, Hemmings G, Brown S, Barrett JH, Tejpar S, Quirke P, Seymour MT. Combined Epiregulin and Amphiregulin Expression Levels as a Predictive Biomarker for Panitumumab Therapy Benefit or Lack of Benefit in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Advanced Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016 May 1;2(5):633-642. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6065.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Irinotecan With or Without Panitumumab or Cyclosporine in Treating Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Did Not Respond to Fluorouracil

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs