search
Back to results

A Comparison of Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), PRK With Mitomycin-C and Laser Subepithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK) in the Treatment of Moderate and High Myopia

Primary Purpose

MODERATE AND HIGH MYOPIA

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PRK
MMC PRK
LASEK
Sponsored by
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for MODERATE AND HIGH MYOPIA

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Informed consent.
  2. Normal, healthy, active duty adults age 21 years or older. The lower age limit of 21 years is intended to ensure documentation of refractive stability.
  3. Manifest refractive spherical equivalent of greater than -4.00 diopters (D) up to -10.00 D.
  4. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better in both eyes.
  5. Demonstrated refractive stability, confirmed by clinical records. Neither the spherical nor the cylindrical portion of the refraction may have changed more than 0.50D during the 12-month period immediately preceding the baseline examination, as confirmed by clinical records.
  6. Both eyes must fall in the same refraction group and there must be less than 1 D difference between eyes.
  7. Soft contact lens users must have removed their lenses at least 2 weeks before baseline measurements. Hard contact lens users (PMMA or rigid gas permeable lenses) must have removed their lenses at least 4 weeks prior to baseline measurements and have 2 central keratometry readings and 2 manifest refractions taken at least 1 week apart that do not differ by more than 0.50 D in either meridian.
  8. Access to transportation to meet the follow-up requirements.
  9. Available for evaluation during the 1-year follow-up period.
  10. Consent of the subject's command to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Female subjects who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant during the study. Women of childbearing age will take a urine pregnancy test before starting this study.
  2. Residual, recurrent or active ocular diseases or corneal abnormalities in either eye such as keratoconus, iritis, uveitis, keratoconjunctivitis sicca, vernal conjunctivitis, lagophthalmos, corneal scarring, glaucoma, previous steroid responder, occludable chamber angles, visually significant cataracts.
  3. Medical condition(s), which, in the judgment of the investigator, may impair healing, including but not limited to: collagen vascular disease, autoimmune disease, immunodeficiency diseases, and ocular herpes zoster or simplex.
  4. Concurrent topical or systemic medications that may impair healing, including corticosteroids, antimetabolites, isotretinoin (Accutane), amiodarone hydrochloride (Cordarone) and/or sumatripin (Imitrex).
  5. Any physical or mental impairment that would preclude participation in any of the examinations.
  6. Prior refractive or ocular surgery.

Sites / Locations

  • Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Center For Refractive Surgery

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

2

3

1

Arm Description

LASEK- laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy

Mitomycin C PRK

PRK- Photorefractive keratectomy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Efficacy in terms of uncorrected visual acuity and post operative refraction. Safety in terms of maintenance of best spectacle corrected acuity within 2 lines of preoperative levels.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
December 21, 2006
Last Updated
July 15, 2010
Sponsor
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Collaborators
Madigan Army Medical Center, C.R.Darnall Army Medical Center, Blanchfield Army Community Hospital, Tripler Army Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00415077
Brief Title
A Comparison of Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), PRK With Mitomycin-C and Laser Subepithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK) in the Treatment of Moderate and High Myopia
Official Title
A Prospective Comparison of Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), PRK With Mitomycin-C and Laser Subepithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK) in the Treatment of Moderate and High Myopia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Change in excimer laser systems prior to completion of study
Study Start Date
June 2004 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Collaborators
Madigan Army Medical Center, C.R.Darnall Army Medical Center, Blanchfield Army Community Hospital, Tripler Army Medical Center

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess whether there is a significant difference in visual outcomes or corneal haze after surface ablation for moderate and high myopia in active duty service members treated with PRK, Mitomycin-C (MMC) PRK and LASEK.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
MODERATE AND HIGH MYOPIA

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
960 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
LASEK- laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy
Arm Title
3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Mitomycin C PRK
Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
PRK- Photorefractive keratectomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
PRK
Intervention Description
PRK
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
MMC PRK
Intervention Description
mitomycin C PRK
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
LASEK
Intervention Description
LASEK
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy in terms of uncorrected visual acuity and post operative refraction. Safety in terms of maintenance of best spectacle corrected acuity within 2 lines of preoperative levels.
Time Frame
12 months after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Informed consent. Normal, healthy, active duty adults age 21 years or older. The lower age limit of 21 years is intended to ensure documentation of refractive stability. Manifest refractive spherical equivalent of greater than -4.00 diopters (D) up to -10.00 D. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better in both eyes. Demonstrated refractive stability, confirmed by clinical records. Neither the spherical nor the cylindrical portion of the refraction may have changed more than 0.50D during the 12-month period immediately preceding the baseline examination, as confirmed by clinical records. Both eyes must fall in the same refraction group and there must be less than 1 D difference between eyes. Soft contact lens users must have removed their lenses at least 2 weeks before baseline measurements. Hard contact lens users (PMMA or rigid gas permeable lenses) must have removed their lenses at least 4 weeks prior to baseline measurements and have 2 central keratometry readings and 2 manifest refractions taken at least 1 week apart that do not differ by more than 0.50 D in either meridian. Access to transportation to meet the follow-up requirements. Available for evaluation during the 1-year follow-up period. Consent of the subject's command to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: Female subjects who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant during the study. Women of childbearing age will take a urine pregnancy test before starting this study. Residual, recurrent or active ocular diseases or corneal abnormalities in either eye such as keratoconus, iritis, uveitis, keratoconjunctivitis sicca, vernal conjunctivitis, lagophthalmos, corneal scarring, glaucoma, previous steroid responder, occludable chamber angles, visually significant cataracts. Medical condition(s), which, in the judgment of the investigator, may impair healing, including but not limited to: collagen vascular disease, autoimmune disease, immunodeficiency diseases, and ocular herpes zoster or simplex. Concurrent topical or systemic medications that may impair healing, including corticosteroids, antimetabolites, isotretinoin (Accutane), amiodarone hydrochloride (Cordarone) and/or sumatripin (Imitrex). Any physical or mental impairment that would preclude participation in any of the examinations. Prior refractive or ocular surgery.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
KRAIG S BOWER, MD
Organizational Affiliation
DIRECTOR, CENTER FOR REFRACTIVE SURGERY WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Center For Refractive Surgery
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20307
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Comparison of Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), PRK With Mitomycin-C and Laser Subepithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK) in the Treatment of Moderate and High Myopia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs