search
Back to results

RAD001 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus BSC Plus Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Carcinoma of the Kidney Which Has Progressed After Treatment With Sorafenib and/or Sunitinib (RECORD-1)

Primary Purpose

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
RAD001
Placebo
Sponsored by
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma focused on measuring advanced kidney cancer, everolimus, kidney cancer, oral therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with metastatic carcinoma and with histological or cytological confirmation of clear cell RCC (tissue from the original diagnosis of renal cell cancer is acceptable).
  • The date of progression on sunitinib and/or sorafenib must be within 6 months.
  • Patients may have received one or both agents
  • Prior therapy with cytokines (i.e., IL-2, Interferon) and/or VEGF-ligand inhibitors (i.e., bevacizumab) are permitted.
  • Prior vaccine therapy in the adjuvant setting is permitted.
  • Patients with at least one measurable lesion at baseline as per the Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria, either on physical exam or as determined by Computer Tomography (CT) Scan or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
  • Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70%.
  • Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function.
  • Patients with a life expectancy ≥ 3 months.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have had a negative serum or urine pregnancy test 48 hours prior to the administration of the first study treatment.
  • Patients who give a written informed consent obtained according to local guidelines

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients currently receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radio-therapy or who have received these within 4 weeks of study entry
  • Patients who have previously received mTOR inhibitors.
  • Patients with a known hypersensitivity to RAD001 or other rapamycins (sirolimus, temsirolimus) or to its excipients.
  • Patients with untreated CNS metastases or who are neurologically unstable despite treatment of the CNS metastases. (Patients with treated CNS metastases, who are neurologically stable off of corticosteroids, are eligible to enter study).
  • Patients receiving chronic treatment with corticosteroids or another immunosuppressive agent
  • Patients with a known history of HIV seropositivity.
  • Patients with an active, bleeding diathesis or on oral anti-vitamin K medication (except low dose coumadin)
  • Patients who have any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions
  • Patients who have a history of another primary malignancy ≤ 3 years, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer, and carcinoma in situ of uterine cervix
  • Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding, or adults of reproductive potential who are not using effective birth control methods. If barrier contraceptives are being used, these must be continued throughout the trial by both sexes.
  • Patients who are using other investigational agents or who had received investigational drugs ≤ 4 weeks prior to randomization
  • Patients unwilling to or unable to comply with the protocol

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Sites / Locations

  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

RAD001 +BSC

Placebo (plus BSC)

Arm Description

The study drugs were self administered by the patients. Patients were instructed to take the study drug as specified in the protocol. Patients were instructed to take two tablets (5 mg each) by mouth every day. Tablets were to be taken one tablet after another with a glass of water, at the same time each day in a fasting state or with a light fat-free meal. If disease progression occurred, patients were unblinded and if they were receiving RAD001, they would discontinue the study. Otherwise, they would be given the option to continue in the extension open label phase of 2 tablets of RAD001 5mg by mouth every day.

Patients received matching placebo of RAD001 tablets twice a day along with Best Supportive Care. With the documented disease progression, the investigator could unblind the patient. If unblinded patient was receiving placebo treatment, they were given the option to continue in the extension open label phase of 2 tablets of RAD001 5mg by mouth every day.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progressive Free Survival (PFS) in Patients Who Receive RAD001 Plus Best Supportive Care(BSC) Versus Patients Who Receive Matching Placebo Plus BSC
Progression Free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause. The primary statistical analysis of PFS was based on central radiological assessments using a one-sided stratified log-rank test. Radiological assessments: every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) during the first year and every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) during the second year and thereafter and at the end of the study. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the median PFS for each treatment group.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Overall Survival (OS) Assessed by the Monthly Overall Survival Assessments
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the median overall survival for each treatment group
Best Overall Response Rate in Patients Who Receive RAD001 Plus BSC Versus Matching Placebo Plus BSC
The Best Overall Response rate (BOR) is defined as the percentage of patients having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response. Complete Response (CR) = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression. • Partial response (PR) = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Radiological assessments: every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) during the first year and every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) during the second year and thereafter and at the end of the study.
Duration of Response in Patients Who Receive RAD001 Plus BSC Versus Placebo Plus BSC
Duration of overall response (CR or PR) applies only to patients whose Best Overall Response (BOR) was Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). The start date is the date of first documented response (CR or PR) and the end date is the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death. Radiological assessments: every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) during the first year and every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) during the second year and thereafter and at the end of the study.
Analysis of Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status/QoL Scale(QL) Scores of the EORTC QLQ-30 Questionnaire by at Least 10 Percent Using Kaplan Meier Method, by Treatment.
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items. Global health status / QoL scale (QL), consisting of 2 questions each scored from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent), and with possible scores ranging from 2 to 14. Higher score indicates better functioning. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% is defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% is considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the patient. Time to definitive deterioration is the number of days between the date of randomization and date of assessment at which definitive deterioration is seen.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the FKS-DRS Risk Score by at Least 2 Score Units Using Kaplan-Meier Method, by Treatment.
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) is a set of items to assess symptoms experienced by patients with advanced kidney cancer. These symptoms include fatigue, pain, weight loss, dyspnea, cough, fever and hematuria. There were 4 response categories (1=Not at all, 2= A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much), sum of item responses can range from 0 to 36. "0"= severely symptomatic patient and the highest score is an asymptomatic patient. Definitive deterioration of the FKSI-DRS score was defined as a decrease by at least 2 units compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 2 units was considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the patient. Time to definitive deterioration is the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which definitive deterioration is seen.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning Scale (PF)Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire by at Least 10 Percent Using Kaplan_Meier Method, by Treatment.
The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive functioning), three symptom scales fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, anorexia, insomnia and financial impact). Physical Functioning (PF) sub-scale, consisting of 5 questions each scored from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), and with possible values ranging from 5 to 20. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% is defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% is considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the patient. Time to definitive deterioration is the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which definitive deterioration is seen.
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001:Peak Concentration in a Dosing Interval (C-max); Pre-dose Concentration at 24-h Time Point in Dosing Interval (C-min) and Average Concentration in a Dosing Interval =(C-avg)
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol. C-avg= Area under curve (AUC) in a dosing interval from time-zero to time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-tlast)/ time of the last quantifiable concentration in a dosing interval (tlast)
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001: Time at Which C-Max Occurs (t-Max)
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol.
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001: Area Under Curve (AUC) in a Dosing Interval From Time-zero to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration. (AUC 0-tlast)
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol.
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001: Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration in a Dosing Interval - (Tlast)
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol.
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001: Apparent Systemic Clearance From Blood Following Extravascular Administration (CL/F)
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol.Apparent oral clearance of RAD001 (CL/F) was calculated using AUC in a dosing interval of 24 hours (AUC0-24hours) value on Day 15 as: CL/F = dose/ AUC0-τ
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001: Normalized to Body Surface Area (CL/F)
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol.

Full Information

First Posted
December 11, 2006
Last Updated
December 7, 2012
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00410124
Brief Title
RAD001 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus BSC Plus Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Carcinoma of the Kidney Which Has Progressed After Treatment With Sorafenib and/or Sunitinib
Acronym
RECORD-1
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of RAD001 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus BSC Plus Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Carcinoma of the Kidney Which Has Progressed on VEGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To assess whether daily treatment with RAD001 could slow the growth and spread of metastatic carcinoma of the kidney. The safety of RAD001 was also to be studied in this trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Keywords
advanced kidney cancer, everolimus, kidney cancer, oral therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
416 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
RAD001 +BSC
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The study drugs were self administered by the patients. Patients were instructed to take the study drug as specified in the protocol. Patients were instructed to take two tablets (5 mg each) by mouth every day. Tablets were to be taken one tablet after another with a glass of water, at the same time each day in a fasting state or with a light fat-free meal. If disease progression occurred, patients were unblinded and if they were receiving RAD001, they would discontinue the study. Otherwise, they would be given the option to continue in the extension open label phase of 2 tablets of RAD001 5mg by mouth every day.
Arm Title
Placebo (plus BSC)
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Patients received matching placebo of RAD001 tablets twice a day along with Best Supportive Care. With the documented disease progression, the investigator could unblind the patient. If unblinded patient was receiving placebo treatment, they were given the option to continue in the extension open label phase of 2 tablets of RAD001 5mg by mouth every day.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
RAD001
Other Intervention Name(s)
Everolimus
Intervention Description
The dose of RAD001 was 10 mg/day. Patients were instructed to take two tablets (5 mg each) by mouth every day.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progressive Free Survival (PFS) in Patients Who Receive RAD001 Plus Best Supportive Care(BSC) Versus Patients Who Receive Matching Placebo Plus BSC
Description
Progression Free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause. The primary statistical analysis of PFS was based on central radiological assessments using a one-sided stratified log-rank test. Radiological assessments: every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) during the first year and every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) during the second year and thereafter and at the end of the study. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the median PFS for each treatment group.
Time Frame
Time from randomization to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment reported between date of first patient randomized until 28Feb2008 cut of date.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival (OS) Assessed by the Monthly Overall Survival Assessments
Description
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the median overall survival for each treatment group
Time Frame
Assessed every month up to 2 years after the last patient was randomized into the study from the date of randomization to the time of death. (Data cutoff was 15Nov2009)
Title
Best Overall Response Rate in Patients Who Receive RAD001 Plus BSC Versus Matching Placebo Plus BSC
Description
The Best Overall Response rate (BOR) is defined as the percentage of patients having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response. Complete Response (CR) = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression. • Partial response (PR) = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Radiological assessments: every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) during the first year and every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) during the second year and thereafter and at the end of the study.
Time Frame
Time from randomization to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment reported, between date of first patient randomized until 28Feb2008 cutoff date
Title
Duration of Response in Patients Who Receive RAD001 Plus BSC Versus Placebo Plus BSC
Description
Duration of overall response (CR or PR) applies only to patients whose Best Overall Response (BOR) was Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). The start date is the date of first documented response (CR or PR) and the end date is the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death. Radiological assessments: every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) during the first year and every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) during the second year and thereafter and at the end of the study.
Time Frame
Time from randomization to dates of disease progression, death from any cause or last tumor assessment reported, between date of first patient randomized until 28Feb2008 cutoff date
Title
Analysis of Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status/QoL Scale(QL) Scores of the EORTC QLQ-30 Questionnaire by at Least 10 Percent Using Kaplan Meier Method, by Treatment.
Description
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items. Global health status / QoL scale (QL), consisting of 2 questions each scored from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent), and with possible scores ranging from 2 to 14. Higher score indicates better functioning. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% is defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% is considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the patient. Time to definitive deterioration is the number of days between the date of randomization and date of assessment at which definitive deterioration is seen.
Time Frame
Baseline and every 28 days under treatment and at discontinuation from RAD001" until 28Feb2008 cutoff date
Title
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the FKS-DRS Risk Score by at Least 2 Score Units Using Kaplan-Meier Method, by Treatment.
Description
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) is a set of items to assess symptoms experienced by patients with advanced kidney cancer. These symptoms include fatigue, pain, weight loss, dyspnea, cough, fever and hematuria. There were 4 response categories (1=Not at all, 2= A little, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much), sum of item responses can range from 0 to 36. "0"= severely symptomatic patient and the highest score is an asymptomatic patient. Definitive deterioration of the FKSI-DRS score was defined as a decrease by at least 2 units compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 2 units was considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the patient. Time to definitive deterioration is the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which definitive deterioration is seen.
Time Frame
Baseline and every 28 days under treatment and at discontinuation from RAD001" until 28Feb2008 cutoff date
Title
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning Scale (PF)Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire by at Least 10 Percent Using Kaplan_Meier Method, by Treatment.
Description
The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive functioning), three symptom scales fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, anorexia, insomnia and financial impact). Physical Functioning (PF) sub-scale, consisting of 5 questions each scored from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), and with possible values ranging from 5 to 20. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% is defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% is considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the patient. Time to definitive deterioration is the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the assessment at which definitive deterioration is seen.
Time Frame
Baseline and every 28 days under treatment and at discontinuation from RAD001" until 28Feb2008 cutoff date
Title
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001:Peak Concentration in a Dosing Interval (C-max); Pre-dose Concentration at 24-h Time Point in Dosing Interval (C-min) and Average Concentration in a Dosing Interval =(C-avg)
Description
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol. C-avg= Area under curve (AUC) in a dosing interval from time-zero to time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-tlast)/ time of the last quantifiable concentration in a dosing interval (tlast)
Time Frame
At pre-dose and post-dose: 1 hour, 2 hour, 5 hour, 24 hour of Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and at pre-dose from Cycle 2(day1) and all subsequent treatment cycles up until data cut-off 28 Feb 2008.
Title
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001: Time at Which C-Max Occurs (t-Max)
Description
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol.
Time Frame
At pre-dose and post-dose: 1 hour, 2 hour, 5 hour, 24 hour of Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and at pre-dose of From Cycle 2 (Day 1) and all subsequent treatment cycles until data cut-off 28Feb2008.
Title
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001: Area Under Curve (AUC) in a Dosing Interval From Time-zero to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration. (AUC 0-tlast)
Description
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol.
Time Frame
At pre-dose and post-dose: 1 hour, 2 hour, 5 hour, 24 hour of Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and at pre-dose from Cycle 2 (Day 1) and all subsequent treatment cycles until data cut-off 28Feb2008.
Title
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001: Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration in a Dosing Interval - (Tlast)
Description
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol.
Time Frame
At pre-dose and post-dose: 1 hour, 2 hour, 5 hour, 24 hour of Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and at pre-dose from Cycle 2 (Day 1) and all subsequent treatment cycles until data cut-off 28Feb2008.
Title
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001: Apparent Systemic Clearance From Blood Following Extravascular Administration (CL/F)
Description
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol.Apparent oral clearance of RAD001 (CL/F) was calculated using AUC in a dosing interval of 24 hours (AUC0-24hours) value on Day 15 as: CL/F = dose/ AUC0-τ
Time Frame
At pre-dose and post-dose: 1 hour, 2 hour, 5 hour, 24 hour of Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and at pre-dose from Cycle 2 (Day 1) and all subsequent treatment cycles until data cut-off 28Feb2008.
Title
Pharmacokinetics of RAD001: Normalized to Body Surface Area (CL/F)
Description
Blood samples will be collected by direct venipuncture during regularly scheduled visits according to the collection plan provided in the study protocol.
Time Frame
At pre-dose and post-dose: 1 hour, 2 hour, 5 hour, 24 hour of Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and at pre-dose from Cycle 2 (Day 1) and all subsequent treatment cycles until data cut-off 28Feb2008.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with metastatic carcinoma and with histological or cytological confirmation of clear cell RCC (tissue from the original diagnosis of renal cell cancer is acceptable). The date of progression on sunitinib and/or sorafenib must be within 6 months. Patients may have received one or both agents Prior therapy with cytokines (i.e., IL-2, Interferon) and/or VEGF-ligand inhibitors (i.e., bevacizumab) are permitted. Prior vaccine therapy in the adjuvant setting is permitted. Patients with at least one measurable lesion at baseline as per the Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria, either on physical exam or as determined by Computer Tomography (CT) Scan or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70%. Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Patients with a life expectancy ≥ 3 months. Women of childbearing potential must have had a negative serum or urine pregnancy test 48 hours prior to the administration of the first study treatment. Patients who give a written informed consent obtained according to local guidelines Exclusion Criteria: Patients currently receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radio-therapy or who have received these within 4 weeks of study entry Patients who have previously received mTOR inhibitors. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to RAD001 or other rapamycins (sirolimus, temsirolimus) or to its excipients. Patients with untreated CNS metastases or who are neurologically unstable despite treatment of the CNS metastases. (Patients with treated CNS metastases, who are neurologically stable off of corticosteroids, are eligible to enter study). Patients receiving chronic treatment with corticosteroids or another immunosuppressive agent Patients with a known history of HIV seropositivity. Patients with an active, bleeding diathesis or on oral anti-vitamin K medication (except low dose coumadin) Patients who have any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions Patients who have a history of another primary malignancy ≤ 3 years, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer, and carcinoma in situ of uterine cervix Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding, or adults of reproductive potential who are not using effective birth control methods. If barrier contraceptives are being used, these must be continued throughout the trial by both sexes. Patients who are using other investigational agents or who had received investigational drugs ≤ 4 weeks prior to randomization Patients unwilling to or unable to comply with the protocol Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Organizational Affiliation
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Fayetteville
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72703
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Duarte
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91010-3000
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Ocoee
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
*see dep*
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46227
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Columbia
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89135
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14263
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10021
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27609
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Canton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44718
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bedford
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76022
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75246
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75702
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98109-1023
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
99202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Morgantown
State/Province
West Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
26506
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Camperdown
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2050
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Randwick
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2031
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Westmead
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2145
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
South Brisbane
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4101
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Woodville
State/Province
South Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
5011
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Heidelberg
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3084
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G 1Z2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vancouver
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 4E6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8V 5C2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 4G5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3G 1A4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bordeaux Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
33075
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lille Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
59020
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lyon Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
69373
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75015
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saint-Herblain Cédex
ZIP/Postal Code
44805
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67091
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Toulouse Cedex 3
ZIP/Postal Code
31052
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Villejuif Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
94805
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Frankfurt/M
ZIP/Postal Code
60590
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hannover
ZIP/Postal Code
30625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kassel
ZIP/Postal Code
34125
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Mainz
ZIP/Postal Code
55101
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
München
ZIP/Postal Code
81675
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Cremona
State/Province
CR
ZIP/Postal Code
26100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Genova
State/Province
GE
ZIP/Postal Code
16132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Milano
State/Province
MI
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Modena
State/Province
MO
ZIP/Postal Code
41100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Perugia
State/Province
PG
ZIP/Postal Code
06129
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pavia
State/Province
PV
ZIP/Postal Code
27100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Roma
State/Province
RM
ZIP/Postal Code
00152
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Napoli
ZIP/Postal Code
80132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Matsuyama
State/Province
Ehime
ZIP/Postal Code
791-0280
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
060-8543
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
060-8648
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tsukuba
State/Province
Ibaraki
ZIP/Postal Code
305-8576
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kurashiki
State/Province
Okayama
ZIP/Postal Code
710-8602
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
OsakaSayama
State/Province
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
589-8511
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sunto-gun
State/Province
Shizuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
411-8777
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Utsunomiya
State/Province
Tochigi
ZIP/Postal Code
320-0834
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chuo-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
104-0045
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Akita
ZIP/Postal Code
010-8543
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chiba
ZIP/Postal Code
260-8717
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
812-8582
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
537-8511
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tokushima
ZIP/Postal Code
770-8503
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Leiden
ZIP/Postal Code
2300 RC
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nijmegen
ZIP/Postal Code
6525 GA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Utrecht
ZIP/Postal Code
3584CX
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Gdañsk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-219
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
90-153
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
00-909
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-367
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hospitalet de LLobregat
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08907
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08025
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28041
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46009
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23219086
Citation
Stein A, Bellmunt J, Escudier B, Kim D, Stergiopoulos SG, Mietlowski W, Motzer RJ; RECORD-1 Trial Study Group. Survival prediction in everolimus-treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma incorporating tumor burden response in the RECORD-1 trial. Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):994-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.032. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22824201
Citation
Stein A, Wang W, Carter AA, Chiparus O, Hollaender N, Kim H, Motzer RJ, Sarr C. Dynamic tumor modeling of the dose-response relationship for everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma using data from the phase 3 RECORD-1 trial. BMC Cancer. 2012 Jul 23;12:311. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-311.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22342553
Citation
Oudard S, Thiam R, Fournier LS, Medioni J, Lamuraglia M, Scotte F, Fabre E, Kim D, Kpamegan E, Panneerselvam A, Cuenod CA. Optimisation of the tumour response threshold in patients treated with everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: analysis of response and progression-free survival in the RECORD-1 study. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(10):1512-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.01.027. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22297244
Citation
Porta C, Calvo E, Climent MA, Vaishampayan U, Osanto S, Ravaud A, Bracarda S, Hutson TE, Escudier B, Grunwald V, Kim D, Panneerselvam A, Anak O, Motzer RJ. Efficacy and safety of everolimus in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an exploratory analysis of the outcomes of elderly patients in the RECORD-1 Trial. Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):826-33. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.057. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22209391
Citation
Calvo E, Escudier B, Motzer RJ, Oudard S, Hutson TE, Porta C, Bracarda S, Grunwald V, Thompson JA, Ravaud A, Kim D, Panneerselvam A, Anak O, Figlin RA. Everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Subgroup analysis of patients with 1 or 2 previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies enrolled in the phase III RECORD-1 study. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Feb;48(3):333-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.027. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
20194812
Citation
White DA, Camus P, Endo M, Escudier B, Calvo E, Akaza H, Uemura H, Kpamegan E, Kay A, Robson M, Ravaud A, Motzer RJ. Noninfectious pneumonitis after everolimus therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug 1;182(3):396-403. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200911-1720OC. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
18653228
Citation
Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S, Hutson TE, Porta C, Bracarda S, Grunwald V, Thompson JA, Figlin RA, Hollaender N, Urbanowitz G, Berg WJ, Kay A, Lebwohl D, Ravaud A; RECORD-1 Study Group. Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet. 2008 Aug 9;372(9637):449-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61039-9. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

RAD001 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus BSC Plus Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Carcinoma of the Kidney Which Has Progressed After Treatment With Sorafenib and/or Sunitinib

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs