A Study of OROS Hydromorphone HCL vs Morphine in Cancer Pain Patients.
Primary Purpose
Pain, Analgesics, Opioid
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
OROS hydromorphone HCL ; Morphine sulfate
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain focused on measuring Cancer pain, Oral analgesic, OROS hydromorphone HCL, Morphine sulfate
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with cancer pain who are currently receiving strong oral or transdermal opioid analgesics or in whom strong opioid analgesics are appropriate
- Patients who requires or are expected to require between 60 and 540 mg of oral morphine or morphine equivalents every 24 hours for the chronic management of cancer pain
- Patients who have pain suitable for treatment with a once-daily formulation
- Patients with concomitant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient with gastrointestinal (GI) disease of sufficient severity to interfere with orally administered analgesia (eg dysphagia, vomiting, constipation, bowel obstruction, severe gut narrowing) were not permitted to enroll
- Patient where the risks of treatment with morphine or hydromorphone outweighed the potential benefits such as raised intracranial pressure, hypotension, hypothyroidism, asthma, reduced respiratory reserve, prostatic hypertrophy, hepatic or renal impairment, convulsive disorders, and Addison's disease
- Debilitated patients were excluded.
Sites / Locations
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The primary efficacy : Patient's assessment of "worst pain in the past 24 hours" Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questions, scored daily in the patient's diary.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00410540
First Posted
December 12, 2006
Last Updated
April 26, 2010
Sponsor
Alza Corporation, DE, USA
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00410540
Brief Title
A Study of OROS Hydromorphone HCL vs Morphine in Cancer Pain Patients.
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial of Hydromorphone (Immediate and Sustained- Release) vs Morphine (Immediate and Sustained-release) in Cancer Pain
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
undefined (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
May 2001 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Alza Corporation, DE, USA
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the clinical equivalence of hydromorphone and morphine (immediate-release [IR] and sustained-release [SR] formulations) using the "worst pain in the past 24 hours" item of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The secondary objective of this study was to compare hydromorphone and morphine in the following variables: other pain measures, various questionnaires, and safety and tolerability variables.
Detailed Description
This was a phase-3, multicenter, multinational, randomized (patients are assigned different treatments based on chance), active-controlled, double-blind, multiple-ascending-dose, parallel-group study in adult patients with cancer pain who receive and/or require strong oral or transdermal opioid analgesics (60-540 mg of oral morphine equivalents daily). This study consisted of 2 phases: an initial immediate release (IR) phase and a subsequent slow release (SR) phase. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either OROS hydromorphone HCl or morphine sulfate (immediate release formulation in the immediate release phase, slow release formulation in the slow release phase). In the immediate release phase (2-9 days), patients were started on the appropriate initial dose of immediate release medication every 4 hours (q4h), (6 doses/day) using a 5:1 conversion ratio (morphine equivalents:hydromorphone dosage). If the patient had greater than 3 breakthrough-pain episodes requiring additional pain medication in 24 hours, the study medication dosage was increased, at most once a day. When the patient had achieved dose-stable pain control (2 days with 3 or less than 3 breakthrough-pain episodes per day), the patient was permitted to continue into the slow release phase. The patient was given an equivalent dosage of a slow release formulation of the same drug (OROS® hydromorphone HCL each day or morphine sulfate slow release two times per day), administered using a double-dummy technique. Dosage increases were permitted every 2 days if the patient had more than 3 breakthrough-pain episodes in 24 hours. To complete the slow release phase, patients had to achieve dose-stable pain control for at least 2 days.Safety assessments of physical examination, labs and adverse event reporting were done. OROS hydromorphone HCL slow release 8, 16, 32, and 64mg tablets; Morphine sulfate immediate release10, 20, 50 mg capsules;Morphine sulfate slow release 5, 30, 60, 90, 120, 160, and 200mg capsules;hydromorphone immediate release 2, 4, 8 mg;The immediate release medications orally every 4 hours;The OROS hydromorphone slow release formulation orally every 24 hours and morphine slow release orally twice daily.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Analgesics, Opioid
Keywords
Cancer pain, Oral analgesic, OROS hydromorphone HCL, Morphine sulfate
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Double
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
202 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
OROS hydromorphone HCL ; Morphine sulfate
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary efficacy : Patient's assessment of "worst pain in the past 24 hours" Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questions, scored daily in the patient's diary.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with cancer pain who are currently receiving strong oral or transdermal opioid analgesics or in whom strong opioid analgesics are appropriate
Patients who requires or are expected to require between 60 and 540 mg of oral morphine or morphine equivalents every 24 hours for the chronic management of cancer pain
Patients who have pain suitable for treatment with a once-daily formulation
Patients with concomitant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Exclusion Criteria:
Patient with gastrointestinal (GI) disease of sufficient severity to interfere with orally administered analgesia (eg dysphagia, vomiting, constipation, bowel obstruction, severe gut narrowing) were not permitted to enroll
Patient where the risks of treatment with morphine or hydromorphone outweighed the potential benefits such as raised intracranial pressure, hypotension, hypothyroidism, asthma, reduced respiratory reserve, prostatic hypertrophy, hepatic or renal impairment, convulsive disorders, and Addison's disease
Debilitated patients were excluded.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alza Corporation Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
ALZA
Official's Role
Study Director
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
A Study of OROS Hydromorphone HCL vs Morphine in Cancer Pain Patients.
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs