search
Back to results

Lithium Carbonate in Treating Patients With Acute Intestinal Graft-Versus-Host-Disease (GVHD) After Donor Stem Cell Transplant (GVHD)

Primary Purpose

Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
lithium carbonate
laboratory biomarker analysis
Sponsored by
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a diagnosis of severe intestinal GVHD that is not improving at any time after initial treatment with glucocorticoids for at least 7 days are eligible for enrollment; measures indicating severity of GVHD will include: a) persistent diarrhea with average daily stool volumes > 500 mL per day; or b) persistent hemorrhage that is detectable by visual inspection of the stool
  • Patients with denuded mucosa caused by GVHD are eligible for enrollment, regardless of prior treatment for acute GVHD; denuded mucosa is defined as loss (i.e., erosion or sloughing) of the epithelium in: a) at least one-third of the surface area in a 30 cm colonic segment (i.e., rectosigmoid, descending or transverse colon); or b) at least one fifth of the surface area of the second portion of the duodenum, as estimated by endoscopic evaluation; denuded mucosa must be documented by images of the duodenum and colon and by histologic evaluation of the colon
  • All subjects must provide written informed consent with the use of forms approved by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC) Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant renal dysfunction (estimated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min)
  • Persistent or recurrent malignancy
  • Secondary malignancy
  • Patients who had autologous or syngeneic marrow transplantation
  • Presence of any cause of intestinal symptoms or ulceration other than GVHD
  • Patients with any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol will be excluded

Sites / Locations

  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Arm I

Arm Description

Patients receive oral lithium carbonate once or twice daily. Treatment continues for up to 8 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Functional Recovery
Functional recovery was defined as partial or complete resolution of gastrointestinal manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease. Gastrointestinal manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain and bleeding. Complete response (CR) of intestinal GVHD was defined as the absence of any symptoms referable to intestinal GVHD. Partial response (PR) was defined as clearing of abdominal pain (or withdrawal of opioid analgesic requirements in patients treated for abdominal pain) and of grossly visible bleeding if present, and resolution of diarrhea or decrease in the three day average stool volume by ≥ 500 mL in patients with stool volumes of ≥ 500 mL. Progression of GVHD was defined as an increase in the three day average stool volume by > 500 mL, or the development of new abdominal pain (or new opioid analgesic requirements) or new intestinal bleeding.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Duration of Treatment With the Study Product
Number of days from beginning of orally administered lithium carbonate to the end of orally administered lithium carbonate
Mucosal Anatomic Recovery
Endoscopic evaluation of improvement. Categories include 1) no improvement, 2) regenerative changes, 3) limited improvement, 4) partial improvement and 5) complete response. Endoscopic manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include edema, erythema, mucosal ulceration and denudation. Complete mucosal recovery was defined as the appearance of intact mucosa with at least 98% of the luminal surface covered by epithelium. Partial response was defined as the appearance of mostly intact mucosa with at least 80% improvement or less than 10% denuded. Limited response was retrospectively designated to describe visible improvement that was less than partial response. Regenerative change was retrospectively designated to describe early reappearance of mucosal integrity in a previously denuded area but not sufficient to meet criteria for partial response. Failure to respond was defined as failure to meet partial response criteria.
Mucosal Anatomic Recovery
Endoscopic evaluation of improvement. Categories include 1) no improvement, 2) regenerative changes, 3) limited improvement, 4) partial improvement and 5) complete response. Endoscopic manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include edema, erythema, mucosal ulceration and denudation. Complete mucosal recovery was defined as the appearance of intact mucosa with at least 98% of the luminal surface covered by epithelium. Partial response was defined as the appearance of mostly intact mucosa with at least 80% improvement or less than 10% denuded. Limited response was retrospectively designated to describe visible improvement that was less than partial response. Regenerative change was retrospectively designated to describe early reappearance of mucosal integrity in a previously denuded area but not sufficient to meet criteria for partial response. Failure to respond was defined as failure to meet partial response criteria.
Mucosal Anatomic Recovery
Endoscopic evaluation of improvement. Categories include 1) no improvement, 2) regenerative changes, 3) limited improvement, 4) partial improvement and 5) complete response. Endoscopic manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include edema, erythema, mucosal ulceration and denudation. Complete mucosal recovery was defined as the appearance of intact mucosa with at least 98% of the luminal surface covered by epithelium. Partial response was defined as the appearance of mostly intact mucosa with at least 80% improvement or less than 10% denuded. Limited response was retrospectively designated to describe visible improvement that was less than partial response. Regenerative change was retrospectively designated to describe early reappearance of mucosal integrity in a previously denuded area but not sufficient to meet criteria for partial response. Failure to respond was defined as failure to meet partial response criteria.
Mucosal Anatomic Recovery
Endoscopic evaluation of improvement. Categories include 1) no improvement, 2) regenerative changes, 3) limited improvement, 4) partial improvement and 5) complete response. Endoscopic manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include edema, erythema, mucosal ulceration and denudation. Complete mucosal recovery was defined as the appearance of intact mucosa with at least 98% of the luminal surface covered by epithelium. Partial response was defined as the appearance of mostly intact mucosa with at least 80% improvement or less than 10% denuded. Limited response was retrospectively designated to describe visible improvement that was less than partial response. Regenerative change was retrospectively designated to describe early reappearance of mucosal integrity in a previously denuded area but not sufficient to meet criteria for partial response. Failure to respond was defined as failure to meet partial response criteria.
Mucosal Anatomic Recovery
Endoscopic evaluation of improvement. Categories include 1) no improvement, 2) regenerative changes, 3) limited improvement, 4) partial improvement and 5) complete response. Endoscopic manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include edema, erythema, mucosal ulceration and denudation. Complete mucosal recovery was defined as the appearance of intact mucosa with at least 98% of the luminal surface covered by epithelium. Partial response was defined as the appearance of mostly intact mucosa with at least 80% improvement or less than 10% denuded. Limited response was retrospectively designated to describe visible improvement that was less than partial response. Regenerative change was retrospectively designated to describe early reappearance of mucosal integrity in a previously denuded area but not sufficient to meet criteria for partial response. Failure to respond was defined as failure to meet partial response criteria.
Recurrent or Progressive Malignancy
Recurrence or progression of the malignant disease that was the reason for hematopoietic cell transplantation
Non-relapse Mortality
Death without prior recurrent or progressive malignancy after transplantation.
Survival
Patients who were alive at the specified time after enrollment
Survival
Patients who were alive at the specified time point
Survival
Patients who were alive at the specified time point
Causes of Death
Medical condition that made the greatest contribution in causing death

Full Information

First Posted
December 6, 2006
Last Updated
January 24, 2017
Sponsor
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00408681
Brief Title
Lithium Carbonate in Treating Patients With Acute Intestinal Graft-Versus-Host-Disease (GVHD) After Donor Stem Cell Transplant
Acronym
GVHD
Official Title
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Potential Efficacy of Lithium Carbonate for Stimulation of Intestinal Recovery In Patients With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 1, 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Lithium carbonate may be an effective treatment for intestinal graft-versus-host disease caused by a donor stem cell transplant. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying lithium carbonate in treating patients with acute intestinal graft-versus-host-disease after donor stem cell transplant.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the effects of lithium on functional and mucosal anatomic recovery in the small or large bowel of patients with acute GVHD. II. Functional recovery will be evaluated according to changes in clinical manifestations of gastrointestinal GVHD. III. Mucosal anatomic recovery will be evaluated by review of results from clinically indicated endoscopic evaluations. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the tolerability of lithium administration in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. OUTLINE: Patients receive oral lithium carbonate once or twice daily. Treatment continues for up to 8 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission, Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With 11q23 (MLL) Abnormalities, Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Inv(16)(p13;q22), Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(15;17)(q22;q12), Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(16;16)(p13;q22), Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(8;21)(q22;q22), Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Breakpoint Cluster Region-abl Translocation (BCR-ABL) Negative, Blastic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission, Childhood Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Childhood Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia, Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, de Novo Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Disseminated Neuroblastoma, Extranodal Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma of Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissue, Gastrointestinal Complications, Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia, Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm, Unclassifiable, Nodal Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Adult Burkitt Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Adult Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Adult Diffuse Mixed Cell Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Adult Diffuse Small Cleaved Cell Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Adult Immunoblastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Adult Lymphoblastic Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Marginal Zone Lymphoma, Noncontiguous Stage II Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Poor Prognosis Metastatic Gestational Trophoblastic Tumor, Previously Treated Childhood Rhabdomyosarcoma, Primary Myelofibrosis, Recurrent Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Recurrent Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Recurrent Adult Burkitt Lymphoma, Recurrent Adult Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma, Recurrent Adult Diffuse Mixed Cell Lymphoma, Recurrent Adult Diffuse Small Cleaved Cell Lymphoma, Recurrent Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma, Recurrent Adult Immunoblastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Recurrent Adult Lymphoblastic Lymphoma, Recurrent Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Recurrent Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Recurrent Childhood Large Cell Lymphoma, Recurrent Childhood Lymphoblastic Lymphoma, Recurrent Childhood Rhabdomyosarcoma, Recurrent Childhood Small Noncleaved Cell Lymphoma, Recurrent Cutaneous T-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Recurrent Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma, Recurrent Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma, Recurrent Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma, Recurrent Malignant Testicular Germ Cell Tumor, Recurrent Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Recurrent Marginal Zone Lymphoma, Recurrent Mycosis Fungoides/Sezary Syndrome, Recurrent Neuroblastoma, Recurrent Ovarian Epithelial Cancer, Recurrent Ovarian Germ Cell Tumor, Recurrent Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Recurrent Wilms Tumor and Other Childhood Kidney Tumors, Recurrent/Refractory Childhood Hodgkin Lymphoma, Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Refractory Hairy Cell Leukemia, Relapsing Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma, Stage I Multiple Myeloma, Stage II Multiple Myeloma, Stage II Ovarian Epithelial Cancer, Stage III Adult Burkitt Lymphoma, Stage III Adult Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma, Stage III Adult Diffuse Mixed Cell Lymphoma, Stage III Adult Diffuse Small Cleaved Cell Lymphoma, Stage III Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma, Stage III Adult Immunoblastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Stage III Adult Lymphoblastic Lymphoma, Stage III Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Stage III Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma, Stage III Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma, Stage III Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma, Stage III Malignant Testicular Germ Cell Tumor, Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Stage III Marginal Zone Lymphoma, Stage III Multiple Myeloma, Stage III Ovarian Epithelial Cancer, Stage III Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Stage IIIA Breast Cancer, Stage IIIB Breast Cancer, Stage IIIC Breast Cancer, Stage IV Adult Burkitt Lymphoma, Stage IV Adult Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma, Stage IV Adult Diffuse Mixed Cell Lymphoma, Stage IV Adult Diffuse Small Cleaved Cell Lymphoma, Stage IV Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma, Stage IV Adult Immunoblastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Stage IV Adult Lymphoblastic Lymphoma, Stage IV Breast Cancer, Stage IV Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Stage IV Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma, Stage IV Grade 2 Follicular Lymphoma, Stage IV Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma, Stage IV Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Stage IV Marginal Zone Lymphoma, Stage IV Ovarian Epithelial Cancer, Stage IV Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm I
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive oral lithium carbonate once or twice daily. Treatment continues for up to 8 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
lithium carbonate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Eskalith, Lithane, Lithium, Lithobid, Lithonate, Lithotabs
Intervention Description
Given orally
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
laboratory biomarker analysis
Intervention Description
Correlative studies
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Functional Recovery
Description
Functional recovery was defined as partial or complete resolution of gastrointestinal manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease. Gastrointestinal manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain and bleeding. Complete response (CR) of intestinal GVHD was defined as the absence of any symptoms referable to intestinal GVHD. Partial response (PR) was defined as clearing of abdominal pain (or withdrawal of opioid analgesic requirements in patients treated for abdominal pain) and of grossly visible bleeding if present, and resolution of diarrhea or decrease in the three day average stool volume by ≥ 500 mL in patients with stool volumes of ≥ 500 mL. Progression of GVHD was defined as an increase in the three day average stool volume by > 500 mL, or the development of new abdominal pain (or new opioid analgesic requirements) or new intestinal bleeding.
Time Frame
at 28 days after starting treatment with the study product
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of Treatment With the Study Product
Description
Number of days from beginning of orally administered lithium carbonate to the end of orally administered lithium carbonate
Time Frame
Up to 6 months
Title
Mucosal Anatomic Recovery
Description
Endoscopic evaluation of improvement. Categories include 1) no improvement, 2) regenerative changes, 3) limited improvement, 4) partial improvement and 5) complete response. Endoscopic manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include edema, erythema, mucosal ulceration and denudation. Complete mucosal recovery was defined as the appearance of intact mucosa with at least 98% of the luminal surface covered by epithelium. Partial response was defined as the appearance of mostly intact mucosa with at least 80% improvement or less than 10% denuded. Limited response was retrospectively designated to describe visible improvement that was less than partial response. Regenerative change was retrospectively designated to describe early reappearance of mucosal integrity in a previously denuded area but not sufficient to meet criteria for partial response. Failure to respond was defined as failure to meet partial response criteria.
Time Frame
2 to 3 weeks after starting treatment with the study product
Title
Mucosal Anatomic Recovery
Description
Endoscopic evaluation of improvement. Categories include 1) no improvement, 2) regenerative changes, 3) limited improvement, 4) partial improvement and 5) complete response. Endoscopic manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include edema, erythema, mucosal ulceration and denudation. Complete mucosal recovery was defined as the appearance of intact mucosa with at least 98% of the luminal surface covered by epithelium. Partial response was defined as the appearance of mostly intact mucosa with at least 80% improvement or less than 10% denuded. Limited response was retrospectively designated to describe visible improvement that was less than partial response. Regenerative change was retrospectively designated to describe early reappearance of mucosal integrity in a previously denuded area but not sufficient to meet criteria for partial response. Failure to respond was defined as failure to meet partial response criteria.
Time Frame
4 weeks after starting treatment with the study product
Title
Mucosal Anatomic Recovery
Description
Endoscopic evaluation of improvement. Categories include 1) no improvement, 2) regenerative changes, 3) limited improvement, 4) partial improvement and 5) complete response. Endoscopic manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include edema, erythema, mucosal ulceration and denudation. Complete mucosal recovery was defined as the appearance of intact mucosa with at least 98% of the luminal surface covered by epithelium. Partial response was defined as the appearance of mostly intact mucosa with at least 80% improvement or less than 10% denuded. Limited response was retrospectively designated to describe visible improvement that was less than partial response. Regenerative change was retrospectively designated to describe early reappearance of mucosal integrity in a previously denuded area but not sufficient to meet criteria for partial response. Failure to respond was defined as failure to meet partial response criteria.
Time Frame
5 weeks after starting treatment with the study product
Title
Mucosal Anatomic Recovery
Description
Endoscopic evaluation of improvement. Categories include 1) no improvement, 2) regenerative changes, 3) limited improvement, 4) partial improvement and 5) complete response. Endoscopic manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include edema, erythema, mucosal ulceration and denudation. Complete mucosal recovery was defined as the appearance of intact mucosa with at least 98% of the luminal surface covered by epithelium. Partial response was defined as the appearance of mostly intact mucosa with at least 80% improvement or less than 10% denuded. Limited response was retrospectively designated to describe visible improvement that was less than partial response. Regenerative change was retrospectively designated to describe early reappearance of mucosal integrity in a previously denuded area but not sufficient to meet criteria for partial response. Failure to respond was defined as failure to meet partial response criteria.
Time Frame
6 to 7 weeks after starting treatment with the study product
Title
Mucosal Anatomic Recovery
Description
Endoscopic evaluation of improvement. Categories include 1) no improvement, 2) regenerative changes, 3) limited improvement, 4) partial improvement and 5) complete response. Endoscopic manifestations of acute graft-versus-host disease include edema, erythema, mucosal ulceration and denudation. Complete mucosal recovery was defined as the appearance of intact mucosa with at least 98% of the luminal surface covered by epithelium. Partial response was defined as the appearance of mostly intact mucosa with at least 80% improvement or less than 10% denuded. Limited response was retrospectively designated to describe visible improvement that was less than partial response. Regenerative change was retrospectively designated to describe early reappearance of mucosal integrity in a previously denuded area but not sufficient to meet criteria for partial response. Failure to respond was defined as failure to meet partial response criteria.
Time Frame
9 to 11 weeks after starting treatment with the study product
Title
Recurrent or Progressive Malignancy
Description
Recurrence or progression of the malignant disease that was the reason for hematopoietic cell transplantation
Time Frame
2 years after enrollment
Title
Non-relapse Mortality
Description
Death without prior recurrent or progressive malignancy after transplantation.
Time Frame
2 years after enrollment
Title
Survival
Description
Patients who were alive at the specified time after enrollment
Time Frame
6 months after enrollment
Title
Survival
Description
Patients who were alive at the specified time point
Time Frame
1 year after enrollment
Title
Survival
Description
Patients who were alive at the specified time point
Time Frame
2 years after enrollment
Title
Causes of Death
Description
Medical condition that made the greatest contribution in causing death
Time Frame
up to 6 years after enrollment
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Agents Added to Treat GVHD More Than 3 Days After Enrollment
Description
Any systemic medication given in an effort to control graft-versus-host disease
Time Frame
Up to 100 days after enrollment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient with a diagnosis of severe intestinal GVHD that is not improving at any time after initial treatment with glucocorticoids for at least 7 days are eligible for enrollment; measures indicating severity of GVHD will include: a) persistent diarrhea with average daily stool volumes > 500 mL per day; or b) persistent hemorrhage that is detectable by visual inspection of the stool Patients with denuded mucosa caused by GVHD are eligible for enrollment, regardless of prior treatment for acute GVHD; denuded mucosa is defined as loss (i.e., erosion or sloughing) of the epithelium in: a) at least one-third of the surface area in a 30 cm colonic segment (i.e., rectosigmoid, descending or transverse colon); or b) at least one fifth of the surface area of the second portion of the duodenum, as estimated by endoscopic evaluation; denuded mucosa must be documented by images of the duodenum and colon and by histologic evaluation of the colon All subjects must provide written informed consent with the use of forms approved by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC) Institutional Review Board (IRB) Exclusion Criteria: Significant renal dysfunction (estimated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min) Persistent or recurrent malignancy Secondary malignancy Patients who had autologous or syngeneic marrow transplantation Presence of any cause of intestinal symptoms or ulceration other than GVHD Patients with any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol will be excluded
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Martin
Organizational Affiliation
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98109
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28817727
Citation
Steinbach G, Hockenbery DM, Huls G, Furlong T, Myerson D, Loeb KR, Fann JR, Castilla-Llorente C, McDonald GB, Martin PJ. Pilot study of lithium to restore intestinal barrier function in severe graft-versus-host disease. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0183284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183284. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Lithium Carbonate in Treating Patients With Acute Intestinal Graft-Versus-Host-Disease (GVHD) After Donor Stem Cell Transplant

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs