search
Back to results

Maintenance Treatment Versus Observation After Induction in Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma (CAIRO3)

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer Metastatic

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
capecitabine + bevacizumab
observation
Sponsored by
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Colorectal Cancer Metastatic focused on measuring CAIRO3, DCCG, colorectal cancer, induction, metronomic chemotherapy, observation, capecitabine, bevacizumab, oxaliplatin

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Before the start of induction therapy:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histological proof of colorectal cancer (in case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of this lesion should be obtained);
  • Distant metastases (patients with only local recurrence are not eligible);
  • Unidimensionally measurable disease (> 1 cm on spiral CT scan or > 2 cm on chest X-ray; liver ultrasound is not allowed). Serum CEA may not be used as a parameter for disease evaluation;
  • In case of previous radiotherapy, at least one measurable lesion should be located outside the irradiated field.
  • Ongoing or planned first line treatment with 6 cycles of Xeloda, Eloxatin, and Avastin.

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior adjuvant treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer ending within 6 months before the start of induction treatment
  • Any prior adjuvant treatment after resection of distant metastases
  • Previous systemic treatment for advanced disease

At randomisation:

Inclusion criteria:

  • WHO performance status 0-1 (Karnofsky PS > 70%);
  • Disease evaluation with proven SD, PR or CR according to RECIST after 6 cycles of MTD chemotherapy performed in week 3-4 of the 6th cycle induction therapy, and randomisation performed in week 3-5 of the 6th cycle (see time table);
  • Laboratory values obtained ≤ 2 weeks prior to randomisation: adequate bone marrow function (Hb > 6.0 mmol/L, absolute neutrophil count > 1.5 x 109/L, platelets > 100 x 109/L), renal function (serum creatinine ≤ 1.5x ULN and creatinine clearance, Cockroft formula, > 30 ml/min), liver function (serum bilirubin ≤ 2 x ULN, serum transaminases ≤ 3 x ULN without presence of liver metastases or ≤ 5x ULN with presence of liver metastases);
  • Life expectancy > 12 weeks;
  • Age >= 18 yrs;
  • Negative pregnancy test in women with childbearing potential;
  • Expected adequacy of follow-up;
  • Institutional Review Board approval;
  • Written informed consent Exclusion criteria
  • History or clinical signs/symptoms of CNS metastases;
  • History of a second malignancy ≤ 5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma of cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of skin;
  • Previous intolerance of XelodaR, EloxatinR, and/or AvastinR for which any of these drugs have been permanently discontinued; patients with previous dose reductions or delays are eligible; patients with grade 2 neurotoxicity after the 6th cycle are eligible, and retreatment with EloxatinR after PFS1 should depend on the grade of neurotoxicity at that moment;
  • Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency;
  • (Planned) radical resection of all metastatic disease;
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, i.e. consistently > 150/100 mmHg;
  • Use of more than 3 antihypertensive drugs;
  • Significant cardiovascular disease < 1 yr before randomisation (symptomatic congestive heart failure, myocardial ischemia or infarction, unstable angina pectoris, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, arterial thrombosis, cerebrovascular event, pulmonary embolism);
  • Any of these significant cardiovascular events during previous fluoropyrimidine therapy;
  • Chronic active infection;
  • Any other concurrent severe or uncontrolled disease preventing the safe administration of study drugs;
  • Any impairment of gastrointestinal function or -disease that may significantly impair the absorption of oral drugs (i.e. uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea (defined as >CTC grade 2), malabsorption syndrome, bowel obstruction, or inability to swallow tablets);
  • Concomitant treatments: concomitant (or within 4 weeks before randomisation) administration of any other experimental drug under investigation; concurrent treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy; full-dose anticoagulation (is allowed if started during induction therapy);
  • Continuous use of immunosuppressive agents (except the use of corticosteroids as anti-emetic prophylaxis/treatment).

Sites / Locations

  • University Medical Center Nijmegen

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

observation

capecitabine plus bevacizumab

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression-free survival after re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab (PFS2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression-free survival between observation versus maintenance therapy (PFS1)
Response rate during re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab
Toxicity
Quality of life
Overall survival
Translational research

Full Information

First Posted
February 28, 2007
Last Updated
December 11, 2013
Sponsor
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
Collaborators
Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds, Sanofi, Hoffmann-La Roche
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00442637
Brief Title
Maintenance Treatment Versus Observation After Induction in Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma
Acronym
CAIRO3
Official Title
Maintenance Treatment With Capecitabine and Bevacizumab Versus Observation After Induction Treatment With Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2013 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
Collaborators
Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds, Sanofi, Hoffmann-La Roche

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The optimal duration of systemic treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer is unknown. In this study the effects of bevacizumab and low-dose continuous chemotherapy with capecitabine is investigated in patients who have responded to 6 courses of oxaliplatin, capecitabine and bevacizumab ("induction treatment", at standard doses). This treatment is continued until progression or severe toxicity. This regimen is compared to the effects a observation without treatment after the induction treatment. In case of disease progression, induction treatment will be reintroduced.
Detailed Description
Standard 1st-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer currently consists of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. With this approach the median overall survival is approximately 20 months, and progression-free survival in first-line approximately 9-11 months. The optimal duration of treatment is unknown. Current data suggest that the efficacy of bevacizumab is dependent on concomitant use of chemotherapy. However, oxaliplatin almost invariably gives rise to neuropathy after 6-8 cycles. Prolonged use of capecitabine is associated with e.g. hand-foot syndrome. Lastly, the prolonged use of these agents is associated with considerable costs. Evidence, mainly preclinical, suggests that continuous dosing metronomic chemotherapy may be more efficacious than interval-chemotherapy given at MTD. In this study the concept of metronomic chemotherapy is explored by administering a continuous daily instead of the usual 2 weeks-on/1 week-off oral dosing regimen of low-dose capecitabine plus bevacizumab as maintenance therapy after induction combination chemotherapy given at MTD plus bevacizumab.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer Metastatic
Keywords
CAIRO3, DCCG, colorectal cancer, induction, metronomic chemotherapy, observation, capecitabine, bevacizumab, oxaliplatin

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
635 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
observation
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
capecitabine plus bevacizumab
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
capecitabine + bevacizumab
Intervention Description
Ca 1250 mg/m2 daily orally continuously, B 7.5 mg/kg i.v. q 3 w
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
observation
Intervention Description
observation after induction treatment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free survival after re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab (PFS2)
Time Frame
study duration
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free survival between observation versus maintenance therapy (PFS1)
Time Frame
study duration
Title
Response rate during re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab
Time Frame
study duration
Title
Toxicity
Time Frame
study duration
Title
Quality of life
Time Frame
study duration
Title
Overall survival
Time Frame
study duration
Title
Translational research
Time Frame
study duration

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Before the start of induction therapy: Inclusion Criteria: Histological proof of colorectal cancer (in case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of this lesion should be obtained); Distant metastases (patients with only local recurrence are not eligible); Unidimensionally measurable disease (> 1 cm on spiral CT scan or > 2 cm on chest X-ray; liver ultrasound is not allowed). Serum CEA may not be used as a parameter for disease evaluation; In case of previous radiotherapy, at least one measurable lesion should be located outside the irradiated field. Ongoing or planned first line treatment with 6 cycles of Xeloda, Eloxatin, and Avastin. Exclusion criteria Prior adjuvant treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer ending within 6 months before the start of induction treatment Any prior adjuvant treatment after resection of distant metastases Previous systemic treatment for advanced disease At randomisation: Inclusion criteria: WHO performance status 0-1 (Karnofsky PS > 70%); Disease evaluation with proven SD, PR or CR according to RECIST after 6 cycles of MTD chemotherapy performed in week 3-4 of the 6th cycle induction therapy, and randomisation performed in week 3-5 of the 6th cycle (see time table); Laboratory values obtained ≤ 2 weeks prior to randomisation: adequate bone marrow function (Hb > 6.0 mmol/L, absolute neutrophil count > 1.5 x 109/L, platelets > 100 x 109/L), renal function (serum creatinine ≤ 1.5x ULN and creatinine clearance, Cockroft formula, > 30 ml/min), liver function (serum bilirubin ≤ 2 x ULN, serum transaminases ≤ 3 x ULN without presence of liver metastases or ≤ 5x ULN with presence of liver metastases); Life expectancy > 12 weeks; Age >= 18 yrs; Negative pregnancy test in women with childbearing potential; Expected adequacy of follow-up; Institutional Review Board approval; Written informed consent Exclusion criteria History or clinical signs/symptoms of CNS metastases; History of a second malignancy ≤ 5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma of cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of skin; Previous intolerance of XelodaR, EloxatinR, and/or AvastinR for which any of these drugs have been permanently discontinued; patients with previous dose reductions or delays are eligible; patients with grade 2 neurotoxicity after the 6th cycle are eligible, and retreatment with EloxatinR after PFS1 should depend on the grade of neurotoxicity at that moment; Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency; (Planned) radical resection of all metastatic disease; Uncontrolled hypertension, i.e. consistently > 150/100 mmHg; Use of more than 3 antihypertensive drugs; Significant cardiovascular disease < 1 yr before randomisation (symptomatic congestive heart failure, myocardial ischemia or infarction, unstable angina pectoris, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, arterial thrombosis, cerebrovascular event, pulmonary embolism); Any of these significant cardiovascular events during previous fluoropyrimidine therapy; Chronic active infection; Any other concurrent severe or uncontrolled disease preventing the safe administration of study drugs; Any impairment of gastrointestinal function or -disease that may significantly impair the absorption of oral drugs (i.e. uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea (defined as >CTC grade 2), malabsorption syndrome, bowel obstruction, or inability to swallow tablets); Concomitant treatments: concomitant (or within 4 weeks before randomisation) administration of any other experimental drug under investigation; concurrent treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy; full-dose anticoagulation (is allowed if started during induction therapy); Continuous use of immunosuppressive agents (except the use of corticosteroids as anti-emetic prophylaxis/treatment).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
C. JA Punt, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Amsterdam Medical Centre, Amsterdam Netherlands
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Medical Center Nijmegen
City
Nijmegen
State/Province
Gelderland
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31094083
Citation
Kurk S, Peeters P, Stellato R, Dorresteijn B, de Jong P, Jourdan M, Creemers GJ, Erdkamp F, de Jongh F, Kint P, Simkens L, Tanis B, Tjin-A-Ton M, Van Der Velden A, Punt C, Koopman M, May A. Skeletal muscle mass loss and dose-limiting toxicities in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Aug;10(4):803-813. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12436. Epub 2019 May 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28911067
Citation
Goey KKH, Elias SG, van Tinteren H, Lacle MM, Willems SM, Offerhaus GJA, de Leng WWJ, Strengman E, Ten Tije AJ, Creemers GM, van der Velden A, de Jongh FE, Erdkamp FLG, Tanis BC, Punt CJA, Koopman M. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation in metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results and molecular subgroup analyses of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study. Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2128-2134. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx322.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25862517
Citation
Simkens LH, van Tinteren H, May A, ten Tije AJ, Creemers GJ, Loosveld OJ, de Jongh FE, Erdkamp FL, Erjavec Z, van der Torren AM, Tol J, Braun HJ, Nieboer P, van der Hoeven JJ, Haasjes JG, Jansen RL, Wals J, Cats A, Derleyn VA, Honkoop AH, Mol L, Punt CJ, Koopman M. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1843-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62004-3. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.dccg.nl
Description
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group

Learn more about this trial

Maintenance Treatment Versus Observation After Induction in Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs