search
Back to results

A Randomised, Controlled Comparison of Vitamin D Strategies is Acute Hip Fracture Patients

Primary Purpose

Hip Fracture

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vitamin D2
Vitamin D2
Placebo
Sponsored by
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hip Fracture focused on measuring Vitamin D, Hip fracture, Optimal level, Deficiency, Functional muscle strength

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fragility hip fracture patient
  • Previous Vitamin D supplementation is okay.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pathological fracture secondary to malignancy or intrinsic bone disease (eg. Paget's disease)
  • Cancer in the past 10 years likely to metastasize to bone
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine <30 mls/min)
  • Hypercalcemia (primary hyperparathyroidism; granulomatous diseases; drug-induced such as lithium, thiazides), hypocalcemia, hypercalciuria, fracture or stroke within the last 3 months
  • Hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, fluoride, or bisphosphonates during the previous 24 months
  • Pre-existing bone abnormality
  • Renal stones in past 10 years

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Placebo Comparator

    Arm Label

    1

    2

    3

    Arm Description

    50 000 IU Vitamin D2

    100 000 IU Vitamin D2

    Placebo

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD)
    Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD) was measured at baseline, at discharge from hospital (approximately 4-weeks), and at a follow-up study visit at approximately 3-months.Baseline and 4-week blood samples were drawn in-hospital; venipunctures performed at 3-months were either in-hospital (if patient remained in acute care or rehabilitation) or at the out-patient clinic visit.Serum 25-OHD was analyzed with the DiaSorin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D radioimmunoassay (Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0285, U.S.A) at the central laboratory with the exception of 3 patients (data analyzed at other laboratories).
    Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional PTH was accessed at baseline.
    Calcium
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional Calcium was accessed at baseline and approximately 4 weeks.
    Phosphate
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional phosphate was accessed at baseline.
    Alkaline Phosphatase
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional Alkaline Phosphatase was accessed at baseline.
    Hemoglobin
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional hemoglobin was accessed at baseline.
    Creatinine
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional creatinine was accessed at baseline.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Functional Assessment Using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test After 3 Months
    The Timed Up and Go (TUG) was collected for patients who attended the 3-month clinic appointment by study coordinators or for patients who attended the rehabilitation unit this is routinely collected and was abstracted from chart. The TUG was conducted using a standard armchair and a line marked 3-metres from the chair. Participants were given the following instructions (no physical assistance was given): "Rise from the chair, walk to the line on the floor, turn, return to the chair and sit down again". Scores are measured as time in seconds to complete the task.
    Functional Assessment Using the Two Minute Walk Test (2MWT)After 3 Months
    The 2MWT was collected for patients who attended the 3-month clinic appointment by study coordinators or for patients who attended rehabilitation, it was abstracted from their charts. The 2MWT test was given in a carpeted corridor and the subject was instructed to wear regular footwear and to use their customary walking aid. The distance the participant could comfortably walk in two-minutes (without physical assistance) was measured in metres.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    January 17, 2007
    Last Updated
    May 11, 2012
    Sponsor
    Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
    Collaborators
    Merck Frosst Canada Ltd.
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT00424619
    Brief Title
    A Randomised, Controlled Comparison of Vitamin D Strategies is Acute Hip Fracture Patients
    Official Title
    A Randomised, Controlled Comparison of Vitamin D Strategies is Acute Hip Fracture Patients
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    May 2012
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    October 2007 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    July 2009 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    July 2009 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
    Collaborators
    Merck Frosst Canada Ltd.

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of the study is to determine the best dose of Vitamin D to give to hip fracture patients to achieve the optimal therapeutic level.
    Detailed Description
    Low Vitamin D levels can cause faster bone loss and increase the risk of having a fracture. Patients who experience a hip fracture have low levels of Vitamin D. It is not clear how much Vitamin D must be taken in order to reach this optimal level. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD) concentrations are the recognized functional status indicator for vitamin D. Although there is no clear consensus, vitamin D 'insufficiency' has been considered in the range of 25- 75/80 nmol/L. Patients with acute hip fracture are at high risk for a recurrent hip fracture or other fragility fractures (and falls) and are a group who should be targeted for osteoporosis treatment (i.e. Bisphosphonate or other antiresorptive). Before fracture patients start on a bisphosphonate, however, an important consideration is whether 25-OHD levels are at a therapeutic level (>75 nmol/l and less than 150-200 nmol/L). Case-control studies indicate that older people who experience a hip fracture have lower serum concentrations of 25-OHD than do those without a fracture. In cross-sectional studies, the majority of patients with hip fracture are considered to have insufficient vitamin D levels. Although the benefits of supplementing patients with at least 800 to 1000 IU/day Vitamin D3 may be recognized, there is little information available to guide physicians regarding the appropriate management of hip fracture patients who may be severely Vitamin D deficient, particularly in acute hip fracture patients. Few studies have examined whether high dose vitamin D (i.e. 50,000 IU or greater/week) offers an advantage over smaller, routinely prescribed doses (i.e. 800 or 1000 IU), particularly in hip fracture patients. The purpose of this study is to determine the number of hip fracture patients reaching an optimal level of vitamin D comparing between three different Vitamin D dose strategies: A. 50,000 D2 oral bolus followed by 800 IU D3 daily B. 100,000 D2 oral bolus followed by 800 IU D3 daily C. 800 IU D3 daily The Vitamin D strategies will be administered over 3-months in acute hip fracture patients. The proportion of patients reaching an optimal level of 25-OHD (>75 nmol/L) will be determined. Secondary measures include the Timed Up and Go test, and 2 Minute Walk Test to compare the effects of the Vitamin D supplementation strategies on functional and muscle strength scales.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Hip Fracture
    Keywords
    Vitamin D, Hip fracture, Optimal level, Deficiency, Functional muscle strength

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 4
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Participant
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    64 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    1
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    50 000 IU Vitamin D2
    Arm Title
    2
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    100 000 IU Vitamin D2
    Arm Title
    3
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    Placebo
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Vitamin D2
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Ostoforte
    Intervention Description
    50 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Vitamin D2
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Ostoforte
    Intervention Description
    100 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Placebo
    Intervention Description
    Placebo, 1 time bolus dose
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD)
    Description
    Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD) was measured at baseline, at discharge from hospital (approximately 4-weeks), and at a follow-up study visit at approximately 3-months.Baseline and 4-week blood samples were drawn in-hospital; venipunctures performed at 3-months were either in-hospital (if patient remained in acute care or rehabilitation) or at the out-patient clinic visit.Serum 25-OHD was analyzed with the DiaSorin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D radioimmunoassay (Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0285, U.S.A) at the central laboratory with the exception of 3 patients (data analyzed at other laboratories).
    Time Frame
    Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
    Title
    Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
    Description
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional PTH was accessed at baseline.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Calcium
    Description
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional Calcium was accessed at baseline and approximately 4 weeks.
    Time Frame
    Baseline, 4 weeks
    Title
    Phosphate
    Description
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional phosphate was accessed at baseline.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Alkaline Phosphatase
    Description
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional Alkaline Phosphatase was accessed at baseline.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Hemoglobin
    Description
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional hemoglobin was accessed at baseline.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Creatinine
    Description
    Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional creatinine was accessed at baseline.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Functional Assessment Using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test After 3 Months
    Description
    The Timed Up and Go (TUG) was collected for patients who attended the 3-month clinic appointment by study coordinators or for patients who attended the rehabilitation unit this is routinely collected and was abstracted from chart. The TUG was conducted using a standard armchair and a line marked 3-metres from the chair. Participants were given the following instructions (no physical assistance was given): "Rise from the chair, walk to the line on the floor, turn, return to the chair and sit down again". Scores are measured as time in seconds to complete the task.
    Time Frame
    3 months
    Title
    Functional Assessment Using the Two Minute Walk Test (2MWT)After 3 Months
    Description
    The 2MWT was collected for patients who attended the 3-month clinic appointment by study coordinators or for patients who attended rehabilitation, it was abstracted from their charts. The 2MWT test was given in a carpeted corridor and the subject was instructed to wear regular footwear and to use their customary walking aid. The distance the participant could comfortably walk in two-minutes (without physical assistance) was measured in metres.
    Time Frame
    3 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    50 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Fragility hip fracture patient Previous Vitamin D supplementation is okay. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with pathological fracture secondary to malignancy or intrinsic bone disease (eg. Paget's disease) Cancer in the past 10 years likely to metastasize to bone Renal insufficiency (creatinine <30 mls/min) Hypercalcemia (primary hyperparathyroidism; granulomatous diseases; drug-induced such as lithium, thiazides), hypocalcemia, hypercalciuria, fracture or stroke within the last 3 months Hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, fluoride, or bisphosphonates during the previous 24 months Pre-existing bone abnormality Renal stones in past 10 years
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Alexandra Papaioannou, M.D., M.Sc.
    Organizational Affiliation
    McMaster University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    21689448
    Citation
    Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Giangregorio L, Ioannidis G, Pritchard J, Hanley DA, Farrauto L, DeBeer J, Adachi JD. A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D dosing strategies after acute hip fracture: no advantage of loading doses over daily supplementation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jun 20;12:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-135.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    A Randomised, Controlled Comparison of Vitamin D Strategies is Acute Hip Fracture Patients

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs