search
Back to results

Long-term Study of Efficacy/Safety of Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide Topical Gel in Acne Vulgaris Subjects

Primary Purpose

Acne Vulgaris

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide
Sponsored by
Galderma R&D
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acne Vulgaris focused on measuring Acne Vulgaris, Adapalene, Benzoyl Peroxide

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris with facial involvement
  • A minimum of 20 but not more than 50 Inflammatory lesions
  • A minimum of 30 but not more than 100 Noninflammatory lesions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with presence of nodules or cysts.
  • Acne conglobata, acne fulminans, secondary acne, or severe acne.
  • Underlying diseases that require the use of interfering topical or systemic therapy.
  • Use of prohibited medications prior to the study unless appropriate washout period is documented

Sites / Locations

  • Phoebe Rich, MD

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide

Arm Description

Participants were treated with adapalene 0.1 percent (%) [weight by weight (W/W)] and benzoyl peroxide 2.5 percent (%) (W/W) gel topically to the face and trunk area once daily in the evening.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory, Noninflammatory and Total Lesion Count at Month 12 LOCF
Percent change in inflammatory, noninflammatory and total lesions at Month 12 was measured from baseline lesions. The noninflammatory lesion count was the sum of open comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind an open follicular orifice (blackhead) and closed comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind a closed follicular orifice (whitehead). The inflammatory lesion count was the sum of papules (a small, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter) and pustules (a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate). The total lesion count was the sum of inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions. Missing adapalene and benzoyl peroxide data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Number of Participants Categorized Based on Participant's Assessment Scale of Acne at Month 6
Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse.
Number of Participants Categorized Based on Participant's Assessment Scale of Acne at Month 12
Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Erythema
Local tolerability assessment for erythema (abnormal redness of the skin) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no erythema), mild (1- slight pinkness present), moderate (2- definite redness, easily recognized), severe (3- intense redness). The worst severity scores were generally mild or moderate, and rarely severe.
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Scaling
Local tolerability assessment for scaling (abnormal shedding of the stratum corneum) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follow; none (0- no Scaling), mild (1- barely perceptible shedding, noticeable only on light scratching or rubbing), moderate (2- obvious but not profuse shedding), severe (3- heavy scale production).
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Dryness
Local tolerability assessment for dryness (brittle and/or tight sensation) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no dryness), mild (1- slight but definite roughness), moderate (2 -moderate roughness), severe (3- marked roughness).
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Stinging/Burning
Local tolerability assessment for stinging/burning [prickling pain sensation immediately after (within 5 minutes of) dosing] was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no stinging/ burning), mild (1- slight warm, tingling/stinging sensation; not really bothersome), moderate (2- definite warm, tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat), severe (3- hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort).
Number of Participant With Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters
Clinical laboratory parameters included hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported.

Full Information

First Posted
March 8, 2007
Last Updated
August 8, 2022
Sponsor
Galderma R&D
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00446043
Brief Title
Long-term Study of Efficacy/Safety of Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide Topical Gel in Acne Vulgaris Subjects
Official Title
A Long-term Safety and Efficacy Study of a Fixed Combination of Adapalene 0.1% and Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% (Adapalene and Benzoyl Peroxide Topical Gel) Gel in Subjects With Acne Vulgaris
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 17, 2004 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 23, 2005 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 23, 2005 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Galderma R&D

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This was a multi-center, open-label, non-comparative study that evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy profile of Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide Gel. Subjects were evaluated at Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Safety was evaluated by spontaneous reports of Adverse Events (AEs), the Local Tolerability Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, and Stinging/Burning), routine laboratory testing (hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis), and monitoring of suspected sensitizations. Efficacy was evaluated by analysis of Percent Change from Baseline in Inflammatory, Noninflammatory, and Total Lesion Counts, and by the Subject's Assessment of Acne.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acne Vulgaris
Keywords
Acne Vulgaris, Adapalene, Benzoyl Peroxide

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
452 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants were treated with adapalene 0.1 percent (%) [weight by weight (W/W)] and benzoyl peroxide 2.5 percent (%) (W/W) gel topically to the face and trunk area once daily in the evening.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide
Intervention Description
Adapalene 0.1 percent (%) [weight by weight (W/W)] and benzoyl peroxide 2.5 % (W/W) gel topically daily in the evening.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory, Noninflammatory and Total Lesion Count at Month 12 LOCF
Description
Percent change in inflammatory, noninflammatory and total lesions at Month 12 was measured from baseline lesions. The noninflammatory lesion count was the sum of open comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind an open follicular orifice (blackhead) and closed comedones (a mass of sebaceous material that is impacted behind a closed follicular orifice (whitehead). The inflammatory lesion count was the sum of papules (a small, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter) and pustules (a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate). The total lesion count was the sum of inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions. Missing adapalene and benzoyl peroxide data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12 LOCF
Title
Number of Participants Categorized Based on Participant's Assessment Scale of Acne at Month 6
Description
Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse.
Time Frame
At Month 6
Title
Number of Participants Categorized Based on Participant's Assessment Scale of Acne at Month 12
Description
Participant's assessment of acne improvement was graded as 0; complete improvement, 1; marked improvement, 2; moderate improvement, 3; minimal improvement, 4; no change, 5; worse.
Time Frame
At Month 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Erythema
Description
Local tolerability assessment for erythema (abnormal redness of the skin) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no erythema), mild (1- slight pinkness present), moderate (2- definite redness, easily recognized), severe (3- intense redness). The worst severity scores were generally mild or moderate, and rarely severe.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Title
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Scaling
Description
Local tolerability assessment for scaling (abnormal shedding of the stratum corneum) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follow; none (0- no Scaling), mild (1- barely perceptible shedding, noticeable only on light scratching or rubbing), moderate (2- obvious but not profuse shedding), severe (3- heavy scale production).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Title
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Dryness
Description
Local tolerability assessment for dryness (brittle and/or tight sensation) was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no dryness), mild (1- slight but definite roughness), moderate (2 -moderate roughness), severe (3- marked roughness).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Title
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Assessment For Stinging/Burning
Description
Local tolerability assessment for stinging/burning [prickling pain sensation immediately after (within 5 minutes of) dosing] was graded on a "0" (none) to "3" (severe) scale as follows; none (0- no stinging/ burning), mild (1- slight warm, tingling/stinging sensation; not really bothersome), moderate (2- definite warm, tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat), severe (3- hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 1 and 2, Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Title
Number of Participant With Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Month 14
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Parameters
Description
Clinical laboratory parameters included hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Month 14

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: A clinical diagnosis of acne vulgaris with facial involvement. A minimum of 20 but not more than 50 Inflammatory lesions. A minimum of 30 but not more than 100 Noninflammatory lesions. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects with presence of nodules or cysts. Acne conglobate, acne fulminans, secondary acne, or severe acne. Underlying diseases that required the use of interfering topical or systemic therapy. Use of prohibited medications prior to the study unless appropriate washout period was documented.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Graeber, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Galderma R&D
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Phoebe Rich, MD
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97210
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12963896
Citation
Leyden JJ. A review of the use of combination therapies for the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Sep;49(3 Suppl):S200-10. doi: 10.1067/s0190-9622(03)01154-x.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Long-term Study of Efficacy/Safety of Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide Topical Gel in Acne Vulgaris Subjects

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs