Methylphenidate (Ritalin) and Memory/Attention in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Primary Purpose
Brain Injury
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Methylphenidate
Memory and Attention Training
Placebo as both treatments
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Brain Injury focused on measuring TBI, Memory, Methylphenidate, Ritalin, Memory and Attention Training
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: Individuals aged 18-65 who sustained a mild to severe TBI 4 months prior to study entry.
- TBI: Subjects must sustain a traumatic blow to the head, resulting in either alteration of level of consciousness (manifested by being dazed and confused or having amnesia for the event) or loss of consciousness (LOC). Duration of LOC will be estimated by using all available information including patient and witness reports, emergency personnel records and Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) medical records. Post traumatic amnesia (PTA) will be estimated by careful questioning of patients to determine the time of return of continuous memory. This will be informed by review of medical records. We plan to include individuals with intracranial or skull injuries stemming from the TBI, providing they meet the inclusion criteria. Such lesions will be catalogued, and included as a factor in the data analysis.
- Cognitive Deficits: Subjects will have either subjective and objective evidence of persistent cognitive deficits. Subjects must report persistent memory or attention deficits as a result of their injury, which are of sufficient severity to interfere with social and/or occupational functioning. Subjects must either score more than 2 standard deviations below the age adjusted norm or estimates of baseline premorbid function on one or more tests of attention and/or memory administered as part of the baseline screening cognitive battery (see below), or score greater than 1.0 standard deviations below either age adjusted norms or estimates of premorbid function on 2 or more of the screening tests.
Exclusion Criteria:
The following factors will exclude otherwise eligible subjects from participation:
- a history of other neurologic disorders (such as epilepsy, cerebrovascular disease, mental retardation, neurodegenerative disorders)
- significant systemic medical illness such as clinically significant liver disease, renal disease, atherosclerotic coronary vascular disease, or hypertension requiring medication management
- current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) Axis I diagnosis of psychiatric illness other than substance abuse. We have given careful consideration to the inclusion of the latter group given our use of a stimulant with potential abuse properties. Because of the potential for cross-over abuse with cocaine, amphetamines, and other stimulants, individuals with such histories will be excluded from this study. Individuals with history of otherwise uncomplicated ethanol or other non-stimulant drug abuse currently in stable remission will be eligible. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (MINI) will be used to screen for psychiatric illness
- women currently pregnant or lactating. Female participants will be asked to take a pregnancy test to confirm they are not currently pregnant.
Sites / Locations
- University of Colorado at Denver
- Indiana University
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
1
2
3
4
Arm Description
Placebo Capsule and Placebo Memory and Attention Training (Placebo as both conditions)
Methylphenidate capsules and Memory and Attention Training (Active Med/Active therapy)
Methylphenidate capsules and Placebo Memory and Attention Training (Active Med/Placebo therapy)
Placebo capsules and Memory and Attention Training (Placebo Med/Active therapy)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Neuropsychological Assessment, CVLT-II
Memory measure: California Verbal Learning Test, 2nd edition (CVLT), Total, trials 1-5 (range: 0-80). Higher scores are better outcome.
Neuropsychological Assessment - CPT, Distractibility Condition (Reaction Time)
Continuous Performance Test, Distractibility Condition (Reaction Time in msecs) (range: 0-800). Higher score is worse performance.
Functional MRI Task Performance and Brain Activation (Change From Baseline to Post-treatment)
Change in performance (percent correct,adjusted for guessing) from pre-(baseline) to post-treatment (approximately 7 weeks) for in-scanner n-back working memory task (Range: 0-100). Higher scores means better performance.
Change in Anterior Cingulate Gyrus Activation During Working Memory Processing (3-back > 0-back Condition) From Baseline to Post-intervention
Change from pre- to post-treatment in brain activation in the anterior cingulate region of interest in arbitrary units provided by the SPM (statistical parametric mapping) program (range: unknown). Higher scores indicate greater increase in activation from pre- to post-treatment.
Change in Left Middle/Inferior Frontal Activation During Working Memory Processing (3-back > 0-back Condition) From Baseline to Post-intervention
Change from pre- to post-treatment in brain activation in the left middle/inferior frontal region of interest in arbitrary units provided by the SPM (statistical parametric mapping) program (range: unknown). Higher scores indicate greater increase in activation from pre- to post-treatment.
Change in Right Inferior Frontal Activation During Working Memory Processing (3-back > 0-back Condition) From Baseline to Post-intervention
Change from pre- to post-treatment in brain activation in the right inferior frontal region of interest in arbitrary units provided by the SPM (statistical parametric mapping) program (range: unknown). Higher scores indicate greater increase in activation from pre- to post-treatment.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Self Report Questionnaire - MASQ
The Multiple Abilities Questionnaire (self rating) is a questionnaire in which participants can identify deficits/complaints in the areas of language, visual perception, verbal memory, visual memory and attention and concentration. A total score is calculated; range is 30-130. Higher scores indicate greater level of complaints (worse outcome). For the purposes of this study, a score one standard deviation above the mean (102.7) indicated significant reported cognitive complaints.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00453921
First Posted
March 27, 2007
Last Updated
June 11, 2018
Sponsor
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00453921
Brief Title
Methylphenidate (Ritalin) and Memory/Attention in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Official Title
Methylphenidate (Ritalin) and Memory/Attention in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health problem, with 1.5-2.0 million Americans injured each year. Cognitive deficits, particularly in the domains of memory and attention are frequently the source of lingering disability after TBI and a source of enormous distress to the injured individuals and their family/caregivers. To date, interventions to ameliorate chronic cognitive deficits have been directed at either pharmacological interventions or cognitive rehabilitation. We propose to (1) To compare the efficacy of three interventions: memory and attention training (MAAT), methylphenidate, and memory/attention training in combination with methylphenidate and (2) use functional MRI (fMRI) to characterize changes in activation of the neural circuitry of memory and attention due to MAAT alone, methylphenidate alone, and MAAT in combination with methylphenidate. This is a two by two design with medication (methylphenidate/placebo) and cognitive therapy (Memory and Attention Training (MAAT) or an Attention control intervention) as possible interventions. Using a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind design, 200 individuals with persistent cognitive deficits 6-12 months after MTBI will be randomized to receive a six week trial of either (1) MAAT and placebo, (2) MAAT and methylphenidate (0.3 mg/kg BID), (3) attention control intervention and methylphenidate (0.3 mg/kg BID), or (4) attention control intervention and placebo. Symptom distress, attention and memory performance, and activation patterns of the neural circuitry of attention and memory while undergoing fMRI will be characterized at baseline, and after the four treatment conditions. This study will provide important information on three interventions for the most disabling sequelae of an enormous public health problem. Further, it will help to clarify underlying neural mechanisms and suggest additional treatment possibilities.
Detailed Description
Summary and Gaps to be Addressed by the Proposed Study
What is known: There are two interventions of promising efficacy in ameliorating deficits in attention and memory after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI): (i) memory and attention training/rehabilitation, and (ii) catecholaminergic augmentation (particularly with methylphenidate - which augments both dopaminergic and adrenergic systems). fMRI and other functional imaging strategies are providing valuable insights into the underlying neural mechanisms of the cognitive enhancing effects of methylphenidate in some neuropsychiatric populations (individuals with ADHD), and the effects of cognitive rehabilitation efforts in some domains (e.g. speech and language in individuals after stroke).
What is not known: To date there are no studies that apply a psychopharmacological strategy of augmenting neurotransmitter systems known to modulate memory/attention (dopaminergic and adrenergic systems) in combination with a cognitive rehabilitation intervention known to improve memory/attention (memory/attention training) in individuals with MTBI. We are aware of no published studies that use fMRI to assess the neural mechanisms of memory/attention improvement from the use of catecholaminergic agents or memory/attention training in individuals with MTBI. It is important to determine the efficacy of combined memory/attention training and methylphenidate. It is equally important to begin to understand the neural mechanisms underlying effective treatment as it may help to inform the development of the next generation of interventions and perhaps lead to individually tailored treatment interventions. This proposal will start to address these gaps in our knowledge.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Brain Injury
Keywords
TBI, Memory, Methylphenidate, Ritalin, Memory and Attention Training
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
76 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo Capsule and Placebo Memory and Attention Training (Placebo as both conditions)
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Methylphenidate capsules and Memory and Attention Training (Active Med/Active therapy)
Arm Title
3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Methylphenidate capsules and Placebo Memory and Attention Training (Active Med/Placebo therapy)
Arm Title
4
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo capsules and Memory and Attention Training (Placebo Med/Active therapy)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Methylphenidate
Intervention Description
Dosage dependent on weight
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Memory and Attention Training
Intervention Description
Weekly Memory and Attention Training with at home practice.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo as both treatments
Intervention Description
Placebo capsules and Placebo Memory and Attention Training
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Neuropsychological Assessment, CVLT-II
Description
Memory measure: California Verbal Learning Test, 2nd edition (CVLT), Total, trials 1-5 (range: 0-80). Higher scores are better outcome.
Time Frame
post-intervention (at least 7 weeks)
Title
Neuropsychological Assessment - CPT, Distractibility Condition (Reaction Time)
Description
Continuous Performance Test, Distractibility Condition (Reaction Time in msecs) (range: 0-800). Higher score is worse performance.
Time Frame
post-intervention (at least 7 weeks)
Title
Functional MRI Task Performance and Brain Activation (Change From Baseline to Post-treatment)
Description
Change in performance (percent correct,adjusted for guessing) from pre-(baseline) to post-treatment (approximately 7 weeks) for in-scanner n-back working memory task (Range: 0-100). Higher scores means better performance.
Time Frame
pre- to post-6 week treatment intervention (at least 7 weeks)
Title
Change in Anterior Cingulate Gyrus Activation During Working Memory Processing (3-back > 0-back Condition) From Baseline to Post-intervention
Description
Change from pre- to post-treatment in brain activation in the anterior cingulate region of interest in arbitrary units provided by the SPM (statistical parametric mapping) program (range: unknown). Higher scores indicate greater increase in activation from pre- to post-treatment.
Time Frame
pre- to post-intervention (at least 7 weeks)
Title
Change in Left Middle/Inferior Frontal Activation During Working Memory Processing (3-back > 0-back Condition) From Baseline to Post-intervention
Description
Change from pre- to post-treatment in brain activation in the left middle/inferior frontal region of interest in arbitrary units provided by the SPM (statistical parametric mapping) program (range: unknown). Higher scores indicate greater increase in activation from pre- to post-treatment.
Time Frame
pre- to post-treatment (at least 7 weeks)
Title
Change in Right Inferior Frontal Activation During Working Memory Processing (3-back > 0-back Condition) From Baseline to Post-intervention
Description
Change from pre- to post-treatment in brain activation in the right inferior frontal region of interest in arbitrary units provided by the SPM (statistical parametric mapping) program (range: unknown). Higher scores indicate greater increase in activation from pre- to post-treatment.
Time Frame
pre- to post-treatment (at least 7 weeks)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Self Report Questionnaire - MASQ
Description
The Multiple Abilities Questionnaire (self rating) is a questionnaire in which participants can identify deficits/complaints in the areas of language, visual perception, verbal memory, visual memory and attention and concentration. A total score is calculated; range is 30-130. Higher scores indicate greater level of complaints (worse outcome). For the purposes of this study, a score one standard deviation above the mean (102.7) indicated significant reported cognitive complaints.
Time Frame
post-intervention (at least 7 weeks)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age: Individuals aged 18-65 who sustained a mild to severe TBI 4 months prior to study entry.
TBI: Subjects must sustain a traumatic blow to the head, resulting in either alteration of level of consciousness (manifested by being dazed and confused or having amnesia for the event) or loss of consciousness (LOC). Duration of LOC will be estimated by using all available information including patient and witness reports, emergency personnel records and Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) medical records. Post traumatic amnesia (PTA) will be estimated by careful questioning of patients to determine the time of return of continuous memory. This will be informed by review of medical records. We plan to include individuals with intracranial or skull injuries stemming from the TBI, providing they meet the inclusion criteria. Such lesions will be catalogued, and included as a factor in the data analysis.
Cognitive Deficits: Subjects will have either subjective and objective evidence of persistent cognitive deficits. Subjects must report persistent memory or attention deficits as a result of their injury, which are of sufficient severity to interfere with social and/or occupational functioning. Subjects must either score more than 2 standard deviations below the age adjusted norm or estimates of baseline premorbid function on one or more tests of attention and/or memory administered as part of the baseline screening cognitive battery (see below), or score greater than 1.0 standard deviations below either age adjusted norms or estimates of premorbid function on 2 or more of the screening tests.
Exclusion Criteria:
The following factors will exclude otherwise eligible subjects from participation:
a history of other neurologic disorders (such as epilepsy, cerebrovascular disease, mental retardation, neurodegenerative disorders)
significant systemic medical illness such as clinically significant liver disease, renal disease, atherosclerotic coronary vascular disease, or hypertension requiring medication management
current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) Axis I diagnosis of psychiatric illness other than substance abuse. We have given careful consideration to the inclusion of the latter group given our use of a stimulant with potential abuse properties. Because of the potential for cross-over abuse with cocaine, amphetamines, and other stimulants, individuals with such histories will be excluded from this study. Individuals with history of otherwise uncomplicated ethanol or other non-stimulant drug abuse currently in stable remission will be eligible. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (MINI) will be used to screen for psychiatric illness
women currently pregnant or lactating. Female participants will be asked to take a pregnancy test to confirm they are not currently pregnant.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas W McAllister, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Medical School
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Colorado at Denver
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80291-0238
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana University
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46266-6057
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
City
Lebanon
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03753
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17020482
Citation
McAllister TW, Flashman LA, McDonald BC, Saykin AJ. Mechanisms of working memory dysfunction after mild and moderate TBI: evidence from functional MRI and neurogenetics. J Neurotrauma. 2006 Oct;23(10):1450-67. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1450.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17020483
Citation
Neurobehavioral Guidelines Working Group; Warden DL, Gordon B, McAllister TW, Silver JM, Barth JT, Bruns J, Drake A, Gentry T, Jagoda A, Katz DI, Kraus J, Labbate LA, Ryan LM, Sparling MB, Walters B, Whyte J, Zapata A, Zitnay G. Guidelines for the pharmacologic treatment of neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006 Oct;23(10):1468-501. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1468.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16135640
Citation
McAllister TW, Rhodes CH, Flashman LA, McDonald BC, Belloni D, Saykin AJ. Effect of the dopamine D2 receptor T allele on response latency after mild traumatic brain injury. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;162(9):1749-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.9.1749.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14742148
Citation
McAllister TW, Flashman LA, Sparling MB, Saykin AJ. Working memory deficits after traumatic brain injury: catecholaminergic mechanisms and prospects for treatment -- a review. Brain Inj. 2004 Apr;18(4):331-50. doi: 10.1080/02699050310001617370.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12547983
Citation
McAllister TW, Ferrell RB. Evaluation and treatment of psychosis after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2002;17(4):357-68.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12547977
Citation
Flashman LA, McAllister TW. Lack of awareness and its impact in traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2002;17(4):285-96.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12547976
Citation
McAllister TW, Arciniegas D. Evaluation and treatment of postconcussive symptoms. NeuroRehabilitation. 2002;17(4):265-83.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12547975
Citation
McAllister TW. Evaluation and treatment of neurobehavioral complications of traumatic brain injury--have we made any progress? NeuroRehabilitation. 2002;17(4):263-4. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11910544
Citation
McAllister TW, Sparling MB, Flashman LA, Saykin AJ. Neuroimaging findings in mild traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Dec;23(6):775-91. doi: 10.1076/jcen.23.6.775.1026.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11697932
Citation
McAllister TW, Sparling MB, Flashman LA, Guerin SJ, Mamourian AC, Saykin AJ. Differential working memory load effects after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage. 2001 Nov;14(5):1004-12. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0899.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10522888
Citation
McAllister TW, Saykin AJ, Flashman LA, Sparling MB, Johnson SC, Guerin SJ, Mamourian AC, Weaver JB, Yanofsky N. Brain activation during working memory 1 month after mild traumatic brain injury: a functional MRI study. Neurology. 1999 Oct 12;53(6):1300-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.6.1300.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10085209
Citation
McAllister TW. Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychosis: What Is the Connection? Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 1998 Jul;3(3):211-223.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10085208
Citation
Flashman LA, Amador X, McAllister TW. Lack of Awareness of Deficits in Traumatic Brain Injury. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 1998 Jul;3(3):201-210.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10085203
Citation
McAllister TW, Green RL. Traumatic Brain Injury: A Model of Acquired Psychiatric Illness? Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 1998 Jul;3(3):158-159. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9250431
Citation
McAllister TW. Evaluation of brain injury related behavioral disturbances in community mental health centers. Community Ment Health J. 1997 Aug;33(4):341-58; discussion 359-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1025055426260.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9017537
Citation
Silver JM, McAllister TW. Forensic issues in the neuropsychiatric evaluation of the patient with mild traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997 Winter;9(1):102-13. doi: 10.1176/jnp.9.1.102. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1603732
Citation
McAllister TW. Neuropsychiatric sequelae of head injuries. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1992 Jun;15(2):395-413.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.bianh.org
Description
Brain Injury Association of New Hampshire
URL
http://www.biavt.org/
Description
Brain Injury Association of Vermont
Learn more about this trial
Methylphenidate (Ritalin) and Memory/Attention in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs