P E P C A D II, The Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA-Balloon Catheter in Coronary Artery Disease to Treat In-Stent Restenoses
Primary Purpose
In-Stent Restenosis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
paclitaxel coated balloon catheter
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for In-Stent Restenosis focused on measuring in stent restenosis, paclitaxel coated balloon catheter, pepcad, drug eluting balloon
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient Related
- Patients with stable angina pectoris (CCS class 1-3) or with unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald class 1-2, A-C) or documented ischemia or with documented silent ischemia
- Patients eligible for coronary revascularization by means of PCI
- Age at least 18 years of age
- Women of childbearing potential may not be pregnant nor have the desire to becoming pregnant during the first year following the study procedure. Hence, patients will be advised to use an adequate birth control method up to and including 6 months follow-up
- Patients must agree to undergo the 6 months angiographic follow-up and the 1 and 3 year clinical follow-up Inclusion Criteria: Lesion Related
- In-stent restenosis or Mehran type III stenoses reaching ≤ 2 mm into the adjacent native vessel of a metal stent (including passive coatings, exclusive of active coatings), i.e., no recurrence in the native vessel adjacent to the stent, after stent deployment in a native coronary artery (reference vessel between 2.5 and 3.5 mm, lesion length ≤ 22 mm as angiographically documented)
- Diameter stenosis pre procedure must be either at least 70 % or 50 % if ischemia corresponding to the target lesion is documented either by exercise stress ECG, stress echocardiography, scintigraphy, MRT, or suspected based on angina pectoris
- In the stent group, the target lesion must be treated with a single stent only (multiple stenting shifts the patient to the intention-to-treat group) Exclusion Criteria: Patient Related
- Patients with acute (< 24 h) or recent (48 hours) myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald class 3)
- Clinical signs of cardiogenic shock at the time of the procedure (systolic blood pressure of less than 80 mmHg requiring inotropic support, IABP and/or fluid challenge)
- Patients with another coronary stent implanted previously into the target vessel
- Patients with bleeding diathesis in whom anticoagulation or anti-platelet medication is contraindicated
- Patients who had a cerebral stroke < 6 months prior to the procedure
- Patient participates in other clinical trials involving any investigational device or drug
- Untreated hyperthyroidism
- Patient has presence or history of severe renal failure (GFR<30ml/min) and is therefore not eligible for angiography. Patient's serum creatinine levels must be documented
- Post transplantation of any organ or immune suppressive medication
- Other disease to jeopardize follow-up (e.g., malignoma)
- Patients with any type of surgery during the week preceding the interventional procedure.
- Therapy with anticogulants Exclusion Criteria: Lesion Related
- Evidence of extensive thrombosis within target vessel before the intervention
- Side branch > 2 mm in diameter originating from the stent
- Bifurcate lesion
- Left main coronary artery stenosis
- Multilesion percutaneous coronary intervention within the same artery
- Percutaneous coronary intervention of venous graft
- Coronary artery occlusions of any type
- In-stent restenosis of a drug eluting stent (DES)
- In-segment stenosis of the native vessel within the 5 mm adjacent to the stent
- Lesion within 1 mm of vessel origin
- Exclusion Criteria Related to Concomitant Medication
- Patient is intolerant to aspirin and/or the ADP-antagonists clopidogrel or has a history of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia induced by ADP-antagonists, or severe hepatic dysfunction prohibiting the use of clopidogrel
Sites / Locations
- Kerckhoff-Clinic Bad Nauheim
- Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin
- Medizinische Klinik, Kardiologie, Charité - Hochschulmedizin Berlin
- Klinikum Darmstadt, Medizinische Klinik I
- Medizinische Klinik, Kardiologie, St.-Johannes -Hospital
- Städtische Kliniken Esslingen, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie
- University of Saarland, Internal Medicine III
- I. Med. Abteilung, Krankenhaus Bogenhausen
- University of Regensburg
- Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiologic Clinic
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Late lumen loss at 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
Procedural success
Occurrence of acute (up to 48 hours), subacute (up to 30 days), and late thrombosis
30-day MACE rate
Percent in-stent stenosis at 6 months
Percent in-segment stenosis at 6 months
In-stent late loss index at 6 months
Angiographic binary in-stent stenosis rate at 6 months
In-segment late loss index at 6 months
Angiographic binary in-segment stenosis rate at 6 months
Acute and cumulative MACE rate at 6 months
Cumulative MACE rate after one year
Cumulative MACE rate after three years
Indication for premature follow-up
Type of recurrence (Mehran-Classification)
Target vessel failure
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00393315
First Posted
October 26, 2006
Last Updated
June 29, 2010
Sponsor
University Hospital, Saarland
Collaborators
B. Braun Melsungen AG
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00393315
Brief Title
P E P C A D II, The Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA-Balloon Catheter in Coronary Artery Disease to Treat In-Stent Restenoses
Official Title
P E P C A D II, The Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA-Balloon Catheter in Coronary Artery Disease to Treat In-Stent Restenoses: A Comparison to the Paclitaxel-Eluting Taxus™ Stent. A Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2007 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Saarland
Collaborators
B. Braun Melsungen AG
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA-balloon in the treatment of in-stent restenoses in native coronary arteries with reference diameters between 2.5 mm and 3.5 mm and ≤ 22 mm in length for procedural success and preservation of vessel patency in comparison to the Paclitaxel-eluting Taxus™ stent.
Detailed Description
Background information:
Stent deployment for the treatment of coronary artery stenoses has evolved as the standard treatment in nearly all types of coronary lesions over the past two decades.The initial recurrence rate of bare stents in the range of 20 30 % in low risk stenoses has been further reduced by devices with passive coatings such as silicon carbide, heparin, phosphorylcholine, and carbon. The significant decline of in-stent restenoses (= ISR) to the order of 12 % was achieved by active coatings like the cell-cycle inhibitor sirolimus and to about 13.7 % by the cytotoxic paclitaxel. Taken into account the more than one million annual stent procedures performed worldwide even low recurrence rates will leave some hundred thousand repeat procedures annually. In the treatment of in-stent restenoses, however, approaches such as stand alone angioplasty with conventional balloons, the repeat use of bare stents, cutting balloon angioplasty, rotablation, and atherectomy have revealed unsatisfactory and often conflicting results. For brachytherapy the late loss was reported in the range from 0.22 +/- 0.84 mm to 0.73 +/- 0.79mm. Due to its disadvantages such as delayed endothelialization with ensuing late thrombosis cumulating in a 12-months cardiac event rate of up to 30% rising to 50% after five years, its decrease of benefit over time, and the cumbersome logistics at the sites and in the labs, brachytherapy is not considered as a valid approach of the future. Recently, the deployment of drug eluting stents into a restenotic device was associated with restenosis rates in the range from 4% to 30% suggesting some advantage over the aforementioned approaches. The wide range of the results and some late cardiac events still leave room for alternative methods such as the Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA balloon catheter.
Study Rationale The principle of the Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA balloon catheter is based on the antiproliferative mode of action of the compound, the latter being homogenously distributed along the entire length of the balloon and, hence, the vessel segment to be treated. This advantage is in particular relevant in comparison to drug eluting stents as are the lack of chronic mechanical alterations of the artery, the ease of access to the lesion, the obviation of adding another layer of metal to the lesion, and the presumably lower cost of the procedure. Data on the use of the Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA balloon catheter on the treatment of in-stent restenoses, however, are scant. In the animal model and according to unpublished results in humans, the proliferation induced by a Paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter was significantly less compared to an uncoated balloon and to the Sirolimus-eluting Cypher™ stent.Therefore, it is prudent to compare the direct arterial application of Paclitaxel by means of the Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA balloon catheter versus the Paclitaxel-eluting Taxus™-stent as percutaneous transluminal treatment options of in-stent restenosis in human coronary arteries in a prospective randomized pilot study.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
In-Stent Restenosis
Keywords
in stent restenosis, paclitaxel coated balloon catheter, pepcad, drug eluting balloon
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
paclitaxel coated balloon catheter
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Late lumen loss at 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Procedural success
Title
Occurrence of acute (up to 48 hours), subacute (up to 30 days), and late thrombosis
Title
30-day MACE rate
Title
Percent in-stent stenosis at 6 months
Title
Percent in-segment stenosis at 6 months
Title
In-stent late loss index at 6 months
Title
Angiographic binary in-stent stenosis rate at 6 months
Title
In-segment late loss index at 6 months
Title
Angiographic binary in-segment stenosis rate at 6 months
Title
Acute and cumulative MACE rate at 6 months
Title
Cumulative MACE rate after one year
Title
Cumulative MACE rate after three years
Title
Indication for premature follow-up
Title
Type of recurrence (Mehran-Classification)
Title
Target vessel failure
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient Related
Patients with stable angina pectoris (CCS class 1-3) or with unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald class 1-2, A-C) or documented ischemia or with documented silent ischemia
Patients eligible for coronary revascularization by means of PCI
Age at least 18 years of age
Women of childbearing potential may not be pregnant nor have the desire to becoming pregnant during the first year following the study procedure. Hence, patients will be advised to use an adequate birth control method up to and including 6 months follow-up
Patients must agree to undergo the 6 months angiographic follow-up and the 1 and 3 year clinical follow-up Inclusion Criteria: Lesion Related
In-stent restenosis or Mehran type III stenoses reaching ≤ 2 mm into the adjacent native vessel of a metal stent (including passive coatings, exclusive of active coatings), i.e., no recurrence in the native vessel adjacent to the stent, after stent deployment in a native coronary artery (reference vessel between 2.5 and 3.5 mm, lesion length ≤ 22 mm as angiographically documented)
Diameter stenosis pre procedure must be either at least 70 % or 50 % if ischemia corresponding to the target lesion is documented either by exercise stress ECG, stress echocardiography, scintigraphy, MRT, or suspected based on angina pectoris
In the stent group, the target lesion must be treated with a single stent only (multiple stenting shifts the patient to the intention-to-treat group) Exclusion Criteria: Patient Related
Patients with acute (< 24 h) or recent (48 hours) myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald class 3)
Clinical signs of cardiogenic shock at the time of the procedure (systolic blood pressure of less than 80 mmHg requiring inotropic support, IABP and/or fluid challenge)
Patients with another coronary stent implanted previously into the target vessel
Patients with bleeding diathesis in whom anticoagulation or anti-platelet medication is contraindicated
Patients who had a cerebral stroke < 6 months prior to the procedure
Patient participates in other clinical trials involving any investigational device or drug
Untreated hyperthyroidism
Patient has presence or history of severe renal failure (GFR<30ml/min) and is therefore not eligible for angiography. Patient's serum creatinine levels must be documented
Post transplantation of any organ or immune suppressive medication
Other disease to jeopardize follow-up (e.g., malignoma)
Patients with any type of surgery during the week preceding the interventional procedure.
Therapy with anticogulants Exclusion Criteria: Lesion Related
Evidence of extensive thrombosis within target vessel before the intervention
Side branch > 2 mm in diameter originating from the stent
Bifurcate lesion
Left main coronary artery stenosis
Multilesion percutaneous coronary intervention within the same artery
Percutaneous coronary intervention of venous graft
Coronary artery occlusions of any type
In-stent restenosis of a drug eluting stent (DES)
In-segment stenosis of the native vessel within the 5 mm adjacent to the stent
Lesion within 1 mm of vessel origin
Exclusion Criteria Related to Concomitant Medication
Patient is intolerant to aspirin and/or the ADP-antagonists clopidogrel or has a history of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia induced by ADP-antagonists, or severe hepatic dysfunction prohibiting the use of clopidogrel
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Martin Unverdorben, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Clinical Research Institute, Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Heinz-Meise-Strasse 100, D-36199 Rotenburg a.d. Fulda, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Kerckhoff-Clinic Bad Nauheim
City
Bad Nauheim
ZIP/Postal Code
61231
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12683
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Medizinische Klinik, Kardiologie, Charité - Hochschulmedizin Berlin
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13353
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum Darmstadt, Medizinische Klinik I
City
Darmstadt
ZIP/Postal Code
64283
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Medizinische Klinik, Kardiologie, St.-Johannes -Hospital
City
Dortmund
ZIP/Postal Code
44137
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Städtische Kliniken Esslingen, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie
City
Esslingen
ZIP/Postal Code
73730
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University of Saarland, Internal Medicine III
City
Homburg/Saar
ZIP/Postal Code
66421
Country
Germany
Facility Name
I. Med. Abteilung, Krankenhaus Bogenhausen
City
München
ZIP/Postal Code
81925
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University of Regensburg
City
Regensburg
ZIP/Postal Code
93053
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiologic Clinic
City
Rotenburg a.d. Fulda
ZIP/Postal Code
36199
Country
Germany
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16864669
Citation
Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Breitwieser C, Dobberstein J, Boehm M, Hamm B. Neointima inhibition: comparison of effectiveness of non-stent-based local drug delivery and a drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries. Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):411-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2402051248.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16538559
Citation
Custodis F, Scheller B, Laufs U. [Stable coronary artery disease -- case report]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006 Mar 17;131(11):554-5; quiz 563-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-933695. No abstract available. German.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16106539
Citation
Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U. Drug delivery by angiographic contrast media: inhibition of restenosis. Acad Radiol. 2005 May;12 Suppl 1:S14-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.02.017. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15302790
Citation
Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Paclitaxel balloon coating, a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation. 2004 Aug 17;110(7):810-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138929.71660.E0. Epub 2004 Aug 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15076010
Citation
Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Grossmann S, Mahnkopf D, Simon O. Inhibition of restenosis in stented porcine coronary arteries: uptake of Paclitaxel from angiographic contrast media. Invest Radiol. 2004 Mar;39(3):182-6. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000116125.96544.64.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14563585
Citation
Scheller B, Speck U, Schmitt A, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Addition of paclitaxel to contrast media prevents restenosis after coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 15;42(8):1415-20. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)01056-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12909076
Citation
Scheller B, Speck U, Romeike B, Schmitt A, Sovak M, Bohm M, Stoll HP. Contrast media as carriers for local drug delivery. Successful inhibition of neointimal proliferation in the porcine coronary stent model. Eur Heart J. 2003 Aug;24(15):1462-7. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00317-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25169589
Citation
Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B, Heuer H, Hengstenberg C, Maikowski C, Werner GS, Antoni D, Kleber FX, Bocksch W, Leschke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Speck U, Degenhardt R, Scheller B. Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: the three-year results of the PEPCAD II ISR study. EuroIntervention. 2015 Dec;11(8):926-34. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M08_12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
19487593
Citation
Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B, Heuer H, Hengstenberg C, Maikowski C, Werner GS, Antoni D, Kleber FX, Bocksch W, Leschke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Speck U, Degenhardt R, Scheller B. Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2009 Jun 16;119(23):2986-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.839282. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
P E P C A D II, The Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA-Balloon Catheter in Coronary Artery Disease to Treat In-Stent Restenoses
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs