search
Back to results

A Randomised, Comparing Fixed Doses of Pramipexole to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With RLS.

Primary Purpose

Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pramipexole 0.125 mg tablet
Pramipexole 0.5 mg tablet
Sponsored by
Boehringer Ingelheim
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female patients between 20 and 80 years
  2. Patients with a diagnosis of restless legs syndrome (RLS) according to the following diagnosis criteria of National institute of health (NIH)/International restless legs syndrome study group (IRLSSG):

    1. An urge to move the legs, usually accompanied or caused by uncomfortable and unpleasant sensations in the legs.
    2. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations begin or worsen during periods of rest or inactivity such as lying or sitting.
    3. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations are partially or totally relieved by movement, such as walking or stretching, at least as long as the activity continues.
    4. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations are worse in the evening or night than during the day or only occur in the evening or night.
  3. Patients with a total score larger than 15 on the IRLS at Visit 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Premenopausal women who meet any of the following 1) to 3) 1) Patients who are pregnant or possibly pregnant 2) Patients who are lactating 3) Patients who wish to become pregnant during the study period
  2. Patients who cannot take adequate contraceptive measures
  3. Patients with a history of akathisia induced by neuroleptics
  4. Patients with diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy
  5. Patients who are judged to have microcytic anaemia by the investigator or sub-investigator
  6. Patients with a history or signs of peripheral neuropathy, myelopathy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease or other neurological diseases that may result in the occurrence of secondary RLS in the physical function tests or neurological tests
  7. Patients with other sleep disorders such as abnormal behaviour during Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, narcolepsy and sleep apnoea syndrome (patients with an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) exceeding 15 determined by polysomnography at the relevant trial site or those with loud snoring at least 5 nights/week and an experience of respiratory arrest during sleep or excessive daytime sleepiness)

Sites / Locations

  • 248.627.037 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.032 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.030 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.033 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.027 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.034 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.038 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.041 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.039 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.036 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.035 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.040 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
  • 248.627.031 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Pramipexole 0.25 mg once daily

Pramipexole 0.5 mg once daily

Pramipexole 0.75 mg once daily

Arm Description

Pramipexole 0.25 mg given once daily

Pramipexole 0.5 mg given once daily

Pramipexole 0.75 mg given once daily

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 6 Weeks
The International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) proposes classification of severity based on the total score on the IRLS (0-10, mild; 11-20, moderate; 21-30, severe; 31-40, very severe). A decrease in the score of the IRLS by 10 or more points corresponds to the improvement of severity by one rank and has clinical importance. Therefore, the primary endpoint in the double-blind period was set as a decrease by 10 or more points in the mean change on the total score of the IRLS from the baseline to Visit 5 (last observation day in the double-blind period) at all doses of 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, and 0.75 mg/day of pramipexole.

Secondary Outcome Measures

IRLS Responder
The percentage of patients with 50 % or more reduction of IRLS (The measure means the percentage of high responder on the trial medications)
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 6 Weeks
PSQI developed to evaluate the quality of sleep is a self-recording questionnaire consisting of 18 questions focused on 7 factors such as sleep quality, sleep period time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, sleep difficulty, use of hypnotics, and hindrance to activities of daily living due to daytime sleepiness. Each score (0-3 points) in the respective factors was added to calculate the total score (0-21 points). Rating scale scored from 0 (best sleep) to 21 (worst sleep).
Change From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 6 Weeks
ESS is a self-recording scale used to evaluate sleepiness experienced in daily activities and it consists of 8 items focused on specific situations such as reading books and watching television. Each score (0-3 points) to 8 questions was added simply to calculate the total ESS score. A Japanese translation of the ESS (a provisional version provided by the Japanese Respiratory Society) used so far had not been prepared through the international scale development and validation process, but the version prepared through this process was published at the 31st meeting of the Japanese Society of Sleep Research. The questions in JESS had been discussed with the original author of the ESS and their measurement concepts had been confirmed. The JESS is the Japanese version of ESS prepared through the international scale development and validation process. Rating scale scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep)
Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder
CGI is extensively used for risk-benefit evaluation (efficacy) of drug therapies. The CGI evaluates the severity and improvement in 7 ranks. It also evaluates the therapeutic effect and side effects in 4 ranks, separately. Rating scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients who were evaluated as 1(very much improved) or 2(much improved) by the investigator were considered responders.
Patient Global Impression (PGI) Responder
PGI is used to evaluate a global impression by patients themselves in 7 ranks. Rating scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients where the patient evaluated himself/herself as 1(very much better) or 2(much better)were considered responders.
Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Both Supine and Standing Positions), ECG, Laboratory Tests - Double Blind Period.
Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period
The International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) proposes classification of severity based on the total score on the IRLS (0-10, mild; 11-20, moderate; 21-30, severe; 31-40, very severe).
IRLS Responder for Open-label Period
The percentage of patients with 50 % or more reduction of IRLS (The measure means the percentage of high responder on the trial medications)
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period
PSQI developed to evaluate the quality of sleep is a self-recording questionnaire consisting of 18 questions focused on 7 factors such as sleep quality, sleep period time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, sleep difficulty, use of hypnotics, and hindrance to activities of daily living due to daytime sleepiness. Each score (0-3 points) in the respective factors was added to calculate the total score (0-21 points). Rating scale scored from 0 (best sleep) to 21 (worst sleep).
Change From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period
ESS is a self-recording scale used to evaluate sleepiness experienced in daily activities and it consists of 8 items focused on specific situations such as reading books and watching television. Each score (0-3 points) to 8 questions was added simply to calculate the total ESS score. A Japanese translation of the ESS (a provisional version provided by the Japanese Respiratory Society) used so far had not been prepared through the international scale development and validation process, but the version prepared through this process was published at the 31st meeting of the Japanese Society of Sleep Research. The questions in JESS had been discussed with the original author of the ESS and their measurement concepts had been confirmed. The JESS is the Japanese version of ESS prepared through the international scale development and validation process. Rating scale scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep)
Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-label Period
CGI is extensively used for risk-benefit evaluation (efficacy) of drug therapies. The CGI evaluates the severity and improvement in 7 ranks. It also evaluates the therapeutic effect and side effects in 4 ranks, separately. Rating scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients who were evaluated as 1(very much improved) or 2(much improved) by the investigator were considered responders.
Patient Global Impression (PGI) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period
PGI is used to evaluate a global impression by patients themselves in 7 ranks. Rating scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients where the patient evaluated himself/herself as 1(very much better) or 2(much better)were considered responders.
Possible Augmentation in RLS Symptoms at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period
Possible augmentation defined as persistence of a state in which RLS symptoms begin to occur 2 hours earlier than the usual time zone for 5 days or more a week

Full Information

First Posted
October 19, 2006
Last Updated
June 23, 2014
Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00390689
Brief Title
A Randomised, Comparing Fixed Doses of Pramipexole to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With RLS.
Official Title
A Randomised, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pramipexole at Fixed Doses of 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, and 0.75 mg in Patients With Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome for 6 Weeks, Followed by a 46-week Open-label Long-term Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of double blind phase in this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety at the fixed dose of 0.25 mg,0.5 mg and 0.75 mg pramipexole in RLS. The objective of open label phase in this trial is to investigate the long term safety and efficacy of pramipexole in RLS.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
154 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Pramipexole 0.25 mg once daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Pramipexole 0.25 mg given once daily
Arm Title
Pramipexole 0.5 mg once daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Pramipexole 0.5 mg given once daily
Arm Title
Pramipexole 0.75 mg once daily
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Pramipexole 0.75 mg given once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pramipexole 0.125 mg tablet
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pramipexole 0.5 mg tablet
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 6 Weeks
Description
The International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) proposes classification of severity based on the total score on the IRLS (0-10, mild; 11-20, moderate; 21-30, severe; 31-40, very severe). A decrease in the score of the IRLS by 10 or more points corresponds to the improvement of severity by one rank and has clinical importance. Therefore, the primary endpoint in the double-blind period was set as a decrease by 10 or more points in the mean change on the total score of the IRLS from the baseline to Visit 5 (last observation day in the double-blind period) at all doses of 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, and 0.75 mg/day of pramipexole.
Time Frame
Week 6 - change from baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
IRLS Responder
Description
The percentage of patients with 50 % or more reduction of IRLS (The measure means the percentage of high responder on the trial medications)
Time Frame
baseline to week 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 6 Weeks
Description
PSQI developed to evaluate the quality of sleep is a self-recording questionnaire consisting of 18 questions focused on 7 factors such as sleep quality, sleep period time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, sleep difficulty, use of hypnotics, and hindrance to activities of daily living due to daytime sleepiness. Each score (0-3 points) in the respective factors was added to calculate the total score (0-21 points). Rating scale scored from 0 (best sleep) to 21 (worst sleep).
Time Frame
Week 6 - change from baseline
Title
Change From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 6 Weeks
Description
ESS is a self-recording scale used to evaluate sleepiness experienced in daily activities and it consists of 8 items focused on specific situations such as reading books and watching television. Each score (0-3 points) to 8 questions was added simply to calculate the total ESS score. A Japanese translation of the ESS (a provisional version provided by the Japanese Respiratory Society) used so far had not been prepared through the international scale development and validation process, but the version prepared through this process was published at the 31st meeting of the Japanese Society of Sleep Research. The questions in JESS had been discussed with the original author of the ESS and their measurement concepts had been confirmed. The JESS is the Japanese version of ESS prepared through the international scale development and validation process. Rating scale scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep)
Time Frame
Week 6 - change from baseline
Title
Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder
Description
CGI is extensively used for risk-benefit evaluation (efficacy) of drug therapies. The CGI evaluates the severity and improvement in 7 ranks. It also evaluates the therapeutic effect and side effects in 4 ranks, separately. Rating scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients who were evaluated as 1(very much improved) or 2(much improved) by the investigator were considered responders.
Time Frame
baseline to week 6
Title
Patient Global Impression (PGI) Responder
Description
PGI is used to evaluate a global impression by patients themselves in 7 ranks. Rating scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients where the patient evaluated himself/herself as 1(very much better) or 2(much better)were considered responders.
Time Frame
baseline to week 6
Title
Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Both Supine and Standing Positions), ECG, Laboratory Tests - Double Blind Period.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period
Description
The International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) proposes classification of severity based on the total score on the IRLS (0-10, mild; 11-20, moderate; 21-30, severe; 31-40, very severe).
Time Frame
Week 52 - change from baseline
Title
IRLS Responder for Open-label Period
Description
The percentage of patients with 50 % or more reduction of IRLS (The measure means the percentage of high responder on the trial medications)
Time Frame
baseline to week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period
Description
PSQI developed to evaluate the quality of sleep is a self-recording questionnaire consisting of 18 questions focused on 7 factors such as sleep quality, sleep period time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, sleep difficulty, use of hypnotics, and hindrance to activities of daily living due to daytime sleepiness. Each score (0-3 points) in the respective factors was added to calculate the total score (0-21 points). Rating scale scored from 0 (best sleep) to 21 (worst sleep).
Time Frame
Week 52 - change from baseline
Title
Change From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period
Description
ESS is a self-recording scale used to evaluate sleepiness experienced in daily activities and it consists of 8 items focused on specific situations such as reading books and watching television. Each score (0-3 points) to 8 questions was added simply to calculate the total ESS score. A Japanese translation of the ESS (a provisional version provided by the Japanese Respiratory Society) used so far had not been prepared through the international scale development and validation process, but the version prepared through this process was published at the 31st meeting of the Japanese Society of Sleep Research. The questions in JESS had been discussed with the original author of the ESS and their measurement concepts had been confirmed. The JESS is the Japanese version of ESS prepared through the international scale development and validation process. Rating scale scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep)
Time Frame
Week 52 - change from baseline
Title
Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-label Period
Description
CGI is extensively used for risk-benefit evaluation (efficacy) of drug therapies. The CGI evaluates the severity and improvement in 7 ranks. It also evaluates the therapeutic effect and side effects in 4 ranks, separately. Rating scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients who were evaluated as 1(very much improved) or 2(much improved) by the investigator were considered responders.
Time Frame
baseline to week 52
Title
Patient Global Impression (PGI) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period
Description
PGI is used to evaluate a global impression by patients themselves in 7 ranks. Rating scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients where the patient evaluated himself/herself as 1(very much better) or 2(much better)were considered responders.
Time Frame
baseline to week 52
Title
Possible Augmentation in RLS Symptoms at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period
Description
Possible augmentation defined as persistence of a state in which RLS symptoms begin to occur 2 hours earlier than the usual time zone for 5 days or more a week
Time Frame
baseline to week 52

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female patients between 20 and 80 years Patients with a diagnosis of restless legs syndrome (RLS) according to the following diagnosis criteria of National institute of health (NIH)/International restless legs syndrome study group (IRLSSG): An urge to move the legs, usually accompanied or caused by uncomfortable and unpleasant sensations in the legs. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations begin or worsen during periods of rest or inactivity such as lying or sitting. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations are partially or totally relieved by movement, such as walking or stretching, at least as long as the activity continues. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations are worse in the evening or night than during the day or only occur in the evening or night. Patients with a total score larger than 15 on the IRLS at Visit 2 Exclusion Criteria: Premenopausal women who meet any of the following 1) to 3) 1) Patients who are pregnant or possibly pregnant 2) Patients who are lactating 3) Patients who wish to become pregnant during the study period Patients who cannot take adequate contraceptive measures Patients with a history of akathisia induced by neuroleptics Patients with diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy Patients who are judged to have microcytic anaemia by the investigator or sub-investigator Patients with a history or signs of peripheral neuropathy, myelopathy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease or other neurological diseases that may result in the occurrence of secondary RLS in the physical function tests or neurological tests Patients with other sleep disorders such as abnormal behaviour during Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, narcolepsy and sleep apnoea syndrome (patients with an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) exceeding 15 determined by polysomnography at the relevant trial site or those with loud snoring at least 5 nights/week and an experience of respiratory arrest during sleep or excessive daytime sleepiness)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Boehringer Ingelheim
Organizational Affiliation
Boehringer Ingelheim
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
248.627.037 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Aichi-gun, Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Fujisawa, Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Fukuoka, Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.032 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Hiroshima, Hiroshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.030 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Kagoshima, Kagoshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa, Yokohama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.033 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Kanazawa, Ishikawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.027 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Kawasaki, Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Kitakyusyu, Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Kitakyusyu, Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Kochi, Kochi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.034 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Kodaira, Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.038 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Koriyama, Fukushima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.041 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Koriyama, Fukushima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.039 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Kumamoto, Kumamoto
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Kurume, Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.036 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Minato-ku, Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Mitaka-shi, Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Nagoya, Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Osaka, Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Otaru, Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Otsu, Shiga
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Sakai,Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Sapporo, Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.035 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Sapporo, Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Sendai, Miyagi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Shimotsuga-gun,Tochigi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.040 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Takatsuki,Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Tokorozawa, Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Tokushima, Tokushima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Toyohashi, Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
248.627.031 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
City
Urasoe, Okinawa
Country
Japan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
http://trials.boehringer-ingelheim.com/content/dam/internet/opu/clinicaltrial/com_EN/results/248/248.627_U08-3594-01-DS.pdf
Description
Related Info
URL
http://trials.boehringer-ingelheim.com/content/dam/internet/opu/clinicaltrial/com_EN/results/248/248.627_literature.pdf
Description
Related Info

Learn more about this trial

A Randomised, Comparing Fixed Doses of Pramipexole to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With RLS.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs