search
Back to results

Laser-Ranibizumab-Triamcinolone for Diabetic Macular Edema (LRT for DME)

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetic Macular Edema

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Triamcinolone Acetonide + laser
Ranibizumab + laser
Sham injection + laser
Ranibizumab + deferred laser
Sponsored by
Jaeb Center for Health Research
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Retinopathy focused on measuring Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetic Macular Edema, Lucentis, Ranibizumab, Triamcinolone, Laser photocoagulation, Combination Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

General Inclusion Criteria

To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria (1-5) must be met:

  • Age >= 18 years
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)
  • At least one eye meets the study eye criteria
  • Fellow eye (if not a study eye) meets criteria
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent

General Exclusion Criteria

A subject is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present:

  • Significant renal disease, defined as a history of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant.
  • A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).
  • Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry.
  • Known allergy to any component of the study drug.
  • Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110).
  • Major surgery within 28 days prior to randomization or major surgery planned during the next 6 months.
  • Myocardial infarction, other cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4 months prior to randomization.
  • Systemic anti-vascular growth factor (anti-VEGF) or pro-VEGF treatment within 4 months prior to randomization.
  • For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 12 months.
  • Subject is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the first 12 months of the study.

Study Eye Inclusion Criteria

The subject must have one eye meeting all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria listed below. A subject may have two study eyes only if both are eligible at the time of randomization.

  • Best corrected electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy (E-ETDRS) visual acuity letter score <= 78 (i.e., 20/32 or worse) and >= 24 (i.e., 20/320 or better) within 8 days of randomization.
  • On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula.
  • Ocular coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield >=250 microns within 8 days of randomization.
  • Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and subject cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs.
  • If prior macular photocoagulation has been performed, the investigator believes that the study eye may possibly benefit from additional photocoagulation.

Study Eye Exclusion Criteria

The following exclusions apply to the study eye only (i.e., they may be present for the nonstudy eye):

  • Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.
  • An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition).
  • An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.)
  • Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal).
  • History of treatment for diabetic macular edema at any time in the past 4 months (such as focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroids, anti-VEGF drugs, or any other treatment).
  • History of panretinal (scatter) photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to randomization.
  • Anticipated need for PRP in the 6 months following randomization.
  • History of major ocular surgery (including vitrectomy, cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization.
  • History of yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization.
  • Aphakia.
  • Intraocular pressure >= 25 mmHg.
  • History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma; note: history of angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion criterion).
  • History of steroid-induced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment.
  • History of prior herpetic ocular infection.
  • Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis.
  • Exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.
  • Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis.

Sites / Locations

  • Sall Research Medical Center
  • Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
  • University of California, Irvine
  • Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
  • Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
  • California Retina Consultants
  • Bay Area Retina Associates
  • Retina Vitreous Consultants
  • Retina Consultants of Southwest Florida
  • University of Florida College of Med., Department of Ophthalmology
  • Central Florida Retina Institute
  • Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
  • Illinois Retina Associates
  • Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
  • John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
  • Medical Associates Clinic, P.C.
  • Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
  • Paducah Retinal Center
  • Elman Retina Group, P.A.
  • Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins
  • Retina Consultants of Delmarva, P.A.
  • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
  • Joslin Diabetes Center
  • Retina Center, PA
  • Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA
  • The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
  • Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
  • University of North Carolina, Dept of Ophthalmology
  • Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Assoc., PA
  • Wake Forest University Eye Center
  • Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Retina Northwest, PC
  • Casey Eye Institute
  • Penn State College of Medicine
  • University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
  • Retina Consultants
  • Palmetto Retina Center
  • Carolina Retina Center
  • Southeastern Retina Associates, PC
  • Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
  • West Texas Retina Consultants P.A.
  • Retina Research Center
  • Texas Retina Associates
  • Retina and Vitreous of Texas
  • Vitreoretinal Consultants
  • Texas Retina Associates
  • University of Washington Medical Center
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept of Ophthalmology/Retina Service
  • Medical College of Wisconsin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

0.5mg Ranibizumab plus laser

0.5 mg Ranibizumab plus deferred laser

4 mg Triamcinolone plus laser

Sham plus laser

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) From Baseline to 1 Year Adjusted for Baseline Visual Acuity
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score from baseline to one year as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) From Baseline to 1 Year
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method.
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Among Eyes That Were Pseudophakic at Baseline
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Among Eyes That Had Prior Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Grouped by Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Grouped by Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score from baseline to one year as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Grouped by Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score from baseline to one year as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Grouped by Diffuse vs. Focal Edema as Characterized by the Investigator
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score from baseline to one year as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Retinal Thickening of Central Subfield on Optical Coherence Tomography From Baseline to 1 Year
Negative change denotes an improvement.
Number of Injections in First Year
Maximum possible number of injections for each of the following groups: sham+prompt laser=13 sham injections;ranibizumab+prompt laser=13 ranibizumab injections; ranibizumab+deferred laser=13 ranibizumab injections; triamcinolone+prompt laser=4 triamcinolone injections and 9 sham injections.
Number of Laser Treatments Received Prior to the 1 Year Visit
One eye in the sham+prompt laser group did not receive laser until post 1-year due to an adverse event unrelated to study treatment. One eye in the triamcinolone+prompt laser did not receive laser until after 1-year due to missing 2 consecutive visits at the time of required laser treatment.
Percentage of Eyes Receiving Laser at the 48 Week Visit (%)
Mean Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Volume at 1 Year
Mean Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Volume From Baseline to 1 Year

Full Information

First Posted
March 6, 2007
Last Updated
September 20, 2019
Sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Collaborators
National Eye Institute (NEI), Allergan, Genentech, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00444600
Brief Title
Laser-Ranibizumab-Triamcinolone for Diabetic Macular Edema
Acronym
LRT for DME
Official Title
Intravitreal Ranibizumab or Triamcinolone Acetonide in Combination With Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Collaborators
National Eye Institute (NEI), Allergan, Genentech, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to find out which is a better treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME): laser alone, laser combined with an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone, laser combined with an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, or intravitreal injection of ranibizumab alone. At the present time, it is not known whether intravitreal steroid or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, with or without laser treatment, are better than just laser by itself. It is possible that one or both of the types of injections, with or without laser treatment, will improve vision more often than will laser without injections. However, even if better vision outcomes are seen with injections, side effects may be more of a problem with the injections than with laser. Therefore, this study is conducted to find out whether the benefits of the injections will outweigh the risks.
Detailed Description
Thus far the only demonstrated means to reduce the risk of vision loss from diabetic macular edema are laser photocoagulation, intensive glycemic control, and blood pressure control. Earlier studies have shown that photocoagulation, although effective in reducing the risk of moderate vision loss, can eventually result in retinal and retinal pigment epithelium atrophy resulting in loss of central vision, central scotomata, and decreased color vision. Consequently, many retinal specialists today tend to treat diabetic macular edema (DME) with lighter, less intense laser burns than was originally specified in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). The additional unsatisfactory outcome from treatments with laser photocoagulation in a significant proportion of eyes with DME has prompted interest in other treatment modalities. One such treatment is pars plana vitrectomy. Studies suggest that vitreomacular traction may play a role in increased retinal vascular permeability, and that removal of the vitreous, or relief of mechanical traction with vitrectomy and membrane stripping may substantially improve macular edema and visual acuity. However, this treatment may be applicable only to a specific subset of eyes with a component of vitreomacular traction secondary to edema. Other treatment modalities such as pharmacologic therapy with oral protein kinase C inhibitors and intravitreal corticosteroids are under investigation. The use of antibodies targeted at vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is another treatment modality that needs to be further explored for its potential benefits. Increased VEGF levels have been demonstrated in the retina and vitreous of human eyes with diabetic retinopathy. VEGF, also knows as vascular permeability factor, has been shown to increase retinal vascular permeability in in vivo models. Therapy that inhibits VEGF, therefore, may represent a useful therapeutic modality which targets the underlying pathogenesis of diabetic macular edema. Ranibizumab is a promising anti-VEGF drug. Its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Reports of its use and that of other anti-VEGF drugs in DME have suggested sufficient benefit to warrant evaluation of efficacy and safety in a phase III trial. Corticosteroids, a class of substances with anti-inflammatory properties, have also been demonstrated to inhibit the expression of the VEGF gene. The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) is currently conducting a phase III randomized clinical trial comparing focal photocoagulation to intravitreal corticosteroids (triamcinolone acetonide) for diabetic macular edema. However, even if triamcinolone or ranibizumab are proven to be efficacious, a major concern, based on clinical observations with intravitreal corticosteroids, is that DME will recur as the effect of the intravitreal drug wears off, necessitating repetitive injections long-term. Combining an intravitreal drug (triamcinolone or ranibizumab) with photocoagulation provides hope that one could get the short-term benefit of the intravitreal drug (decreased retinal thickening and decreased fluid leakage) and the long-term reduction in fluid leakage as a result of photocoagulation. In addition, it is possible that the worsening of macular edema immediately following focal photocoagulation, a known complication of this treatment, could be decreased if an intravitreal drug was present at the time of photocoagulation. This might result in an increased likelihood of vision improvement following photocoagulation and a decreased likelihood of vision loss. This study is designed to determine if ranibizumab alone or ranibizumab added to laser photocoagulation is more efficacious than photocoagulation alone, and if so, to determine if combining ranibizumab with photocoagulation reduces the total number of injections needed to obtain these benefits. Furthermore, this study is designed to determine if combining photocoagulation with corticosteroids, the only other class of drugs currently being considered for treatment of DME, is efficacious in the population being enrolled. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the following 4 groups: Group A: Sham injection plus focal (macular) photocoagulation Group B: 0.5 mg injection of intravitreal ranibizumab plus focal photocoagulation Group C: 0.5 mg injection of intravitreal ranibizumab plus deferred focal photocoagulation Group D: 4 mg intravitreal triamcinolone plus focal photocoagulation In groups A, B and D, laser will be given 7-10 days after the initial injection at the time of the injection follow-up safety visit. During the first year, subjects are evaluated for retreatment every 4 weeks. The injection for group A is a sham and for groups B and C ranibizumab. For group D, a triamcinolone injection is given if one has not been given in the prior 15 weeks; otherwise a sham injection is given. For Groups A, B, and D, focal photocoagulation will be given 7 to 10 days later following each injection unless focal photocoagulation has been given in the past 15 weeks or no macular edema is present. In Years 2 and 3, subjects continue to be evaluated for retreatment every 4 weeks unless injections are discontinued due to failure. In that case, follow-up visits occur every 4 months and treatment is at investigator discretion.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetic Macular Edema
Keywords
Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetic Macular Edema, Lucentis, Ranibizumab, Triamcinolone, Laser photocoagulation, Combination Therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
691 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
0.5mg Ranibizumab plus laser
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
0.5 mg Ranibizumab plus deferred laser
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
4 mg Triamcinolone plus laser
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Sham plus laser
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Triamcinolone Acetonide + laser
Other Intervention Name(s)
corticosteroid
Intervention Description
4 mg intravitreal triamcinolone at randomization plus focal photocoagulation 1 week post-injection, repeated every 16 weeks with sham injections at 4-week intervals in-between. Retreatment starting at 16 weeks depends on visual acuity and OCT.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ranibizumab + laser
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lucentis, anti-VEGF drug
Intervention Description
0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab at randomization plus focal photocoagulation 1 week post-injection. Injections are repeated every 4 weeks with focal photocoagulation given post-injection every 16 weeks. Retreatment starting at 16 weeks depends on visual acuity and OCT.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sham injection + laser
Other Intervention Name(s)
placebo
Intervention Description
Sham injection at randomization plus focal photocoagulation 1 week post-injection. Injections are repeated every 4 weeks with focal photocoagulation given post-injection every 16 weeks. Retreatment starting at 16 weeks depends on visual acuity and OCT.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ranibizumab + deferred laser
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lucentis, anti-VEGF drug
Intervention Description
0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab at randomization, repeated every 4 weeks. Retreatment starting at 16 weeks depends on visual acuity and OCT. If improvement has not occured from injections alone, laser can be given starting at the 24 week visit.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) From Baseline to 1 Year Adjusted for Baseline Visual Acuity
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score from baseline to one year as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 Year
Title
Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) From Baseline to 1 Year
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method.
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 Year
Title
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Among Eyes That Were Pseudophakic at Baseline
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 Year
Title
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Among Eyes That Had Prior Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 Year
Title
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Grouped by Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 Year
Title
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Grouped by Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score from baseline to one year as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 Year
Title
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Grouped by Diabetic Retinopathy Severity
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score from baseline to one year as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 Year
Title
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 1 Year Grouped by Diffuse vs. Focal Edema as Characterized by the Investigator
Description
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score from baseline to one year as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 Year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Retinal Thickening of Central Subfield on Optical Coherence Tomography From Baseline to 1 Year
Description
Negative change denotes an improvement.
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 year
Title
Number of Injections in First Year
Description
Maximum possible number of injections for each of the following groups: sham+prompt laser=13 sham injections;ranibizumab+prompt laser=13 ranibizumab injections; ranibizumab+deferred laser=13 ranibizumab injections; triamcinolone+prompt laser=4 triamcinolone injections and 9 sham injections.
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 year
Title
Number of Laser Treatments Received Prior to the 1 Year Visit
Description
One eye in the sham+prompt laser group did not receive laser until post 1-year due to an adverse event unrelated to study treatment. One eye in the triamcinolone+prompt laser did not receive laser until after 1-year due to missing 2 consecutive visits at the time of required laser treatment.
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Percentage of Eyes Receiving Laser at the 48 Week Visit (%)
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Mean Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Volume at 1 Year
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Mean Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Volume From Baseline to 1 Year
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 Year
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Central Subfield Thickness < 250 With at Least a 25 Micron Decrease From Baseline to 1 Year
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Distribution of Logarithmic Transformation of Optical Coherence Tomography (LogOCT) Improvement and Worsening
Description
Logarithmic transformation of optical coherence tomography central subfield thickness is calculated by taking the log base 10 of the ratio of the central subfield thickness divided by 200 and rounding to the nearest hundredth. The change is the change in the log values.
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Eyes With Alternative Treatments Prior to the 1-year Visit
Description
Each combination of treatment only counted once.
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Change From Moderately Severe Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy or Better From Baseline to 1-year
Description
113 eyes had missing or ungradable photos at 1 year. Criteria are based on the ETDRS fundus photographic risk factors for the progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report no. 12. Ophthalmology 1991; 98:823-833
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 Year
Title
Change From Severe Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy or Worse From Baseline to 1-year
Description
Criteria are based on the ETDRS fundus photographic risk factors for the progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report no. 12. Ophthalmology 1991; 98:823-833, ETDRS Severity Scale = Diabetic retinopathy absent, minimal non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), mild to moderately severe non-PDR, severe non-PDR, scars of full pr partial panretinal photocoagulation present PDR absent, mild to moderate PDR, high risk PDR, cannot grade, missing.
Time Frame
from baseline to 1 Year
Title
Cardiovascular Events According to Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration Through 1 Year
Description
Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration is a collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy - I: Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. MBJ 1994; 308:81-106. Nonfatal cerebrovascular accident includes ischemic or hemorrhagic or unknown events. Vascular death includes death from any potential vascular or unknown cause.
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Major Ocular Adverse Events During First Year of Follow-Up
Time Frame
1 Year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
General Inclusion Criteria To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria (1-5) must be met: Age >= 18 years Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) At least one eye meets the study eye criteria Fellow eye (if not a study eye) meets criteria Able and willing to provide informed consent General Exclusion Criteria A subject is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present: Significant renal disease, defined as a history of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant. A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control). Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry. Known allergy to any component of the study drug. Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110). Major surgery within 28 days prior to randomization or major surgery planned during the next 6 months. Myocardial infarction, other cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4 months prior to randomization. Systemic anti-vascular growth factor (anti-VEGF) or pro-VEGF treatment within 4 months prior to randomization. For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 12 months. Subject is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the first 12 months of the study. Study Eye Inclusion Criteria The subject must have one eye meeting all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria listed below. A subject may have two study eyes only if both are eligible at the time of randomization. Best corrected electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy (E-ETDRS) visual acuity letter score <= 78 (i.e., 20/32 or worse) and >= 24 (i.e., 20/320 or better) within 8 days of randomization. On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula. Ocular coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield >=250 microns within 8 days of randomization. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and subject cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs. If prior macular photocoagulation has been performed, the investigator believes that the study eye may possibly benefit from additional photocoagulation. Study Eye Exclusion Criteria The following exclusions apply to the study eye only (i.e., they may be present for the nonstudy eye): Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition). An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.) Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal). History of treatment for diabetic macular edema at any time in the past 4 months (such as focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroids, anti-VEGF drugs, or any other treatment). History of panretinal (scatter) photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to randomization. Anticipated need for PRP in the 6 months following randomization. History of major ocular surgery (including vitrectomy, cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization. History of yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization. Aphakia. Intraocular pressure >= 25 mmHg. History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma; note: history of angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion criterion). History of steroid-induced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment. History of prior herpetic ocular infection. Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis. Exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael J. Elman, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Elman Retina Group, PA
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sall Research Medical Center
City
Artesia
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group
City
Beverly Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90211
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California, Irvine
City
Irvine
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92697
Country
United States
Facility Name
Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
City
Loma Linda
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92354
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
City
Palm Springs
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92262
Country
United States
Facility Name
California Retina Consultants
City
Santa Barbara
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bay Area Retina Associates
City
Walnut Creek
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94598
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Vitreous Consultants
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33334
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Consultants of Southwest Florida
City
Fort Myers
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33912
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida College of Med., Department of Ophthalmology
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Central Florida Retina Institute
City
Lakeland
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33805
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
City
Augusta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30909
Country
United States
Facility Name
Illinois Retina Associates
City
Joliet
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60435
Country
United States
Facility Name
Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46280
Country
United States
Facility Name
John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
City
New Albany
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47150
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical Associates Clinic, P.C.
City
Dubuque
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52002
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40509-1802
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paducah Retinal Center
City
Paducah
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42001
Country
United States
Facility Name
Elman Retina Group, P.A.
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21237
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287-9277
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Consultants of Delmarva, P.A.
City
Salisbury
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Joslin Diabetes Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Center, PA
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA
City
Portsmouth
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03801
Country
United States
Facility Name
The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10003
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13224
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina, Dept of Ophthalmology
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599-7040
Country
United States
Facility Name
Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Assoc., PA
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Forest University Eye Center
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
City
Beachwood
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Case Western Reserve University
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Northwest, PC
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Casey Eye Institute
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Penn State College of Medicine
City
Hershey
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17033
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania Scheie Eye Institute
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Consultants
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02903
Country
United States
Facility Name
Palmetto Retina Center
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29169
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolina Retina Center
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29223
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeastern Retina Associates, PC
City
Kingsport
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37660
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37909
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Texas Retina Consultants P.A.
City
Abilene
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina Research Center
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Retina Associates
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Retina and Vitreous of Texas
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77025
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vitreoretinal Consultants
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Retina Associates
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79424
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Washington Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98195
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Dept of Ophthalmology/Retina Service
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical College of Wisconsin
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53226
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21459214
Citation
Elman MJ, Bressler NM, Qin H, Beck RW, Ferris FL 3rd, Friedman SM, Glassman AR, Scott IU, Stockdale CR, Sun JK; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Expanded 2-year follow-up of ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011 Apr;118(4):609-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.033.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22136692
Citation
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; Writing Committee; Aiello LP, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Browning DJ, Chalam KV, Davis M, Ferris FL 3rd, Glassman AR, Maturi RK, Stockdale CR, Topping TM. Rationale for the diabetic retinopathy clinical research network treatment protocol for center-involved diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011 Dec;118(12):e5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.058.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22332211
Citation
Glassman AR, Stockdale CR, Beck RW, Baker C, Bressler NM; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Evaluation of masking study participants to intravitreal injections in a randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;130(2):190-4. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.387.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22965591
Citation
Bressler SB, Qin H, Beck RW, Chalam KV, Kim JE, Melia M, Wells JA 3rd; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Factors associated with changes in visual acuity and central subfield thickness at 1 year after treatment for diabetic macular edema with ranibizumab. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;130(9):1153-61. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1107.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23807371
Citation
Bressler SB, Qin H, Melia M, Bressler NM, Beck RW, Chan CK, Grover S, Miller DG; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Exploratory analysis of the effect of intravitreal ranibizumab or triamcinolone on worsening of diabetic retinopathy in a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;131(8):1033-40. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.4154.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23792486
Citation
Bressler SB, Almukhtar T, Aiello LP, Bressler NM, Ferris FL 3rd, Glassman AR, Greven CM; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Green or yellow laser treatment for diabetic macular edema: exploratory assessment within the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Retina. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(10):2080-8. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318295f744.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25719991
Citation
Bressler SB, Almukhtar T, Bhorade A, Bressler NM, Glassman AR, Huang SS, Jampol LM, Kim JE, Melia M; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Investigators. Repeated intravitreous ranibizumab injections for diabetic macular edema and the risk of sustained elevation of intraocular pressure or the need for ocular hypotensive treatment. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 May;133(5):589-97. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.186.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30234859
Citation
Bressler SB, Odia I, Glassman AR, Danis RP, Grover S, Hampton GR, Jampol LM, Maguire MG, Melia M. CHANGES IN DIABETIC RETINOPATHY SEVERITY WHEN TREATING DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA WITH RANIBIZUMAB: DRCR.net Protocol I 5-Year Report. Retina. 2018 Oct;38(10):1896-1904. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002302.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26035510
Citation
Bressler SB, Melia M, Glassman AR, Almukhtar T, Jampol LM, Shami M, Berger BB, Bressler NM; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. RANIBIZUMAB PLUS PROMPT OR DEFERRED LASER FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN EYES WITH VITRECTOMY BEFORE ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY. Retina. 2015 Dec;35(12):2516-28. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000617.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26746868
Citation
Bressler SB, Ayala AR, Bressler NM, Melia M, Qin H, Ferris FL 3rd, Flaxel CJ, Friedman SM, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, Rauser ME; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Persistent Macular Thickening After Ranibizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;134(3):278-85. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.5346.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20427088
Citation
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; Elman MJ, Aiello LP, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Edwards AR, Ferris FL 3rd, Friedman SM, Glassman AR, Miller KM, Scott IU, Stockdale CR, Sun JK. Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1064-1077.e35. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.031. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22999634
Citation
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; Elman MJ, Qin H, Aiello LP, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Ferris FL 3rd, Glassman AR, Maturi RK, Melia M. Intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: three-year randomized trial results. Ophthalmology. 2012 Nov;119(11):2312-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.022. Epub 2012 Sep 19. Erratum In: Ophthalmology. 2014 Mar;121(3):805.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26802783
Citation
Bressler SB, Glassman AR, Almukhtar T, Bressler NM, Ferris FL, Googe JM Jr, Gupta SK, Jampol LM, Melia M, Wells JA 3rd; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Five-Year Outcomes of Ranibizumab With Prompt or Deferred Laser Versus Laser or Triamcinolone Plus Deferred Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;164:57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.12.025. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25439614
Citation
Elman MJ, Ayala A, Bressler NM, Browning D, Flaxel CJ, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, Stone TW; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Intravitreal Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema with prompt versus deferred laser treatment: 5-year randomized trial results. Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.047. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21571677
Citation
Gangaputra S, Almukhtar T, Glassman AR, Aiello LP, Bressler N, Bressler SB, Danis RP, Davis MD; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Comparison of film and digital fundus photographs in eyes of individuals with diabetes mellitus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Aug 3;52(9):6168-73. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7321.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
20008710
Citation
Bhavsar AR, Googe JM Jr, Stockdale CR, Bressler NM, Brucker AJ, Elman MJ, Glassman AR; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Risk of endophthalmitis after intravitreal drug injection when topical antibiotics are not required: the diabetic retinopathy clinical research network laser-ranibizumab-triamcinolone clinical trials. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;127(12):1581-3. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.304.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://public.jaeb.org/drcrnet/pubs
Description
DRCR Retina Network

Learn more about this trial

Laser-Ranibizumab-Triamcinolone for Diabetic Macular Edema

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs