search
Back to results

Operative or Conservative Treatment for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome?

Primary Purpose

Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Finland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Arthroscopic acromioplasty or arthroscopy alone (sham) or conservative treatment (rehabilitation)
Sponsored by
University of Helsinki
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome focused on measuring Shoulder, impingement, conservative, acromioplasty, arthroscopy

Eligibility Criteria

35 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

In the first phase orthopaedists select consecutive female or male patients who are admitted to the hospital policlinic of Helsinki University Hospital, (either Töölö Hospital or Jorvi Hospital) or District Hospital of Tampere (Hatanpää Hospital) and fulfill the following inclusion criteria:

  1. Subjects are 35 to 65 years of age female or male and have a characteristic history and symptoms of subacromial impingement syndrome at least 3 months.
  2. Symptoms have no relieved with appropriate conservative treatment (i.e. physiotherapy, NSAIDs and subacromial corticosteroid injection).
  3. They have clinical findings of impingement syndrome; painful arc sign and pain in shoulder abduction, positive findings in two of three isometric shoulder abduction tests (0 degree, 30 degree and external rotation), and positive subacromial injection test.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous surgery of affected shoulder
  2. Symptomatic osteoarthrosis of acromio-clavicular joint
  3. Full thickness rotator cuff tear based on clinical findings and MRI
  4. Long-term cervical syndrome
  5. Instability of shoulder
  6. Reluctance to participate in any study groups (i.e. any treatment options of the study)
  7. Reduced co-operation (drug or alcohol abuse, mental illness)

Sites / Locations

  • Helsinki University Hospital, Töölö Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Arthroscopic acromioplasty

Sham surgery

Conservative treatment

Arm Description

Arthroscopic acromioplasty

Shoulder arthroscopy without active treatment and subacromial arthroscopy without bursectomy, decompression or other active interventions

Standardized exercise rehabilitation (supervised by physiotherapist)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain at rest
Assessed with 10-cm visual analog scales (VASs).
Pain during activity
Assessed with 10-cm visual analog scales (VASs).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Constant score and Simple Shoulder test
Functional assessment of the shoulder
global assessment of change,
Likert scale
SF-36 and 15D
Quality of life assessment
Costs
Resource use

Full Information

First Posted
January 29, 2007
Last Updated
September 19, 2018
Sponsor
University of Helsinki
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00428870
Brief Title
Operative or Conservative Treatment for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome?
Official Title
Arthroscopic Decompression Versus Diagnostic Arthroscopy Without Subacromial Decompression Versus Supervised Exercise Therapy in Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome. A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trail.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
February 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Helsinki

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
pShoulder impingement syndrome is common and number of operations done per year is growing. The aim of this study is to compare the value of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (acromioplasty group) vs. diagnostic arthroscopy (control group) vs. supervised exercise therapy (conservative group) on subjects with chronic subacromial impingement syndrome. The results of treatment are measured at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years and 10 years. Primary outcome measures are pain at rest and activity (VASs) and secondary outcomes are functional assessment of the shoulder with Constant score and Simple Shoulder test (SST), global assessment of change , quality of life assessment (SF-36 and 15D) and costs. At 10 year follow-up, MRI imaging is obtained and the findings compared to baseline imaging.
Detailed Description
Applicant information: Name: Mika Paavola, MD, PhD Address: Helsinki University Central Hospital, Töölö Hospital, Topeliuksenkatu 5, P.O. Box 266, FIN-00029 HUS, Finland Tel: +358 50 523 8382 Fax: +358 9 471 87481 Email: mika.paavola@hus.fi Trial record details: Protocol / serial number: N/A Title: Arthroscopic decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy without subacromial decompression versus supervised exercise therapy in treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome. A blinded randomized controlled trail. Acronym: N/A Study hypothesis: Operative and diagnostic arthroscopy is equally effective as conservative treatment (supervised exercise therapy) alone for subacromial impingement syndrome. Research ethics review: Ethics committee approval from the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Districts of Pirkanmaa, date 28.12.2004 (ETL code R04200) Study design: Randomized controlled trial Participants - inclusion criteria: In the first phase orthopaedists select consecutive female or male patients who are admitted to the hospital policlinic of Helsinki University Hospital, (either Töölö Hospital or Jorvi Hospital) or District Hospital of Tampere (Hatanpää Hospital) and fulfill the following inclusion criteria: Subjects are 35 to 65 years of age female or male and have a characteristic history and symptoms of subacromial impingement syndrome at least 3 months. Symptoms have no relieved with appropriate conservative treatment (i.e. physiotherapy, NSAIDs and subacromial corticosteroid injection). They have clinical findings of impingement syndrome; painful arc sign and pain in shoulder abduction, positive findings in two of three isometric shoulder abduction tests (0 degree, 30 degree and external rotation), and positive subacromial injection test. Participants - exclusion criteria: Previous surgery of affected shoulder Symptomatic osteoarthrosis of acromio-clavicular joint Full thickness rotator cuff tear based on clinical findings and MRI Long-term cervical syndrome Instability of shoulder Reluctance to participate in any study groups (i.e. any treatment options of the study) Reduced co-operation (drug or alcohol abuse, mental illness) Anticipated start date: 1/10/2005 Anticipated end date: 31/12/2009 Target number of participants: 210 Disease: Chronic (> 3 months before inclusion) shoulder subacromial pain syndrome. Interventions: The aim of this study is to compare the value of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (acromioplasty group) vs. diagnostic arthroscopy (control group) vs. supervised exercise therapy (conservative group) on subjects with chronic subacromial impingement syndrome. The shoulder arthroscopy is done three to six week after the baseline clinical examination by one of the seven experienced shoulder orthopaedists. At first, arthroscopy of shoulder joint is performed in patients of acromioplasty group and control group, and all pathological findings are recorded. Thereafter, arthroscopy of subacromial space is carried out. In control group, subacromial decompression is not done. In patients of supervised exercised therapy group, 3 months period of exercise therapy with home exercises, supervised by experienced physiotherapist, is initiated. Primary outcome(s): Pain at rest and activity assessed with 10-cm visual analog scales (VASs). Participants assess maximum pain in the previous two days at rest and at exertion. Main follow-up time-point is 24 months after initiation of the treatment (i.e. operative treatment or first visit at the physiotherapist. Other time-points when the main outcome is measured are before the randomization, three month follow-up, six month follow-up and 12 month follow-up. Secondary outcome(s): Functional assessment of the shoulder with Constant score and Simple Shoulder test (SST), global assessment of change [symptom questionnaire and subjective contentment (10-cm visual analog scales)], quality of life assessment (SF-36 and 15D). Sources of funding: Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health of Finland) and Sigrid Juselius Foundation Main sponsor information Name: Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment Address: National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (STAKES) - P.O. Box 220, FI-00531 Helsinki, Lintulahdenkuja 4, Finland Contact person Contact information: Name: Mika Paavola Address: Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Töölö hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital P.O. Box 266 00029 HUS Helsinki Finland Tel: +358-50-5238382 Email: mika.paavola@hus.fi and mika.paavola@fimnet.fi Privacy level: Show all contact details

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Keywords
Shoulder, impingement, conservative, acromioplasty, arthroscopy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
210 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arthroscopic acromioplasty
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Arthroscopic acromioplasty
Arm Title
Sham surgery
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Shoulder arthroscopy without active treatment and subacromial arthroscopy without bursectomy, decompression or other active interventions
Arm Title
Conservative treatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standardized exercise rehabilitation (supervised by physiotherapist)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Arthroscopic acromioplasty or arthroscopy alone (sham) or conservative treatment (rehabilitation)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain at rest
Description
Assessed with 10-cm visual analog scales (VASs).
Time Frame
2 years (primary)
Title
Pain during activity
Description
Assessed with 10-cm visual analog scales (VASs).
Time Frame
2 years (primary)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Constant score and Simple Shoulder test
Description
Functional assessment of the shoulder
Time Frame
2 years (primary)
Title
global assessment of change,
Description
Likert scale
Time Frame
2 years (primary)
Title
SF-36 and 15D
Description
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame
2 years (primary)
Title
Costs
Description
Resource use
Time Frame
2 years (primary)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: In the first phase orthopaedists select consecutive female or male patients who are admitted to the hospital policlinic of Helsinki University Hospital, (either Töölö Hospital or Jorvi Hospital) or District Hospital of Tampere (Hatanpää Hospital) and fulfill the following inclusion criteria: Subjects are 35 to 65 years of age female or male and have a characteristic history and symptoms of subacromial impingement syndrome at least 3 months. Symptoms have no relieved with appropriate conservative treatment (i.e. physiotherapy, NSAIDs and subacromial corticosteroid injection). They have clinical findings of impingement syndrome; painful arc sign and pain in shoulder abduction, positive findings in two of three isometric shoulder abduction tests (0 degree, 30 degree and external rotation), and positive subacromial injection test. Exclusion Criteria: Previous surgery of affected shoulder Symptomatic osteoarthrosis of acromio-clavicular joint Full thickness rotator cuff tear based on clinical findings and MRI Long-term cervical syndrome Instability of shoulder Reluctance to participate in any study groups (i.e. any treatment options of the study) Reduced co-operation (drug or alcohol abuse, mental illness)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mika Paavola, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
1.1.2003
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Teppo Jarvinen, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
1.1.2004
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Antti Malmivaara, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
1.8.2004
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Timo Järvelä, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
1.1.2004
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Simo Taimela, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
1.6.2004
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Harri Sintonen, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
1.8.2004
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Helsinki University Hospital, Töölö Hospital
City
Helsinki
State/Province
HUS
ZIP/Postal Code
FIN-00029
Country
Finland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34666734
Citation
Back M, Paavola M, Aronen P, Jarvinen TLN, Taimela S; Finnish Shoulder Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT) Investigators. Return to work after subacromial decompression, diagnostic arthroscopy, or exercise therapy for shoulder impingement: a randomised, placebo-surgery controlled FIMPACT clinical trial with five-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Oct 19;22(1):889. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04768-7.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33676417
Citation
Kanto K, Lahdeoja T, Paavola M, Aronen P, Jarvinen TLN, Jokihaara J, Ardern CL, Karjalainen TV, Taimela S. Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for pain, Constant-Murley score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01241-w.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30026230
Citation
Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Taimela S, Kanto K, Inkinen J, Kalske J, Sinisaari I, Savolainen V, Ranstam J, Jarvinen TLN; Finnish Subacromial Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT) Investigators. Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial. BMJ. 2018 Jul 19;362:k2860. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2860.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28588109
Citation
Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Taimela S, Kanto K, Jarvinen TL; FIMPACT Investigators. Finnish Subacromial Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT): a protocol for a randomised trial comparing arthroscopic subacromial decompression and diagnostic arthroscopy (placebo control), with an exercise therapy control, in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome. BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e014087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014087.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Operative or Conservative Treatment for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome?

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs